Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:43:20.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Structure and Dynamics of Vorticity in Turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Jörg Schumacher
Affiliation:
Ilmenau University of Technology
Robert M. Kerr
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Kiyosi Horiuti
Affiliation:
Tokyo Institute of Technology
Peter A. Davidson
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Yukio Kaneda
Affiliation:
Aichi Institute of Technology, Japan
Katepalli R. Sreenivasan
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Ancient depictions of fluids, going back to the Minoans, envisaged waves and moving streams. They missed what we would call vortices and turbulence. The first artist to depict the rotational properties of fluids, vortical motion and turbulent flows was da Vinci (1506 to 1510). He would recognize the term vortical motion as it comes from the Latin vortere or vertere: to turn, meaning that vorticity is where a gas or liquid is rapidly turning or spiraling. Mathematically, one represents this effect as twists in the velocity derivative, that is the curl or the anti-symmetric component of the velocity gradient tensor. If the velocity field is u, then for the vorticity is ω = ∇ × u.

The aspect of turbulence which this chapter will focus upon is the structure, dynamics and evolution of vorticity in idealized turbulence – either the products of homogeneous, isotropic, statistically stationary states in forced, periodic simulations, or flows using idealized initial conditions designed to let us understand those states. The isotropic state is often viewed as a tangle of vorticity (at least when the amplitudes are large), an example of which is given in Fig. 2.1. This visualization shows isosurfaces of the magnitude of the vorticity, and similar techniques have been discussed before (see e.g. Pullin and Saffman, 1998; Ishihara et al., 2009; Tsinober, 2009). The goal of this chapter is to relate these graphics to basic relations between the vorticity and strain, to how this subject has evolved to using vorticity as a measure of regularity, then focus on the structure and dynamics of vorticity in turbulence, in experiments and numerical investigations, before considering theoretical explanations. Our discussions will focus upon three-dimensional turbulence.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreotti, B. 1997. Studying Burgers models to investigate the physical meaning of the alignments statistically observed in turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 9, 735–742.Google Scholar
Ashurst, W. T., R., , Kerstein, A., Kerr, R. M., and Gibson, C. H. 1987. Alignment of vorticity and scalar gradient with strain rate in simulated Navier–Stokes turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 30, 2343–2353.Google Scholar
Bardos, C., and Titi, E. 2007. Euler equations for incompressible ideal fluids. Russian Math. Surveys, 62, 409–451.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1953. Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Beale, J. T., T., Kato, and Majda, A. 1984. Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3D Euler equations. Commun. Math. Phys., 94, 61–66.Google Scholar
Bermejo-Moreno, I., and Pullin, D. I. 2008. On the non-local geometry of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 603, 101–135.Google Scholar
Bermejo-Moreno, I., Pullin, D. I., and Horiuti, K. 2009. Geometry of enstrophy and dissipation, grid resolution effects and proximity issues in turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 620, 121–166.Google Scholar
Betchov, R. 1956. An inequality concerning the production of vorticity in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 1, 497–504.Google Scholar
Boratav, O. N., and Pelz, R. B. 1994. Direct numerical simulation of transition to turbulence from a high-symmetry initial condition. Phys. Fluids, 6, 2757–2784.Google Scholar
Brachet, M. E., Meiron, D. I., Orszag, S. A., Nickel, B. G., Morf, R. H., and Frisch, U. 1983. Small-scale structure of the Taylor-Green vortex. J. Fluid Mech., 130, 411–452.Google Scholar
