Baird, Louise, 2008. A Grammar of Klon: A Non-Austronesian Language of Alor, Indonesia. Pacific Linguistics, vol. 596. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Barnes, Barney, 1989. Urat grammar essentials. Unpublished manuscript, Summer Institute of Linguistics Papua New Guinea Branch.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter, 2002. Farmers, foragers, languages, genes: The genesis of agricultural societies. In Bellwood, and Renfrew, (eds), pp. 17–28.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter and Renfrew, Colin (eds), 2002. Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis. Cambridge: McDonald Institute of Archaeological Research.Google Scholar

Bellwood, Peter, Ross, Malcolm, Chambers, Geoff and Hung, Hsiao-chun, 2011. Are ‘cultures’ inherited? Multidisciplinary perspectives on the origins and migrations of Austronesian-speaking peoples prior to 1000 BCE. In Roberts, Ben and Vander Linden, Marc (eds), Investigating Archaeological Cultures: Material Culture, Variability and Transmission, pp. 321–354. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar and Nichols, Johanna, 2006. Oceania, the Pacific Rim, and the theory of linguistic areas. Berkeley Linguistics Society 32.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert A., 1982. The linguistic value of the Wallace Line. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 138: 231–250.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert A., 1993. Central and Central-Eastern Malayo-Polynesian. Oceanic Linguistics 32: 241–293.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert A., 2009. The position of the languages of Eastern Indonesia: A reply to Donohue and Grimes. Oceanic Linguistics 48: 36–77.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert, 2013. The Austronesian Languages, revised edition. Asia-Pacific Linguistics Open Access Monographs, vol. A-PL 008. Canberra: Australian National University. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/10191Google Scholar

Bowden, John, 2001. Taba: Description of a South Halmahera Language. Pacific Linguistics, vol. 521. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Brandes, J. H. L., 1884. Bijdragen tot de vergelijkende klankleer der westerse afdeling van de Maleisch-Polynesische taalfamilie. PhD dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden.Google Scholar

Bugenhagen, Robert D., 1994. The semantics of irrealis in the Austronesian languages of Papua New Guinea. In Reesink, Ger P. (ed.), Topics in Descriptive Austronesian Linguistics, pp. 1–39. Semaian, vol. 11. Leiden: Vakgroep Talen en Culturen van Zuidoost-Azie en Oceanie, Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden.Google Scholar

Cahill, Michael, 2011. Tonal diversity in languages of Papua New Guinea. SIL Electronic Working Papers 2011:008.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, 2006. Areal linguistics: A closer scrutiny. In Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April and Vincent, Nigel (eds), Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective, pp. 1–31. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle and Poser, William J., 2008. Language Classification: History and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Capell, Arthur, 1943. The Linguistic Position of South-Eastern Papua. Sydney: Australasian Medical Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Capell, Arthur, 1948. Distribution of languages in the Central Highlands of New Guinea. Oceania 19: 104–129, 234–253, 249–377.Google Scholar

Capell, Arthur, 1949. Two tonal languages of New Guinea. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 13: 184–199.Google Scholar

Capell, Arthur, 1952. Languages of Bogia District, New Guinea. Oceania 22: 130–147, 178–207.Google Scholar

Capell, Arthur, 1969. A Survey of New Guinea Languages. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar

Capell, Arthur, 1976. Austronesian and Papuan ‘mixed’ languages: General remarks. In Wurm, S. A. (ed.), New Guinea Area Languages and Language Study, vol. 2: Austronesian Languages, pp. 527–579. Pacific Linguistics, vol. C-39. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Coller, Matthew, 2007. Sahul Time. Melbourne: Monash University. http://sahultime.monash.edu.auGoogle Scholar

Comrie, Bernard and Cysouw, Michael, 2012. New Guinea through the eyes of WALS. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 30: 65–94.Google Scholar

Conrad, Robert J. and Wogiga, Kepas, 1991. An Outline of Bukiyip Grammar. Pacific Linguistics, vol. C-113. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G., 2013. Canonical morphosyntactic features. In Brown, Dunstan, Chumakina, Marina and Corbett, Greville G. (eds), Canonical Morphology and Syntax, pp. 48–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Corris, Miriam, 2005. A Grammar of Barupu: A Language of Papua New Guinea. PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

