Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:08:32.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Cervix: adenocarcinoma and precursors, including variants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Robert A. Soslow
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Teri A. Longacre
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

While the overall age-adjusted incidence of cervical squamous cell carcinoma has declined in countries that have implemented organized cervical Pap smear surveillance programs, the incidence of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma has increased considerably from 1.30 and 0.15 cases per 100 000 women, respectively, in 1970–1972, to 1.83 and 0.41 per 100 000 women in 1994–1996. Moreover, the overall increase in incidence has been observed primarily in women less than 50 years of age. Although initial increases were attributed to increasing prevalence of persistent oncogenic HPV infection (and its cofactors) as well as inherent limitations of cervical cytology in detecting precursor glandular lesions, recent data indicate that cytologic screening, if performed and interpreted properly, can detect these early lesions. In fact, the decrease in glandular lesions of the cervix observed in several countries during the latter part of the 1990s strongly suggests that cytology screening is detecting more preinvasive adenocarcinomas than in previous decades, and further suggests that screening may be starting to have a protective impact on adenocarcinoma.

However, diagnostic issues concerning cervical glandular lesions continue to plague the cytopathologist and surgical pathologist. The key problematic areas revolve around (1) the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ and the exclusion of benign mimics; (2) the presence of early or superficially invasive adenocarcinoma (we do not use the term “microinvasive adenocarcinoma”); (3) identification of the primary site of origin of problematic glandular proliferations in uterine samplings: that is, is it cervical, or endometrial, or metastatic; and (4) special variants.

Type
Chapter
Information
Uterine Pathology , pp. 34 - 69
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ioffe, OB, Sagae, S, Moritani, S, et al. Proposal of a new scoring scheme for the diagnosis of noninvasive endocervical glandular lesions. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:452–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, C, Beck, A, Longacre, T.A panel of three markers including p16, ProEx C, or HPV ISH is optimal for distinguishing between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomasAm J Surg Pathol 2010;34:915–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, KJ, Kiyokawa, T, Soslow, RA, et al. Unusual endocervical adenocarcinomas: an immunohistochemical analysis with molecular detection of human papillomavirus. Am J Surg Pathol 2011;35:633–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabban, JT, McAlhany, S, Lerwill, MF, et al. PAX2 distinguishes benign mesonephric and mullerian glandular lesions of the cervix from endocervical adenocarcinoma, including minimal deviation adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2010;34:137–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiMaio, M, Beck, A, Montgomery, K, et al. PAX8 and WT1 are superior to PAX2 and BRST2 in distinguishing mullerian tract tumors from breast carcinomas. Mod Pathol 2011;24:243A.Google Scholar
Vang, R, Vinh, TN, Burks, RT, et al. Pseudoinfiltrative tubal metaplasia of the endocervix: a potential form of in utero diethylstilbestrol exposure-related adenosis simulating minimal deviation adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2005;24:391–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nucci, MR, Young, RH. Arias-Stella reaction of the endocervix: a report of 18 cases with emphasis on its varied histology and differential diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:608–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, RH, Clement, PB. Endocervicosis involving the uterine cervix: a report of four cases of a benign process that may be confused with deeply invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2000;19:322–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clement, PB, Young, RH. Florid cystic endosalpingiosis with tumor-like manifestations: a report of four cases including the first reported cases of transmural endosalpingiosis of the uterus. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:166–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lesack, D, Wahab, I, Gilks, CB. Radiation-induced atypia of endocervical epithelium: a histological, immunohistochemical and cytometric study. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1996;15:242–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, MA, Young, RH. Atypical oxyphilic metaplasia of the endocervical epithelium: a report of six cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1997;16:99–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trowell, JE. Intestinal metaplasia with argentaffin cells in the uterine cervix. Histopathology 1985;9:551–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostor, AG. Early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2000;19:29–38.Google ScholarPubMed
Mills, AM, Liou, S, Kong, CS, et al. Are women with endocervical adenocarcinoma at risk for Lynch syndrome? Evaluation of 101 cases including unusual subtypes and lower uterine segment tumors. Int J Gyn Pathol 2012; in press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daya, D, Young, RH. Florid deep glands of the uterine cervix. Another mimic of adenoma malignum. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;103:614–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clement, PB, Young, RH. Deep nabothian cysts of the uterine cervix. A possible source of confusion with minimal-deviation adenocarcinoma (adenoma malignum). Int J Gynecol Pathol 1989; 8:340–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greeley, C, Schroeder, S, Silverberg, SG. Microglandular hyperplasia of the cervix: a true “pill” lesion?Int J Gynecol Pathol 1995;14:50–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nichols, TM, Fidler, HK.Microglandular hyperplasia in cervical cone biopsies taken for suspicious and positive cytology. Am J Clin Pathol 1971;56:424–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, RH, Scully, RE.Atypical forms of microglandular hyperplasia of the cervix simulating carcinoma. A report of five cases and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol 1989;13:50–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, MA, Young, RH, Scully, RE.Diffuse laminar endocervical glandular hyperplasia. A benign lesion often confused with adenoma