Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-qf55q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T01:11:20.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Zona Binding: Hemizona Assay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2021

By
Shubhadeep Roychoudhury  and
Daniel Franken
Edited by
Ashok Agarwal ,
Ralf Henkel  and
Ahmad Majzoub
Ashok Agarwal
Affiliation:
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
Ralf Henkel
Affiliation:
University of the Western Cape, South Africa
Ahmad Majzoub
Affiliation:
Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha
Get access

Summary

The incidence of infertility is up to 20–25 percent in men with poor semen quality with a contribution of the male factor in 30–50 percent of couples undergoing assisted reproduction, including in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). In 17 studies sampling 6410 women, the proportion of couples seeking such medical care was, on average, 56.1 percent (range 42–76.3 percent) in more developed countries and 51.2 percent (range 27–74.1 percent) in less developed countries [1]. Investigation of male infertility or sub-fertility basically comprises of semen analysis [2]. However, a standard semen analysis cannot always assess the multifunctional events and biological properties that spermatozoa express following capacitation. In many cases, it is only when couples fail to achieve conception, the male factor is suspected and advanced laboratory tests are recommended to establish this reliably.

Type
Chapter
Information
Manual of Sperm Function Testing in Human Assisted Reproduction , pp. 100 - 105
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boivin, J, Bunting, L, Collins, JA, Nygren, KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1506–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. (2010) WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 5th ed. Geneva: The WHO Press.Google Scholar
Franken, DR, Kruger, TF, Oehninger, S, Coddington, CC, Lombard, C, Smith, K. The ability of the hemizona assay to predict human fertilization in different and consecutive in-vitro fertilization cycles. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1240–4.Google Scholar
Garrett, C, Liu, DY, Gordon Baker, HWG. Selectivity of the human sperm-zona pellucida binding process to sperm head morphometry. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 362–71.Google Scholar
Oehninger, S, Toner, JP, Muasher, SJ, Coddington, C, Acosta, AA, Hodgen, GD. Prediction of fertilization in vitro with human gametes: is there a litmus test? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 1760–7.Google Scholar
Paul, M, Sumpter, JP, Lindsay, KS. The paradoxical effects of pentoxifylline on the binding of spermatozoa to the human zona pellucida. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 814–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, DY, Baker, HW. Evaluation and assessment of semen for IVF/ICSI. Asian J Androl 2002; 4: 281–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Liu, DY, Lopata, A, Johnston, WI, Baker, HW. Human sperm zona pellucida binding, sperm characteristics and in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1989; 4: 696–701.Google Scholar
Liu, DY, Baker, HW. Defective sperm-zona pellucida interaction: a major cause of failure of fertilization in clinical in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 702–8.Google Scholar
Liu, DY, Baker, HW. Frequency of defective sperm-zona pellucida interaction in severely teratozoospermic infertile men. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 802–7.Google Scholar
Oehninger, S, Coddington, CC, Scott, R, Franken, DR, Burkman, J, Acosta, AA, Hodgen, GD. Hemizon assay: assessment of sperm dysfunction and prediction of in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1989; 1: 665–70.Google Scholar
Dunbar, BS, Wolgemuth, DJ. Structure and function of the mammalian zona pellucida, a unique extracellular matrix. Mod Cell Biol 1984; 3: 77–111.Google Scholar
Nikas, G, Paraschos, T, Psychoyos, A, Handyside, AH. The zona reaction in human oocytes as seen with scanning electron microscopy. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 2135–8.Google Scholar