Burgers, J. M. 1948. A mathematical model illustrating the theory of turbulence. Adv. Appl. Math., 1, 171–199.Google Scholar
Bustamante, M. D., and Kerr, R. M. 2008. 3D Euler about a 2D symmetry plane. PhysicaD, 237, 1912–1920.Google Scholar
Candès, E.J., and Donoho, D. L. 2002. New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with piecewise-C2 singularities. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 57, 219–266.Google Scholar
Cantwell, B. 1992. Exact solution of a restricted Euler equation for the velocity gradient tensor. Phys. FluidsA, 4, 782–793.Google Scholar
Cantwell, B. 1993. On the behavior of velocity gradient tensor invariants in direct numerical simulations of turbulence. Phys. FluidsA, 5, 2008–2013.Google Scholar
Cartes, C., Bustamante, M., and Brachet, M.E. 2007. Generalized Eulerian–Lagrangian description of Navier–Stokes dynamics. Phys. Fluids, 19, 077101.Google Scholar
Chen, S., Doolen, G., Herring, J.R., Kraichnan, R.H., Orszag, S.A., and She, Z.S. 1993. Far-dissipation range of turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 3051–3054.Google Scholar
Chen, S., Sreenivasan, K.R., and Nelkin, M. 1997. Inertial range scalings of dissipation and enstrophy in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 1253–1256.Google Scholar
Chertkov, M., Pumir, A., and Shraiman, B.I. 1999. Lagrangian tetrad dynamics and the phenomenology of turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 11, 2394–2410.Google Scholar
Chevillard, L., and Meneveau, C. 2006. Lagrangian dynamics and statistical geometric structure of turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 174501.Google Scholar
Cichowlas, C., and Brachet, M.-E. 2005. Evolution of complex singularities in Kida–Pelz and Taylor–Green inviscid flows. Fluid Dyn. Res., 36, 239–248.Google Scholar
Constantin, P. 1994. Geometric statistics in turbulence. SIAM Review, 36, 73–98.Google Scholar
Constantin, P. 2001. Three lectures on mathematical fluid mechanics. In: From Finite to Infinite Dimensional Dynamical Systems, Glendinning, P.A., and Robinson, J.C. (eds), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, for NATO ASI workshop at the Isaac Newton Institute, August 1995.
Constantin, P., and Fefferman, C. 1993. Direction of vorticity and the problem of global regularity for the Navier–Stokes equations. Indiana Univ. Math. Journal, 42, 775–789.Google Scholar
Constantin, P., Fefferman, C., and Majda, A.J. 1996. Geometric constraints on potentially singular solutions for the 3-D Euler equations. Comm. in PDE, 21, 559–571.Google Scholar
Cuypers, Y., Maurel, A., and Petitjeans, P. 2003. Vortex burst as a source of turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 194502.Google Scholar
da Vinci, L. 1506 to 1510. Codex Leicester.
Deng, J., Hou, T.Y., and Yu, X. 2005. Geometric properties and non-blowup of 3D incompressible Euler Flow. Commun. PDEs, 30, 225–243.Google Scholar
Doering, C. R. 2009. The 3D Navier–Stokes problem. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 41, 109–128.Google Scholar
Donoho, D. L., and Johnstone, J. M. 1994. Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika, 81, 425–455.Google Scholar
Donzis, D. A., Yeung, P. K., and Sreenivasan, K. R. 2008. Dissipation and enstrophy in isotropic turbulence: Resolution and scaling in direct numerical simulations. Phys. Fluids, 20, 045108.Google Scholar
Douady, S., Couder, Y., and Brachet, M. E. 1991. Direct observation of the intermittency of intense vorticity filaments in turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 67, 983–986.Google Scholar
Euler, L. 1761. Principia motus fluidorum. Novi Commentarii Acad. Sci. Petropolitanae, 6, 271–311.Google Scholar
Farge, M. 1992. Wavelet transforms and their application to turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 24, 395–457.Google Scholar
Fefferman, C. 2000. Existence and smoothness of the Navier–Stokes equation. Clay Millenium Prize description. http://www.claymath.org/millenium, 1–5.
