Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., 2006a. Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Aikhenvald, and Dixon, (eds), pp. 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., 2006b. Semantics and pragmatics of grammatical relations in the Vaupés linguistic area. In Aikhenvald, and Dixon, (eds), pp. 237–266.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds), 2006. Grammars in Contact: A Cross-linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Allen, Joseph H., 1916. Allen and Greenough’s New Latin Grammar. New York: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar

Altimari, Francesco, 2011. Traces d’infinitifs anciens appartenant à l’albanais dans la langue arbërisht d’Italie. In Antoniadis-Bibicou, Hélène, Aymard, Maurice and Guillou, André (eds), L’homme et son environnement dans le Sud-Est européen: Actes du X^e Congrès de l’Association internationale du Sud-Est européen, pp. 445–455. Paris: Association Pierre Belon.Google Scholar

Andriotis, Nikolaos and Kourmoulis, Georgios, 1968. Questions de la linguistique balkanique et l’apport de la langue grecque. In Gălăbov, I. et al. (eds), Actes du Premier Congrès International des Études Balkaniques et Sud-est Européennes, vol. 6, pp. 21–30. Sofia: BAN.Google Scholar

Asenova, Petja, 2002. Balkansko ezikoznanie [Balkan Linguistics], second edition. Veliko Tărnovo: Faber.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, 1998a. Revisiting the Balkan and Meso-American linguistic areas. Language Sciences 20 (3): 259–270.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, 1998b. Conclusions. In van der Auwera, Johan (ed.), Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, pp. 813–836. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Guy, Maynor, Natalie and Cukor-Avila, Patricia, 1989. Variation in subject–verb concord in early Modern English. Language Variation and Change 1 (3): 285–300.Google Scholar

Ball, Christopher G., 2007. Out of the Park: Trajectories of Wauja (Xingu Arawak) Language and Culture. PhD thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Beck, David, 2000. Grammatical convergence and the genesis of diversity in the Northwest coast Sprachbund. Anthropological Linguistics 42: 147–213Google Scholar

Belić, Aleksandar, 1936. La linguistique balkanique aux congrès internationaux des linguistes. Revue Internationale des Etudes Balkaniques 2 (3/4): 167–171.Google Scholar

Belyavski-Frank, Masha, 2003. The Balkan Conditional in South Slavic. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar

Benor, Sarah Bunin, 2009. Lexical othering in Judezmo: How Ottoman Sephardim refer to non-Jews. In Bunis, David M. (ed.), Languages and Literatures of Sephardic and Oriental Jews, pp. 65–85. Jerusalem: The Bialik Institute & Misgav Yerushalayim.Google Scholar

Bird, Norman, 1982. The Distribution of Indo-European Root Morphemes (A Checklist for Philologists). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Birnbaum, Henrik, 1968. Slavjanskie jazyki na Balkanax i ponjatie tak nazyvaemyx jazykovyx sojuzov. Glossa 2 (1): 70–92.Google Scholar

Bisang, Walter, 2006. Linguistic areas, language contact and typology: Some implications from the case of Ethiopia as a linguistic area. In Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April and Vincent, Nigel (eds), Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective, pp. 75–98. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Boretzky, Norbert, 1996. The new infinitive in Romani. Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society, Fifth Series 6: 1–51.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, Kaufman, Terrence and Smith-Stark, Thomas C., 1986. Meso-America as a linguistic area. Language 62: 530–570.Google Scholar

Chang, Will, Cathcart, Chundra, Hall, David and Garrett, Andrew, 2015. Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis. Language 91: 194–244.Google Scholar

Demiraj, Shaban, 2004. Gjuhësi ballkanike, second edition. Tiranë: Akademia e Shkencave e Republikës së Shqipërise (Instituti i Gjuhësisë dhe i Letërisë).Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W., 1997. The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dobreva, Iskra. 2016. Préstam panbalcanicos en judeoespañol / Panbalkanski zaemki v sefardski ezik. Doctoral dissertation, University of Sofia.Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark, 2012. Studying contact without detailed studies of the languages involved: A non-philological approach to language contact. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA, 10–12 February 2012.Google Scholar

Emeneau, Murray B., 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32: 3–16.Google Scholar

Enfield, Nick, 2005. Areal linguistics and mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181–206.Google Scholar

Enfield, Nick J., 2008. Transmission biases in linguistic epidemiology. Journal of Language Contact, Thema 2: 297–306.Google Scholar

