Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:46:43.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

10 - The doctor and sexual boundaries

Kerry J. Breen
Affiliation:
National Health and Medical Research Council
Stephen M. Cordner
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Colin J. H. Thomson
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong, New South Wales
Vernon D. Plueckhahn
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

From the time of Hippocrates, the medical profession has acknowledged that the special relationship of trust between patient and doctor must not be abused by the doctor establishing any type of improper or sexual relationship. As stated in the Hippocratic Oath:

Whatever houses I may visit, I will come for the benefit of the sick, remaining free of all intentional injustice, of all mischief and in particular of sexual relations, with both female and male persons, be they free or slaves.

This prohibition has been widely restated in recent times and is enforced by the threat of suspension or removal of the name of the doctor from the medical register if found guilty of such unprofessional conduct [2–6]. For example, the Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria states: ‘It is always wrong for a doctor and a patient to enter into a sexual or an improper emotional relationship. It is also wrong for a doctor to enter into a relationship with a former patient or a close relative of a patient, if this breaches the trust the patient placed in the doctor’. Despite this clear prohibition, there is considerable evidence from North America, Europe and Australia that sexual boundary violations remain a problem [7–11].

This chapter defines sexual misconduct and summarises what is known of the incidence of sexual misconduct. It discusses the apparent causes of boundary violations, emphasising the psychological dynamics for the patient/complainant, who is usually female, and the doctor, who is usually male.

Type
Chapter
Information
Good Medical Practice
Professionalism, Ethics and Law
, pp. 156 - 168
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Edelstein, L.The Hippocratic Oath: Text, Translation and Interpretation, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1943.Google Scholar
,Australian Medical Association. AMA Code of Ethics – 2004 (editorially revised 2006). http://www.ama.com.au/codeofethics
,New South Wales Medical Board. Sexual Misconduct. Policy Statement. New South Wales Medical Board, 1992. http://www.nswmb.org.au/index.pl?page=74
,Medical Board of Queensland, other Health Practitioner Registration Boards and Queensland Nursing Council's statement on sexual relationships between health practitioners and their patients, 2000. http://www.medicalboard.qld.gov.au/resources/index.html
Professional Boundaries: A Guide for Patients and Doctors. http://medicalboardvic.org.au/pdf/Professional_Boundaries.pdf
Crossing the Boundaries: The Report of the Committee on Physician Sexual Misconduct. College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, 1992.
Rutter, P.Sex in the Forbidden Zone. When Men in Power – Therapists, Doctors, Clergy, Teachers and Others – Betray Women's Trust. Harper Collins, London, 1995.Google Scholar
Gartrell, N, Herman, J, Olarte, S, Feldstein, M, Localio, R. Psychiatrist-patient sexual contact: results of a national survey, I: Prevalence. Am J Psychiatry 1986; 143: 1126–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilbers, D, Veenstra, G, Wiel, HB, Weijmar Schultz, W. Sexual contact in the doctor–patient relationship in the Netherlands. BMJ 1992; 304: 1531–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, EM. Professional misconduct in psychiatry: sexual behaviour with patients. A report of recent New South Wales finding. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 1994; 28: 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leggett, A. A survey of Australian psychiatrists' attitudes and practices regarding physical contact with patients. Aust NZ J of Psychiatry 1994; 28: 488–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Embon, JA, Thomas, CD. Evaluation of sexual misconduct complaints: The Oregon Board of Medical Examiners, 1991–1995. Amer J Obs and Gyn 1997; 176: 1340–8.Google Scholar
Gabbard, GO. Post-termination sexual boundary violations. Psychiatr Clin North America 2002; 25: 593–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, J. Rules for romance. Lancet 2002; 361: 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheather, J. Sexual relationships between doctors and former patients. BMJ 2006; 333: 1132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Medical Board of Queensland. Annual Report 2007. http://www.medicalboard.qld.gov.au/pdfs/medical-annual-report-2006-07.pdf
,Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria. Annual Report 2007. http://medicalboardvic.org.au/pdf/AR_2007.pdf
Celenza, A, Gabbard, GO. Analysts who commit boundary violations: a lost cause?J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2003; 51: 617–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quadrio, C. Sex and gender and the impaired therapist. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 1992; 26: 346–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galletly, CA. Crossing professional boundaries: the slippery slope to patient sexual exploitation. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 380–3.Google ScholarPubMed
,Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria Bulletin. Update to the Profession – Sexual Offences. June 2008, pp. 11–12. http://medicalboardvic.org.au/pdf/Vol2_2008.pdf
Gutheil, TG. Borderline personalty disorder, boundary violations and patient therapist sex: medico-legal pitfalls. Am J Psychiatry 1989; 146: 597–602.Google Scholar
Sederer, LI, Libby, M. False allegations of sexual misconduct: clinical and institutional considerations. Psychiatr Serv 1995; 46: 160–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Quadrio, C. Sexual abuse in therapy: gender issues. Aust NZ J of Psychiatry 1996; 30: 124–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dundee, JW. Fantasies during sedation with intravenous midazolam or diazepam. Med Leg J 1990; 58: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brahams, D. Benzodiazepines and sexual assault, Canada. Lancet 1991; 337: 291–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mark, PD. Sexual fantasy following midazolam. Emerg Med (Freemantle) 1991; 3: 59–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brahams, D. Benzodiazepines and sexual fantasies. Lancet 1990; 335: 157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brahams, D. Benzodiazepine sex fantasies: acquittal of dentist. Lancet 1990; 335: 403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, GE. Setting and maintaining boundaries: an educational strategy. Med Educ 2004; 38: 903–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, GE, Stewart, . A curriculum on physician–patient sexual misconduct and teacher–learner mistreatment. Part 2: Teaching method. Can Med Assoc Journal 1996; 154: 1021–5.Google ScholarPubMed
,Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria. Physical Examinations, including Intimate Examinations. Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria, 2007. http://www.medicalboardvic.org.au/content.php?sec=54
Ching, HY, Eze, N, Moore-Gillon, V. Chaperones in ENT outpatients: the patients' perspective. J Laryngol Otol 2007; 121: 684–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, JD, Nadelson, CC, Notman, MT (eds). Physician Sexual Misconduct. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, 1999.
Burgess, AW, Hartman, CR (eds). Sexual Exploitation of Patients by Health Professionals. Praeger, New York, 1986.
Gabbard, GO (ed), Sexual Exploitation in Professional Relationships. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, 1989.Google Scholar
Russell, J.Out of Bounds: Sexual Exploitation in Counselling and Therapy. Sage Publications, London, 1993.Google Scholar
Rutter, P.Sex in the Forbidden Zone, When Men in Power – Therapists, Doctors, Clergy, Teachers and Others – Betray Women's Trust. Harper Collins, London, 1995.Google Scholar
Schoener, GR, Milgrown, JH, Gonsiorek, JC, Luepker, ET, Conroe, RM. Psychotherapists; Sexual Involvement with Clients: Intervention and Prevention. Minneapolis Walk-in Counselling Center, Minneapolis, 1989.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×