Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T12:39:15.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Antisatellite Weapons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

David A. Koplow
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Law Center
Get access

Summary

Scenario 7

The upcoming war between the United States and Iralia is going to be high-tech. Iralia, a medium-size and more than medium-power country, is even attempting for the first time to exploit outer space for specialized military operations. Although it cannot hope to match the American war fighters in overall satellite technology, Iralia calculates that in three novel applications, turning to the heavens might prove advantageous.

First, although Iralia has no remote sensing satellites of its own, it fully recognizes the value of modern overhead reconnaissance, and it now intends to acquire militarily useful photographic and related data from the satellites of other cooperating countries and foreign private consortia. Some of the contemplated satellite surveillance products are commercially available on the global market; others may be obtainable as concessions from more advanced spacefaring countries that will be officially neutral in the war, but are sympathetic to the Iralian cause.

Iralia figures that these augmented intelligence capabilities may be useful in several ways. As a most obvious example, enhanced meteorology information from space would bolster the ability of the national leadership to know, and to predict, local and regional weather patterns with greater precision and specificity. The Americans, of course, already collect and exploit this kind of information; Iralia hopes to achieve something of a balance in similarly adapting its military operations to the prevailing conditions – and, not incidentally, in being able to forecast better when and where the Americans will decide to undertake their military strikes, too.

