Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T09:14:26.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Precision-Guided Munitions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

David A. Koplow
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Law Center
Get access

Summary

Scenario 4

The United States is preparing to fight a limited war in Belovenia – a very limited war. The motivation for entering the conflict is noble enough, with pure, generous humanitarianism at its core. Over the past year, Americans have been shocked and outraged as the Belovenian government has undertaken a particularly rapacious program of repression against its own ethnic minority. The government has stripped members of the minority of many of their fundamental human rights, depriving them of civil and political freedoms and degrading their social and cultural identity. Most recently, the government has undertaken an even more vigorous program of “ethnic cleansing,” expelling minority families from their homes in the southern province of the country, revoking their citizenship, firing them from their jobs, expelling their children from schools, and generating a flood of vagabond refugees. Their property has been confiscated, their personal effects and official papers have been destroyed, and their cultural icons obliterated. At length, horrifying violence has erupted, arousing the conscience of the world to the specter of genocide: there are widespread reports of government-orchestrated mass killings and rapes targeted at the minority populations.

Many members of the United Nations have expressed their alarm and demanded immediate, forceful action, but Belovenia still enjoys the stalwart support of one of the permanent members of the Security Council. The threat of a veto has therefore blocked any meaningful Resolution authorizing international military action under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. Diplomatic pressure and economic sanctions have proven unavailing; while the world searches in vain for some means to gain traction on the problem, the government of Belovenia continues its daily carnage.

