Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:39:46.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Norway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Michael Lang
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Pasquale Pistone
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Josef Schuch
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Claus Staringer
Affiliation:
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
Get access

Summary

The relevance of the OECD and UN Model Conventions and their Commentaries for the interpretation of Norwegian tax treaties

Introduction

Norway has a relatively broad tax treaty network with treaties with about eighty-five jurisdictions. The first tax treaty was signed with Sweden as early as 1913, only eight years after the splitting of the union between Norway and Sweden. This first tax treaty was a treaty specifically designed to cover the relations between Norway and Sweden in the north regarding the mining industry.

The first ‘ordinary’ tax treaties were those signed in 1946 with Denmark and in 1947 with Sweden. After this, Norway signed tax treaties with its most important trading partners. Thus, it signed a tax treaty with the UK in 1951 and with the USA in 1952. The first treaty with the Netherlands was signed in 1952.

Tax treaties have also been concluded with jurisdictions as a result of foreign aid policy and due to the significant number of immigrants from a jurisdiction.

The tax treaty with the Nordic countries (Nordic Convention)2 is a multilateral tax treaty. All other tax treaties are bilateral treaties. The treaties are mainly based on the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital (OECD Model). In some situations, where Norway has entered into tax treaties with developing countries, these treaties are influenced by the United Nations Model Double Taxation Convention between Developed and Developing Countries (UN Model), in which more taxing rights are allocated to the source country.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jensen, O.‘Recent Tax Treaty Development’Lang, M.Recent Tax Treaty Developments around the GlobeViennaLinde 2009 313Google Scholar
Skaar, A. A.Permanent Establishment. Erosion of a Tax Treaty PrincipleDeventerKluwer 1991 39Google Scholar
Skaa, A. A.Norsk SkatteavtalerettOsloGyldendal akademisk 2006 50Google Scholar
Skaar, A. A.Permanent Establishment: Erosion of a Tax Treaty PrincipleBostonKluwer Law International 1991Google Scholar
Zimmer, F.Internasjonal inntektsskatterettOsloUniversitetsforl 2009 271Google Scholar
Biller, O. I.‘Norway’Mutual Agreement – Procedure and Practice, IFA Cahiers de droit fiscal internationalDeventerInternational Fiscal Association 1981 369Google Scholar
Avery Jones, J. F.‘The Legal Nature of the Mutual Agreement Procedure under the OECD Model Convention’British Tax Review 1979 333Google Scholar
Skaar, A. A.‘The Legal Nature of Mutual Agreements under Tax Treaties’Tax Notes International 1992 1446Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Norway
  • Edited by Michael Lang, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Pasquale Pistone, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Josef Schuch, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Claus Staringer, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
  • Book: The Impact of the OECD and UN Model Conventions on Bilateral Tax Treaties
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095686.026
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Norway
  • Edited by Michael Lang, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Pasquale Pistone, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Josef Schuch, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Claus Staringer, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
  • Book: The Impact of the OECD and UN Model Conventions on Bilateral Tax Treaties
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095686.026
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Norway
  • Edited by Michael Lang, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Pasquale Pistone, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Josef Schuch, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria, Claus Staringer, Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien, Austria
  • Book: The Impact of the OECD and UN Model Conventions on Bilateral Tax Treaties
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095686.026
Available formats
×