Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T05:18:25.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Prejudice Against Immigrants in Multicultural Societies

from Part II - Prejudice in Specific Domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2016

Colleen Ward
Affiliation:
Victoria University
Agnes Szabo
Affiliation:
Victoria University
Jaimee Stuart
Affiliation:
Victoria University
Chris G. Sibley
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Fiona Kate Barlow
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Get access

Summary

Migration is one of the most ancient traditions of humankind. From the beginning of human history, people have been moving places and crossing cultural and societal borders to search for new opportunities and a better life or to flee from war and natural disasters. Although migration is not a modern phenomenon, because of recent technological advancements in communication and transportation, moving across countries has become easier than ever before. This has resulted in a marked worldwide increase in the migrant stock over the past 50 years. In 2013, more than 230 million people were living as international immigrants, and it is projected that the migrant population will reach 400 million by 2050 (Martin, 2013).

Globally, four major migration pathways can be identified. The largest exchange (36%) occurs between regions of the Global South, that is, people from less affluent countries moving to other undeveloped regions. The second largest flow (35%) goes from the Global South to the Global North, that is, people from undeveloped regions migrating to the developed world. It is worth noting that the South to North migration continues to rise and is soon expected to become the primary trend. International relocation within the Global North is also considerable (23%), whereas North to South migration contributes only a small proportion (6%) to the global trends. Although there are no notable gender differences in migration trends, age appears to be a significant factor. Of all immigrants, 15% are younger than age 20, and approximately 74% belong to the working-age population. In sum, the majority of international immigrants (59%) currently reside in the developed world, where, according to recent statistics, migration has become the primary source of population growth, highlighting its growing significance in terms of economic prosperity and sustainable social development (UN, 2013).

At the same time, it is important to recognize that migration is not just an economic matter; it also has important implications for individuals and societies. As a result of globalization, demographic expansion, and increasing diversity within and across nations, plural societies are facing a wide range of social issues stemming from a multicultural reality, in which firsthand intercultural contact is an indispensable part of everyday experiences. Navigating these multiethnic contemporary societies has become increasingly complex and challenging, fostering public resistance to immigration and negative intergroup attitudes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B., & Araya, T. (2000). Classical and modern racial prejudice: A study of attitudes toward immigrants in Sweden. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(4), 521–532. doi: 10.1002/1099-0992(200007/08)30:4<521::Aid-Ejsp5>3.0.Co;2-N3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other authoritarian personality. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Apfelbaum, E. P., Norton, M. I., & Sommers, S. R. (2012). Racial color blindness: Emergence, practice, and implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 205–209. doi: 10.1177/0963721411434980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1980). Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In Padilla, A. M. (Ed.), Acculturation: Theory, models and some new findings (pp. 9–25). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review 46(1), 5–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 615–631. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. (2003). Conceptual approaches to acculturation. In Chung, K., Organista, P. Balls, & Marin, G. (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research (pp. 17–37). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Berry, J. W. (2006). Mutual attitudes among immigrants and ethnocultural groups in Canada. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 719–734. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W., & Kalin, R. (1995). Multicultural and ethnic attitudes in Canada: An overview of the 1991 national survey. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 27(3), 301–320. doi: 10.1037/0008-400x.27.3.301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W., Kalin, R., & Taylor, D. M. (1977). Multiculturalism and ethnic attitudes in Canada. Ottawa: Minister of State for Multiculturalism.
Berry, J. W., Phinney, J., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (2006). Immigrant youth in cultural transition: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation across national contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Berry, J. W., & Sam, D. L. (2016). Theoretical perspectives. In Berry, J. W. & Sam, D. L. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology (ed., pp. 11–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Billiet, J., Maddens, B., & Beerten, R. (2003). National identity and attitude toward foreigners in a multinational state: A replication. Political Psychology, 24(2), 241–257. doi: 10.1111/0162-895x.00327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A.Leyens, J. P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843–856. doi: 10.1037/A0013470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloemraad, I., & Wright, M. (2014). “Utter failure” or unity out of diversity? Debating and evaluating policies of multiculturalism. International Migration Review, 48, 292–334. doi: 10.1111/Imre.12135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourhis, R. Y., Moïse, L. C., Perreault, S., & Senècal, S. (1997). Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32(6), 369–386. doi: 10.1080/002075997400629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breugelmans, S. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2004). Antecedents and components of majority attitudes toward multiculturalism in the Netherlands. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(3), 400–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00177.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255–343). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Christ, O., Schmid, K., Lolliot, S., Swart, H., Stolle, D., Tausch, N.Hewstone, M. (2014). Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(11), 3996–4000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320901111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correll, J., Park, B., & Smith, J. A. (2008). Colorblind and multicultural prejudice reduction strategies in high-conflict situations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11(4), 471–491. doi: 10.1177/1368430208095401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of “we”: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(1), 3–20. doi: 10.1177/1088868308326751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 389–412. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Semenya, A. H., & Jackson, L. M. (2005). Attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: The role of national and international identity. In Abrams, D., Hogg, M. A., & Marques, J. M. (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 317–337). New York: Psychology Press.
Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54(4), 699–724. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.911998091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., & Bennett-AbuAyyash, C. (2010). Intergroup competition. In Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. M. (Eds.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 225–240). London: Sage.
Esses, V. M., Wagner, U., Wolf, C., Preiser, M., & Wilbur, C. J. (2006). Perceptions of national identity and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration in Canada and Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 653–669. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20(3–4), 271–290. doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(96)00019-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Research, 25(2), 224–249. doi: 10.1177/1046496494252005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieling, M., Thijs, J., & Verkuyten, M. (2014). Dutch adolescents’ tolerance of Muslim immigrants: The role of assimilation ideology, intergroup contact, and national identification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(3), 155–165. doi: 10.1111/Jasp.12220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasford, D. E., & Dovidio, J. F. (2011). E pluribus unum: Dual identity and minority group members’ motivation to engage in contact, as well as social change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 1021–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guimond, S. (2000). Group socialization and prejudice: The social transmission of intergroup attitudes and beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(3), 335–354. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200005/06)30:33.0.CO;2-VCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guimond, S., Crisp, R. J., De Oliveira, P., Kamiejski, R., Kteily, N., Kuepper, B.Zick, A. (2013). Diversity policy, social dominance, and intergroup relations: Predicting prejudice in changing social and political contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6), 941–958. doi: 10.1037/A0032069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N., & Duarte, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 697–721. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guimond, S., de la Sablonnière, R., & Nugier, A. (2014). Living in a multicultural world: Intergroup ideologies and the societal context of intergroup relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 25(1), 142–188. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2014.957578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewstone, M. (2015). Consequences of diversity for social cohesion and prejudice: The missing dimension of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 71(2), 417–438. doi: 10.1111/Josi.12120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindriks, P., Verkuyten, M., & Coenders, M. (2014). Interminority attitudes: The roles of ethnic and national identification, contact, and multiculturalism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77(1), 54–74. doi: 10.1177/0190272513511469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, E. S. (1995). The challenge of culture change: The cross-cultural adaptation of Hong Kong Chinese adolescent immigrants in New Zealand. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Hamilton: University of Waikato.
Hooghe, M., Trappers, A., Meuleman, B., & Reeskens, T. (2008). Migration to European countries: A structural explanation of patterns, 1980–2004. International Migration Review, 42(2), 476–504. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2008.00132.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, B. P. H., Chen, S. X., Leung, C. M., & Berry, J. W. (2015). Facilitating adaptation and intercultural contact: The role of integration and multicultural ideology in dominant and non-dominant groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 45, 70–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, L. M., & Esses, V. M. (2000). Effects of perceived economic competition on people's willingness to help empower immigrants. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 419–435. doi: 10.1177/1368430200003004006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Liebkind, K., Horenczyk, G., & Schmitz, P. (2003). The interactive nature of acculturation: Perceived discrimination, acculturation attitudes and stress among young ethnic repatriates in Finland, Israel and Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(1), 79–97. doi: Pii S0147-1767(02)00061-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesler, C., & Bloemraad, I. (2010). Does immigration erode social capital? The conditional effects of immigration-generated diversity on trust, membership, and participation across 19 countries, 1981–2000. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 319–347. doi: 10.1017/S0008423910000077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, R., Statham, P., Giugni, M., & Passy, F. (2005). Contested citizenship: Immigration and cultural diversity in Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kosic, A., Mannetti, L., & Sam, D. L. (2005). The role of majority attitudes towards outgroup in the perception of the acculturation strategies of immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(3), 273–288. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (2012). Multiculturalism: Success, failure, and the future. Report for the Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from www.migrationpolicy.org/research/TCM-multiculturalism-success-failure
Leong, C. H. (2008). A multilevel research framework for the analyses of attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(2), 115–129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P. (2013). The global challenge of managing migration. Report by the Population Reference Bureau. Population Bulletin, 68, 2–18.Google Scholar
Martinovic, B., & Verkuyten, M. (2013). “We were here first, so we determine the rules of the game”: Autochthony and prejudice towards outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(7), 637–647. doi: 10.1002/Ejsp.1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masgoret, A. M. (2004, August). Examining the bases of intergroup competition and its role in determining immigration attitudes in New Zealand. Paper presented at the XXVI International Conference of Psychology, Beijing, China.
