Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:16:29.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

31 - Native North American Languages

from Part II - Case Studies for Areal Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

By
Marianne Mithun
Edited by
Raymond Hickey
Raymond Hickey
Affiliation:
Universität Duisburg–Essen
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics , pp. 878 - 933
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrade, Manuel J., 1933. Quileute. In Boas, Franz (ed.), 1933–1938, Handbook of American Indian Languages, part 3, pp. 149–292. Glückstadt, Hamburg and New York: J. J. Augustin.Google Scholar
Aoki, Haruo, 1962. Nez Perce and Northern Sahaptin: A binary comparison. International Journal of American Linguistics 28: 172–182.Google Scholar
Beck, David, 2000. Grammatical convergence and the genesis of diversity in the Northwest Coast Sprachbund. Anthropological Linguistics 42 (2): 147–213.Google Scholar
Bereznak, Catherine, 1995. The Pueblo Region as a Linguistic Area: Diffusion among the Indigenous Languages of the Southwest United States. Unpublished PhD thesis, Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
Blansitt, E. L., 1975. Progressive aspect. Working Papers on Language Universals 18: 1–34.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz, 1921. Ethnology of the Kwakiutl. Bureau of American Ethnology Annual Report 35, for the Years 1913–1914. Washington.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz, 1947. Kwakiutl Grammar, edited by Yampolsky, Helene Boas. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 37.2.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz and Deloria, Ella, 1941. Dakota Grammar. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. XXIII.2. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Booker, Karen M., 1980. Comparative Muskogean: Aspects of Proto-Muskogean Verb Morphology. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Booker, Karen M., 1991. Languages of the Aboriginal Southeast: An Annotated Bibliography. Native American Bibliography Series, vol. 15. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Booker, Karen M., 2005. Muskogean historical phonology. In Hardy, and Scancarelli, (eds), pp. 246–298.Google Scholar
Booker, Karen M., Hudson, Charles and Rankin, Robert, 1992. Place name identification and multilingualism in the sixteenth-century Southeast. Ethnohistory 39: 399–451.Google Scholar
Brain, Jeffrey P., Roth, George and de Reuse, Willem J., 2004. Tunica, Biloxi, and Ofo. In Fogelson, (ed.), pp. 586–597.Google Scholar
Bright, William, 1957. The Karok Language. University of California Publications in Linguistics, vol. 13.Google Scholar
Bright, William, 1959. Review of The Yurok language, by R. H. Robins. Language 35: 100–104.Google Scholar
Brown, James A., 2004. Exchange and interaction until 1500. In Fogelson, (ed.), pp. 677–685.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere and Pagliuca, William, 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Byington, Cyrus, 1915. A Dictionary of the Choctaw Language, edited by Swanton, John R. and Halbert, Henry. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. 1973 reprint, Oklahoma City, OK: Oklahoma City Indian Calendar, Inc.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Catherine, 1964. Phonemic borrowing in Lake Miwok. In Bright, William (ed.), Studies in Californian Linguistics, pp. 46–53. University of California Publications in Linguistics, vol. 34. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Catherine, 1987. Lake Miwok naturalization of borrowed phonemes. In Joseph, Brian and Zwicky, Arnold (eds), A Festschrift for Ilse Lehiste, pp. 84–93. Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 35. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Catherine, 1991. Climbing a low mountain. In Chung, Sandra and Hankamer, Jorge (eds), A Festschrift for William F. Shipley, pp. 47–59. Santa Cruz: Syntax Research Center, University of California.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, 1997. American Indian Languages: The Historical Linguistics of Native America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, 2005. Caddo. In Hardy, and Scancarelli, (eds), pp. 323–350.Google Scholar
Conathan, Lisa, 2004. The Linguistic Ecology of Northwestern California: Contact, Functional Convergence and Dialectology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, 1975. Southeastern Indian languages. In Crawford, James M. (ed.), Studies in Southeastern Indian Languages, pp. 1–120. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Dayley, Jon, 1989. Tümpisa (Panamint) Shoshone Grammar. University of California Publications in Linguistics, vol. 115. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
De Laguna, Frederica, 1990. Tlingit. In Suttles, (ed.), pp. 203–228.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott, 1996. Penutian in the bipartite stem belt: Disentangling areal and genetic correspondences. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Historical Topics in Native American Languages, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
Dorsey, James Owen and Swanton, John R., 1912. A Dictionary of the Biloxi and Ofo Languages, Accompanied with Thirty-one Biloxi Texts and Numerous Biloxi Phrases. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin, vol. 47. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Dunn, John, 1995. Sm’algyax: A Reference Dictionary and Grammar for the Coast Tsimshian Language. Seattle, WA: University of Washington/Sealaska Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
Einaudi, Paula, 1976. A Grammar of Biloxi. New York: GarlandGoogle Scholar
