Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T04:31:21.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Adenofibroma and adenosarcoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Robert A. Soslow
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Teri A. Longacre
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The adenofibroma–adenosarcoma spectrum of biphasic mullerian tumors in the female gynecologic tract resembles the fibroadenoma–phyllodes spectrum in the breast. As in the breast, zones of histologic overlap exist and, on occasion, areas of adenofibromatous and adenosarcomatous differentiation may be seen in the same neoplasm. Classification of these tumors is ultimately based on the most histologically malignant area, but it should not be surprising that, just as there are gradations of histologic malignancy amongst these tumors, gradations of clinical behavior may also occur. However, unlike the situation in the breast, most (some authorities have maintained all) of these biphasic tumors in the uterus fall well within the low-grade sarcoma spectrum. In contrast, adenofibromas, if they exist, are clinically benign with little risk for recurrence once they are completely excised.

ADENOSARCOMA

Adenosarcoma is uncommon; it is a predominantly low-grade malignant tumor that is composed of sarcomatous stroma and benign epithelial elements. This tumor often represents a challenge for the pathologist due to significant overlap with benign polyps on the one hand and with carcinosarcoma and sarcoma entrapping benign glands on the other. Indeed, the low-grade forms of adenosarcoma account for a significant proportion of malignant lesions within the female genital tract and peritoneum that are underdiagnosed by pathologists.

Most adenosarcomas occur in the uterine corpus, but they may arise in cervical, vaginal, tubal, ovarian, and peritoneal sites. Involvement of additional extragenital sites in women has been linked to endometriosis. An association with unopposed estrogen and tamoxifen therapy has been reported in uterine adenosarcoma.

Type
Chapter
Information
Uterine Pathology , pp. 205 - 218
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Young, RH, Clement, PB.Malignant lesions of the female genital tract and peritoneum that may be underdiagnosed. Semin Diagn Pathol 1995;12:14–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Clement, PB, Oliva, E, Young, RH.Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterine corpus associated with tamoxifen therapy: a report of six cases and a review of tamoxifen-associated endometrial lesions. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1996;15:222–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clement, P, Scully, R.Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathologic analysis of 100 cases with a review of the literature. Hum Pathol 1990;21:363–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murugasu, A, Miller, J, Proietto, A, et al. Extragenital mullerian adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth arising in an endometriotic cyst in the pouch of Douglas. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003;13:371–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidman, JD, Chauhan, S.Evaluation of the relationship between adenosarcoma and carcinosarcoma and a hypothesis of the histogenesis of uterine sarcomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2003;22:75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaloudek, CJ, Norris, HJ.Adenofibroma and adenosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Cancer 1981;48:354–66.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tackin, S, Bozaci, EA, Sonmezer, M, et al. Late recurrence of uterine mullerian adenosarcoma as heterologous sarcoma: three recurrences in 8 months increasing in number and grade of sarcomatous components. Gynecol Oncol 2006;101:179–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soslow, RA, Ali, A, Oliva, E.Mullerian adenosarcomas: an immunophenotypic analysis of 35 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32:1013–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Z, Hong, B, Drozd-Borysiuk, E, et al. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a case of mullerian adenosarcoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2004;148:129–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clement, P, Scully, R.Mullerian adenofibroma of the uterus with invasion of myometrium and pelvic veins. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1990;9:363–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czernobilsky, B, Hohlweg-Majert, P, Dallenbach-Hellweg, G.Uterine adenosarcoma: a clinicopathologic study of 11 cases with a reevaluation of histologic criteria. Arch Gynecol 1983;233:281–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tai, LH, Tavassoli, FA.Endometrial polyps with atypical (bizarre) stromal cells. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:505–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilks, CB, Clement, PB, Hart, WR, et al. Uterine adenomyomas excluding atypical polypoid adenomyomas and adenomyomas of endocervical type: a clinicopathologic study of 30 cases of an underemphasized lesion that may cause diagnostic problems with brief consideration of adenomyomas of other female genital tract sites. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2000;19:195–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longacre, TA, Chung, MH, Rouse, RV, et al. Atypical polypoid adenomyofibromas (atypical polypoid adenomyomas) of the uterus. A clinicopathologic study of 55 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1996;20:1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazur, M.Atypical polypoid adenomyomas of the endometrium. Am J Surg Pathol 1981;5:473–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, R, Treger, T, Scully, R.Atypical polypoid adenomyoma of the uterus. A report of 27 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1986;86:139–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilks, CB, Young, RH, Clement, PB, et al. Adenomyomas of the uterine cervix of endocervical type: a report of ten cases of a benign cervical tumor that may be confused with adenoma malignum [corrected]. Mod Pathol 1996;9:220–4.Google Scholar
Parker, RL, Dadmanesh, F, Young, RH, et al. Polypoid endometriosis: a clinicopathologic analysis of 24 cases and a review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:285–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krivak, TC, Seidman, JD, McBroom, JW, et al. Uterine adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth versus uterine carcinosarcoma: comparison of treatment and survival. Gynecol Oncol 2001;83:89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×