Lefievre, L, Conner, SJ, Salpekar, A, Olufowobi, O, Ashton, P, Pavlovic, B. Four zona pellucida glycoproteins are expressed in the human. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 1580–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huszar, G, Vique, L, Oehninger, SC. Creatine kinase immunocytochemistry of human sperm-hemizona complexes: selective binding of sperm with mature creatine kinase staining pattern. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 129–35.Google Scholar
Kruger, TF, Oehninger, S, Franken, DR, Hodgen, GD. Hemizona assay: use of fresh versus salt-stored human oocytes to evaluate sperm binding potential to the zona pellucida. J In Vitro Fert Embry Trans 1991; 8: 154–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, TT, Ohzu, E, Yanagimachi, R. Evidence suggesting that L-Fucose is part of a recognition signal for sperm zona pellucida attachment in mammals. Gamete Res 1982; 5: 355–61.Google Scholar
Familiari, G, Nottola, SA, Micara, G, Aragona, C, Motta, PM. Is the sperm-binding capability of the zona pellucida limited to its surface structure? A scanning electron microscopic study of human IVF. J In Vitro Fert Embry Trans 1988; 5: 134–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesarik, J, Kopecny, V. Late preovulatory synthesis of proteoglycans by the human oocyte and cumulus cells and their secretion into the oocyte-cumulus-complex extracellular matrices. Histochem J 1986; 85: 523–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Overstreet, JW, Hembree, WC. Penetration of zona pellucida of non-living human oocytes by human spermatozoa in vitro. Fertil Steril 1976; 27: 815–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkman, LJ, Coddington, CC, Franken, DR. The hemizona assay (HZA): development of a diagnostic test for the binding of human spermatozoa to the human hemizona pellucida to predict fertilization potential. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 688–97.Google Scholar
Liu, DY, Lopata, A, Baker, HWG. Use of oocytes that failed to be fertilized in vitro to study human sperm-oocyte interactions: comparison of sperm-oolemma and sperm-zona pellucida binding, and relationship with results of IVF. Reprod Fertil Dev 1990; 2: 641–50.Google Scholar
Franken, DR, Burkman, LJ, Oehninger, SC, Veeck, L, Kruger, TF, Coddington, CC, Hodgen, GD. The hemizona assay using salt stored human oocytes: evaluation of zona pellucida capacity for binding human spermatozoa. Gam Res 1989; 22: 15–26.Google Scholar
Sigman, M, Baazeem, A, Zini, A. Semen analysis and sperm function assays: what do they mean? Semin Reprod Med 2009; 27: 115–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janssen, M, Ombelet, W, Cox, A, Pollet, H, Franken, DR, Bosmans, S. The hemizona assay: a simplified technique. Arc of Andro 1997; 38: 127–31.Google Scholar
Vasan, SS. Semen analysis and sperm function tests: how much to test? Indian J Urol 2011; 27: 41–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franken, DR, Kruger, TF, Oehninger, SC, Kaskar, K, Hodgen, GD. Sperm binding capacity of human zona pellucida derived from oocytes obtained from different sources. Andrologia 1994; 26: 277–81.Google Scholar
Oehninger, SC, Franken, DR, Elyed, S, Barosso, G, Kolm, P. Sperm function and their predictive value for fertilization in IVF therapy: a meta analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2000; 6: 160–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aitken, RJ. Sperm function tests and fertility. Int J Aandrol 2006; 29: 69–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arslan, M, Morshedi, M, Arslan, EO, Taylor, S, Kanik, A, Duran, HF, Oehninger, S. Predictive value of the hemizona assay for pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 1697–707.Google Scholar
Crosignani, PG, Rubin, BL. Optimal use of infertility diagnostic tests and treatments. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 723–32.Google Scholar