Gibbon, J.D. 2008. The three-dimensional Euler equations: Where do we stand?PhysicaD, 237, 1895–1904.Google Scholar
Gibbon, J.D., Holm, D.D., Kerr, R.M., and Roulstone, I. 2006. Quaternions and particle dynamics in the Euler fluid equations. Nonlinearity, 19, 1969–1983.Google Scholar
Grafke, T., Homann, H., Dreher, J., and Grauer, R. 2008. Numerical simulations of possible finite time singularities in the incompressible Euler equations: comparison of numerical methods. PhysicaD, 237, 1932–1936.Google Scholar
Gulak, Y., and Pelz, R. B. 2005. High-symmetry Kida flow: Time series analysis and resummation. Fluid Dyn. Res., 36, 211–220.Google Scholar
Hamlington, P. E., Schumacher, J., and Dahm, W. J. A. 2008a. Direct assessment of vorticity alignment with local and nonlocal strain rates in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids, 20, 111703.Google Scholar
Hamlington, P. E., Schumacher, J., and Dahm, W. J. A. 2008b. Local and nonlocal strain rate fields and vorticity alignment in turbulent flows. Phys. Rev.E, 77, 026303.Google Scholar
Herring, J.R., and Kerr, R.M. 1982. Comparison of direct numerical simulation with prediction of two–point closures. J. Fluid Mech., 118, 205–219.Google Scholar
Holm, D. D., and Kerr, R. M. 2007. Helicity in the formation of turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 19, 025101.Google Scholar
Horiuti, K. 2001. A classification method for vortex sheet and tube structures in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids, 13, 3756–3774.Google Scholar
Horiuti, K., and Fujisawa, T. 2008. Multi mode stretched spiral vortex in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 595, 341–366.Google Scholar
Horiuti, K., and Takagi, Y. 2005. Identification method for vortex sheet structures in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids, 17, 121703.Google Scholar
Hou, T. Y., and Li, R. 2008. Blowup or no blowup? The interplay between theory and numerics. PhysicaD, 237, 1937–1944.Google Scholar
Ishihara, T., Kaneda, Y., Yokokawa, M., Itakura, K., and Uno, A. 2007. Small-scale statistics in high-resolution direct numerical simulation of turbulence: Reynolds number dependence of one-point velocity gradient statistics. J. Fluid Mech., 592, 335–366.Google Scholar
Ishihara, T., Gotoh, T., and Kaneda, Y. 2009. Study of high-Reynolds number isotropic turbulence by direct numerical simulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 41, 165–180.Google Scholar
Jeong, J., and Hussain, F. 1995. On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech., 285, 69–94.Google Scholar
Jianwei, M., Hussaini, M. Y., Vasilyev, O. V., and Le Dimet, F. 2009. Multiscale geometric analysis of turbulence by curvelets. Phys. Fluids, 21, 075104.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J., and Wray, A. A. 1998. On the characteristics of vortex filaments in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 373, 255–285.Google Scholar
Kerr, R. M. 1985. Higher-order derivative correlations and the alignment of small-scale structures in isotropic numerical turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 153, 31–58.Google Scholar
Kerr, R. M. 1987. Histograms of helicity and strain in numerical turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 59, 783–786.Google Scholar
Kerr, R. M. 1993. Evidence for a singularity of the three-dimensional incompressible Euler equations. Phys. FluidsA, 5, 1725–1746.Google Scholar
Kerr, R. M. 2005. Velocity and scaling of collapsing Euler vortices. Phys. Fluids, 17, 075103.Google Scholar
Kerr, R.M., Virk, D., and Hussain, F. 1990. Effects of incompressible and compressible vortex reconnection. Page 1 of: Topological Fluid Mechanics, Moffatt, H.K., and Tsinober, A. (eds), Cambridge University Press, for IUTAM meeting at Cambridge University 1989.