David, Bruno, McNiven, Ian J., Richards, Thomas et al., 2011. Lapita sites in the Central Province of mainland Papua New Guinea. World Archaeology 43: 576–593.Google Scholar

Dempwolff, Otto, 1937. Vergleichende Lautlehre des Austronesischen Wortschatzes, vol. 2: Deduktive Anwendung des Urindonesischen auf austronesische Einzelsprachen. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen, vol. 17. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar

Dempwolff, Otto, 1939. Grammatik der Jabêm-Sprache auf Neuguinea. Hamburg: Friederichsen, de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Dempwolff, Otto. Grammar of the Graged language. Unpublished mimeograph, Lutheran Mission, Narer, Karkar Island.Google Scholar

Denham, T. P., Haberle, S. G., Lentfer, C. et al., 2003. Origins of agriculture at Kuk Swamp in the Highlands of New Guinea. Science 301: 189–193.Google Scholar

D’Jernes, Lucille, 1990. Arop-Lokep grammar. Unpublished manuscript, Summer Institute of Linguistics, Ukarumpa.Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark, 1997. Tone systems in New Guinea. Linguistic Typology 1: 347–386.Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark, 2005a. Tone and the Trans New Guinea languages. In Kaji, (ed.), pp. 33–53.Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark, 2005b. Word order in New Guinea: Dispelling a myth. Oceanic Linguistics 44: 527–536.Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark, 2005c. Configurationality in the languages of New Guinea. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25: 181–218.Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark, 2007a. The Papuan language of Tambora. Oceanic Linguistics 46: 520–537.Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark, 2007b. Word order in Austronesian from north to south and west to east. Linguistic Typology 11: 349–391.Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark and Denham, Tim, 2010. Farming and language in Island Southeast Asia: Reframing Austronesian history. Current Anthropology 51: 223–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donohue, Mark and San Roque, Lila, 2004. I’saka. Pacific Linguistics, vol. 554. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark and Schapper, Antoinette, 2008. Whence the Austronesian possession construction? Oceanic Linguistics 47: 316–327.Google Scholar

Drabbe, Peter, 1940/1941. Beitrag zur Sprachgruppierung in Holländisch-Neuguinea. Anthropos 35/36: 355.Google Scholar

Drabbe, Peter, 1949a. Bijzonderheden uit de talen van Frederik-Hendrik-Eiland: Kimaghama, Ndom en Riantana. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 105: 1–24.Google Scholar

Drabbe, Peter, 1949b. Aantekeningen over twee talen in het centraal gebergte van Nederlands Nieuw-Guinea. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 105: 423–444.Google Scholar

Drabbe, Peter, 1950. Talen en dialecten van Zuid-West Nieuw-Guinea. Anthropos 45: 545–574.Google Scholar

Drabbe, Peter, 1952. Spraakkunst can het Ekagi. The Hague : Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Drabbe, Peter, 1953. Spraakkunst van de Kamoro-taal. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Drabbe, P., 1955. Spraakkunst van het Marind, zuidkust Nederlands Nieuw-Guinea. Studia Instituti Anthropos, vol. 11. Posieux and Fribourg: Instituut Anthropos.Google Scholar

Drabbe, P., 1959. Kaeti en Wambon: Twee Awju Dialecten. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Draper, Norm and Draper, Sheila, 2002. Dictionary of Kyaka Enga, Papua New Guinea. Pacific Linguistics, vol. 532. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S., 1988. Object-verb order and adjective-noun order: Dispelling a myth. Lingua 74: 185–217.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S., 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68: 81–138.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S., 2013a. Order of adjective and noun. In Dryer, and Haspelmath, (eds), chapter 87. http://wals.info/chapter/87Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S., 2013b. Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of adjective and noun. In Dryer, and Haspelmath, (eds), chapter 97. http://wals.info/chapter/97Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S., 2013c. Relationship between the order of object and verb and the order of adposition and noun phrase. In Dryer, and Haspelmath, (eds), chapter 95. http://wals.info/chapter/95Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S., 2013d. Order of genitive and noun. In Dryer, and Haspelmath, (eds), chapter 86. http://wals.info/chapter/86Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S., 2013e. Position of negative morpheme with respect to subject, object, and verb. In Dryer, and Haspelmath, (eds), chapter 144. http://wals.info/chapter/144Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds), 2013. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.infoGoogle Scholar