Epps, Patience, 2006. The Vaupés melting pot: Tucanoan influence on Hup. In Aikhenvald, and Dixon, (eds), pp. 267–289.Google Scholar

Feuillet, Jack, 2012. Linguistique comparée des langues balkaniques. Paris: Institut d’études slaves.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A., 1995. Persistence and change in Ottoman patterns of codeswitching in the Republic of Macedonia: Nostalgia, duress and language shift in contemporary Southeastern Europe. In Gorter, Durk et al. (eds), Summer School: Code-switching and Language Contact, pp. 58–67. Ljouwert/Leeuwarden: Fryske Akademy.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A., 1996. The Turkish lexical element in the languages of the Republic of Macedonia from the Ottoman period to independence. Zeitschrift für Balkanologie 32 (1): 133–150Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A., 2000. After 170 years of Balkan linguistics: Whither the millennium? Mediterranean Language Review 12: 1–15.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A., 2003. Language in Macedonia as an identity construction site. In Joseph, Brian, DeStefano, Johanna, Jacobs, Neil and Lehiste, Ilse (eds), When Languages Collide: Perspectives on Language Conflict, Language Competition, and Language Coexistence, pp. 257–295. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A., 2005. From orientalism to democracy and back again. In Detrez, Raymond and Plas, Pieter (eds), Developing Cultural Identity in the Balkans: Convergence vs. Divergence, pp. 25–43. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A., 2006a. Balkanizing the Balkan sprachbund: A closer look at grammatical permeability and feature distribution. In Aikhenvald, and Dixon, (eds), pp. 201–219.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A., 2006b. The Balkans as a linguistic area. In Brown, Keith (Editor-in-Chief), Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 657–672. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A., 2007. Udvojuvanjeto na objektot vo balkanskite jazici vo minatoto i denes [Macedonian: Object reduplication in Balkan languages in the past and today]. In Topolińska, Zuzana et al. (eds), Klasika – Balkanistika – Paleoslavistika: Festschrift in Honor of the 85th Birthday and 60th Anniversary of Scholarly Activity of Acad. Petar Ilievski, pp. 235–249. Skopje: Macedonian Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A., 2008. Balkan Slavic dialectology and Balkan linguistics: Periphery as center. In Bethin, Christina (ed.), American Contributions to the Fourteenth International Congress of Slavists, pp. 131–148. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A., 2011a. The Balkan languages and Balkan linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 275–291.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A., 2011b. Le multilinguisme en République de Macédoine et l’union balkanique aujourd’hui. In Antoniadis-Bibicou, Hélène, Aymard, Maurice and Guillou, André (eds), L’homme et son environnement dans le Sud-Est européen: Actes du X^e Congrès de l’Association internationale du Sud-Est européen, pp. 479–481. Paris: Association Pierre Belon.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A., 2012. Conjunction calquing: A heartland Balkanism. In Kahl, Thede, Metzelin, Michael and Schaller, Helmut (eds), Balkanismen heute / Balkanisms Today / Balkanizmy segodnja, pp. 31–37. Vienna: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A., 2014. Languages are wealth: The Sprachbund as linguistic capital. In Lionnet, Florian, Carpenter, Kayla, David, Oana, Stark, Tammy, Wauters, Vivian and Sheil, Christine (eds), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A. and Joseph, Brian D., 2014. Lessons from Judezmo about the Balkan sprachbund and contact linguistics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 226: 3–23. Special issue on Jewish Language Contact, edited by Zuckermann, Ghil’ad.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A. and Joseph, Brian D., in press a. Non-nominative and depersonalized subjects in the Balkans: Areality vs. genealogy. In Barðdal, Jóhanna, Carey, Stephen Mark, Eythórsson, Thórhallur and Pat-El, Na’ama (eds), Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects within and across Languages and Language Families: The Reykjavík–Eyjafjallajökull Papers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Friedman, Victor A. and Joseph, Brian D., in press b. The Balkan Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gil, David, 2011. Obligatory vs. optional tense-aspect-mood marking. Paper presented at ICHL 20 (20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics), Osaka, 28 July 2011.Google Scholar

Gołąb, Zbigniew, 1976. On the mechanism of Slavic–Rumanian linguistic interference in the Balkans. In Butler, Thomas (ed.), Bulgaria, Past and Present: Studies in History, Literature, Economics, Music, Sociology, Folklore and Linguistics, pp. 296–309. Columbus, OH: AAASS.Google Scholar