Kida, S., and Murakami, Y. 1987. Kolmogorov similarity in freely decaying turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 30, 2030–2039.Google Scholar
Koenderink, J.J., and van Doorn, A.J. 1992. Surface shape and curvature scales. Image Vision Comput., 10, 557–565.Google Scholar
Kozono, H., and Taniuchi, Y. 2000. Limiting case of the Sobolev inequality in BMO, with application to the Euler equations. Commun. Math. Phys., 215, 191–200.Google Scholar
Lanterman, D. D., Lathrop, D. P., Zeff, B. W., McAllister, R., Roy, R., and Kostellich, E. J. 2004. Characterizing intense rotation and dissipation in turbulent flows. Chaos, 14, S8.Google Scholar
Lu, L., and Doering, C. R. 2008. Limits on enstrophy growth for solutions of the three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 57, 2693–2728.Google Scholar
Lundgren, T. S. 1967. Distribution functions in the statistical theory of turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 10, 969–975.Google Scholar
Lundgren, T. S. 1982. Strained spiral vortex model for turbulent fine structure. Phys. Fluids, 25, 2193–2202.Google Scholar
Lundgren, T. S., and Rogers, M. M. 1994. An improved measure of strain state probability in turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids A, 6, 1838–1847.Google Scholar
Lüthi, B., Tsinober, A., and Kinzelbach, W. 2005. Lagrangian measurement of vorticity dynamics in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech., 528, 87–118.Google Scholar
Mallat, S. 1999. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Academic Press, San Diego.
Martin, J., Ooi, A., Chong, M.S., and Soria, J. 1998. Dynamics of the velocity gradient tensor invariants in isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 10, 2336–2346.Google Scholar
Moisy, F., and Jiménez, J. 2004. Geometry and clustering of intense structures in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 513, 111–133.Google Scholar
Monin, A.S. 1967. Equations of turbulent motion. Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 31, 1057–1068.Google Scholar
Mullin, J. A., and Dahm, W. J. A. 2006a. Dual-plane stereo particle image velocimetry measurements of velocity gradient tensor fields in turbulent shear flow. I. Accuracy assessments. Phys. Fluids, 18, 035101.Google Scholar
Mullin, J. A., and Dahm, W. J. A. 2006b. Dual-plane stereo particle image velocimetry measurements of velocity gradient tensor fields in turbulent shear flow. II. Experimental results. Phys. Fluids, 18, 035102.Google Scholar
Nomura, K. K., and Post, G. K. 1998. The structure and dynamics of vorticity and rate of strain in incompressible homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 377, 65–97.Google Scholar
Novikov, E. A. 1968. Kinetic equations for a vortex field. Sov. Phys. Dokl., 12, 1006–1008.Google Scholar
Ohkitani, K. 1994. Kinematics of vorticity: Vorticity–strain conjugation in incompressible fluid flows. Phys. Rev.E, 50, 5107–5110.Google Scholar
Okamoto, N., Yoshimatsu, K., Schneider, K., Farge, M., and Kaneda, Y. 2007. Coherent vortices in high-resolution direct numerical simulation of homogeneous isotropic turbulence: A wavelet viewpoint. Phys. Fluids, 19, 115109.Google Scholar
Orszag, S.A., and Patterson, G.S. 1972. Numerical simulation of three-dimensional homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 28, 76–79.Google Scholar
Pelz, R. B., and Ohkitani, K. 2005. Linearly strained flows with and without boundaries-the regularizing effect of the pressure term. Fluid Dyn. Res., 36, 193–210.Google Scholar
Ponce, G. 1985. Remark on a paper by J.T. Beale, T. Kato and A. Majda. Commun. Math. Phys., 98, 349.Google Scholar
Pullin, D. I., and Lundgren, T. S. 2001. Axial motion and scalar transport in stretched spiral vortices. Phys. Fluids, 13, 2553–2563.Google Scholar
Pullin, D. I., and Saffman, P. S. 1998. Vortex dynamics in turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 30, 31–51.Google Scholar
Rossi, M. 2000. Of vortices and vortical layers: an overview. Pages 40–123 of: Lectures Notes in Physics, Maurel, A., and Petitjeans, P. (eds), vol. 555. Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg.
Rossi, M., Bottausci, F., Maurel, A., and Petitjeans, P. 2004. A nonuniformly stretched vortex. Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 054504.Google Scholar
Rotta, J. C. 1997. Turbulente Strömungen. Teubner, Stuttgart.