Dunn, Michael, Levinson, Stephen C., Lindström, Eva, Reesink, Ger and Terrill, Angela, 2008. Structural phylogeny in historical linguistics: Methodological explorations applied in Island Melanesia. Language 84: 710–759.Google Scholar

Dutton, Tom, 2010. Reconstructing Proto-Koiarian: The History of a Papuan Language Family. Studies in Language Change, vol. 7. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Emeneau, Murray B., 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32: 3–16.Google Scholar

Emeneau, Murray B., 1980. The Indian linguistic area revisited. In Emeneau, Murray B. (ed.), Language and Linguistic Area, pp. 197–249. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Enfield, Nicholas J., 2003. Linguistic Epidemiology: Semantics and Grammar of Language Contact in Mainland Southeast Asia. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar

Enfield, Nicholas J., 2005. Areal linguistics and mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181–206.Google Scholar

Etherington, Paul, 2002. Nggem Morphology and Syntax. MA thesis, Northern Territory University.Google Scholar

Evans, Bethwyn and Palmer, Bill, 2011. Contact-induced change in southern Bougainville. Oceanic Linguistics 50: 483–523.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas, 2012. Even more diverse than we had thought: The multiplicity of Trans-Fly languages. In Evans, Nicholas and Klamer, Marian (eds), Melanesian Languages on the Edge of Asia: Challenges for the Twenty-first Century, pp. 109–149. Language Documentation and Conservation Special Publication 5. Honolulu: Language Documentation and Conservation.Google Scholar

Ewing, Michael C., 2010. Agentive alignment in Central Maluku languages. In Ewing, and Klamer, (eds), pp. 119–141.Google Scholar

Ewing, Michael and Klamer, Marian (eds), 2010. East Nusantara: Typological and Areal Analyses. Pacific Linguistics, vol. 618. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Florey, Margaret J., 2010. Negation in the Moluccan languages. In Ewing, and Klamer, (eds), pp. 227–250.Google Scholar

Foley, William A., 1986. The Papuan Languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Foley, William A., 2000. The languages of New Guinea. Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 357–404.Google Scholar

Foley, William A., 2005a. Linguistic prehistory in the Sepik-Ramu basin. In Pawley, et al. (eds), pp. 109–144.Google Scholar

Foley, William A., 2005b. Semantic parameters and the unaccusative split in the Austronesian language family. Studies in Language 29: 385–430.Google Scholar

Foley, William A., 2010. Clause linkage and nexus in Papuan languages. In Bril, Isabelle (ed.), Clause Linking and Clause Hierarchy: Syntax and Pragmatics, pp. 27–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Foley, William A., in press. The languages of the Sepik-Ramu Basin and environs. In Palmer, Bill (ed.), The Languages and Linguistics of New Guinea: A Comprehensive Guide. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Foley, William A. and Van Valin, Robert D., 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Friedlaender, Jonathan S. (ed.), 2007. Genes, Language and Culture History in the Southwest Pacific. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Friedlaender, Jonathan S., Friedlaender, F. R., Hodgson, J. A. et al., 2007. Mitochondrial DNA variation in Northern Island Melanesia. In Friedlaender, (ed.), pp. 61–80.Google Scholar

Gil, David, 2015. The Mekong-Mamberamo linguistic area. In Enfield, N. J. and Comrie, Bernard (eds), Mainland Southeast Asian Languages: The State of the Art, pp. 261–350. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Golson, Jack, 1977. The making of the New Guinea Highlands. In Winslow, J. H. (ed.), The Melanesian Environment, pp. 45–56. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar

Gravelle, Gilles, 2002. Morphosyntactic properties of Meyah word classes. In Reesink, Ger P. (ed.), Languages of the Eastern Bird’s Head, pp. 109–180. Pacific Linguistics, vol. 524. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H., 1960. A quantitative approach to the morphological study of language. International Journal of American Linguistics 26: 178–194. Originally published in Spencer, Robert F. (ed.), 1954, Method and Perspective in Anthropology: Papers in Honor of Wilson D. Wallis, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Grimes, Charles E., 1991. The Buru Language of Eastern Indonesia. PhD thesis, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald, 2010. Online appendix for ‘A full-scale test of the language farming dispersal hypothesis’ (Diachronica 27: 197–213).Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald, 2012. Pronouns and the (preliminary) classification of Papuan languages. In Hammarström, and van den Heuvel, (eds), pp. 428–538.Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald and van den Heuvel, Wilco (eds), 2012. History, Contact and Classification of Papuan Languages, part 2. Special issue of Language and Linguistics in Melanesia. Port Moresby: Linguistic Society of Papua New Guinea.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew, Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard (eds), 2005. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Healey, Alan, 1964. The Ok Family in New Guinea. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Healey, Alan, 1970. Proto-Awyu-Dumut phonology. In Wurm, S. A. and Laycock, D. C. (eds), Pacific Linguistic Studies in Honour of Arthur Capell, pp. 997–1063. Pacific Linguistics, vol. C-13. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Holton, Gary, 2010. Person-marking, verb classes, and and the notion of alignment in Western Pantar. In Ewing, and Klamer, (eds), pp. 97–117.Google Scholar

Kaji, Shigeki (ed.), 2005. Crosslinguistic Studies of Tonal Phenomena: Historical Development, Tone-Syntax Interface, and Descriptive Studies. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar

Kaspruś, Alois, 1945. The languages of the Mugil District, NE-New Guinea. Anthropos 37–40: 711–778.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Jean, 2002. Manus from the beginning: An archaeological overview. In Kaufmann, Christian, Schmid, C. Kocher and Ohnemus, S. (eds), Admiralty Islands: Art from the South Seas, pp. 17–29. Zürich: Museum Rietberg.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Jean and Clarke, William, 2004. Cultivated Landscapes of the Southwest Pacific. Resource Management in Asia-Pacific Working Paper, vol. 50. Canberra: Resource Management in Asia-Pacific Program, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.Google Scholar

Klaffl, Johann and Vormann, Friedrich, 1905. Die Sprachen des Berlinhafen-Bezirks in Deutsch-Neuguinea. Mitteilungen des Seminars für Orientalische Sprachen 8: 1–138.Google Scholar

Klamer, Marian, 2010. A Grammar of Teiwa. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Klamer, Marian and Ewing, Michael, 2010. The languages of East Nusantara: An introduction. In Ewing, and Klamer, (eds), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Klamer, Marian, Reesink, Ger P. and van Staden, Mirjam, 2008. East Nusantara as a linguistic area. In Muysken, Pieter (ed.), From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics, pp. 95–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter, Cochran, Anne and Disner, Sandra, 1977. Laterals and trills. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 7: 46–54.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter and Maddieson, Ian, 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Laidig, Wyn D. and Laidig, Carol J., 1995. A synopsis of Larike morphology and syntax. NUSA 38: 18–42.Google Scholar

Lepofsky, Diane, 1988. The environmental context of Lapita settlement locations. In Kirch, Patrick V. and Hunt, T. L. (eds), The Archaeology of the Lapita Cultural Complex: A Critical Review, pp. 33–47. Thomas Burke Memorial Washington State Museum Monographs, vol. 5. Seattle: Burke Museum.Google Scholar

Lewis, M. Paul, Simons, Gary F. and Fennig, Charles D. (eds), 2014. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 17th edition. Dallas, TX: SIL International. www.ethnologue.comGoogle Scholar

Lichtenberk, Frantisek, 1983. A Grammar of Manam. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar

Lichtenberk, Frantisek, 2013. The rise and demise of possessive classifiers in Austronesian. In Kikusawa, Ritsuko and Reid, Lawrence A. (eds), Historical Linguistics 2011: Selected Papers from the 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka, 25–30 July 2011, pp. 199–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Longacre, Robert E., 1972. Hierarchy and Universality of Discourse Constituents on New Guinea Languages: Discussion. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Loughnane, Robyn and Fedden, Sebastian, 2011. Is Oksapmin Ok? A study of the genetic relationship between Oksapmin and the Ok languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 31: 1–42.Google Scholar

Lynch, John, 1977. Notes on Maisin: An Austronesian language of the Northern Province of Papua New Guinea. Paper presented to the Annual Congress of the Linguistic Society of Papua New Guinea.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Lorna, 1990. A Grammar of Tauya. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian, 2013. Lateral consonants. In Dryer, and Haspelmath, (eds), chapter 8. http://wals.info/chapter/8Google Scholar

McElhanon, Kenneth A. and Voorhoeve, C. L., 1970. The Trans-New Guinea phylum: Explorations in Deep Level Genetic Relationships. Pacific Linguistics, vol. B-16. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Milke, Wilhelm, 1958. Zur inneren Gliederung und geschichtlichen Stellung der ozeanisch-austronesischen Sprachen. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 83: 58–62.Google Scholar

Milke, Wilhelm, 1961. Beiträge zur ozeanischen Linguistik. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 86: 162–182.Google Scholar

Nettle, Daniel, 1999. Linguistic Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna, 1997. Sprung from two common sources: Sahul as a linguistic area. In McConvell, Patrick and Evans, Nicholas (eds), Archaeology and Linguistics: Aboriginal Australia in Global Perspective, pp. 135–168. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna, 2010. Macrofamilies, macroareas and contact. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, pp. 361–379. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew, 2005. The chequered career of the Trans New Guinea hypothesis: Recent research and its implications. In Pawley, et al. (eds), pp. 67–107.Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew, 2007. Recent research on the historical relationships of the Papuan languages, or, what does linguistics say about the prehistory of Melanesia? In Friedlaender, Jonathan (ed.), Population Genetics, Linguistics, and Culture History in the Southwest Pacific: A Synthesis, pp. 36–59. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew, 2008. Where and when was Proto Oceanic spoken? Linguistic and archaeological evidence. In Lander, Yury A. and Ogoblin, Alexander K. (eds), Language and Text in the Austronesian World: Studies in Honour of Ülo Sirk, pp. 47–71. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew, 2012. How reconstructable is Proto Trans New Guinea? Problems, progress, prospects. In Hammarström, and van den Heuvel, (eds), pp. 88–164.Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew, Attenborough, Robert, Golson, Jack and Hide, Robin (eds), 2005. Papuan Pasts: Cultural, Linguistic and Biological Histories of Papuan-speaking Peoples. Pacific Linguistics, vol. 572. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew and Hammarström, Harald, in press. The Trans New Guinea family. In Palmer, Bill (ed.), The Languages and Linguistics of New Guinea: A Comprehensive Guide. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Pilhofer, G., 1933. Grammatik der Kâte-Sprache in Neuguinea. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar

Ray, Sidney H., 1911. Comparative notes on Maisin and other languages of eastern Papua. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 41: 397–405.Google Scholar

Ray, Sidney H., 1913. The languages of the Papuan Gulf District, Papua. Zeitschrift fur Kolonialsprachen 4: 20–80.Google Scholar

Ray, Sidney H., 1923. The languages of the Western Division of Papua. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 53: 332–360.Google Scholar

Ray, Sidney H., 1926. A Comparative Study of the Melanesian Island Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ray, Sidney H., 1929. The languages of the Central Division of Papua. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 59: 65–96.Google Scholar

Ray, Sidney H., 1932. A Grammar of the Kiwai Language, Fly Delta, Papua, with a Kiwai Vocabulary by E. Baxter Riley. Port Moresby: E.G. Baker, Government Printer.Google Scholar

Ray, Sidney H., 1938. The languages of the Eastern and South-Eastern Divisions of Papua. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 68: 153–208.Google Scholar

Reesink, Ger, 2002. Clause-final negation: Structure and interpretation. Functions of Language 9: 239–268.Google Scholar

Reesink, Ger, 2003. The North Papuan Linkage: A hypothesis. Paper for the Workshop Pioneers of Island Melanesia, Cambridge, April 2003.Google Scholar

Reesink, Ger, 2009. A connection between Bird’s Head and (Proto) Oceanic. In Evans, Bethwyn (ed.), Discovering History through Language: Papers in Honour of Malcolm Ross, pp. 181–192. Pacific Linguistics, vol. 605. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Reesink, Ger, 2010. Prefixation of arguments in West Papuan languages. In Ewing, and Klamer, (eds), pp. 71–95.Google Scholar

Reesink, Ger and Dunn, Michael, 2012. Systematic typological comparison as a tool for investigating language history. In Evans, Nicholas and Klamer, Marian (eds), Melanesian Languages on the Edge of Asia: Challenges for the Twenty-first Century, pp. 34–71. Language Documentation and Conservation Special Publication 5. Honolulu: Language Documentation and Conservation.Google Scholar

Reesink, Ger, Singer, Ruth and Dunn, Michael, 2009. Explaining the linguistic diversity of Sahul using population models. PLoS Biology 7: e1000241.Google Scholar