Mayda, A. M. (2006). Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(3), 510–530. doi: 10.1162/rest.88.3.510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meuleman, B., Davidov, E., & Billiet, J. (2009). Changing attitudes toward immigration in Europe, 2002–2007: A dynamic group conflict theory approach. Social Science Research, 38(2), 352–365. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montreuil, A., & Bourhis, R. Y. (2001). Majority acculturation orientations toward “valued” and “devalued” immigrants. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(6), 698–719. doi: 10.1177/0022022101032006004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mummendey, A., Klink, A., & Brown, R. (2001). Nationalism and patriotism: National identification and outgroup rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 159–172. doi: 10.1348/014466601164740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navas, M., Rojas, A. J., Garcia, M., & Pumares, P. (2007). Acculturation strategies and attitudes according to the relative acculturation extended model (RAEM): The perspectives of natives versus immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(1), 67–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 173–185. doi: 10.1177/0146167297232006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phinney, J., Berry, J. W., Vedder, P., & Liebkind, K. (2006). The acculturation experience: Attitudes, identities and behaviors of immigrant youth. In Berry, J. W., Phinney, J., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (Eds.), Immigrant youth in cultural transition: Acculturation, identity and adaptation across national contexts (pp. 71–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Piontkowski, U., Florack, A., Hoelker, P., & Obdrzalek, P. (2000). Predicting acculturation attitudes of dominant and non-dominant groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00020-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piontkowski, U., Rohmann, A., & Florack, A. (2002). Concordance of acculturation attitudes and perceived threat. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 221–232. doi: 10.1177/1368430202005003003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaut, V. C., Garnett, F. G., Buffardi, L. E., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2011). “What about me?” Perceptions of exclusion and Whites’ reactions to multiculturalism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 337–353. doi: 10.1037/A0022832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, K. J., Batalha, L., Subasic, M., & Jones, B. M. (2015). The social psychology of social (dis)harmony: Implications for political leaders and public policy. In Forgas, J. P., Fiedler, K., & Crano, W. D. (Eds.), Social psychology and politics (pp. 337–356). New York: Psychology Press.
Richeson, J. A., & Nussbaum, R. J. (2004). The impact of multiculturalism versus color-blindness on racial bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(3), 417–423. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohmann, A., Florack, A., & Piontkowski, U. (2006). The role of discordant acculturation attitudes in perceived threat: An analysis of host and immigrant attitudes in Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 683–702. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, C. S., Casas, J. F., & Thompson, B. K. (2010). Interethnic ideology, intergroup perceptions, and cultural orientation. Journal of Social Issues, 66(1), 29–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01631.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, S. J., & Vorauer, J. D. (2013). Ignoring versus exploring differences between groups: Effects of salient color-blindness and multiculturalism on intergroup attitudes and behavior. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 246–259. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalk-Soekar, S. (2007). Multiculturalism: A stable concept with many ideological and political aspects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Tilburg, the Netherlands: Tilburg University.