Saffman, P. 1997. Vortex Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Saffman, P. G., and Pullin, D. I. 1996. Calculation of velocity structure functions for vortex models of isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 8, 3072–3084.Google Scholar
Schumacher, J. 2007. Sub-Kolmogorov-scale fluctuations in fluid turbulence. Europhys. Lett., 80, 54001.Google Scholar
Schumacher, J., Sreenivasan, K. R., and Yakhot, V. 2007. Asymptotic exponents from low-Reynolds-number flows. New J. Phys., 9, 89.Google Scholar
Schumacher, J., Eckhardt, B., and Doering, C. R. 2010. Extremal vorticity growth in Navier–Stokes turbulence. Phys. Lett.A, 371, 861–865.Google Scholar
She, Z.-S., Jackson, E., and Orszag, S. A. 1991. Structure and dynamics of homogeneous turbulence: Models and simulations. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 434, 101–124.Google Scholar
Sheng, J., Malkiel, E., and Katz, J. 2009. Buffer layer structures associated with extreme wall stress events in a smooth wall turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech., 633, 17–60.Google Scholar
Siggia, E. D. 1981a. Invariants for the one-point vorticity and strain rate correlation functions. Phys. Fluids, 24, 1934–1936.Google Scholar
Siggia, E. D. 1981b. Numerical study of small-scale intermittency in three-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 107, 375–406.Google Scholar
Siggia, E. D., and Patterson, G.S. 1978. Intermittency effects in a numerical simulation of stationary three-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 86, 567–592.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R., and Antonia, R. A. 1997. The phenomenology of small-scale turbulence. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 29, 435–472.Google Scholar
Tanaka, M., and Kida, S. 1993. Characterization of vortex tubes and sheets. Phys. Fluids A, 5, 2079–2082.Google Scholar
Taylor, G.I. 1938. Production and dissipation of vorticity in a turbulent fluid. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 164, 15–23.Google Scholar
Taylor, G.I., and Green, A.E. 1937. Mechanism of the production of small eddies from large ones. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 158, 499–521.Google Scholar
Tennekes, H. 1968. Simple model for the small-scale structure of turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 11, 669–671.Google Scholar
Tropea, C., Yarin, A. L., and Foss, J. F. 2007. Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics. Springer, Berlin.
Tsinober, A. 2009. An Informal Conceptual Introduction to Turbulence. Springer, Berlin.
Tsinober, A., Kit, E., and Dracos, T. 1992. Experimental investigation of the field of velocity gradients in turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech., 242, 169–192.Google Scholar
Vieillefosse, P. 1982. Local interaction between vorticity and shear in a perfect incompressible fluid. J. Phys., 43, 837–842.Google Scholar
Vieillefosse, P. 1984. Internal motion of a small element of fluid in an inviscid flow. PhysicaA, 125, 150–162.Google Scholar
Vincent, A., and Meneguzzi, M. 1991. The spatial structure and statistical properties of homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 225, 1–20.Google Scholar
Virk, D., Kerr, R.M., and Hussain, F. 1995. Compressible vortex reconnection. J. Fluid Mech., 304, 47–86.Google Scholar
von Kármán, T., and Howarth, L. 1938. On the statistical theory of turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 164, 192–215.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. M. 2009. Twenty years of experimental and direct numerical simulation access to the velocity gradient tensor: What have we learned about turbulence?Phys. Fluids, 21, 021301.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. M., and Vukoslavčević, P. V. 2010. Measurement of the velocity gradient tensor in turbulence. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 42, 157–181.Google Scholar
Wilczek, M., and Friedrich, R. 2009. Dynamical origins for non-Gaussian vorticity distributions in turbulent flows. Phys. Rev.E, 80, 016316.Google Scholar
Ying, L., Demanet, L., and Candès, E. J. 2005. 3D Discrete curvelet transform. Tech. Rep. Applied and Computational Mathematics, California Institute of Technology, 1–11.
Zeff, B. W., Lanterman, D. D., McAllister, R., Roy, R., Kostellich, E. J., and Lathrop, D. P. 2003. Measuring intense rotation and dissipation in turbulent flows. Nature, 421, 146–149.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×