Gołąb, Zbigniew, 1984. The Arumanian Dialect of Kruševo in SR Macedonia SFR Yugoslavia. Skopje: MANU.Google Scholar

Grannes, Alf, Hauge, Kjetil Rå and Süleymenoğlu, Hayriye, 2002. A Dictionary of Turkisms in Bulgarian. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Robert, 2000. The dialects of Macedonia and Montenegro: Random linguistic parallels or evidence of a sprachbund? Južnoslovenski Filolog 56: 295–300.Google Scholar

Gumperz, J. J. and Wilson, R., 1971. Convergence and creolization: A case from the Indo-Aryan / Dravidian border in India. In Hymes, Dell (ed.), Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, pp. 151–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hamp, Eric P., 1977. On some questions of areal linguistics. In Whistler, Kenneth, Van Valin, Robert D., Chiarello, Chris, Jaeger, Jeri J., Petruck, Miriam, Thompson, Henry, Javkin, Ronya and Woodbury, Anthony (eds), Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 279–282. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Hamp, Eric P., 1989. Yugoslavia crossroads of Sprachbünde. Zeitschrift für Balkanologie 25 (1): 44–47.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, 1998. How young is Standard Average European? Language Sciences 20 (3): 271–287.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, 2001. The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Haspelmath, Martin (ed.), Language Typology and Language Universals, vol. 2, pp. 1492–1551. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Haugen, Einar, 1966. Semicommunication: The language gap in Scandinavia. Sociological Inquiry 36: 280–297.Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey, 1984. Language contact and language change. Annual Review of Anthropology 13: 367–384.Google Scholar

Ilievski, Petar, 1972. Kon interpretacijata na modelot na udvoeniot objekt vo makedonskiot jazik. In Godišen zbornik, Filozofski fakultet na Univerzitetot Skopje, pp. 205–220. Reprinted in Ilievski, 1988, pp. 167–182.Google Scholar

Ilievski, Petar, 1988 [1973]. Balkanološki Lingvistički Studii. Skopje: Institut za makedonski Jazik.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, 1931/1971. Harakteristike evrazijskogo jazykovogo sojuza [Characteristics of the Eurasian sprachbund]. In Selected Writings, second edition, vol. 1, pp. 143–201. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D., 1983. The Synchrony and Diachrony of the Balkan Infinitive: A Study in Areal, General, and Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reissued in paperback, 2009.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian, 1987. A fresh look at the Balkan sprachbund: Some observations on H. W. Schaller’s Die Balkansprachen. Mediterranean Language Review 3: 105–114.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D., 2000a. Textual authenticity: Evidence from Medieval Greek. In Herring, Susan C., van Reenen, Pieter and Schøsler, Lene (eds), Textual Parameters in Older Languages, pp. 309–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D., 2000b. Processes of spread for syntactic constructions in the Balkans. In Tzitzilis, Christos and Symeonidis, Charalambos (eds), Balkan Linguistik: Synchronie und Diachronie, pp. 139–150. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D., 2001a. Review of R. M. W. Dixon, The Rise and Fall of Languages. Journal of Linguistics 37: 180–186.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D., 2001b. Is Balkan comparative syntax possible? In Rivero, Maria L. and Ralli, Angela (eds), Comparative Syntax of Balkan Languages, pp. 17–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D., 2003. The Balkan languages. In Frawley, William (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, second edition, pp. 194–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D., 2010. Language contact in the Balkans. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, pp. 618–633. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D. and Wallace, Rex E., 1987. Latin sum / Oscan súm, sim, esum. American Journal of Philology 108: 675–693.Google Scholar

Kodov, Hr., 1935. Ezikăt na trakijskite bălgari [The Language of the Thracian Bulgarians]. Sofia: Trakijskijăt naučen institut.Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard, 1998. General preface. In van der Auwera, Johan (ed.), Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, pp. v–vii. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kopitar, Jernej, 1829. Albanische, walachische und bulgarische Sprache. Jahrbücher der Literatur 46: 59–106.Google Scholar

Labov, William, 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83 (2): 344–387.Google Scholar

Leake, William Martin, 1814. Researches in Greece. London: John Booth.Google Scholar

