Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T08:50:49.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Law of Armed Conflict

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

David A. Koplow
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Law Center
Get access

Summary

Scenario 3

The specter of revolution loomed over Canada in 1837. William MacKenzie's abortive uprising against British rule had been quashed in what is now the province of Ontario, but the remnants of his rebel band retreated into the United States, especially into upstate New York, to regroup and resupply, as well as to recruit new members.

On December 11–13, 1837, in a series of rousing mass meetings in Buffalo, MacKenzie issued a new proclamation for insurrection and earnestly solicited private American citizens to join his quest to oust the British overlords. He established a makeshift headquarters on Navy Island, a small British possession in a narrow portion of the Niagara River. Rallying to his support, an eager American, Rensselaer Van Rensselaer, who had been appointed a general by MacKenzie, raised a “Patriot Army” of 300 and advanced to Navy Island, unfurling a new Canadian flag. Within two weeks, the force had grown to 1000 well-armed men, encamped on Navy Island and also at Black Rock on the American side of the river.

The Caroline was a small steamer (46 tons displacement, 71 feet long), owned by an American and chartered by the rebel force to shuttle men and materiel. On the morning of December 29, the Caroline left Buffalo, called at Black Rock and then at Navy Island, and discharged a quantity of men and freight.

Type
Chapter
Information
Death by Moderation
The U.S. Military's Quest for Useable Weapons
, pp. 55 - 78
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Marie and Zukauskas, Emily (eds.), Operational Law Handbook, U.S. Army Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School, International and Operational Law Department, 2008
Bellinger, John and Haynes, William J., letter to Dr. Jakob Kellenberger, regarding Red Cross Customary International Law Study, November 3, 2006, 46 ILM 511, 2007
Belt, Stuart Walters, Missiles Over Kosovo: Emergence, Lex Lata, of a Customary Norm Requiring the Use of Precision Munitions in Urban Areas, 47 Naval Law Review115, 2000Google Scholar
Benjamin, Mark, When Is an Accidental Civilian Death Not an Accident? Salon.com, July 30, 2007
Bourbonniere, Michel, Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) and the Neutralisation of Satellites or Ius in Bello Satellitis, 9 Journal of Conflict & Security Law No. 1, 2004, p. 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouvier, Antoine, Protection of the Natural Environment in Time of Armed Conflict, International Review of the Red Cross, No. 285, December 31, 1991, p. 567
Correll, John T., Casualties, 86 Air Force Magazine No. 6, June 2003, p. 48Google Scholar
Crawford, III J.W., The Law of Noncombatant Immunity and the Targeting of National Electrical Power Systems, 21 Fletcher Forum of World Affairs No. 2, Summer/Fall 1997, p. 101Google Scholar
Daoust, Isabelle, Coupland, Robin, and Ishoey, Rikke, New Wars, New Weapons? The Obligation of States to Assess the Legality of Means and Methods of Warfare, International Review of the Red Cross No. 846, June 2002, p. 345
Dunlap, Jr. Charles J., Technology: Recomplicating Moral Life for the Nation's Defenders, 29 Parameters No. 3, Autumn 1999, p. 24Google Scholar
Dunlap, Jr. Charles J., The End of Innocence: Rethinking Noncombatancy in the Post-Kosovo Era, 28 Strategic Review, Summer 2000, p. 9Google Scholar
Fleck, Dieter (ed.), The Handbook of Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts, 2008
Gardam, Judith, Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States, 2004
Gonzales, Alberto R., Counsel for the President, Memorandum to the President, Decision Re: Application of the Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War to the Conflict with Al Qaeda and the Taliban, January 25, 2002
Green, James A., Docking the Caroline: Understanding the Relevance of the Formula in Contemporary Customary International Law Concerning Self-Defense, 14 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law429, Fall 2006Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, 2005
Howard, Michael, Andreopoulos, George J., and Shulman, Mark R. (eds.), The Laws of War: Constraints on Warfare in the Western World, 1994
