Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T00:52:33.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

7 - Negligence, professional liability and adverse events

Kerry J. Breen
Affiliation:
National Health and Medical Research Council
Stephen M. Cordner
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Colin J. H. Thomson
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong, New South Wales
Vernon D. Plueckhahn
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

The discomfit the medical profession has with the legal concept of negligence was succinctly expressed by Justice Michael Kirby in 1995 when he wrote:

Medical practitioners tend to see malpractice cases as involving a moral blight or stigma upon the practitioner concerned. From the point of view of the patient (and most lawyers) however, the issue is usually much more basic. It is whether a person who has suffered in some way as a result of medical or hospital procedures will be cast upon the genteel poverty of the social security system or be entitled to recover compensatory damages from the medical practitioner's insurance.

He went on to add:

To gain insurance the practitioner must pay premiums. These premiums become part of the costs of medical practice. In this way, all patients bear the cost of, and contribute to, the fund from which are paid damages when things go wrong.

Many have argued that the current system of the use of civil action by way of claims for negligence should be replaced by a no-fault compensation scheme [2–4] as exists in New Zealand and some Scandinavian countries. Others have pointed out how fraught is the concept of independent experts judging the cause of a poor or unexpected outcome after the event and have decried the gradual change in the notion of what represents negligent conduct [6–7]. These issues are not addressed in this chapter.

Type
Chapter
Information
Good Medical Practice
Professionalism, Ethics and Law
, pp. 103 - 123
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kirby, M. Patients' rights – why the Australian courts have rejected ‘Bolam’. Journal of Medical Ethics 1995; 21: 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spigelman, Justice. Negligence: The last outpost of the welfare state. Address to the Judicial Conference of Australia Colloquium, Launceston, 27 April 2002, available at http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/supreme_court/ll_sc.nsf/pages/SCO_speech_spigelman_270402s
Wood, C.The misplace of litigation in medical practice. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 38(4): 365–76.Google ScholarPubMed
MacLennan, AH, Nelson, KB, Hankins, G, Speer, M. Who will deliver our grandchildren? Implications of cerebral palsy litigation. JAMA 2005; 294: 1688–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaine, WJ. No-fault compensation systems. BMJ 2003; 326: 997–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merry, A, Smith, AMc. Errors, Medicine and the Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugh, TB, Tracy, GD. Hindsight bias in medico-legal expert reports. Med J Aust 2002; 176: 277–8.Google Scholar
Breen v Williams (1994) 35 NSWLR 522.
Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479.
Albrighton v Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (1979) 2 NSWLR 165–75.
BT v Oei (1999) NSWSC 1082.
AMA Code of Ethics – 2004 (editorially revised 2006). http://www.ama.com.au/codeofethics
,General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice 2006. http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/index.asp
,Queensland Medical Board. Good Medical Practice. http://www.medicalboard.qld.gov.au/pdfs/good-medical-practice.pdf
Lowns & Anor v. Woods & Ors (1996) Aust Torts Reports 81–376.
Nathan, HL, Lord, N. Medical Negligence: Being the Law of Negligence in Relation to the Medical Profession and Hospitals. Butterworths, London, 1957.Google Scholar
Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) 2 All ER 118 at 121 per McNair J.
Sidaway v Board of Governors of Bethlehem Royal Hospital Governors & Ors (1985) AC 871.
F v R (1983) 33 SASR 189.
Rosenberg v Percival (2001) 205 CLR 434.
Gottlieb, J, Linden, S. Rosenberg v Percival – Rogers v Whitaker revisited. (2001) 9 Australian Health Law Bulletin69–76.Google Scholar
Chappel v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232.
Battersby v Tottman and State of South Australia (1985) 37 SASR 524.
O'Shea v Sullivan (1994) Aust Torts Report 81–273.
Review of the Law of Negligence. 2002 (The Ipp Report) http://www.revofneg.treasury.gov.au/content/review2.asp.
,From a letter headed ‘Medical Indemnity Insurance’ sent to all doctors in Australia dated 12 May 2003 by the then Minister for Revenue and Assistant Treasurer, Senator Helen Coonan.
,Review of Professional Indemnity Arrangements for Health Care Professionals (Australia). Compensation and Professional Indemnity in Health Care, Final Report. Tito F, Chair. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1995.Google Scholar
Wilson, RM, Runciman, WB, Gibberd, R W et al. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study, Med J Aust 1995; 163: 458–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Leape, LL, Brennan, TA, Laird, N et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Eng J Med 1991; 324: 377–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeil, JJ, Leeder, SR. How safe are Australian hospitals?Med J Aust 1995; 163: 472–5.Google ScholarPubMed
,Key achievements of the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. http://mja.com.au/public/issues/184_10_150506/council_achievements_fm.html
Australian ,Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Sentinel Events in Australian Public Hospitals 2005–2005. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2007. http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/index.cfm/title/10353
Davis, P, Lay-Yee, R, Briant, R et al. Adverse events in New Zealand public hospitals. NZ Med J 2003; 116: 1183. http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/116-1183/624/Google ScholarPubMed
Katz, HP, Kaltsounis, D, Halloran, L et al. Patient safety and telephone medicine: Some lessons from closed claim case reviews. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23: 517–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Association of Neurosurgeons Bulletin 2001; 10(3). http://www.aans.org/library/Article.aspx?ArticleId=10046
Kron, J. Honesty as policy. Australian Doctor 2004; 13 August: 47–50.Google Scholar
Iedema, R, Mallock, N, Sorensen, R et al. The National Open Disclosure Standard Pilot: evaluation of a policy implementation initiative. Med J Aust 2008; 188: 397–400.Google Scholar
Hawkins, C. Mishap or Malpractice. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar
Quinn, M. Being sued – it can happen to you. College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Bulletin 2000; 2(4): 259–60.Google Scholar
Nisselle, P. The stress of being sued. Australian Medicine 2000; June: 10.Google Scholar
Nash, L, Daly, M, Johnson, M et al. Psychological morbidity in Australian doctors who have and have not experienced a medico-legal matter: a cross sectional survey. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 2007; 41: 917–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, A, Smith, AMc. Errors, Medicine and the Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, MM, Sutcliffe, KM (eds). Medical Error: What Do We Know? What Do We Do?Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 2002.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×