Elmendorf, William W. and Kroeber, A. L., 1960. The structure of Twana culture. Washington State University Research Studies 28.3: Monographic Supplement 2. Pullman. Reprinted 1992 in Coast Salish and Western Washington Indians IV, Seattle, WA: Washington State University Press.Google Scholar
Epps, Patience, Pat-El, Na’ama and Huehnergard, John (eds), 2013. Contact among Genetically Related Languages. Special issue of Journal of Language Contact 6 (2).Google Scholar
Fogelson, Raymond D., 2004a. Cherokee in the East. In Fogelson, (ed.), pp. 337–353.Google Scholar
Fogelson, Raymond D. (ed.), 2004b. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 14: Southeast. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Ford, Richard, 1983. Inter-Indian exchange in the Southwest. In Ortiz, (ed.), pp. 711–722.Google Scholar
Frachtenberg, Leo, 1922. Siuslawan (Lower Umpqua). In Boas, Franz (ed.), Handbook of American Indian Languages, part 2, pp. 431–629. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Galloway, Patricia and Jackson, Jason Baird, 2004. Natchez and neighboring groups. In Fogelson, (ed.), pp. 598–615.Google Scholar
Galloway, Patricia and Kidwell, Clara Sue, 2004. Choctaw in the East. In Fogelson, (ed.), pp. 499–519.Google Scholar
Gatschet, Albert S. and Swanton, John R., 1932. A Dictionary of the Atakapa Language, Accompanied by Text Material. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin, vol. 108. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R., 1941. Tunica. In Boas, Franz (ed.), Handbook of American Indian Languages, pp. 159–204. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin, vol. 40.1. New York: J. J. Augustin.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R., 1946. A grammatical sketch of Tunica. In Linguistic Structures of Native America, pp. 337–366. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, vol. 6. New York: Wenner-Gren.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R., 1950. Tunica texts. University of California Publications in Linguistics 6 (1): 1–174.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R., 1953. Tunica dictionary. University of California Publications in Linguistics 6 (2): 175–332.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R., 1967. Language and taxonomy in northwestern California. American Anthropologist 96: 358–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Mary R., 1969. The Prehistory of Languages. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R., 1970. Consonant symbolism in northwestern California: A problem in diffusion. In Swanson, Earl H. Jr (ed.), Languages and Cultures of Western North America: Essays in Honor of Sven S. Liljeblad, pp. 86–89. Pocatello: Idaho State University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R., 1971. Southeastern Indian linguistics. In Hudson, Charles (ed.), Red, White, and Black: Symposium on Indians in the Old South. Southern Anthropological Society Proceedings, vol. 5. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R., 1973. The Southeast. In Sebeok, Thomas (ed.), Linguistics in North America, pp. 1210–1249. Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 10. The Hague: Mouton. Reprinted in 1976 in Sebeok, Thomas (ed.), Native Languages of the Americas, pp. 121–152. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R., 1976. The Northern California linguistic area. In Langdon, Margaret and Silver, Shirley (eds), Hokan Studies: Papers from the First Conference on Hokan Languages, pp. 347–359. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R., 1979. Southeastern languages. In Campbell, Lyle and Mithun, Marianne (eds), The Languages of Native North America, pp. 299–326. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. and Hill, James H., 2015. Creek Texts, edited and translated by Martin, Jack B., Mauldin, Margaret McKane and McGirt, Juanita. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hajda, Yvonne, 1984. Regional social organization in the Greater Lower Columbia. Paper read at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hardy, Heather and Scancarelli, Janine (eds), 2005. Native Languages of the Southeastern United States. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Heaton, Raina, 2013. Active/stative agreement in Tunica. Manuscript, University of Hawai‘i.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania, 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heizer, Robert (ed.), 1978. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8: California. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2010. Language contact: Reconsideration and reassessment. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact, pp. 1–28. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond, 2012. Early English and the Celtic hypothesis. In Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds), The Oxford Handbook on the History of English, pp. 497–507. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoijer, Harry, 1933. Tonkawa: An Indian language of Texas. In Boas, Franz (ed.), 1933–1938, Handbook of American Indian Languages, part 3, pp. 1–148. Glückstadt, Hamburg and New York: J. J. Augustin.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell, 1955. The Language of the Kathlamet Chinook. Unpublished PhD thesis, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Innes, Pamela, 2004. Creek in the West. In Fogelson, (ed.), pp. 393–403.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Melville, 1954. The areal spread of sound features in the languages north of California. In Papers from the Symposium on American Indian Linguistics Held at Berkeley, July 7, 1951. University of California Publications in Linguistics, vol. 10.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William H., 1969. Origin of the Nootka pharyngeals. International Journal of American Linguistics 35: 125–153.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William H., 1980a. Inclusive/exclusive: A diffused pronominal category in native western North America. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora, pp. 204–227.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, William., 1980b. Washo bipartite verb stems. In Klar, Kathryn, Langdon, Margaret and Silver, Shirley (eds), American Indian and Indoeuropean Studies, pp. 85–100. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jany, Carmen, 2009. Chimariko Grammar: Areal and Typological Perspective. University of California Publications in Linguistics, vol. 142.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars, 2008. Remodeling grammar: Copying, conventionalization, grammaticalization. In Siemund, Peter and Kintana, Noemi (eds), Language Contact and Contact Languages, pp. 61–79. Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism, vol. 7. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kaufman, David, 2013. Positional auxiliaries in Biloxi 1. International Journal of American Linguistics 79 (2): 283–299.Google Scholar
Kimball, Geoffrey, 2005. Natchez. In Hardy, and Scancarelli, (eds), pp. 385–453.Google Scholar
Kinkade, M. Dale, 1991. Prehistory of the Native languages of the Northwest Coast. In Great Ocean Conference: The North Pacific to 1600, pp. 37–158. Portland: Oregon Historical Society Press.Google Scholar
Kinkade, M. Dale, Elmendorf, William H., Rigsby, Bruce and Aoki, Haruo, 1998. Languages. In Walker, (ed.), 49–72.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul, 1982. Language contact and linguistic diffusion: The Arizona Tewa speech community. In Barkin, F., Brandt, E. and Ornstein-Galicia, J. (eds), Bilingualism and Language Contact: Spanish, English, and Native American Languages, pp. 51–72. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, 2001. Auxiliation: An Enquiry into the Nature of Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langdon, Margaret, 1971. Sound symbolism in Yuman languages. In Sawyer, Jesse (ed.), Studies in American Indian Languages, pp. 149–174. University of California Publications in Linguistics, vol. 65.Google Scholar
Lipkind, William, 1945. Winnebago Grammar. New York: King’s Crown Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Monica, 1992. Inverse marking in Karuk: The function of the suffix -ap. International Journal of American Linguistics 58: 182–210.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Monica, 2000. Obviative marking in ergative contexts: The case of Karuk ’îin. International Journal of American Linguistics 66: 464–498.Google Scholar
Martin, Jack B., 1994. Modeling language contact in the prehistory of the southeastern U.S. In Kwachka, Patricia (ed.), Perspectives on the Southeast: Linguistics, Archaeology, and Ethnohistory, pp. 14–24, 143–163. Southern Anthropological Society Proceedings, vol. 27. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Jack, 2004. Languages. In Fogelson, (ed.), pp. 68–86.Google Scholar
Martin, Jack B., 2011. A Grammar of Creek (Muskogee). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. Hubert, 1970. Notes on the Proto-Siouan continuants. International Journal of American Linguistics 36: 98–109.Google Scholar
May, Stephanie, 2004. Alabama and Koasati. In Fogelson, (ed.), pp. 407–414.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne, 1991. Active/agentive case marking and its motivations. Language 67: 510–546.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne, 1997. Lexical affixes and morphological typology. In Haiman, John, Bybee, Joan and Thompson, Sandra (eds), Essays on Language Function and Language Type, pp. 357–372. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne, 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne, 2007a. Grammar, contact, and time. Journal of Language Contact, Thema 1: 133–155.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne, 2007b. Integrating approaches to diversity: Argument structure on the Northwest Coast. In Matsumoto, Yoshiko, Oshima, David, Robinson, Orrin and Sells, Peter (eds), Diversity in Language, pp. 9–36. Stanford, CA: CSLI (Center for the Study of Language and Information).Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne, 2008. The emergence of agentive systems. In Donohue, Mark and Wichmann, Søren (eds), The Typology of Semantic Alignment Systems, pp. 297–333. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne, 2012a. Morphologies in contact: Form, meaning, and use in the grammar of reference. In Stolz, Thomas, Vanhove, Martine, Otsuka, Hitomi and Urdzu, Anna (eds), Morphologies in Contact, pp. 15–36. Studia Typologica, vol. 10. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne, 2012b. Core argument patterns and deep genetic relations: Hierarchical systems in Northern California. In Suihkonen, Pirkko, Comrie, Bernard and Solovyev, Valery (eds), Typology of Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations, pp. 257–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne, 2013. Challenges and benefits of contact among relatives: Morphological copying. Journal of Language Contact 6: 243–270.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela, 1985. Auxiliaries and auxiliarization in Western Muskogean. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Historical Syntax, pp. 333–362. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nakayama, Toshihide (ed.), 2003. George Louie’s Nuu-chah-nulth (Ahousaht) Texts with Grammatical Analysis. Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim, vol. A2–028. Kyoto: Nakanish.Google Scholar