,Human Rights Watch, Off Target: The Conduct of the War and Civilian Casualties in Iraq, 2003
Infeld, Danielle L., Precision Guided Munitions Demonstrated Their Pinpoint Accuracy in Desert Storm; But Is a Country Obligated to Use Precision Technology to Minimize Collateral Civilian Injury and Damage? 26 George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics109, 1992Google Scholar
Jennings, R.Y., The Caroline and McLeod Cases, 32 American Journal of International Law82, 1938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahl, Colin H., How We Fight, 85 Foreign Affairs No. 6, November/December 2006, p. 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalshoven, Frits and Zegveld, Liesbeth, Constraints on the Waging of War: An Introduction to International Humanitarian Law, 2001
Lawand, Karen with Coupland, Robin and Herby, Peter, A Guide to the Legal Review of New Weapons, Means and Methods of Warfare: Measures to Implement Article 36 of Additional Protocol I of 1977, International Committee of the Red Cross, January 2006
McClelland, Justin, The Review of Weapons in Accordance with Article 36 of Additional Protocol I, International Review of the Red Cross, No. 850, June 2003, p. 397
Moore, John Bassett, A Digest of International Law, volume II, sec. 217, 1906
Moore, John Norton and Turner, Robert F. (eds.), National Security Law (2nd ed.), 2005
Murphy, John F., Some Legal (and a Few Ethical) Dimensions of the Collateral Damage Resulting from NATO's Kosovo Campaign, in Wall, Andru E. (ed.), Legal and Ethical Lessons of NATO's Kosovo Campaign, Naval War College, vol. 78, 2002Google Scholar
Occelli, Maria Benvenuta, ‘Sinking’ the Caroline: Why the Caroline Doctrine's Restrictions on Self-Defense Should Not Be Regarded as Customary International Law, 4 San Diego International Law Journal467, 2003Google Scholar
O'Connell, Mary Ellen, International Law and the Use of Force: Cases and Materials, 2005
Parks, W. Hays, Air War and the Law of War, 32 Air Force Law Review p. 1, 1990Google Scholar
Pictet, Jean, Development and Principles of International Humanitarian Law, 1985
Puckett, Christopher B., In This Era of ‘Smart Weapons,’ Is a State Under an International Legal Obligation to Use Precision-Guided Technology in Armed Conflict? 18 Emory International Law Review645, Fall 2004Google Scholar
Rawcliffe, John T., Changes to the Department of Defense Law of War Program, Army Lawyer, August 2006, p. 23
Reynolds, Jefferson D., Collateral Damage on the 21st Century Battlefield: Enemy Exploitation of the Law of Armed Conflict, and the Struggle for a Moral High Ground, Air Force Law Review, Winter 2005
Rizer, Kenneth R., Bombing Dual-Use Targets: Legal, Ethical, and Doctrinal Perspectives, Air & Space Power Chronicles, May 1, 2001
Robinson, Paul, ‘Ready to Kill but Not to Die,’ 54 International Journal, Autumn 1999, p. 671Google Scholar
Roblyer, Dwight A., Beyond Precision: Issues of Morality and Decision Making in Minimizing Collateral Casualties, Program in Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security, University of Illinois, April 28, 2003
Rogers, A.P.V., Zero-Casualty Warfare, International Review of the Red Cross No. 837, March 31, 2000, p. 165
Rogers, A.P.V., Law on the Battlefield (2nd ed.), 2004
Rogoff, Martin A. and Collins, Jr. Edward, The Caroline Incident and the Development of International Law, 16 Brooklyn Journal of International Law No. 3, p. 493, 1990Google Scholar
Rouillard, Louis-Philippe, The Caroline Case: Anticipatory Self-Defence in Contemporary International Law, 1 Miskolc Journal of International Law No. 2, p. 104, 2004Google Scholar
Rudesill, Dakota S., Precision War and Responsibility: Transformational Military Technology and the Duty of Care Under the Laws of War, 32 Yale Journal of International Law517, Summer 2007Google Scholar
Sassoli, Marco, Legitimate Targets of Attacks under International Humanitarian Law, International Humanitarian Law Research Institute, Harvard University, January 2003Google Scholar
Sassoli, Marco and Bouvier, Antoine A., How Does Law Protect in War? Cases, Documents, and Teaching Materials on Contemporary Practice in International Humanitarian Law, 1999
Schmitt, Eric, Rumsfeld Says Dozens of Important Targets Have Been Avoided, New York Times, March 24, 2003, p. B12