Vogiatzi, P, Chrelias, C, Cahill, DJ, Creatsa, M, Vrachnis, N, Iliodromiti, Z, Kassanos, D, Siristatidis, C. Hemizona assay and sperm penetration assay in the prediction of IVF outcome: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int 2013: 945825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samplaski, MK, Agarwal, A, Sharma, S, Sabanegh, E. New generation of diagnostic tests for infertility: review of specialized semen tests. Int J Urol 2010; 7: 839–47.Google Scholar
Hodgen, GD, Burkman, LJ, Coddington, CC, Franken, DR, Oehninger, S, Kruger, TF, Rosenwaks, Z. The hemizona assay (HZA): finding sperm that have the “right stuff”. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1988; 5: 311–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franken, DR, Kruger, TF, Lombard, CJ, Oehninger, SC, Acosta, AA, Hodgen, GD. The ability of the hemizona assay to predict human fertilisation in different and consecutive in-vitro fertilization cycles. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1240–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Windt, ML, Franken, DR, Kruger, TF, Oehninger, SC. In vitro fertilization failure: identification of gamete defects by investigation of sperm-zona pellucida binding capacity of unfertilized oocytes. Andrologia 1996; 28: 211–15.Google Scholar
Oehninger, S, Morshedi, M, Franken, D. The Hemizona Assay for assessment of sperm function. Methods Mol Biol 2013; 927: 91–102.Google Scholar
Sanchez, R, Finkenzeller, C, Schill, WB, Miska, W. Comparison of two methods to obtain hemizonae pellucidae for sperm function tests. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 2945–7.Google Scholar
Franken, DR, Oehninger, S. The clinical significance of sperm-zona pellucida binding: 17 years later. Front Biosci 2006; 11: 1227–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bleil, JD, Wasserman, PM. Structure and function of the zona pellucida: identification and characterization of the proteins of the mouse oocyte's zona pellucida. Dev Biol 1980; 76: 185–8.Google Scholar
Hammit, DG, Syrop, CH, Walker, DL, Bennet, MR. Conditions of oocyte storage and use of non-inseminated as compared with inseminated, non-fertilized oocytes for the hemizona assay. Fertil Steril 1993; 60: 131–6.Google Scholar
Morroll, DR, Lieberman, BA, Matson, PL. Use of human zonae from cryopreserved oocytes in a test to assess the binding capacity of human spermatozoa. IntJ Androl 1993; 16: 97–103.Google Scholar
Yoshimatsu, NR, Yanagimachi R, , Lopata, A. Zona pellucidae of salt-stored hamster and human eggs: their penetrability by homologous and heterologous spermatozoa. Gamete Res 1988; 21: 115–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henkel, R, Muller, C, Stalf, T, Schill, W-B, Franken, DR. Use of failed-fertilized oocyte for diagnostic zona binding purposes after sperm binding improvement with a modified medium. J Assist Reprod Genet 1999; 16: 24–9.Google Scholar
Henkel, R, Finkenzeller, C, Monsees, T, Franken, DR, Schill, W-B, Miska, W. Development of a new, highly sensitive zona pellucid binding assay using a bioluminescence-enhanced detection system. Andrologia 2001; 33: 215–21.Google Scholar
Romar R, Funahashi H, Coy, P. In vitro fertilization in pigs: new molecules and protocols to consider in the forthcoming years. Theriogenology 2016; 85: 125–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avella, MA, Baibakov, B, Dean, J. A single domain of the ZP2 zona pellucida protein mediates gamete recognition in mice and humans. J Cell Biol 2014; 205: 801–9.Google Scholar
Baibakov, B, Boggs, NA, Yauger, B, Baibakov, G, Dean, J. Human sperm bind to the N-terminal domain of ZP2 in humanized zonae pellucidae in transgenic mice. J Cell Biol 2012; 197: 897–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamze, JG, Canha-Gouveia, A, Algarra, B, Gomez-Torres, MJ, Olivares, MC, Romar, R, Jimenez-Movilla, M. Mammalian spermatozoa and cumulus cells bind to a 3D model generated by recombinant zona pellucida protein-coated beads. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 179–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miranda, PV, Gonzalez-Echeverria, F, Marin-Briggiler, CI, Brandelli, A, Blaquier, JA, Tezon, JG. Glycosidic residues involved in human sperm–zona pellucida binding in vitro. Mol Human Reprod 1997; 3: 399–404.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×