Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:06:41.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26 - Water dynamics of epiphytic vegetation in a lower montane cloud forest: fog interception, storage, and evaporation

from Part III - Hydrometeorology of tropical montane cloud forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

C. Tobón
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia
L. Köhler
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen, Germany
K. F. A. Frumau
Affiliation:
VU University, the Netherlands
L. A. Bruijnzeel
Affiliation:
VU University, the Netherlands
R. Burkard
Affiliation:
University of Bern, Switzerland
S. Schmid
Affiliation:
University of Bern, Switzerland
L. A. Bruijnzeel
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
F. N. Scatena
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
L. S. Hamilton
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

Epiphytic vascular plants and bryophytes constitute an important component of cloud forest canopies. Because of their different characteristics compared with leaves and other tree structural elements, epiphytes can be expected to behave differently in terms of their ability to intercept and store rain and cloud water, whereas losses through evaporation and drip may also occur at different rates. The water dynamics of epiphytes were studied in a windward lower montane cloud forest in northern Costa Rica. The exposed site experienced frequent horizontal precipitation (fog and wind-driven rain) as well as strong winds. In situ epiphyte wetting experiments were conducted at different levels within the 20-m canopy during a series of fog events using pre-weighed branches with known epiphyte biomass, while making simultaneous measurements of fog density and drop-size spectrum on a tower extending above the canopy. Rates of water loss via evaporation from pre-wetted epiphyte-laden branches suspended at different heights within the canopy were determined on dry days. Storage capacities were determined by gravimetric means, both in the field and under controlled conditions. Total epiphyte biomass of the forest was estimated through systematic sampling of three emergent trees and five sub-canopy trees in combination with a diameter survey of four plots of 1000 m2 each. Fog interception rates by epiphyte-laden branches differed with position in the canopy, with an average rate of 54.7 ml hour−1 kg−1 of oven-dry biomass. Absorption rates were correlated with fog liquid water content and initial moisture content of the sample. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Tropical Montane Cloud Forests
Science for Conservation and Management
, pp. 261 - 267
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohlman, S. A., Matelson, T. J., and Nadkarni, N. M. (1995). Moisture and temperature patterns of canopy humus and forest floor soil of a montane cloud forest, Costa Rica. Biotropica 27: 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2001). Hydrology of tropical montane cloud forests: a reassessment. Land Use and Water Resources Research 1: 1.1–1.18.Google Scholar
Bruijnzeel, L. A. (compiler) (2006). Hydrological Impacts of Converting Tropical Montane Cloud Forest to Pasture, with Initial Reference to Northern Costa Rica, Final Technical Report DFID-FRP Project no. R7991. Amsterdam: VU University Amsterdam, and Aylesford, UK: Forestry Research Progamme of the UK, Department for International Development. Also available at www.geo.vu.nl/~fiesta.Google Scholar
Burgess, S. S. O, and Dawson, T. E. (2004). The contribution of fog to water relations of Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don): foliar uptake and prevention of dehydration. Plant, Cell and Environment 27: 1023–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkard, R., Bützberger, P., and Eugster, W. (2003). Vertical fogwater flux measurement above an elevated forest canopy at the Lägeren research site, Switzerland. Atmospheric Environment 37: 2979–2990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S. -C., Lai, I. L., and Wu, J. (2002). Estimation of fog on epiphytic bryophytes in a subtropical montane forest ecosystem in north-eastern Taiwan. Atmospheric Research 64: 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, K. L., Nadkarni, N. M., Schaefer, D., and Gholz, H. L. (1998). Atmospheric deposition and net retention of ions by the canopy in a tropical montane forest, Monteverde, Costa Rica. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14: 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frahm, J. -P., and Gradstein, S. R. (1991). An altitudinal zonation of the tropical rain forest using bryophytes. Journal of Biogeography 18: 669–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemp, A. (2002). Ecology of the pteridophytes on the southern slopes of Mt. Kilimanjaro. I. Altitudinal distribution. Plant Ecology 159: 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölscher, D., Köhler, L., Dijk, A. I. J. M., and Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2004). The importance of epiphytes in rainfall interception by a tropical montane rainforest in Costa Rica. Journal of Hydrology 292: 308–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kershaw, K. A. (1985). Physiological Ecology of Lichens. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Köhler, L., Tobón, C., Frumau, K. F. A., and Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2007). Biomass and water storage of epiphytes in old-growth and secondary montane rain forest stands in Costa Rica. Plant Ecology 193: 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, R., and Dryer, V. (1980). The vegetation of the Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve. Brenesia 18: 101–116.Google Scholar
Lovett, G. M. (1984). Rates and mechanisms of cloud water deposition to a subalpine balsam fir forest. Atmospheric Environment 18: 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, S. (2006). A proposal for a new forest canopy interception mechanism: splash droplet evaporation. Journal of Hydrology 319: 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadkarni, N. M., Schaefer, D., Matelson, T. J., and Solano, R. (2004). Biomass and nutrient pools of canopy and terrestrial components in a primary and a secondary montane cloud forest, Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management 198: 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pócs, T. (1980). The epiphytic biomass and its effect on the water balance of two rain forest types in the Uluguru Mountains (Tanzania, East Africa). Acta Botanica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 26: 143–167.Google Scholar
Pypker, T. G., Bond, B. J., and Unsworth, M. H. (2002). The Role of Epiphytes in the Interception and Evaporation of Rainfall in Old-Growth Douglas-Fir Forests in the Pacific Northwest. Corvalis, OR: Oregon State University.Google Scholar
Rhodes, A. L., Guswa, A. J., and Newell, S. E. (2006). Seasonal variation in the stable isotopic composition of precipitation in the tropical montane forests of Monteverde, Costa Rica. Water Resources Research 42, W11402, doi:10.1029/2005WR004535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, B. A., Richardson, M. J., Scatena, F. N., and McDowell, W. H. (2000). Effects of nutrient availability and other elevational changes on bromeliad populations and their invertebrate communities in a humid tropical forest in Puerto Rico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 16: 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, A. J., and Goffinet, B. (2000). Bryophyte Biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leerdam, A., and Zagt, R. J. (1989). The epiphyte vegetation of an Andean forest in Colombia: aspects of its hydrology and distribution in the canopy. M.Sc. thesis, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Veneklaas, E. J., Zagt, R. J., Leerdam, A., et al. (1990). Hydrological properties of epiphyte mass of a montane tropical rain forest, Colombia. Vegetatio 89: 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, J. (1993). Diversity patterns and biomass of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens along an altitudinal gradient in the northern Andes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 928–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadroga, F. (1981). The hydrological importance of a montane cloud forest area of Costa Rica. In Tropical Agricultural Hydrology, eds. Lal, R. and Russell, E. W., pp. 59–73. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×