Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T05:39:16.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Habitat description and phenology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Joanna M. Setchell
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Deborah J. Curtis
Affiliation:
Oxford Brookes University
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Habitat characteristics represent the matrix for the evolution of morphological, physiological and behavioural adaptations and life history traits of animals. These include bottom-up factors (such as distribution and abundance of food) and top-down constraints (such as protection from predators). The role of different habitat components in the survival and reproduction of individuals is of prime interest and is relevant for evolutionary understanding as well as for primate conservation. So far, this has been studied by linking habitat characteristics with phenotypic traits of animals, assuming that these traits represent adaptation to a given habitat constraint. However, we should bear in mind that the characteristics we observe today may represent adaptations to constraints that acted in the past (the Epaminondas effect, named after the little boy who always did the right thing for the previous situation; or, in evolutionary terminology: animals are tracking fitness optima by trying to climb the sides of shifting adaptive peaks, Cody, 1974). However, testing hypotheses based on these ‘ghosts of past constraints’ has so far been impossible.

The present chapter focuses on the description of the vegetation of forest habitats as the biotic matrix for the evolution of life history traits. References are to textbooks or publications that illustrate applications of the methods and do not always refer to the original work.

Type
Chapter
Information
Field and Laboratory Methods in Primatology
A Practical Guide
, pp. 51 - 68
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,APG. (1998). An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 85, 531–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhning-Gaese, K., Gaese, B. H. & Rabemanantsoa, S. B. (1999). Importance of primary and secondary seed dispersal in the Malagasy tree Commiphora guillaumini. Ecology 80, 821–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Brower, J. E., Zar, J. H. & Ende, C. N. (1990). Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Publishers.Google Scholar
Butynski, T. M. (1990). Comparative ecology of blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) in high- and low-density subpopulations. Ecol. Monogr. 60, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A., Chapman, L. J., Wrangham, R.et al. (1992). Estimators of fruit abundance of tropical trees. Biotropica 24, 527–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A., Wrangham, R. & Chapman, L. J. (1994). Indices of habitat-wide fruit abundance in tropical forests. Biotropica 26, 160–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cody, M. L. (1974). Optimization in ecology. Science 183, 1156–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganzhorn, J. U. (1989). Niche separation of the seven lemur species in the eastern rainforest of Madagascar. Oecologia 79, 279–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganzhorn, J. U. (1993). Flexibility and constraints of Lepilemur ecology. In Lemur Social Systems and their Ecological Basis, ed. Kappeler, P. M. & Ganzhorn, J. U., pp. 153–65. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganzhorn, J. U. (1995). Low level forest disturbance effects on primary production, leaf chemistry, and lemur populations. Ecology 76, 2084–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautier, L., Chatelain, C. & Spichiger, R. (1994). Presentation of a relevé method for vegetation studies based on high resolution satellite imagery. In Proceedings of the XIIIth Plenary Meeting AETFAT, Malawi, ed. Seyani, J. H. & Chikuni, A. C., Vol. 2, pp. 1339–50. Zomba: National Herbarium and Botanic Gardens of Malawi.Google Scholar
Génin, F. G. S., Masters, J. C. & Ganzhorn, J. U. (2010). Gummivory in cheirogaleids: primitive retention or adaptation to hypervariable environments? In Evolution of Exudativory in Primates, ed. Burrows, A. & Nash, L. T.. New York: Springer. (In press.)Google Scholar
Gentry, A. (1993). A Field Guide to the Families and Genera of Woody Plants of Northwest South America. Washington, D.C.: Conservation International.Google Scholar
Gentry, A. H. (1995). Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests. In Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests, ed. Bullock, S. H., Mooney, H. A. & Medina, E., pp. 146–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. F., Madden, R. H., vanSchaik, C. & Higdon, D. (1997). Primate species richness is determined by plant productivity: implications for conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 13023–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, R. (1996). Identification of Tropical Woody Plants in the Absence of Flowers and Fruits. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Kent, M. & Coker, P. (1992). Vegetation Description and Analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Kozak, K. H., Graham, C. H. & Wiens, J. J. (2008). Integrating GIS-based environmental data into evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 141–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Krebs, C. J. (1998). Ecological Methodology. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Ludwig, J. A. & Reynolds, J. F. (1988). Statistical Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Messmer, N., Rakotomalaza, P. J. & Gautier, L. (2000). Structure and floristic composition of the Parc National de Marojejy, Madagascar. In A Floral and Faunal Inventory of the Parc National de Marojejy, Madagascar: With Reference to Elevational Variation, ed. Goodman, S. M., New Series 97, Fieldiana Zoology, pp. 41–104. Chicago, IL: Field Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Müller, J., Moning, C., Bassler, C., Heurich, M. & Brandl, R. (2009). Using airborne laser scanning to model potential abundance and assemblages of forest passerines. Basic Appl. Ecol. 10, 671–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, J. F., Whitesides, G. H., Davies, A. G.et al. (1990). Determinants of variation in tropical forest primate biomass: new evidence from West Africa. Ecology 71, 328–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatz, G. E. (2001). Generic Tree Flora of Madagascar. Kew, St. Louis, MO: Royal Botanical Garden and Missouri Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
Schwarzkopf, L. & Rylands, A. B. (1989). Primate species richness in relation to habitat structure in Amazonian rainforest fragments. Biol. Cons. 48, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Southwood, T. R. E. & Henderson, P. A. (2000). Ecological Methods. (3rd edn.) Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Stohlgren, T. & Chong, G. (1997). Assessment of biological diversity and long-term monitoring plan for the Lower Urubamba Region. In Biodiversity Assessment and Monitoring of the Lower Urubamba Region, Peru, ed. Dallmeier, F. & Alonso, A., Vol. 1, SI/Monitoring and Assessment of Biodiversity Program, pp. 41–4. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
*Stolter, C., Julkunen-Tiitto, R. & Ganzhorn, J. U. (2006). Application of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to assess some properties of a sub-arctic ecosystem. Basic Appl. Ecol. 7, 167–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terborgh, J. (1983). Five New World Primates: A Study in Comparative Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schaik, C. P., Terborgh, J. W. & Wright, S. J. (1993). The phenology of tropical forests: adaptive significance and consequences for primary consumers. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24, 353–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, R. D. (1997). Habitat use and support preference of two free-ranging saltatory lemurs (Lepilemur edwardsi and Avahi occidentalis). J. Zool., Lond. 241, 325–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Whitmore, T. C. (1990). An Introduction to Tropical Rain Forests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitten, A. J. (1982). A numerical analysis of tropical rain forest using floristic and structural data and its application to an analysis of gibbon ranging behaviour. J. Ecol. 70, 249–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, P. C. (1997). Behavioral and ecological comparisons of Neotropical and Malagasy primates. In New World Primates: Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, ed. Kinzey, W. G., pp. 127–41. New York: Aldine de Gruiter.Google Scholar
Wright, P. C. (1999). Lemur traits and Madagascar ecology: coping with an island environment. Yb. Phys. Anthropol. 42, 31–72.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×