Type
Chapter
Information
Death by Moderation
The U.S. Military's Quest for Useable Weapons
, pp. 79 - 103
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arkin, William, Smart Bombs, Dumb Targeting? 56 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists No. 3, May/June 2000, p. 46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacevich, A.J. and Kaplan, Lawrence F., The Clinton Doctrine, The Weekly Standard, September 30, 1996, p. 16Google Scholar
Belt, Stuart Walters, Missiles Over Kosovo: Emergence, Lex Lata, of a Customary Norm Requiring the Use of Precision Munitions in Urban Areas, 47 Naval Law Review115, 2000Google Scholar
Colucci, Frank, Small Precision Bomb Program on Fast Track, 89 National Defense, No. 608, July 2004, p. 40Google Scholar
Crawford, III J.W., The Law of Noncombatant Immunity and the Targeting of National Electrical Power Systems, 21 Fletcher Forum of World Affairs101, 1997Google Scholar
Digby, James, Precision-Guided Weapons, Adelphi Paper No. 118, International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1975
Dunlap, Jr. Charles J., Technology and the 21st Century Battlefield: Recomplicating Moral Life for the Statesman and the Soldier, U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, January 15, 1999
Dunnigan, James F., Digital Soldiers: The Evolution of High-Tech Weaponry and Tomorrow's Brave New Battlefield, 1996
Eikenberry, Karl W., Take No Casualties, 26 Parameters No. 2, Summer 1996Google Scholar
Erwin, Sandra I., Threat to Satellite Signals Fuels Demand for Anti-Jam Products, National Defense, June 2000
Fiscus, Thomas J., Requested Legal Review of the Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) Weapon, U.S. Department of the Air Force memorandum, March 21, 2003
George, and Friedman, Meredith, The Future of War: Power, Technology, and American World Dominance in the 21st Century, 1996
Friedman, Norman, A Problem with Precision? 127 Proceedings of the U.S. Naval Institute No. 4, April 2001, p. 4Google Scholar
Fulghum, David A., What a Blast, 159 Aviation Week and Space Technology No. 20, November 17, 2003, p. 68Google Scholar
Hallion, Richard P., Precision Guided Munitions and the New Era of Warfare, Air Power Studies Centre, Royal Australian Air Force, Working Paper No. 53, 1995
Hambling, David, Blast Reduction, Defense Technology International, September 2007, p. 54
Human Rights Watch, Civilian Deaths in the NATO Air Campaign, vol. 12, no. 1, February 2000
Human Rights Watch, Off Target: The Conduct of the War and Civilian Casualties in Iraq, December 11, 2003, http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2003/12/11/target-0
Infeld, Danielle L., Precision-Guided Munitions Demonstrated Their Pinpoint Accuracy in Desert Storm; But Is a Country Obligated to Use Precision Technology to Minimize Collateral Civilian Injury and Damage? 26 George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics109, 1992Google Scholar
Jaffe, Greg, To Fight Terrorists, Air Force Seeks a Bomb With Less Bang, Wall Street Journal, April 6, 2006, p. 1Google Scholar
Kahl, Colin H., How We Fight, 85 Foreign Affairs No. 6, November/December 2006, p. 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Harold, Precision Weapons Command More Attention, Resources, National Defense, March 2003, p. 36
Lambeth, Benjamin S., The Transformation of American Air Power, 2000
Mandel, Robert, The Wartime Utility of Precision Versus Brute Force in Weaponry, 30 Armed Forces & Society No. 2, Winter 2004, p. 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, Robert, Security, Strategy, and the Quest for Bloodless War, 2004
Mazarr, Michael J., Shaffer, Jeffrey, and Ederington, Benjamin, The Military Technical Revolution: A Structural Framework, Center for Strategic and International Studies, March 1993
Meilinger, Phillip S., A Matter of Precision, Foreign Policy, March/April 2001, p. 78
Meilinger, Phillip S., Precision Aerospace Power, Discrimination, and the Future of War, 15 Aerospace Power Journal No. 3, Fall 2001, p. 12Google Scholar
Mets, David R., The Long Search for a Surgical Strike: Precision Munitions and the Revolution in Military Affairs, CADRE Paper No. 12, Air University Press, College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education, October 2001
Mok, Michael, Precision Guided Munitions, 2002
Powell, Colin, My American Journey, 1995
Project on Defense Alternatives, Operation Enduring Freedom: Why a Higher Rate of Civilian Bombing Casualties, Briefing Report No. 11, January 18, 2002, revised January 24, 2002
Puckett, Christopher B., In This Era of ‘Smart Weapons,’ Is a State Under an International Legal Obligation to Use Precision-Guided Technology in an Armed Conflict? 18 Emory International Law Review645, Fall 2004Google Scholar
Rip, Michael Russell and Hasik, James M., The Precision Revolution: GPS and the Future of Aerial Warfare, 2002
Thomas, Ward, The Ethics of Destruction: Norms and Force in International Relations, 2001
Tirpak, John A., The First Six Weeks, 82 Air Force Magazine No. 6, June 1999Google Scholar
Tirpak, John A., Precision: The Next Generation, 86 Air Force Magazine No. 11, November 2003Google Scholar
,U.S. Air Force, Fact Sheets, http://www.af.mil/factsheets/index.asp
U.S. General Accounting Office, Weapons Acquisition: Precision Guided Munitions in Inventory, Production, and Development, GAO/NSIAD-95-95, June 1995
Watts, Barry D., The Military Use of Space: A Diagnostic Assessment, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, February 2001
Wrage, Stephen, When War Isn't Hell: A Cautionary Tale, 102 Current History No. 660, January 2003, p. 32Google Scholar
Digby, James, Precision-Guided Weapons, Adelphi Paper No. 118, International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1975, p. 1
George, and Friedman, Meredith, The Future of War: Power, Technology, and American World Dominance in the 21st Century, 1996, p. 270
Hallion, Richard P., Precision Guided Munitions and the New Era of Warfare, Air Power Studies Centre, Royal Australian Air Force, Working Paper No. 53, 1995
Belt, Stuart Walters, Missiles Over Kosovo: Emergence, Lex Lata, of a Customary Norm Requiring the Use of Precision Munitions in Urban Areas, 47 Naval Law Review115, 117, 2000Google Scholar
Mandel, Robert, The Wartime Utility of Precision Versus Brute Force in Weaponry, 30 Armed Forces & Society No. 2, Winter 2004, p. 171, 186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirpak, John A., Precision: The Next Generation, 86 Air Force Magazine No. 11, November 2003Google Scholar
Watts, Barry D., The Military Use of Space: A Diagnostic Assessment, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, February 2001, pp. 42–43
Hambling, David, Blast Reduction, Defense Technology International, September 2007, p. 54
Meilinger, Phillip S., A Matter of Precision, Foreign Policy, March/April 2001, p. 78
Kahl, Colin H., How We Fight, 85 Foreign Affairs No. 6, November/December 2006, p. 83, 88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkin, William, Smart Bombs, Dumb Targeting? 56 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists No. 3, May/June 2000, p. 46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Infeld, Danielle L., Precision-Guided Munitions Demonstrated Their Pinpoint Accuracy in Desert Storm; But Is a Country Obligated to Use Precision Technology to Minimize Collateral Civilian Injury and Damage? 26 George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics109, 1992Google Scholar
Puckett, Christopher B., In This Era of ‘Smart Weapons,’ Is a State Under an International Legal Obligation to Use Precision-Guided Technology in an Armed Conflict? 18 Emory International Law Review645 (Fall 2004)Google Scholar
Mazarr, Michael J., Shaffer, Jeffrey, and Ederington, Benjamin, The Military Technical Revolution: A Structural Framework, Center for Strategic and International Studies, March 1993, p. 26
Bacevich, A.J. and Kaplan, Lawrence F., The Clinton Doctrine, The Weekly Standard, September 30, 1996, p. 16, 20–21Google Scholar
Wrage, Stephen, When War Isn't Hell: A Cautionary Tale, 102 Current History No. 660, January 2003, p. 32Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×