Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T13:49:08.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Water decision-makers in a desert city: text analysis and environmental social science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Ismael Vaccaro
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Eric Alden Smith
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Shankar Aswani
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Text analysis encompasses a broad range of methods. For many researchers, the phrase “text analysis” likely connotes the close reading and interpretation of data that come in the form of words rather than numbers. Yet in this chapter, we argue for an inclusive approach to text analysis – one that recognizes the advantages of moving iteratively between words and numbers in analyzing texts. Our view is that both qualitative and quantitative methods belong in a complete methodological toolkit for analyzing texts. Instead of envisioning text analysis as occupying one side of a qualitative–quantitative continuum, we see text analysis as a suite of methods that can be used to investigate the full range of research questions, from exploratory to confirmatory.

Exploratory research questions are used to understand new phenomena – uncovering how they work and developing new models to describe them. Examples of exploratory research in environmental social science, which we discuss in greater detail below, include Paolisso and Maloney’s (2000) exploration of environmental knowl­edge of the Chesapeake Bay, and Apostolopoulou and Pantis’ (2009) investigation of failures in Greek conservation policy. Confirmatory research questions are used to test how well existing theories, hypotheses, or models describe a phenomenon of interest. Examples of confirmatory research, also discussed below, include Drieschova, Giordano, and Fischhendler (2008) study of flow variability regulations in international water treaties and Laurian’s (2005) research on the efficacy of citizen input mechanisms in the toxic remediation process.

Type
Chapter
Information
Environmental Social Sciences
Methods and Research Design
, pp. 188 - 211
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apostolopoulou, E.Pantis, J. D. 2009 Conceptual gaps in the national strategy for the implementation of the European Natura 2000 conservation policy in GreeceBiological Conservation 142 221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, H. R.Ryan, G. W. 2010 Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systematic ApproachesLos AngelesSage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S. 1992 Anthropac 4.8Colombia, SCAnalytic TechnologiesGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S.M. G. Everett, and L. C. Freeman 2004 UCINET 6.69Harvard, MAAnalytic TechnologiesGoogle Scholar
Cash, D. W.Clark, W. C.Alcock, F. 2003 Knowledge systems for sustainable developmentProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 8086CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charmaz, K. 2000 Denzin, N. K.Lincoln, Y.The Handbook of Qualitative ResearchThousand Oaks, CASage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L.Palacio, E. 2009 ¿El ciclo hidrológico o el ciclo de atención mediática? Estudio empírico de los encuadres noticiosos del AGUA en la prensa españolaComunicación y Sociedad 22 197Google Scholar
Chhetri, P.Arrowsmith, C.Jackson, M. 2004 Determining hiking experiences in nature-based tourist destinationsTourism Management 25 3143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diefenbach, D. L. 2001 West, M. D.New directions in computer content analysis: theory, method, and practiceNew YorkAblex PublishingGoogle Scholar
Drieschova, A.Giordano, M.Fischhendler, I. 2008 Governance mechanisms to address flow variability in water treatiesGlobal Environmental Change 18 285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, A. W.Hawkins, T. W.Balling, R. C.Gober, P. 2008 Estimating future runoff levels for a semi-arid fluvial system in central ArizonaClimate Research 35 227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmar-Bowers, Q.Lane, R. 2009 Understanding farmers’ strategic decision-making processes and the implications for biodiversity conservation policyJournal of Environmental Management 90 1135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, B. 1992 Basics of Grounded TheoryMill Valley, CASociology PressGoogle Scholar
Glaser, B. G.Strauss, A. 1967 The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative ResearchChicagoAldineGoogle Scholar
Gober, P. 2006 Metropolitan Phoenix: Place Making and Community Building in the DesertPhiladelphiaUniversity of Pennsylvania PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravlee, C. C. 2010 Singer, M.Erickson, P.A Companion to Medical AnthropologyMalden, MABlackwell PublishingGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J.Biro, A.MacKendrick, N. 2009 Lost in the supermarket: the corporate-organic foodscape and the struggle for food democracyAntipode 41 509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplowitz, M. D. 2001 Assessing mangrove products and services at the local level: the use of focus groups and individual interviewsLandscape & Urban Planning 56 53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koski, C. 2007 Examining state environmental regulatory policy designJournal of Environmental Planning and Management 50 483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurian, L. 2005 Public input in toxic site cleanup decisions: the strengths and limitations of Community Advisory BoardsEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32 445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X.Vedlitz, A.Alston, L. 2008 Regional news portrayals of global warming and climate changeEnvironmental Science & Policy 11 379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacQueen, K. M.E. McLellan, K. KayMilstein, B. 1998 Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysisCultural Anthropology Methods 10 31Google Scholar
Miles, M. B.Huberman, A. M. 1994 Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded SourcebookThousand Oaks, CASage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Oreszczyn, S. 2000 A systems approach to the research of people’s relationships with English hedgerowsLandscape and Urban Planning 50 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paloniemi, R.Tikka, P. M. 2008 Ecological and social aspects of biodiversity conservation on private landsEnvironmental Science & Policy 11 336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paolisso, M.Maloney, R. S. 2000 Recognizing farmer environmentalism: nutrient runoff and toxic dinoflagellate blooms in the Chesapeake Bay regionHuman Organization 59 209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, G. W. 1999 Measuring the typicality of text: using multiple coders for more than just reliability and validity checksHuman Organization 58 313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, G. W. 2005 Qualitative Data AnalysisBeaufort, NCNational Science Foundation Short Courses in Research MethodsGoogle Scholar
Ryan, G. W.Bernard, H. R. 2003 Techniques to identify themesField Methods 15 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, G. W.Weisner, T. 1996 Analyzing words in brief descriptions: fathers and mothers describe their childrenCultural Anthropology Methods Journal 8 13Google Scholar
Shandas, V.J. K. Graybill, and C. M. Ryan 2001 Incorporating ecosystem-based management into urban environmental policy: a case study from western WashingtonJournal of Environmental Planning and Management 51 647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, A.Corbin, J. 1990 Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and TechniquesNewbury Park, CASage Publications, IncGoogle Scholar
Tikkanen, J.T. Isokaanta, J. PykalainenLeskinen, P. 2006 Applying cognitive mapping approach to explore the objective–structure of forest owners in a Northern Finnish case areaForest Policy and Economics 9 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, R. P. 1990 Basic Content AnalysisNewbury Park, CASageCrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, D.A. Wutich, T. Lant 2010 Science and Public Policy 37 219CrossRef
Wutich, A.Lant, T.White, D.Larson, K.Gartin, M. 2010 Field Methods 22 88CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×