Type
Chapter
Information
Death by Moderation
The U.S. Military's Quest for Useable Weapons
, pp. 150 - 187
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bender, Bryan, Pentagon Eyeing Weapons in Space, Boston Globe, March 14, 2006, p. 1
Black, Sam, The Rhetoric of the Rumsfeld Space Commission, Center for Defense Information, January 24, 2007
Bourbonniere, Michel, Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) and the Neutralisation of Satellites or Ius in Bello Satellitis, 9 Journal of Conflict & Security Law No. 1, 2004, p. 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broad, William J., Administration Conducting Research into Laser Weapon, New York Times, May 3, 2006, p. 22
Caldicott, Helen and Eisendrath, Craig, War in Heaven: The Arms Race and Outer Space, 2007
Carter, Ashton, Satellites and Anti-Satellites: The Limits of the Possible, 10 International Security No. 4, Spring 1986, p. 46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton Chun, K.S., Shooting Down a ‘Star’: Program 437, the US Nuclear ASAT System and Present-Day Copycat Killers, CADRE Paper No. 6, Air University Press, Maxwell Air Force Base, April 2000
,Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization (Rumsfeld Commission) Report, January 11, 2001
David, Leonard, The Clutter Above, 61 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists No. 4, July/August 2005, p. 32
Dolman, Everett, Astropolitik: Classical Geopolitics in the Space Age, 2002
Dupont, Daniel G., Nuclear Explosions in Orbit, Scientific American, June 2004, p. 100
Erwin, Sandra I., Threat to Satellite Signals Fuels Demand for Anti-Jam Products, National Defense, June 2000
Everett, Terry, Arguing for a Comprehensive Space Protection Strategy, Strategic Studies Quarterly, Fall 2007, p. 20
,Federation of American Scientists, Space Policy Project, Military Space Programs, http://www.fas.org/spp/military/program/asat/overview.htm
Ferster, Warren and Clark, Colin, NRO Confirms Chinese Laser Test Illuminated U.S. Spacecraft, Space News, October 2, 2006, p. 10
Forden, Geoffrey, After China's Test: Time for a Limited Ban on Anti-Satellite Weapons, 37 Arms Control Today No. 3, April 2007, p. 19Google Scholar
Foster, Jr. John S. et al., Report of the Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack, 2004
Gabrynowicz, Joanne, Space Law: Its Cold War Origins and Challenges in the Era of Globalization, 37 Suffolk University Law Review1041, 2004Google Scholar
Garwin, Richard L., Gottfried, Kurt, and Hafner, Donald L., Anti-Satellite Weapons, 250 Scientific American No. 6, June 1984, p. 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertz, Bill, Moscow, Beijing Eye Space Weapons, Washington Times, January 17, 2007, p. 6Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael R. and Cloud, David S., U.S. Knew of China Missile Test, But Kept Silent, New York Times, April 23, 2007
Grego, Laura, A History of US and Soviet ASAT Programs, Union of Concerned Scientists, April 9, 2003
Hagt, Eric, China's ASAT Test: Strategic Response, China Security, Winter 2007, p. 31
Harrison, Roger G., Jackson, Deron R., and Shackelford, Collins G., Space Deterrence: The Delicate Balance of Risk, Eisenhower Center for Space and Defense Studies, 2009
Hays, Peter L., Smith, James M., Tassel, Alan R., and Walsh, Guy M. (eds.), Spacepower for a New Millennium: Space and U.S. National Security, 2000
Hecht, Jeff, US Plans Anti-Satellite Lasers, New Scientist, May 3, 2006
Hitchens, Theresa, Katz-Hyman, Michael, and Lewis, Jeffrey, U.S. Space Weapons: Big Intentions, Little Focus, 13 Nonproliferation Review No. 1, March 2006, p. 35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchens, Theresa, Testimony before National Security and Foreign Affairs Subcommittee of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, May 23, 2007
Hitchens, Theresa, Code Red? Chinese ASAT Test Raises Debris Threat to EO Sats, Imaging Notes, Summer 2007, p. 36
Hitchens, Theresa, Space Wars: Coming to the Skies Near You? 298 Scientific American No. 3, March 2008, p. 78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoerlin, Herman, United States High-Altitude Test Experiences, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Monograph, October 1976
Isenberg, David, The Newest Anti-Satellite Contender: China's ASAT Test, British American Security Information Council, BASIC Notes, Occasional Paper, March 16, 2007
Johnson-Freese, Joan, China's Space Ambitions, IFRI Security Studies Department, Proliferation Papers, Summer 2007
Joseph, Robert G., Remarks on the President's National Space Policy, December 13, 2006.
Kan, Shirley, China's Anti-Satellite Weapon Test, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, RS22652, April 23, 2007
Kaufman, Marc and Linzer, Dafna, China Criticized for Anti-Satellite Missile Test, Washington Post, January 19, 2007, p. A1
Kochems, Alane and Gudgel, Andrew, The Viability of Directed-Energy Weapons, Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 1931, April 28, 2006
Kosiak, Steven M., Arming the Heavens: A Preliminary Assessment of the Potential Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Space-Based Weapons, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2007
Krepon, Michael with Clary, Christopher, Space Assurance or Space Dominance? The Case Against Weaponizing Space, Henry L. Stimson Center, 2003
Krepon, Michael and Katz-Hyman, Michael, Space Weapons and Proliferation, 12 Nonproliferation Review No. 2, July 2005, p. 323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyl, Jon, China's Anti-Satellite Weapons and American National Security, Heritage Lectures No. 990, January 29, 2007
Lambakis, Steven, On the Edge of the Earth: The Future of American Space Power, 2001
Lewis, Jeffrey, What If Space Were Weaponized? Possible Consequences for Crisis Scenarios, Center for Defense Information, July 2004
Liou, J.-C. and Johnson, N.L., Risks in Space from Orbiting Debris, 311 Science p. 340, January 20, 2006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logsdon, John M. and Adams, Gordon (eds.), Space Weapons: Are They Needed? Space Policy Institute, George Washington University, October 2003
Lyall, Francis and Larsen, Paul B. (eds.), Space Law, 2007
Lyall, Francis and Larsen, Paul B., Space Law: A Treatise, 2009
Mahley, Donald A., The State of Space Security, address to Space Policy Institute conference, George Washington University, January 24, 2008
Moltz, James Clay (ed.), Future Security in Space: Commercial, Military, and Arms Control Trade-Offs, Monterey Institute, Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Occasional Paper No. 10, July 2002