malignum (minimal deviation adenocarcinoma). Am J Surg Pathol 1991;15:1123–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fluhmann, CF.Focal hyperplasis (tunnel clusters) of the cervix uteri. Obstet Gynecol 1961;17:206–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Segal, GH, Hart, WR.Cystic endocervical tunnel clusters. A clinicopathologic study of 29 cases of so-called adenomatous hyperplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 1990;14:895–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, MA, Young, RH.Endocervical type A (noncystic) tunnel clusters with cytologic atypia. A report of 14 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1996;20:1312–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondo, T, Hashi, A, Murata, SI, et al. Gastric mucin is expressed in a subset of endocervical tunnel clusters: type A tunnel clusters of gastric phenotype. Histopathology 2007;50:843–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nucci, MR, Clement, PB, Young, RH.Lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia, not otherwise specified: a clinicopathologic analysis of thirteen cases of a distinctive pseudoneoplastic lesion and comparison with fourteen cases of adenoma malignum. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:886–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawauchi, S, Kusuda, T, Liu, XP, et al. Is lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia a cancerous precursor of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma? A comparative molecular-genetic and immunohistochemical study. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32:1807–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brainard, JA, Hart, WR.Adenoid basal epitheliomas of the uterine cervix: a reevaluation of distinctive cervical basaloid lesions currently classified as adenoid basal carcinoma and adenoid basal hyperplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 1998;22:965–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grayson, W, Cooper, K.A reappraisal of “basaloid carcinoma” of the cervix, and the differential diagnosis of basaloid cervical neoplasms. Adv Anat Pathol 2002;9:290–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferry, JA, Scully, RE.Mesonephric remnants, hyperplasia, and neoplasia in the uterine cervix. A study of 49 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1990;14:1100–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidman, JD, Tavassoli, FA.Mesonephric hyperplasia of the uterine cervix: a clinicopathologic study of 51 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1995;14:293–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCluggage, WG, Oliva, E, Herrington, CS, et al. CD10 and calretinin staining of endocervical glandular lesions, endocervical stroma and endometrioid adenocarcinomas of the uterine corpus: CD10 positivity is characteristic of, but not specific for, mesonephric lesions and is not specific for endometrial stroma. Histopathology 2003;43:144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longacre, TA, Atkins, KA, Kempson, RL, et al. The uterine corpus. In: Sternberg, S, Mills, S, eds. Diagnostic Surgical Pathology. New York: Raven Press; 2009:2184–277.Google Scholar
Gilks, CB, Young, RH, Aguirre, P, et al. Adenoma malignum (minimal deviation adenocarcinoma) of the uterine cervix. A clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 26 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1989;13:717–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaminski, PF, Norris, HJ.Minimal deviation carcinoma (adenoma malignum) of the cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1983;2:141–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michael, H, Grawe, L, Kraus, FT.Minimal deviation endocervical adenocarcinoma: clinical and histologic features, immunohistochemical staining for carcinoembryonic antigen, and differentiation from confusing benign lesions. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1984;3:261–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toki, T, Shiozawa, T, Hosaka, N, et al. Minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix has abnormal expression of sex steroid receptors, CA125 and gastric mucin. Int J Gyn Pathol 1999;18:215–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawakami, F, Mikami, Y, Kojima, A, et al. Diagnostic reproducibility in gastric-type mucinous adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: validation of novel diagnostic criteria. Histopathology 2010;56:551–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikami, Y, Kiyokawa, T, Hata, S, et al. Gastrointestinal immunophenotype in adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix and related glandular lesions: a possible link between lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia/pyloric gland metaplasia and ‘adenoma malignum’. Mod Pathol 2004;17:962–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Kojima, A, Mikami, Y, Sudo, T, et al. Gastric morphology and immunophenotype predict poor outcome in mucinous adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Am J Surg Pathol 2007;31:664–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kusanagi, Y, Kojima, A, Mikami, Y, et al. Absence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) detection in endocervical adenocarcinoma with gastric morphology and phenotype. Am J Pathol; 177:2169–75.CrossRef
Jones, MW, Silverberg, SG, Kurman, RJ.Well-differentiated villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinicopathological study of 24 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1993;12:1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, RH, Scully, RE.Villoglandular papillary adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. A clinicopathologic analysis of 13 cases. Cancer 1989;63:1773–9.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, MW, Kounelis, S, Papadaki, H, et al. Well-differentiated villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: oncogene/tumor suppressor gene alterations and human papillomavirus genotyping. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2000;19:110–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alfsen, GC, Thoresen, SO, Kristensen, GB, et al. Histopathologic subtyping of cervical adenocarcinoma reveals increasing incidence rates of endometrioid tumors in all age groups: a population based study with review of all nonsquamous cervical carcinomas in Norway from 1966 to 1970, 1976 to 1980, and 1986 to 1990. Cancer 2000;89:1291–9.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahilly, MA, Williams, AR, al-Nafussi, A.Minimal deviation endometrioid adenocarcinoma of cervix: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of two cases. Histopathology 1992;20:351–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, RH, Scully, RE.Minimal-deviation endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. A report of five cases of a distinctive neoplasm that may be misinterpreted as benign. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17:660–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, KR, Trainer, TD.Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix of small intestinal type containing numerous Paneth cells. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990;114:731–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Lewis, TL.Colloid (mucus secreting) carcinoma of the cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1971;78:1128–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shingleton, HM, Bell, MC, Fremgen, A, et al. Is there really a difference in survival of women with squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix?Cancer 1995;76:1948–55.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kato, N, Katayama, Y, Kaimori, M, et al. Glassy cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: histochemical, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic observations. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2002;21:134–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Littman, P, Clement, PB, Henriksen, B, et al. Glassy cell carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer 1976;37:2238–46.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, HJ, Garcia, R, Tamimi, HK, et al. Glassy cell carcinoma of the cervix revisited. Gynecol Oncol 2002;85:274–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaminski, PF, Maier, RC.Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the cervix unrelated to diethylstilbestrol exposure. Obstet Gynecol 1983;62:720–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Thomas, MB, Wright, JD, Leiser, AL, et al. Clear cell carcinoma of the cervix: a multi-institutional review in the post-DES era. Gynecol Oncol 2008;109:335–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houghton, O, Jamison, J, Wilson, R, et al. p16 immunoreactivity in unusual types of cervical adenocarcinoma does not reflect human papillomavirus infection. Histopathology 2010;57:342–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, C, Gilks, CB, Hayes, M, et al. Papillary serous carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinicopathologic study of 17 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1998;22:113–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bague, S, Rodriguez, IM, Prat, J.Malignant mesonephric tumors of the female genital tract: a clinicopathologic study of 9 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:601–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clement, PB, Young, RH, Keh, P, et al. Malignant mesonephric neoplasms of the uterine cervix. A report of eight cases, including four with a malignant spindle cell component. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;19:1158–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silver, SA, Devouassoux-Shisheboran, M, Mezzetti, TP, et al. Mesonephric adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix: a study of 11 cases with immunohistochemical findings. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25:379–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferry, JA.Adenoid basal carcinoma of the uterine cervix: evolution of a distinctive clinicopathologic entity. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1997;16:299–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferry, JA, Scully, RE.“Adenoid cystic” carcinoma and adenoid basal carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A study of 28 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1988;12:134–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, WR.Symposium part II: special types of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2002;21:327–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grayson, W, Taylor, LF, Cooper, K.Adenoid cystic and adenoid basal carcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparative morphologic, mucin, and immunohistochemical profile of two rare neoplasms of putative ‘reserve cell’ origin. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:448–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parwani, AV, Smith Sehdev, AE, Kurman, RJ, et al. Cervical adenoid basal tumors comprised of adenoid basal epithelioma associated with various types of invasive carcinoma: clinicopathologic features, human papillomavirus DNA detection, and p16 expression. Hum Pathol 2005;36:82–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albores-Saavedra, J, Manivel, C, Mora, A, et al. The solid variant of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1992;11:2–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grayson, W, Taylor, L, Cooper, K.Detection of integrated high risk human papillomavirus in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the uterine cervix. J Clin Pathol 1996;49:805–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gersell, DJ, Mazoujian, G, Mutch, DG, et al. Small-cell undifferentiated carcinoma of the cervix. A clinicopathologic, ultrastructural, and immunocytochemical study of 15 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1988;12:684–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilks, CB, Young, RH, Gersell, DJ, et al. Large cell neuroendocrine [corrected] carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinicopathologic study of 12 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21:905–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishida, GM, Kato, N, Hayasaka, T, et al. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix: a histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2004;23:366–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, Y, Shimamoto, T, Amada, S, et al. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinicopathological study of six cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2003;22:226–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grayson, W, Rhemtula, HA, Taylor, LF, et al. Detection of human papillomavirus in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a study of 12 cases. J Clin Pathol 2002;55:108–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strosberg, JR, Coppola, D, Klimstra, DS, et al. The NANETS consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of poorly differentiated (high-grade) extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas. Pancreas;39:799–800.CrossRef
Gardner, GJ, Reidy-Lagunes, D, Gehrig, PA.Neuroendocrine tumors of the gynecologic tract: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) clinical document. Gynecol Oncol 2011;122:190–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×