Adelaar, Willem F. H. (with Muysken, Pieter C.), 2004. The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., 2000. Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., 2011. The wonders of the Gran Chaco: Setting the scene. Indiana 28: 171–181.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds), 2001a. Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W., 2001b. Introduction. In Aikhenvald, and Dixon, (eds), pp. 1–26.Google Scholar

van der Auwera, Johan, 1998. Revisiting the Balkan and Meso-American linguistic areas. Language Sciences 20: 259–270.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, 1985. Areal linguistics and its implications for historical linguistic theory. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Historical Linguistics, pp. 25–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, 1994. Grammar: Typological and areal issues. In Asher, R. E. and Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 3, pp. 1471–1474. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, 1996a. Typological and areal issues. In Brown, Keith and Miller, Jim (eds), Concise Encyclopedia of Syntactic Theories, pp. 339–343. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Reprint of 1994, in Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, 1996b. Phonetics and phonology. In Goebl, Hans, Nelde, Peter H., Stary, Zdenek and Wölck, Wolfgang (eds), An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, vol. 14: Contact Linguistics, pp. 98–103. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, 2002. Areal linguistics. In Smelser, Neil J. and Balte, Paul B. (eds), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 729–733, volume edited by Comrie, Bernard. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, 2006a. Areal linguistics: A closer scrutiny. In Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April and Vincent, Nigel (eds), Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective, pp. 1–31. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, 2006b. Contacto lingüístico entre las lenguas del Gran Chaco: Existe una area lingüística chaqueña? Paper presented at the symposium Advances in South American Historical Linguistics, 52nd International Congress of Americanists, Seville, Spain, 17–21 July 2006.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, 2012a. The classification of South American indigenous languages. In Campbell, and Grondona, (eds), pp. 59–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, 2012b. Typological characteristics of South American indigenous languages. In Campbell, and Grondona, (eds), pp. 259–330.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, 2013. Historical Linguistics: An Introduction, third edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, and Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, Bubenik, Vit and Saxon, Leslie, 1988. Word order universals: Refinements and clarifications. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 33: 209–230.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle and Grondona, Verónica, 2012a. Languages of the Chaco and Southern Cone. In Campbell, and Grondona, (eds), pp. 625–668.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle and Grondona, Verónica (eds), 2012b. The Indigenous Languages of South America: A Comprehensive Guide. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, Kaufman, Terrence and Smith-Stark, Thomas, 1986. Mesoamerica as a linguistic area. Language 62: 530–570.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard, Golluscio, Lucía A., González, Hebe and Vidal, Alejandra, 2010. El Chaco como área lingüística. In Fernández, Zarina Estrada and Marín, Ramón Arzápalo (eds), Estudios de Lenguas Amerindias 2: Contribuciones al Estudio de las Lenguas Originarias de América, pp. 85–132. Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico: Editorial Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar

Curnow, Timothy Jowan, 2001. What language features can be ‘borrowed’? In Aikhenvald, and Dixon, (eds), pp. 412–436.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen, 2001. Principles of areal typology. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf and Raible, Wolfgang (eds), Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 1456–1470. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Daumé, Hal III, 2009. Non-parametric Bayesian areal linguistics. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL ’09), pp. 593–601. Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

Emeneau, Murray B., 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32: 3–16. Reprinted in Emeneau, 1980, pp. 38–65.Google Scholar

Emeneau, Murray B., 1965. India and linguistic areas. In India and Historical Grammar. Ammamalai University, Department of Linguistics, pub. no. 5, pp. 25–75. Reprinted in Emeneau, 1980, pp. 126–166.Google Scholar

Emeneau, Murray B., 1978. Review of Defining a Linguistic Area, by Colin P. Masica. Language 54: 201–210. Reprinted with additions in Emeneau, 1980, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

Emeneau, Murray B., 1980. Language and Linguistic Area, essays by Emeneau, Murray B., selected and introduced by Dil, Anwar S.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Fabre, Alain, 2007. Morfosintaxis de los clasificadores posesivos en las lenguas del Gran Chaco (Argentina, Bolivia y Paraguay). UniverSOS: Revista de lenguas indígenas y universos culturales 4: 67–85.Google Scholar

Gerzenstein, Ana, 2004. Las consonantes laterales y labializadas en lenguas mataguayas del Chaco argentino paraguayo. In Fernández, Zarina Estrada, Fernández Garay, Ana V. and González, A. Álvarez (eds), Estudios en Lenguas Amerindias: Homenaje a Ken L. Hale, pp. 183–197. Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico: Editorial Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar

Gerzenstein, Ana and Gualdieri, Beatriz, 2003. La armonía vocálica en lenguas chaqueñas de las familias Guaicurú y Mataguaya. LIAMES 3: 99–112.Google Scholar

Giannini, Stefania and Scaglione, Stefania, 2002. On defining the notion of areality coefficient: The diagnostic value of quantitative criteria. In Ramat, Paolo and Stolz, Thomas (eds), Mediterranean Languages: Papers from the MEDTYP Workshop, Tirrenia, June 2000, pp. 151–170. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Grondona, Verónica, 2003. Are Guaycuruan and Matacoan languages related? A preliminary account. Paper presented at the 17th International Congress of Linguists, July 2003, Prague.Google Scholar

Grubb, W. Barbrooke, 1914. An Unknown People in an Unknown Land. London: Seeley, Service & Co.Google Scholar