Moore, Mike, Space War – Now We're Jammin'! 61 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists No. 2, March/April 2005, p. 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowthorpe, Matthew, The Revolution in Military Affairs and Directed Energy Weapons, Air & Space Power Chronicles, March 8, 2002
Muradian, Vago, China Tried to Blind U.S. Sats with Laser, Defense News, September 25, 2006, p. 1
Oberg, James, Space Power Theory, 1999
O'Hanlon, Michael E., Neither Star Wars Nor Sanctuary: Constraining the Military Uses of Space, 2004
Petersen, Steven R., Space Control and the Role of Anti-Satellite Weapons, Air University Press, Maxwell Air Force Base, Research Report No. AU-ARI-90–7, May 1991
Petras, Christopher M., The Debate Over the Weaponization of Space: A Military-Legal Conspectus, 28 Annals of Air and Space Law p. 171, 2003Google Scholar
Pike, John and Stambler, Eric, Anti-Satellite Weapons and Arms Control, in Burns, Richard Dean (ed.), Encyclopedia of Arms Control and Disarmament, 1993, vol. 2, p. 991
Pincus, Walter, The New Art of War, Washington Post, March 3, 2008, p. A15
Richelson, Jeffrey T., The Whole World Is Watching, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, January/February 2006, p. 26
Rip, Michael Russell and Hasik, James M., The Precision Revolution: GPS and the Future of Aerial Warfare, 2002
Saunders, Phillip C. and Lutes, Charles D., China's ASAT Test: Motivations and Implications, Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, Special Report, June 2007
Schwellenbach, Nick, Empty Threat? 61 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists No. 5, September/October 2005, p. 50Google Scholar
,Seven Questions: Space Weapons, Part II, Foreign Policy, August 1, 2005
Shixiu, Bao, Deterrence Revisited: Outer Space, China Security, Winter 2007, p. 2
Singer, Jeremy, USAF Interest in Lasers Triggers Concerns About Anti-Satellite Weapons, 17 Space News, May 1, 2006Google Scholar
,Space Security 2007, spacesecurity.org
Spacy, William L. II, Does the United States Need Space-Based Weapons? CADRE Paper, College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education, Air University, September 1999
Stares, Paul B., The Militarization of Space: U.S. Policy, 1945–1984 (1985)
Steer, Ian, High-Altitude Nuclear Explosions: Blind, Deaf and Dumb, Jane's Defence Weekly, October 23, 2002
Stimson, Henry L. Center, Space Security or Space Weapons? A Guide to the Issues, 2005
Tan, Arjun, Badhwar, Gautam D., Allahdadi, Firooz A. and Medina, David F., Analysis of the Solwind Fragmentation Event Using Theory and Computations, 33 Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets No. 1, January/February 1996, p. 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Michael W., Orbital Debris: Technical and Legal Issues and Solutions, thesis at Institute of Air and Space Law, McGill University, August 2006
Tellis, Ashley J., Punching the U.S. Military's ‘Soft Ribs’: China's Anti-Satellite Weapon Test in Strategic Perspective, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Policy Brief No. 51, June 2007
Tellis, Ashley J., China's Military Space Strategy, 49 Survival No. 3, Autumn 2007, p. 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirpak, John A., Space and Counterspace, 89 Air Force Magazine No. 6, June 2006Google Scholar
,Union of Concerned Scientists, Space Weapons and Technical Issues: Debris from China's Kinetic Energy ASAT Test, May, 2007
,United Nations, Technical Report on Space Debris, Report adopted by the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee of the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, A/AC.105/720, 1999
,U.S. Air Force, Counterspace Operations, Air Force Doctrine Document 2–2.1, August 2, 2004
,U.S. Air Force, Space Operations, Doctrine Document 2–2, November 27, 2006
,U.S. Air Force Space Command, Strategic Master Plan FY04 and Beyond, November 5, 2002
,U.S. Air Force Space Command, Satellite Operations, Instruction 10–1204, June 1, 2006
,U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Anti-Satellite Weapons, Countermeasures, and Arms Control, OTA-ISC-281, September 1985
,U.S. Department of Defense, The Military Power of the People's Republic of China, 2005, Annual Report to Congress
,U.S. Department of Defense, Military Power of the People's Republic of China, 2007, Annual Report to Congress
,U.S. National Space Policy, authorized August 31, 2006
Waldrop, Elizabeth S., Weaponization of Outer Space: US National Policy, 26 Annals of Air and Space Law p. 329, 2004Google Scholar
Watts, Barry D., The Military Use of Space: A Diagnostic Assessment, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, February 2001
House, The White, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Interagency Report on Orbital Debris, November 1995
,The White House, National Science and Technology Council, Fact Sheet: National Space Policy, September 19, 1996
,The White House, The Agenda: Defense, http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/defense/
Williams, Christopher D., Space: The Cluttered Frontier, 60 Journal of Air Law & Commerce p. 1139, 1995Google Scholar
Wilson, Clay, High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse (HEMP) and High Power Microwave (HPM) Devices: Threat Assessments, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, RL32544, April 14, 2006
Wilson, George C., Mr. Smith's Crusade, National Journal, August 11, 2001, p. 2542Google Scholar
Wright, David and Grego, Laura, Anti-Satellite Capabilities of Planned US Missile Defence Systems, 68 Disarmament Diplomacy, December 2002-January 2003
Wright, David, Grego, Laura and Gronlund, Lisbeth, The Physics of Space Security: A Reference Manual, 2005
Zhang, Hui, Action/Reaction: U.S. Space Weaponization and China, 35 Arms Control Today No. 10, December 2005, p. 6Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Peter D. and Ferguson, Charles D., Sweeping the Skies, 59 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists No. 6, November/December 2003, p. 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapons Tests in the Atmosphere, in Outer Space and Under Water, signed August 5, 1963, 14 U.S.T. 1313, 480 U.N.T.S. 43, T.I.A.S. No. 5433 (entered into force October 10, 1963) [LTBT]
,Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, January 27, 1967, 18 U.S.T. 2410, 610 U.N.T.S. 205, T.I.A.S. No. 6347 (entered into force October 10, 1967) [Outer Space Treaty or OST]

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×