Science progresses by interchanging the roles of prejudice, paradox and paradigm. Yesterday's prejudice leads to today's paradox and tomorrow's ‘truth.’ An accumulation of paradoxes, enigmas and coincidences means that it is time to step back and start anew. Plate tectonics, mantle convection, isotope geochemistry and seismic tomography are now mature sciences, but they share an uncomfortable coexistence. They are all part of what may be described as the not-yet-unified standard model of mantle dynamics. Evidence for this disunification is the number of times that the words paradox, enigma, surprise, unexpected, counter-intuitive and inconsistent appear in the current literature of mantle geochemistry and tomography, and the number of meetings dedicated to solving ‘long standing paradoxes’ between geophysics and geochemistry. In the jargon of the day, present models of geodynamics are not robust.

The maturing of the Earth sciences has led to a fragmentation into subdisciplines that speak imperfectly to one another. Some of these subdisciplines are field geology, petrology, mineralogy, geochemistry, geodesy and seismology, and these in turn are split into even finer units. The science has also expanded to include the planets and even the cosmos. The practitioners in each of these fields tend to view Earth in completely different ways. Discoveries in one field diffuse only slowly into the consciousness of a specialist in another.