Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T03:19:42.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Superfluous words

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2014

Neville W. Goodman
Affiliation:
Southmead Hospital, Bristol
Andy Black
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access

Summary

I see you have an interesting paper in the latest number of Brain. When is the English translation coming out?

(Remark by Sir Francis M. R. Walshe, 1885–1973, British neurologist, to a London physician on the publication of a somewhat obscure paper, and taken from an out of print book, Familiar medical quotations, edited by Maurice B. Strauss (ed.), Boston, Little, Brown and Company, 1968.)

Scientific writing in general, and medical writing in particular, is muddied by superfluous words. These masquerade as part of convention but are actually just catch-phrases or padding: the literary equivalent of ums and ahs. We select as common culprits basis, case, conditions, essentially, feature, function, grounds, instance, nature, situation and type. These words usually add nothing; they are words for words’ sake. When you can recognize them as such, delete them and restructure the sentence.

ABSENCE

Absence occurred in one in 40 PubMed® articles, mostly in the phrase the absence of . . . . It may be better to write there were no . . . instead, but the phrase is not as redundant as the presence of.

. . . and this correlated with the presence or absence of competence genes . . .

This might be mediated by the reduced stretch of the hip capsule, because of the absence of increased uterine pressure . . .

In the absence of mediastinal lymph node metastases surgery is the treatment of choice.

The first example is correct. The second is correct, but awkward – an absence of an increase is confusing. Try, . . . because the uterine pressure was not increased. The third is better as If there are no mediastinal lymph node metastases . . . .

Type
Chapter
Information
Medical Writing
A Prescription for Clarity
, pp. 160 - 182
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×