Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:02:24.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26 - Poland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Michael Lang
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Pasquale Pistone
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Josef Schuch
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Claus Staringer
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Get access

Summary

The relevance of the OECD and the UN Model Conventions and their Commentaries for the interpretation of Polish tax treaties

Since the 1970s Poland has concluded over eighty tax treaties on the avoidance of double taxation. Most of the treaties that form this network closely follow the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital (OECD Model), despite the fact that Poland reached the status of a regular observer to the OECD no earlier than July 1991 and became an OECD Member country in 1996. The treaty concluded in the 1970s with the Federal Republic of Germany was the first treaty whose structure and wording of the articles corresponded in general with the first OECD Model of 1963. It should be noted, however, that the above-mentioned treaty lacked the non-discrimination clause, deviating from the Model in this respect. The treaty with Germany became a kind of a model convention for the treaties concluded by Poland in the following years. The constantly increasing number of Polish tax treaties was the natural consequence of the increasing significance of economic relations with the countries of Western Europe. The treaties signed during that time were in principle based on the 1977 OECD Model. Poland has also concluded some treaties with Asian developing countries like Malaysia, Pakistan and Thailand, but these did not have any economic significance as they were motivated mostly by political considerations – direct investments between those countries and Poland did not exist, and economic relations were rather poor. These treaties were influenced by the United Nations Model Double Taxation Convention between Developed and Developing Countries (UN Model), mostly in respect of the taxation of profits derived by permanent establishments (PEs) and profits from transport.

Poland's status as an OECD Member country coincided with its regaining full independence and the burst of investments this entailed, as well as with the disintegration of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The former members of the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (an economic organization comprising the countries of the Eastern Bloc along with a number of communist states elsewhere in the world) aimed to build a network of tax treaties that would replace the former multilateral agreements. In the 1990s Poland concluded most of its present tax treaties, the majority of which were with the countries from the former Soviet Bloc. Some old tax treaties have been replaced by new ones which better suit the current economic environment. At this point in time, most of Poland's tax treaties are based on the OECD Models of 1963, 1977 and 1992.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aleksandrowicz, M.Fiszer, J.Jędrzejewski, S.‘Unikanie podwójnego opodatkowania (17): Szczególne postanowienia umów: równe traktowanie’Przegląd Podatkowy 1 1994 12Google Scholar
Fiszer, J.Panek, M.‘Umowy o unikaniu podwójnego opodatkowania, których stroną jest Polska’Brzezinski, B.Model Konwencji OECD. KomentarzWarsawOficyna Prawa Polskiego 2010 177Google Scholar
Głuchowski, J.‘Międzynarodowe umowy w sprawie zapobiegania podwójnemu opodatkowaniu’Państwo i Prawo 2 1983 53Google Scholar
Fiszer, J.‘Polskie umowy w sprawie unikania podwójnego opodatkowania’Państwo i Prawo 2 1991 47Google Scholar
Ault, H.‘The Role of the OECD Commentaries in the Interpretation of Tax Treaties’Alpert, H.van Raad, K.Essays on International TaxationBostonKluwer Law International 1993Google Scholar
van der Bruggen, E.‘The Power of Persuasion: Notes on the Sources of International Law and the OECD Commentary’Intertax 8 2003 259Google Scholar
Vogel, K.‘The Influence of the OECD Commentaries on Treaty Interpretation’Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation 12 2000 612Google Scholar
Malicka, M.Zalasiński, A.‘Rola oficjalnego Komentarza do Modelu Konwencji OECD w interpretacji umów dotyczących unikania podwójnego opodatkowania opartych na tym Modelu’Kwartalnik Prawa Podatkowego 1 2005Google Scholar
Morawski, W.Zalasiński, A.‘Tax Treaty Interpretation in the Case Law of Polish Courts’European Taxation 11 2006 534Google Scholar
Biegalski, A.‘Art. 4. Rezydencja podatkowa’Brzezinski, B.Model Konwencji OECD. KomentarzWarsawOficyna Prawa Polskiego 2010Google Scholar
Lennard, M.‘Update on the United Nations Tax Work’Asia-Pacific Bulletin 1 2010 9Google Scholar
Banach, J.Polskie umowy o unikaniu podwójnego opodatkowaniaWarsawC.H. Beck 2002 284Google Scholar
Bobkiewicz, K.‘Artykuł 17’Cloer, A.Jamroży, M.Umowa o unikaniu podwójnego opodatkowania z NiemcamiWarsawC.H. Beck 2007 345Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Poland
  • Edited by Michael Lang, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Pasquale Pistone, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Josef Schuch, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Claus Staringer, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
  • Book: The Impact of the OECD and UN Model Conventions on Bilateral Tax Treaties
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095686.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Poland
  • Edited by Michael Lang, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Pasquale Pistone, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Josef Schuch, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Claus Staringer, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
  • Book: The Impact of the OECD and UN Model Conventions on Bilateral Tax Treaties
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095686.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Poland
  • Edited by Michael Lang, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Pasquale Pistone, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Josef Schuch, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Claus Staringer, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
  • Book: The Impact of the OECD and UN Model Conventions on Bilateral Tax Treaties
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095686.028
Available formats
×