Haig, Jeffrey, 2001. Linguistic diffusion in present-day East Anatolia: From top to bottom. In Aikhenvald, and Dixon, (eds), pp. 195–224.Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey, 1978. Linguistic Diffusion in Arnhem Land. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Heaton, Raina, in press. Active–stative agreement in Tunica. Anthropological Linguistics.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania, 2001. Convergence and divergence in the development of African languages. In Aikhenvald, and Dixon, (eds), pp. 393–411.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 1999. Ireland as a linguistic area. In Mallory, J. P. (ed.), Language in Ulster, pp. 36–53. Special issue of Ulster Folklife 45. Holywood, Co. Down, Northern Ireland: Ulster Folk and Transport Museum.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2010. Language contact: Reassessment and reconsideration. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, pp. 1–28. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond, 2012. English in Ireland. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Areal Features of the Anglophone World, pp. 79–107. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Katz, Harmut, 1975. Generative Phonologie und Phonologische Sprachbünde des Ostjakischen und Samojedischen. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar

Kirtchuk, Pablo, 1996. Lingüística areal: Deixis y clasificación nominal en lenguas del Gran Chaco. In Martín, Eusebia H. and Diez, Andrés Pérez (eds), Lenguas Indígenas de Argentina 1492–1992, pp. 19–32. (Instituto de Investigaciones Lingüísticas y Filológicas ‘Manuel Alvar’.) San Juan: Editorial Fundación Universidad Nacional de San Juan.Google Scholar

Kuteva, Tania, 1998. Large linguistic areas in grammaticalization: Auxiliation in Europe. Language Sciences 20: 289–311.Google Scholar

Lindstedt, Jouko, 2000. Linguistic Balkanization: Contact-induced change by mutual reinforcement. In Gilbers, Dicky, Nerbonne, John and Schaeken, Jos (eds), Languages in Contact, pp. 231–246. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Masica, Colin P., 1992. Areal linguistics. In Bright, William (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, pp. 108–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, Peter, 1997. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Messineo, Cristina, 2003. Lengua toba (guaycurú): Aspectos gramaticales y discursivos. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar

Messineo, Cristina, 2011. Aproximación tipológica a las lenguas indígenas del Gran Chaco: Rasgos compartidos entre toba (familia guaycurú) y maká (familia mataco-mataguayo). Indiana 28: 183–225.Google Scholar

Messineo, Cristina, Carol, Javier and Klein, Harriet Manelis, 2011. Los determinantes demostrativos en las lenguas guaycurúes y mataguayas (Región del Gran Chaco). Paper presented at the Memorias del V Congreso de Idiomas Indígenas de Latinoamérica, 6–8 October 2011, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar

Métraux, Alfred, 1946. Ethnography of the Chaco. In Steward, Julian H. (ed.), Handbook of South American Indians, vol. 1: The Marginal Tribes, pp. 197–370. Smithsonian Institution Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 143. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Miller, Elmer S. (ed.), 1999. Peoples of the Gran Chaco. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar

Murdock, George P., 1951. Outline of South American Cultures. New Haven: Human Relations Area Files, Inc.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter, Hammarström, Harald, Birchall, Joshua, van Gijn, Rik, Krasnoukhova, Olga and Müller, Neele, 2015. Linguistic areas, bottom-up or top-down? The case of the Guaporé-Mamoré. In Comrie, Bernard and Golluscio, Lucia (eds), Language Contact and Documentation, pp. 205–238. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Rona, José Pedro, 1969–1972. Extensión del tipo chaqueño de lenguas. Revista de Antropología 17/20: 93–103.Google Scholar

Sarhimaa, Anneli, 1991. Karelian Sprachbund? Theoretical basis of the study of Russian/Baltic–Finnic contacts. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 50: 209–219.Google Scholar

Schaller, Helmut Wilhelm, 1975. Die Balkansprachen: Eine Einführung in die Balkanphilologie. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas, 2002. No sprachbund beyond this line! On the age-old discussion of how to define a linguistic area. In Ramat, Paolo and Stolz, Thomas (eds), Mediterranean Languages: Papers from the MEDTYP Workshop, Tirrenia, June 2000, pp. 259–281. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G., 2001. Language Contact: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. and Kaufman, Terrence, 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tonhauser, Judith, 2007. Nominal tense? The meaning of Guaraní nominal temporal markers. Language 83: 831–869.Google Scholar

Tonhauser, Judith, 2008. Defining crosslinguistic categories: The case of nominal tense (Reply to Nordlinger and Sadler). Language 84: 332–342.Google Scholar

Tosco, M., 2000. Is there an Ethiopian language area? Anthropological Linguistics 42: 329–365.Google Scholar

Tovar, Antonio, 1961. Catálogo de las lenguas de América del Sur. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.Google Scholar

Tovar, Antonio and de Tovar, Consuelo Larrucea, 1984. Catálogo de las lenguas de América del Sur. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy, Nikolai Sergeevich, 1928. Proposition 16. In Acts of the First International Congress of Linguists, pp. 17–18. Leiden.Google Scholar

Vidal, Alejandra and Gutiérrez, Analía, 2010. La categoría de ‘tiempo nominal’ en las lenguas chaqueñas. In Castel, V. M. and Cubo, L. (eds), La Renovación de la Palabra en el Bicentenario de la Argentina: 1348–1355. Mendoza: Universidad Nacional de Cuyo.Google Scholar

Viegas Barros, José Pedro, 2002. Fonología del proto-mataguayo. In Crevels, Mily, van der Voort, Hein, Meira, Sérgio and van de Kerke, Simon (eds), Current Studies on South American Languages: Contributions to the 50th International Congress of Americanists, pp. 137–148. Indigenous Languages of Latin America Series, vol. 3. Leiden: Research School CNWS of Asian, African and Amerindian Studies.Google Scholar