Scheepers, P., Gijsberts, M., & Coenders, M. (2002). Ethnic exclusionism in European countries: Public opposition to civil rights for legal migrants as a response to perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 18(1), 17–34. doi: 10.1093/Esr/18.1.17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, K., Al Ramiah, A., & Hewstone, M. (2014). Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: The role of intergroup contact and perceived threat. Psychological Science, 25(3), 665–674. doi: 10.1177/0956797613508956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, S. L. (2008). Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: Outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review, 24(1), 53–67. doi: 10.1093/Esr/Jcm034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semyonov, M., Raijman, R., & Gorodzeisky, A. (2006). The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment in European societies, 1988–2000. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 426–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Stephan, W. G., Diaz-Loving, R., & Duran, A. (2000). Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes – Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(2), 240–249. doi: 10.1177/0022022100031002006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G., Renfro, C. L., Esses, V. M., Stephan, C. W., & Martin, T. (2005). The effects of feeling threatened on attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.04.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In Oskamp, S. (Ed.), Claremont symposium on applied psychology (pp. 23–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Bachman, G. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(11), 2221–2237. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00107.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., Martinez, C. M., Schwarzwald, J., & Tur-Kaspa, M. (1998). Prejudice toward immigrants to Spain and Israel: An integrated threat theory analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(4), 559–576. doi: 10.1177/0022022198294004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolle, D., Soroka, S., & Johnston, R. (2008). When does diversity erode trust? Neighborhood diversity, interpersonal trust and the mediating effect of social interactions. Political Studies, 56(1), 57–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00717.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, J., & Ward, C. (2015, June). The construction and validation of the Subjective Multiculturalism Scale. Paper presented at the IX Biennial Conference of the International Academy for Intercultural Research, Bergen, Norway.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. New York: Academic Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. & Austin, W. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Tip, L. K., Zagefka, H., Gonzalez, R., Brown, R., Cinnirella, M., & Na, X. (2012). Is support for multiculturalism threatened by … threat itself? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(1), 22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (2013). International migration report 2013. New York: Author.CrossRef
Van Oudenhoven, J. P., Groenewoud, J. T., & Hewstone, M. (1996). Cooperation, ethnic salience and generalization of interethnic attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 649–661. doi: 10.1002/(Sici)1099-0992(199607)26:4<649::Aid-Ejsp780>3.0.Co;2-T3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oudenhoven, J. P., Prins, K. S., & Buunk, P. B. (1998). Attitudes of minority and majority members towards adaptation of immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 995–1013. doi: 10.1002/(Sici)1099– 0992(1998110)28:6<995::Aid-Ejsp908>3.0.Co;2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vedder, P., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Liebkind, K. (2006). Predicting immigrant youths’ adaptation across countries and ethno-cultural groups. In Berry, J. W., Phinney, J., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (Eds.), Immigrant youth in cultural transition: Acculturation, identity and adaptation across national contexts (pp. 143–166). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Verkuyten, M. (2009a). Self-esteem and multiculturalism: An examination among ethnic minority and majority groups in the Netherlands. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 419–427. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyten, M. (2009b). Support for multiculturalism and minority rights: The role of national identification and outgroup threat. Social Justice Research, 22(1), 31–52. doi: 10.1007/s11211-008-0087-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkuyten, M. (2010). Multicultural recognition and ethnic minority rights: A social identity perspective. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 148–184. doi: 10.1080/10463280600937418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voci, A., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 37–54. doi: 10.1177/1368430203006001011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorauer, J. D., & Sasaki, S. J. (2011). In the worst rather than the best of times: Effects of salient intergroup ideology in threatening intergroup interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 307–320. doi: 10.1037/A0023152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, C. (2009). Acculturation and social cohesion: Emerging issues for Asian immigrants in New Zealand. In Leong, C. H. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Intercultural relations in Asia: Migration and work effectiveness (pp. 3–22). Singapore: World Scientific.
Ward, C., Bochner, S., & Furnham, A. (2001). The psychology of culture shock. London: Routledge.
Ward, C., & Kus, L. (2012). Back to and beyond Berry's basics: The conceptualization, operationalization and classification of acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(4), 472–485. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, C., & Leong, C. H. (2006). Intercultural relations in plural societies: Theory, research and application. In Sam, D. L. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology (pp. 484–503). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ward, C., & Masgoret, A. M. (2006). An integrative model of attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(6), 671–682. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, C., & Masgoret, A. M. (2008). Attitudes toward immigrants, immigration, and multiculturalism in New Zealand: A social psychological analysis. International Migration Review, 42(1), 227–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00119.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, C., & Stuart, J. (2013, June). Population, policy and psychology: The impact of multiculturalism on the psychological well-being of immigrant youth. Paper presented at the North American Regional Conference of the International Association for Cross-cultural Psychology, Los Angeles, CA.
Wolsko, C., Park, B., & Judd, C. (2006). Considering the Tower of Babel: Correlates of assimilation and multiculturalism among ethnic minority and majority groups in the United States. Social Justice Research, 19, 277–306. doi: 10.1007/s11211-006-0014-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, M., & Bloemraad, I. (2012). Is there a trade-off between multiculturalism and socio-political integration? Policy regimes and immigrant incorporation in comparative perspective. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 77–95. doi: 10.1017/S1537592711004919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagefka, H., & Brown, R. (2002). The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit and intergroup relations: Immigrant-majority relations in Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(2), 171–188. doi: 10.1002/Ejsp.73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Broquard, M., & Martin, S. L. (2007). Predictors and consequences of negative attitudes toward immigrants in Belgium and Turkey: The role of acculturation preferences and economic competition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 153–169. doi: 10.1348/014466606x111185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zick, A., Wagner, U., van Dick, R., & Petzel, T. (2001). Acculturation and prejudice in Germany: Majority and minority perspectives. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 541–557. doi: 10.1111/0022–4537.00228CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×