Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T07:46:48.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Smart Antipersonnel Land Mines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

David A. Koplow
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Law Center
Get access

Summary

Scenario 6

The United States is preparing to assist remote Kafiristan in its defense against an imminent invasion. Kafiristan is small, underdeveloped, and vulnerable; it is likely to be seriously outgunned and outmanned on the battlefield, and the most effective component of its resistance to the aggression is likely to be sheer geography – its mountainous terrain affords the attacker few easy routes for invasion, and most natural conduits are pockmarked by chokepoints and possibilities for ambush.

A hastily drawn strategic plan incorporates as many diverse military elements as the United States, Kafiristan, and a handful of other supporting states are able to cobble together. Air superiority will be crucial, but there is not much time to build up the infrastructure necessary to sustain full-scale aerial operations. Still less feasible is any immediate massive insertion of heavy ground-based equipment – it is not easy to transport large quantities of tanks and artillery into this isolated theater of battle. Even the task of assembling an appreciable pool of military manpower and supplies will consume time and logistics energies. The initial concept of operations, therefore, necessarily emphasizes defensive stalling – a holding operation, to cede ground to the aggressor only slowly, hoping to buy time to permit major reinforcements to arrive.

Land mines figure into the plan in three ways. First, Kafiristan over the years had taken the precaution of erecting solid defensive barriers along its most tempestuous borders. These battlements include expansive fields of emplaced automatic explosives, both antitank mines and antipersonnel mines, designed to complicate the task of an attacker and to slow any advance.

Type
Chapter
Information
Death by Moderation
The U.S. Military's Quest for Useable Weapons
, pp. 132 - 149
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrose, Stephen, Citizen Soldiers, 1997
Bloomfield, Jr. Lincoln P., New Developments in U.S. Approach to Landmines, Department of State briefing, February 27, 2004
Bryce, Robert, Man Versus Mine, Atlantic Monthly, January/February 2006, p. 44
Adm, RearCarroll, Lt Gen (Ret.) EugeneEmerson, Lt Gen (Ret.) HenryHollingsworth, Lt Gen (Ret.) JamesMoore, Lt Gen (Ret.) HaroldPalmer, Dave, Adm, ViceShanahan, Lt Gen (Ret.) JackSmith, Lt Gen (Ret.) DeWittUlmer, Walter, Letter to President George W. Bush, May 19, 2001, quoted in International Committee to Ban Land Mines, Land Mine Monitor Report, 2001
,Center for Security Policy, Hold That Line: JCS Objections Appear Crucial to Retaining American Right to Use Landmines to Save U.S. Troops' Lives, Decision Brief No. 97-D 81, June 18, 1997
Clinton, Bill, New U.S. Land Mine Policy, 11 Defense Issues No. 40, May 16, 1996
Croll, Mike, The History of Landmines, 1998
Dalton, Rex, Geology: Mine Games, 449 Nature p. 968, October 22, 2007
Efaw, Andrew C.S., The United States Refusal to Ban Landmines: The Intersection Between Tactics, Strategy, Policy, and International Law, 159 Military Law Review p. 87, 1999Google Scholar
Gard, Robert G, Alternatives to Antipersonnel Landmines, 1 Vietnam Veterans of America Monograph Series No. 1, Spring 1999
,Human Rights Watch Arms Project, Exposing the Source: U.S. Companies and the Production of Antipersonnel Mines, Vol. 9, No. 2, April 1997
,Human Rights Watch, Position Paper on ‘Smart’ (Self-Destructing) Landmines, 2004
,Human Rights Watch, Back in Business? U.S. Landmine Production and Exports, briefing paper, August 2005
,International Campaign to Ban Landmines, Landmine Monitor Report 2006, 2007, and 2008
,International Committee of the Red Cross, Anti-Personnel Landmines: Friend or Foe? 1996
,Military Consequences of Landmine Restrictions, Dupuy Institute Research Study, 1 Vietnam Veterans of America Monograph Series No. 2, Spring 2000
Rossiter, Caleb, Winning in Korea Without Landmines: Alternatives to Speed Victory and Reduce Allied Casualites, 1 Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation Monograph Series No. 3, Summer 2000
Schneck, William C., The Origins of Military Mines: Parts I and II, Engineering Bulletin, July and November 1998Google Scholar
Sloan, C.E.E., Mine Warfare on Land, 1986, p. 2, cited in John F. Troxell, Landmines: Why the Korea Exception Should Be the Rule, 30 Parameters No. 1, Spring 2000, p. 82
Spring, Baker and Hillen, John, Why a Global Ban on Land Mines Won't Work, Heritage Foundation Executive Memorandum466, January 17, 1997Google Scholar
,U.S. Army Headquarters, Mine/Countermine Operations, Field Manual 20–32, October 1, 2002
,U.S. Defense Science Board Task Force on Munitions System Reliability, September 2005
,U.S. Department of Defense, Report to the Secretary of Defense on the Status of DoD's Implementation of the U.S. Policy on Anti-Personnel Landmines, May 1997
,U.S. Department of Defense, Inspector General Report D-2008–127, Spider XM-7 Network Command Munition, August 29, 2008
,U.S. Department of State, Landmine Policy White Paper, Fact Sheet, February 27, 2004
,U.S. Department of State, New United States Policy on Landmines: Reducing Humanitarian Risk and Saving Lives of United States Soldiers, Fact Sheet, February 27, 2004
,U.S. General Accounting Office, Military Operations: Information on U.S. Use of Land Mines in the Persian Gulf War, GAO-02–1003, September 2002
,U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, letter to Strom Thurmond, Chair, Senate Armed Services Committee, July 10, 1977
1997 Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction, signed December 3, 1997, entered into force July 3, 1998, 36 I.L.M. 1507, 1997 (U.S. not a party) [Ottawa Mine Ban Treaty]
Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects, Oct. 10, 1980, 1342 U.N.T.S. 137, 19 I.L.M. 1523 [CCW]
Hambric, Harry N. and Schneck, William C., The Antipersonnel Mine Threat: A Historical Perspective, Symposium on Technology and the Mine Problem, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, November 18–22, 1996Google Scholar
Dalton, Rex, Geology: Mine Games, 449 Nature p. 968, October 22, 2007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Troxell, John F., Landmines: Why the Korea Exception Should Be the Rule, 30 Parameters No. 1, Spring 2000, p. 82Google Scholar
Bryce, Robert, Man Versus Mine, Atlantic Monthly, January/February 2006, p. 44Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×