Newman, Stanley, 1944. Yokuts Language of California. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, vol. 2. New York: Wenner-Gren.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, 1971. Diminutive consonant symbolism in Western North America. Language 47 (4): 826–848.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Sean, 2008. Cultural Contact and Linguistic Relativity among the Indians of Northwestern California. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Ortiz, Alfonso (ed.), 1983. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 10: Southwest. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Parsons, Elsie Clews, 1939. Pueblo Indian Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Quintero, Carolyn, 2004. Osage Grammar. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Rankin, Robert L., 1977. From verb to auxiliary to noun classifier and definite article. Grammaticalization of the Siouan verbs ‘sit’, ‘stand’, ‘lie’. In Brown, R. L. et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 1976 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, pp. 273–283. St Paul, MN: Department of Linguistics, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Rankin, Robert L., 1978. On the origin of the classificatory verbs in Muskogean. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Rankin, Robert L., 1987. Fricative ablaut in Choctaw and Siouan. Paper presented at the Kentucky Foreign Language Conference Session on the Southeast, Lexington.Google Scholar
Rankin, Robert L., 1988. Quapaw: Genetic and areal affiliations. In Shipley, William (ed.), In Honor of Mary Haas, pp. 629–650. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rankin, Robert, 2004. The history and development of Siouan positionals with special attention to polygrammaticalization in Dhegiha. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 2/3: 202–227.Google Scholar
Rankin, Robert L., 2005. Quapaw. In Hardy, and Scancarelli, (eds), pp. 454–498.Google Scholar
Rankin, Robert L., 2011. The Siouan enclitics: A beginning. Paper prepared for the Comparative Linguistics Workshop, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Reichard, Gladys, 1938. Coeur d’Alene. In Boas, Franz (ed.), 1933–1938, Handbook of American Indian Languages, part 3, pp. 517–707. Glückstadt, Hamburg and New York: J. J. Augustin.Google Scholar
Rigsby, Bruce and Silverstein, Michael, 1969. Nez Perce vowels and Proto-Sahaptian vowel harmony. Language 45: 45–59.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward, 1911. Diminutive and augmentative consonantism in Wishram. In Boas, Franz (ed.), Handbook of American Indian Languages, part 1, pp. 638–645. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward, 1929. A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology 12: 225–239. Reprinted in 1949 in Mandelbaum, D. G. (ed.), Selected Writings of Edward Sapir, pp. 61–72. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scancarelli, Janine, 2005. Cherokee. In Hardy, and Scancarelli, (eds), pp. 351–384.Google Scholar
Sherzer, Joel, 1968. An Areal-Typological Study of the American Indian Languages North of Mexico. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Sherzer, Joel, 1973. Areal linguistics in North America. In Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Linguistics in North America, pp. 749–795. Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 10. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sherzer, Joel, 1976. An Areal-Typological Study of American Indian Languages North of Mexico. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Shipley, William, 1963. Maidu Texts and Dictionary. University of California Publications in Linguistics, vol. 33. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, William (ed.), 1988. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 4: History of Indian–White Relations. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Suttles, Wayne (ed.), 1990a. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 7: Northwest Coast. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Suttles, Wayne, 1990b. Introduction. In Suttles, (ed.), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris, 1933. Chitimacha verbs of derogatory or abusive connotation with parallels from European languages. Language 9: 192–201.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris, 1939. Chitimacha Grammar. Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society Library.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris, 1946. Chitimacha. In Linguistic Structures of Native America, pp. 312–336. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, vol. 6. New York: Wenner-Gren.Google Scholar
Swanton, John R., 1921. The Tunica language. International Journal of American Linguistics 2: 1–39.Google Scholar
Swanton, John R., 1929. A sketch of the Atakapa language. International Journal of American Linguistics 5: 121–149.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard, 1972. Semantic Structures in English and Atsugewi. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Tarpent, Marie-Lucie, 1987. A Grammar of the Nisgha Language. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Victoria, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence D., 1972. Language universals, nasals, and the Northwest Coast. In Smith, Estelle (ed.), Studies in Linguistics in Honor of George L. Trager, pp. 441–456. Janua Linguarum, Series Maior, vol. 52. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence D. and Kinkade, M. Dale, 1990. Languages. In Suttles, (ed.), pp. 30–51.Google Scholar
Walker, Deward E. Jr (ed.), 1998. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 6: Plateau. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Walker, Willard, 2004. Creek confederacy before removal. In Fogelson, (ed.), pp. 373–392.Google Scholar
Waselkov, Gregory A., 2004. Exchange and interaction since 1500. In Fogelson, (ed.), pp. 686–696.Google Scholar
Waterman, T. T. and Kroeber, A. L., 1934. Yurok marriages. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 35: 1–14.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×