Remijsen, Bert, 2001. Word-prosodic Systems of Raja Ampat Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar

Remijsen, Bert, 2002. Lexically contrastive stress accent and lexical tone in Ma’ya. In Gussenhoven, Carlos and Warner, Natasha (eds), Laboratory Phonology, vol. 7, pp. 585–614. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Renfrew, Colin, 2002. ‘The emerging synthesis’: The archaeogenetics of farming/language dispersals and other spread zones. In Bellwood, and Renfrew, (eds), pp. 3–16.Google Scholar

Roberts, John R., 1997. Switch-reference in Papua New Guinea: A preliminary survey. In Pawley, Andrew (ed.), Papers in Papuan Linguistics, no. 3, pp. 101–241. Pacific Linguistics, vol. A-87. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 1984. Maisin: A preliminary sketch. In Papers in New Guinea Linguistics, no. 23, pp. 1–82. Pacific Linguistics, vol. A-63. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 1987. A contact-induced morphosyntactic change in the Bel languages of Papua New Guinea. In Laycock, Donald C. and Winter, W. (eds), A World of Language: Papers Presented to Professor S. A. Wurm on his 65th Birthday, pp. 583–601. Pacific Linguistics, vol. C-100. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 1988. Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian Languages of Western Melanesia. Pacific Linguistics, vol. C-98. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 1993. Tonogenesis in the North Huon Gulf chain. In Edmondson, Jerold A. and Gregerson, Kenneth J. (eds), Tonality in Austronesian Languages, pp. 133–153. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications, vol. 24. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 1994. Areal phonological features in north central New Ireland. In Dutton, Tom and Tryon, Darrell (eds), Language Contact and Change in the Austronesian World, pp. 551–572. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 1996. Contact-induced change and the comparative method: Cases from Papua New Guinea. In Durie, Mark and Ross, Malcolm (eds), The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change, pp. 180–217. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 2001. Contact-induced change in Oceanic languages in north-west Melanesia. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds), Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics, pp. 134–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 2003. Diagnosing prehistoric language contact. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Motives for Language Change, pp. 174–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 2005a. Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. In Pawley, et al. (eds), pp. 15–66.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 2005b. Towards a reconstruction of the history of tone in the Trans New Guinea family. In Kaji, (ed.), pp. 3–31.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 2007. Calquing and metatypy. Journal of Language Contact, Thema 1: 116–143.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 2008. A history of metatypy in the Bel languages. Journal of Language Contact, Thema 2 (1): 149–164.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 2013. Diagnosing contact processes from their outcomes: The importance of life stages. Journal of Language Contact 6: 5–47.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm, 2014. Reconstructing the history of languages in northwest New Britain: Inheritance and contact. Journal of Historical Linguistics 4: 84–132.Google Scholar

Ross, Malcolm and Næss, Åshild, 2007. An Oceanic origin for Äiwoo, the language of the Reef Islands? Oceanic Linguistics 46: 456–498.Google Scholar

Sahlins, Marshall D., 1963. Poor man, rich man, big-man, chief: Political types in Melanesia and Polynesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History 5: 285–303.Google Scholar

Schapper, Antoinette, 2009. Bunaq: A Papuan Language of Central Timor. PhD thesis, The Australian National University.Google Scholar

Schapper, Antoinette, 2014. Elevation in the spatial deictic systems of Alor-Pantar languages. In Klamer, Marian (ed.), Alor-Pantar Languages: History and Typology, pp. 247–284. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar

Schapper, Antoinette, Huber, Juliette and van Engelenhoven, Aone, 2014. The relatedness of Timor-Kisar and Alor-Pantar languages: A preliminary demonstration. In Klamer, Marian (ed.), Alor-Pantar Languages: History and Typology, pp. 99–154. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar

Scheinfeldt, Laura B., Friedlaender, F. R., Friedlaender, Jonathan S. et al., 2007. Y-chromosome variation in Northern Island Melanesia. In Friedlaender, (ed.), pp. 81–95.Google Scholar

Smallhorn, Jacinta, 2011. The Binanderean Languages of Papua New Guinea: Reconstruction and Subgrouping. Studies in Language Change, vol. 9. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Smith, Ellen, 2016. Contact-induced change in a highly endangered language of northern Bougainville. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36 (3): 369–405.Google Scholar

Specht, Jim, 2005. Revisiting the Bismarcks: Some alternative views. In Pawley, Andrew, Attenborough, Robert, Golson, Jack and Hide, Robin (eds), Papuan Pasts: Cultural, Linguistic and Biological Histories of Papuan-Speaking Peoples, pp. 235–288. Pacific Linguistics, vol. 572. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Spriggs, Matthew, 1996. Chronology and colonisation in Island Southeast Asia and the Pacific: New data and an evaluation. In Davidson, Janet, Irwin, Geoffrey, Leach, Foss, Pawley, Andrew and Brown, Dorothy (eds), Oceanic Culture History: Essays in Honour of Roger Green, pp. 33–50. Dunedin: New Zealand Journal of Archaeology.Google Scholar

Spriggs, Matthew J. T., 1997. The Island Melanesians. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Strong, W. M., 1911. The Maisin language. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 41: 381–396.Google Scholar

Summerhayes, Glenn R., Leavesley, Matthew, Fairbairn, Andrew et al., 2010. Human adaptation and plant use in highland New Guinea 49,000 to 44,000 years ago. Science 330: 78–81.Google Scholar

Suter, Edgar, 2012. Verbs with pronominal object prefixes in Finisterre-Huon languages. In Hammarström, and van den Heuvel, (eds), pp. 23–59.Google Scholar

Swadling, Pamela and Hide, Robin, 2005. Changing landscape and social interaction: Looking at agricultural history from a Sepik-Ramu perspective. In Pawley, et al. (eds), pp. 289–327.Google Scholar

Terrill, Angela, 2002. Systems of nominal classification in East Papuan languages. Oceanic Linguistics 41: 63–88.Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah Grey, 2001. Language Contact: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Thurston, William R., 1982. A Comparative Study of Anêm and Lusi. Pacific Linguistics, vol. B-83. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Thurston, William R., 1987. Processes of Change in the Languages of North-Western New Britain. Pacific Linguistics, vol. B-99. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Thurston, William R., 1989. How exoteric languages build a lexicon: Esoterogeny in West New Britain. In Harlow, Ray and Hooper, Robin (eds), VICAL 1, Oceanic Languages: Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, pp. 555–579. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar

Thurston, William R., 1992. Sociolinguistic typology and other factors effecting change in northwestern New Britain, Papua New Guinea. In Dutton, Tom (ed.), Culture Change, Language Change: Case Studies from Melanesia, pp. 123–139. Pacific Linguistics, vol. C-120. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Thurston, William R., 1994. Renovation and innovation in the languages of north-western New Britain. In Dutton, Tom and Tryon, Darrell (eds), Language Contact and Change in the Austronesian World, pp. 573–609. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Usher, Timothy and Suter, Edgar, 2015. The Anim languages of Southern New Guinea. Oceanic Linguistics 54 (1): 110–142.Google Scholar

Van Valin, Robert D. Jr and LaPolla, Randy J., 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Voorhoeve, C. L., 2001. Proto Awyu-Dumut phonology II. In Pawley, Andrew, Ross, Malcolm and Tryon, Darrell (eds), The Boy from Bundaberg: Studies in Melanesian Linguistics in Honour of Tom Dutton, pp. 361–381. Pacific Linguistics, vol. 514. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel, 1953. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York, vol. 1. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar

Wurm, Stefan A., 1975a. Language distribution in the New Guinea area. In Wurm, (ed.), pp. 3–38.Google Scholar

Wurm, Stefan A. (ed.), 1975b. New Guinea Area Languages and Language Study, vol. 1: Papuan Languages and the New Guinea Linguistic Scene. Pacific Linguistics, vol. C-38. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Wurm, Stefan A., 1982. The Papuan Languages of Oceania. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Wurm, Stefan A. and Hattori, Shirō (eds), 1981. Language Atlas of the Pacific Area, part 1. Pacific Linguistics, vol. C-66. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Wurm, Stefan A. and McElhanon, K. A., 1975. Papuan language classification problems. In Wurm, (ed.), pp. 145–164.Google Scholar

Wurm, Stefan A., Voorhoeve, C. L. and McElhanon, K. A., 1975. The Trans-New Guinea phylum in general. In Wurm, (ed.), pp. 299–322.Google Scholar