Anderson, Gregory D. S., 1998a. Xakas. Languages of the World/Materials, vol. 251. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S., 1998b. Historical aspects of Yakut (Sakha) phonology. Turkic Languages 2 (2): 1–32.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S., 2001. Deaffrication in the Siberian area. In Aronson, Howard I. (ed.), Non-Slavic Languages, vol. 9: Linguistic Studies, pp. 1–17. Columbus, OH: SLAVICA.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S., 2003. Towards a phonological typology of native Siberia. In Holisky, Dee Ann and Tuite, Kevin (eds), Current Trends in Caucasian, East European and Inner Asian Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Howard I. Aronson, pp. 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S., 2004. The languages of central Siberia: Introduction and overview. In Vajda, Edward (ed.), Languages and Prehistory of Central Siberia, pp. 1–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S., 2005. Language Contact in South Central Siberia. Turcologica, vol. 54. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S., 2006. Towards a typology of the Siberian linguistic area. In Matras, Yaron, McMahon, April and Vincent, Nigel (eds), Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective, pp. 266–300. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S., 2010. Perspectives on the global language extinction crisis: The Oklahoma and Eastern Siberia language hotspots. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique XLV: 129–142.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S., 2011. Language hotspots: What (applied) linguistics and education should do about language endangerment in the twenty-first century. Language and Education 25 (4): 273–289.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gregory D. S., 2015. Russian colonialism and hegemony and Native Siberian languages. In Stolz, Christel (ed.), Language Empires in Comparative Perspective. Colonial and Postcolonial Linguistics, vol. 6. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Aralova, Natalia, Grawunder, Sven and Winter, Bodo, 2012. The acoustic correlates of tongue root vowel harmony in Even (Tungusic). In The 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 240–243. Hong Kong: City University.Google Scholar

Bergsland, Knut, 1997. Aleut Grammar: Unangam Tunuganaan Achixaasiẋ. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar

Bulatova, N. J. and Grenoble, Leonore A., 1999. Evenki. Munich: LINCOM.Google Scholar

Castrén, M. A., 1854. Grammatik der samojedischen Sprachen. Reprinted in 1966 as Uralic and Altaic Series, vol. 53. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar

Fortescue, Michael, 1998. Language Relations across the Bering Strait: Reassessing the Archaeological and Linguistic Evidence. London and Washington: Cassell.Google Scholar

Georg, Stefan, 2007. Descriptive Grammar of Ket (Yenisei-Ostyak), part 1: Introduction, Phonology, Morphology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Gilbers, Dicky G., Nerbonne, John and Schaeken, Jos, 2000. Languages in Contact. Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics, vol. 28. Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Grenoble, Lenore A., 2000. Morphosyntactic change: The influence of Russian on Evenki. In Gilbers, et al. (eds), pp. 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grenoble, Lenore A., 2010. Switch or shift: Code-mixing, contact-induced change and attrition in Russian-Evenki contacts. In Mustajoki, Arto, Protassova, Ekaterina and Vakhtin, Nikolai (eds), Sociolinguistic Approaches to Non-Standard Russian, pp. 139–152. Slavica Helsingensia, vol. 40. Helsinki: Instrumentarium of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Grenoble, Lenore A., 2012a. Contact induced change and language shift: The impact of Russian and the creation of the Russian Language Empire. Paper presented at Language Empires conference, Bremen, Germany, March 2012.Google Scholar

Grenoble, Lenore A., 2012b. Areal typology and syntactic change. Vestnik TGPU (TSPU Bulletin) 116 (1): 101–105.Google Scholar

Grenoble, Lenore A., 2014. Spatial semantics, case and relator nouns in Evenki. In Suihkonen, Pirkko and Whaley, Lindsay J. (eds), On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia, pp. 111–131. Studies in Language Companion Series, vol. 164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Grishina, N. M., 1977. Upotreblenie slova bang v slozhnom predlozhenii ketskogo jazyka [Use of the word bang in complex sentences in Ket]. Jazyki i Toponimija 4: 102–107.Google Scholar

Gruzdeva, Ekaterina, 2000. Aspects of Russian–Nivkh grammatical interference: The Nivkh imperative. In Gilbers, et al. (eds), pp. f121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Häkkinen, Jaakko, 2012. Early contacts between Uralic and Yukaghir. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 264: 91–101.Google Scholar

Joki, A. J., 1977. Die Tungusen und ihre Kontakte mit anderen Völkern. Studia Orientalia 47: 109–118.Google Scholar

Kämpfe, H. R. and Volodin, A. P., 1995. Abriss der Tschuktschischen Grammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Kilby, David, 1980. Universals and particulars of the Evenki case system. International Review of Slavic Linguistics 5: 45–74.Google Scholar

Ko, Seongyeon, 2012. Tongue Root Harmony and Vowel Contrasts in Northeast Asian Languages. PhD Dissertation, Cornell University, New York.Google Scholar

Kolesnikova, V. D., 1966. Sintaksis èvenkijskogo jazyka [Evenki Syntax]. Moscow and Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar

Kostjakov, M. M., 1976. Ketskie sootvetsvija russkomu slozhnopodchinennomu predlozheniju s pridatochnym vremeni [Ket correspondences to the Russian temporally subordinate clause]. Jazyki i toponimija 1: 56–63.Google Scholar