Lindstedt, Jouko, 2000. Linguistic Balkanization: Contact-induced change by mutual reinforcement. In Gilbers, Dicky, Nerbonne, John and Schaeken, Jos (eds), Languages in Contact, pp. 231–246. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Masica, Colin, 1976. South Asia as a Linguistic Area. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Masica, Colin, 2001. The definition and significance of linguistic areas: Methods, pitfalls, and possibilities (with special reference to the validity of South Asia as a linguistic area). In Bhaskararao, P. and Subbarao, K. (eds), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2001, pp. 205–268. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron, 2004. Romacilikanes: The Romani dialect of Parakalamos. Romani Studies 14 (1): 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miklosich, Franz, 1861. Die slavischen Elemente im Rumunischen. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse 12: 1–70.Google Scholar

Mladenov, Stefan, 1939. Bălgarskijat ezik v svetlinata na balkanistika. Godišnik na Sofijskija Universitet, Istor.-filol. fakultet, 35.13.1ff.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko, 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko, 2004. Language birth and death. Annual Review of Anthropology 33: 201–222.Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna, 1997. Modeling ancient population structures and movements in linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 359–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nuckols, Mark, 2000. Examination of the case for a Central European Sprachbund of Czech, German, Hungarian and Slovak. MA thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar

Obolensky, Dimitri, 1971. The Byzantine Commonwealth. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Pană Dindelegan, Gabriela, 2013. The Grammar of Romanian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Reiter, Norbert, 1994. Grundzüge der Balkanologie: Ein Schritt in die Eurolinguistik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Reiter, Norbert, 1999. Von der Balkanologie zur Eurolinguistik. In Hinrichs, Uwe (ed.), Handbuch der Südosteuropa–Linguistik, pp. 19–26. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Ringe, Donald A., 1992. On calculating the factor of chance in language comparison. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 82 (1): 1–110.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 2001. Contact-induced language change in north-west Melanesia. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance, pp. 134–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sandfeld, Kristian, 1930. Linguistique balkanique. Paris: Klinksieck.Google Scholar

Sawicka, Irena, 1997. The Balkan Sprachbund in the Light of Phonetic Features. Toruń: Energeia.Google Scholar

Schaller, Helmut W., 1975. Die Balkansprachen: Eine Einführung in die Balkanphilologie. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar

Schleicher, August, 1850. Die Sprachen Europas in systematischer Übersicht. Bonn: König.Google Scholar

Seliščev, A., 1925. Des traits linguistiques communs aux langues balkaniques: Un balkanisme ancien en bulgare. Révue des Études Slaves 5: 38–57.Google Scholar

Sherzer, Joel, 1976. An Areal-Typological Study of American Indian Languages North of Mexico. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Solta, Georg R., 1980. Einführung in die Balkanlinguistik mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Substrats und des Balkanlateinischen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Steinke, Klaus, 1999. Zur theoretischen Grundlegung der Südosteuropa-Linguistik. In Hinrichs, Uwe (ed.), Handbuch der Südosteuropa-Linguistik, pp. 67–90. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas, 2006. Europe as a linguistic area. In Brown, Keith et al. (eds), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. IV, pp. 278–295. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G., 2001. Language Contact: An Introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. and Kaufman, Terrence, 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Thumb, Albert, 1895. Handbuch der neugriechischen Volkssprache: Grammatik, Texte, Glossar. Strasbourg: Trübner.Google Scholar

Trask, Robert Lawrence, 1996. Historical Linguistics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S., 1923. Vavilonskaja bašnja i smešenie jazykov. [The tower of Babel and the confusion of languages]. Evrazijskij vremennik 3: 107–124.Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S., 1930. Proposition 16. In de Boer, Cornelis, van Ginneken, Jacobus and van Hamel, Anton G. (eds), Actes du Premier Congrès International des Linguistes à La Haye, du 10–15 Avril 1928, pp. 17–18. Leiden, the Netherlands: A. W. Sijthoff.Google Scholar

Tuite, Kevin, 1999. The myth of the Caucasian sprachbund: The case of ergativity. Lingua 108: 1–26.Google Scholar

Vermeer, Willem, 1992. Serbs and Albanians in Yugoslavia. Yearbook of European Studies 5: 101–124.Google Scholar

Vinožito, , 2006. Bukvar/Anagnōstiko [‘Primer’ Macedonian/Greek]. Thessaloniki: Batavia.Google Scholar

WALS, 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures, edited by Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew, Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wexler, Paul, 1981. Jewish interlinguistics: Facts and conceptual framework. Language 57: 99–149.Google Scholar

Whitney, William D., 1868. Language and the Study of Language: Twelve Lectures on the Principles of Linguistic Science. New York: C. Scribner & Co.Google Scholar