Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T07:20:04.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

9 - Health care complaints systems

Kerry J. Breen
Affiliation:
National Health and Medical Research Council
Stephen M. Cordner
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Colin J. H. Thomson
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong, New South Wales
Vernon D. Plueckhahn
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

Prior to the mid-1980s, the only agencies with statutory powers to handle complaints against doctors were the state and territory medical boards. Medical boards were obliged under the relevant medical Acts to investigate the complaints and determine whether a complaint constituted unprofessional conduct under the Act. Complaints were sometimes also made to state branches of the Australian Medical Association (AMA), to medical colleges and to the state health departments, but these organisations did not have disciplinary powers.

During the 1980s there was dissatisfaction with the health complaints processes in several states, especially in regard to their fragmented nature, difficulties in access, difficulties in knowing where to complain and the recognition that complainants' needs were not always met when the complaints were determined by the medical board according to the terms of the legislation. In New South Wales, the response to this dissatisfaction was the establishment in 1984 of a Health Complaints Unit within the Health Department, and in Victoria by the passing in 1987 of the Health Services (Conciliation and Review) Act. This Act established the office of the Health Services Commissioner, who was charged with receiving complaints from users of health services about providers and given the power to conciliate them confidentially.

In 1991 in Queensland the Health Rights Commission Act 1991 established the Office of the Health Rights Commissioner.

Type
Chapter
Information
Good Medical Practice
Professionalism, Ethics and Law
, pp. 145 - 155
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

,Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Australian Charter of Healthcare Rights, 2008. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/internet/safety/publishing.nsf/Content/PriorityProgram-01

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×