Schmitt, Michael N., Bellum Americanum: The U.S. View of Twenty-First Century War and Its Possible Implications for the Law of Armed Conflict, 19 Michigan Journal of International Law1051, 1997–98Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., War, Technology, and International Humanitarian Law, Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Resolution, Harvard University, Occasional Paper No. 4, Summer 2005Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., Precision Attack and International Humanitarian Law, International Review of the Red Cross No. 859, September 2005, p. 445
Schmitt, Michael N., Effects-Based Operations and the Law of Aerial Warfare, 5 Washington University Global Studies Law Review265, 2006Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth R., Border Diplomacy: The Caroline and McLeod Affairs in Anglo-American-Canadian Relations, 1837–1842, 1989
Swiney, Gabriel, Saving Lives: The Principle of Distinction and the Realities of Modern War, 39 International Lawyer No. 3, Fall 2005, p. 733Google Scholar
Thomas, Ward, The Ethics of Destruction: Norms and Force in International Relations, 2001
,U.S. Air Force Intelligence Targeting Guide, Air Force Pamphlet 14–210, February 1, 1998
,U.S. Army, Field Manual 27–10, The Law of Land Warfare, July 18, 1956
,U.S. Department of Defense Directive 5000.1, The Defense Acquisition System, May 12, 2003
,U.S. Department of Defense Directive 2311. 01E, DoD Law of War Program, May 9, 2006
Creveld, Martin, The Transformation of War, 1991
Waldrop, Elizabeth S., Weaponization of Outer Space: U.S. National Policy, 26 Annals of Air and Space Law p. 329, 2004Google Scholar
Wallace, David A., Battling Terrorism Under the Law of War, Military Review, September/October 2007, p. 101
Wallis, Catherine, Legitimate Targets of Attack: Considerations When Targeting in a Coalition, Army Lawyer, December 2004, p. 44
Waxman, Matthew C., International Law and the Politics of Urban Air Operations, RAND Project Air Force, 2000
Wingfield, Thomas C., The Law of Information Conflict: National Security Law in Cyberspace, 2000
Declaration Renouncing the Use, in Time of War, of Explosive Projectiles Under 400 Grammes Weight, adopted at St. Petersburg by the International Military Commission, December 11, 1868
Convention (No. IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, concluded at the Hague, October 18, 1907, U.S.T.S. 539, 36 Stat. 2277, 1 Bevans 631 (entered into force January 26, 1910)
Protocol Additional (No. I) to the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts, June 8, 1977, 1125 U.N.T.S. 3, 16 I.L.M. 1391 (1977) (United States not a party)
Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to Be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects, Oct. 10, 1980, 1342 U.N.T.S. 137, 19 I.L.M. 1523
Jennings, R.Y., The Caroline and McLeod Cases, 32 American Journal of International Law82, 1938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouillard, Louis-Philippe, The Caroline Case: Anticipatory Self-Defence in Contemporary International Law, 1 Miskolc Journal of International Law No. 2, p. 104, 2004Google Scholar
Green, James A., Docking the Caroline: Understanding the Relevance of the Formula in Contemporary Customary International Law Concerning Self-Defense, 14 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law429, Fall 2006Google Scholar
Occelli, Maria Benvenuta, ‘Sinking’ the Caroline: Why the Caroline Doctrine's Restrictions on Self-Defense Should Not Be Regarded as Customary International Law, 4 San Diego International Law Journal467, 2003Google Scholar
Belt, Stuart Walters, Missiles Over Kosovo: Emergence, Lex Lata, of a Customary Norm Requiring the Use of Precision Munitions in Urban Areas, 47 Naval Law Review115, 2000Google Scholar
Infeld, Danielle L., Precision Guided Munitions Demonstrated Their Pinpoint Accuracy in Desert Storm; But Is a Country Obligated to Use Precision Technology to Minimize Collateral Civilian Injury and Damage? 26 George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics109, 1992Google Scholar
Puckett, Christopher B., In This Era of ‘Smart Weapons,’ Is a State Under an International Legal Obligation to Use Precision-Guided Technology in Armed Conflict? 18 Emory International Law Review645, Fall 2004Google Scholar
Waldrop, Elizabeth S., Weaponization of Outer Space: U.S. National Policy, 26 Annals of Air and Space Law, p. 329, 2004Google Scholar
Schmitt, Eric, Rumsfeld Says Dozens of Important Targets Have Been Avoided, New York Times, March 24, 2003, p. B12

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×