Krejnovich, E. A., 1958. Jukagirskij jazyk [The Yukaghir Language]. Moscow and Leningrad: Akademija Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar

Krejnovich, E. A., 1982. Issledovanija i materialy po jukagirskomu jazyku [Research and Materials on Yukaghir]. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar

Lebedeva, E. P., 1997. Orochskij jazyk [The Orochi language]. In Romanova, et al. (eds), pp. 215–226.Google Scholar

Mal’chukov, A., 1995. Even. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar

Maslova, E., 2003a. Tundra Yukaghir. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar

Maslova, E., 2003b. A Grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Menovshchikov, G. A. and Vakhtin, N. B., 1983. Èskimosskij jazyk [The Eskimo Language]. Leningrad: Proveshchenie.Google Scholar

Nedjalkov, Igor V., 1997. Evenki. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nikolaeva, Irina, 2006. A Historical Dictionary of Yukaghir. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nikolaeva, Irina and Tolskaja, Maria, 2001. A Grammar of Udihe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Oskolskaya, Sofia and Stoynova, Natasha, 2013. The LA-form: Russian verbs in Nanai speech. Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse ajakiri / The Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 4 (2): 99–116.Google Scholar

Pakendorf, Brigitte, 2007. Contact in the History of the Sakha (Yakuts): Linguistic and Genetic Perspectives. Leiden: LOT.Google Scholar

Petrov, N. E., 1984. Modal’nye slova v jakutskom jazyke [Modal Words in Yakut]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar

Prokof’ev, G. N., 1937a. Sel’kupskij (ostjako-samoedskij) jazyk [The Sel’kup language]. In Prokof’ev, G. N. (ed.), Jazyki i pis’mennost’ narodov severa, part 1, pp. 91–124. Moscow and Leningrad: Uchpedgiz.Google Scholar

Prokof’ev, G. N., 1937b. Nganasanskij (tavgijskij) jazyk [The Nganasan language]. In Prokof’ev, G. N. (ed.), Jazyki i pis’mennost’ narodov severa, part 1, pp. 53–74. Moscow and Leningrad: Uchpedgiz.Google Scholar

de Reuse, W., 1994. Siberian Yupik Eskimo: The Language and its Contacts with Chukchi. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Romanova, O. et al. (eds), 1997. Jazyki Mira: Mongol’skie jazyki, Tunguso-Man’chzhurskie jazyki, Japonskij jazyk, Korejskij jazyk. Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar

Sem, L. I., 1997. Nanajskij jazyk [The Nanai language]. In Romanova, et al. (eds), pp. 173–188.Google Scholar

Skorik, P. J., 1986. Kategorii imeni sushchestvitel’nogo v chukotsko-kamchatskikh jazykakh [Categories of the noun in Chukotko-Kamchatkan languages]. In Skorik, P. J. (ed.), Paleoaziatskie jazyki. Novosibirsk: Akademija Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar

Stapert, Eugénie, 2013. Contact-Induced Change in Dolgan: An Investigation into the Role of Linguistic Data for the Reconstruction of a People’s (Pre-)History. PhD Dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar

Stebnitskij, S. N., 1994. Ocherki po jazyku i fol’kloru korjakov [Studies on Koryak Language and Folklore]. Moscow: Muzej antropologii i ètnografii RAN.Google Scholar

Sunik, O. P., 1997. Ul’chskij jazyk [The Ul’chi language]. In Romanova, et al. (eds), pp. 248–260.Google Scholar

Tenishev, È. R. et al., 1988. Sravnitel’no-istoricheskaja grammatika tjurkskikh jazykov: Morfologija [Comparative-historical Grammar of the Turk Languages: Morphology]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Tsintsius, V. I., 1948. Problemy sravnitel’noj grammatiki tunguso-man’chdzhurskikh jazykov [Problems in the Comparative Grammar of the Manchu-Tungus Languages]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Tsintsius, V. I., 1997. Negidal’skij jazyk [Negidal language]. In Romanova, et al. (eds), pp. 188–201.Google Scholar

Tsydendambaev, T. B., 1981. Zametki ob etnicheskikh i jazykovykh kontaktakh burjat i evenkov [Notes on the ethnic and linguistic contacts between Buryat and Evenki]. In Ubrjatova, E. I. (ed.), Jazyki i Fol’klor narodov severa [Languages and Folklore of the Peoples of the North], pp. 70–91 Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar

Ubrjatova, E. I., 1985. Jazyk noril’skix dolgan [The Language of the Norilsk Dolgan]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar

Vajda, Edward, 2008. Head-negating enclitics in Ket. In Vajda, Edward (ed.), Subordination and Coordination Strategies in North Asian Languages, pp. 179–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Vajda, Edward, 2012. The Dene–Yeniseian connection: A reply to G. Starostin. Journal of Language Relationship 8: 138–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhukova, A. N., 1972. Grammatika korjakskogo jazyka [Grammar of Koryak]. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar

Zhukova, A. N., 1980. Jazyk palanskikh korjakov [The Language of the Palana Koryak]. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar