Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., 2002. Language Contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Andersen, Henning, 1986. Sandhi Phenomena in the Languages of Europe. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S., 2005. The velar nasal (ŋ). In Haspelmath, et al. (eds), pp. 42–45.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, 1998. Conclusions. In van der Auwera, Johan (ed.) with Ó Baoill, Dónall, Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 813–836.Google Scholar

Bechert, Johannes, [1981] 1998. Notiz über eine Möglichkeit, die historisch-vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft zu vervollständigen, oder: Lesefrüchte zur Verbesserung Mitteleuropas und anderer Weltgegenden. In Boeder, Winfried (ed.), Sprache in Raum und Zeit: Beiträge zur empirischen Sprachwissenschaft, pp. 13–16. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea and Leo Wetzels, W. (eds), 2009. Loan Phonology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, 2006. Areal linguistics: A closer scrutiny. In Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April and Vincent, Nigel (eds), Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective, pp. 1–30. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Chirikba, Viacheslav, 2008. The problem of the Caucasian Sprachbund. In Muysken, Pieter (ed.), From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics, pp. 25–94. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard, 1993. Language universals and linguistic typology: Data-bases and explanations. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 46: 3–14.Google Scholar

Décsy, Gyula, 2000a. The Linguistic Identity of Europe, part 1: The 62 Languages of Europe Classified in Functional Zones. Bloomington, IN: EUROLINGUA.Google Scholar

Décsy, Gyula, 2000b. The Linguistic Identity of Europe, part 2: Macrolinguistics and Demostatistics of Europe. Bloomington, IN: EUROLINGUA.Google Scholar

Ewels, Andrea-Eva, 2009. Areallinguistik und Sprachtypologie im Ostseeraum: Die phonologisch relevante Vokal- und Konsonantenquantität. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar

Goedemans, Rob and van der Hulst, Harry, 2005. (a) Fixed stress locations; (b) Weight-sensitive stress; (c) Weight factors in weight-sensitive stress systems; (d) Rhythm types. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds), pp. 62–77.Google Scholar

Haarmann, Harald, 1976a. Grundzüge der Sprachtypologie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

Haarmann, Harald, 1976b. Aspekte der Arealtypologie: Die Problematik der europäischen Sprachbünde. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Hajek, John, 2005. Vowel nasalization. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds), pp. 46–49.Google Scholar

Hall, T. Alan, 2011. Phonologie: Eine Einführung. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, 2001. The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Haspelmath, Martin et al. (eds), Language Typology and Language Universals, pp. 1492–1510. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard (eds), 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

van der Hulst, Harry (ed.), 1999. Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

IPA, 1999. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, [1930] 1971. Selected Writings. Phonological Studies. Berlin, New York and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd and van der Auwera, Johan (eds), 2011. The Languages and Linguistics of Europe: A Comprehensive Guide. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter and Maddieson, Ian, 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lewy, Ernst, [1942] 1964. Der Bau der europäischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian, 2005. (a) Consonant inventories; (b) Vowel quality inventories; (c) Consonant–vowel ratio; (d) Voicing in plosives and fricatives; (e) Voicing and gaps in plosive systems; (f) Uvular consonants; (g) Glottalized consonants; (h) Lateral consonants; (i) Front rounded vowels; (j) Syllable structure; (k) Tone; (l) Absence of common consonants; (m) Presence of uncommon consonants. In Haspelmath, et al. (eds), pp. 10–41, 50–61, 78–85.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron, 2007. The borrowability of structural categories. In Matras, Yaron and Sakel, Jeanette (eds), Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-linguistic Perspective, pp. 31–74. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April M. S. and Vincent, Nigel, 2006. Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

van Pottelberge, Jeroen, 2005. Ist jedes grammatische Verfahren Ergebnis eines Grammatikalisierungsprozesses? Fragen zur Entwicklung des am-Progressivs. In Leuschner, Torsten, Mortelmans, Tanja and De Groodt, Sarah (eds), Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen, pp. 169–191. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Sakel, Jeanette, 2007. Types of loan: Matter and pattern. In Matras, Yaron and Sakel, Jeanette (eds), Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-linguistic Perspective, pp. 15–30. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Stadnik, Elena, 2002. Die Palatalisierung in den Sprachen Europas und Asiens: Eine areal-typologische Untersuchung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas, 2006. Europe as a linguistic area. In Brown, Keith et al. (eds), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. IV, pp. 278–295. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas, 2007. Being monosyllabic in Europe: An areal-typological project in statu nascendi. In Ammann, Andreas (ed.), Linguistics Festival: May 2006, Bremen, pp. 97–134. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas, 2010. Phonologie und areal Europa. In Hinrichs, Uwe (ed.), Handbuch der Eurolinguistik, pp. 597–622. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas, Urdze, Aina and Otsuka, Hitomi, 2010. Europäische Liquiden: Rhotische und laterale Phoneme – sprachgeographisch betrachtet. In Stroh, Cornelia (ed.), Von Katastrophen, Zeichen und vom Ursprung der menschlichen Sprache: Würdigung eines vielseitigen Linguisten, Wolfgang Wildgen zur Emeritierung, pp. 93–114. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas, Urdze, Aina and Otsuka, Hitomi, 2011. The sounds of Europe: Velar and post-velar fricatives in areal perspective. Lingua Posnaniensis 53 (1): 87–108.Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas, Urdze, Aina and Otsuka, Hitomi, 2012. Seltene Klänge: Zu den Marginalien der arealen Phonologie Europas. In Stroh, Cornelia (ed.), Neues aus der Bremer Linguistikwerkstatt: Aktuelle Themen und Projekte, pp. 1–22. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Ternes, Elmar, 1998. Lauttypologie der Sprachen Europas. In Boeder, Winfried et al. (eds), Sprache in Raum und Zeit: Beiträge zur empirischen Sprachwissenschaft, pp. 139–152. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Ternes, Elmar, 2010. Phonetische Eigenschaften der Sprachen Europas. In Hinrichs, Uwe (ed.), Handbuch der Eurolinguistik, pp. 577–596. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah Grey, 2001. Language Contact: An Introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Uffmann, Christian, 2015. Loanword adaptation. In Honeybone, Patrick and Salmons, Joseph (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology, pp. 644–666. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Velupillai, Viveka, 2012. An Introduction to Linguistic Typology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Wagner, Heinrich, 2002 [1964]. Nordeuropäische Lautgeographie. In Benes, Birgit, Fromherz, Uta and Gröbli, Fredy (eds), Heinrich Wagner: Beiträge zur typologischen Sprachgeographie, pp. 19–88. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar