Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T12:28:02.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Analyzing the politics of natural resources: from theories of property rights to institutional analysis and beyond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Ismael Vaccaro
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Eric Alden Smith
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Shankar Aswani
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Get access

Summary

Tools for institutional and political analysis

How do patterns of socioeconomic and political organization affect access to, control over, and the sustainability of natural resources? How does access to and control over natural resources influence livelihoods, inequality, and political relationships? Who controls natural resources? What accounts for the extent and form of cooperation and conflict over natural resources? Can patterns of natural resource access and control be altered to promote better social, economic, political, and ecological outcomes? Scholars concerned with these and related questions about natural resources have developed tools for institutional and political analysis. The scope of this chapter does not allow a comprehensive review of these approaches. The focus is on economic theories of property rights, the new institutionalism, and forms of political analysis concerned with cooperation, contestation, and power.

Property rights

Property rights define a variety of rights and assign them to particular actors or categories of actors. Examples include rights of access, withdrawal, management, exclusion, and alienation. Over the years, scholars have developed and revised typologies of property rights and distinguished between the nature of the property rights, the identity of the holder of property rights, and the characteristics of the resource subject to property rights. Research on property rights seeks to understand the emergence and development of property rights and how various allocations of property rights influence the efficiency and sustainability of natural resource use.

Type
Chapter
Information
Environmental Social Sciences
Methods and Research Design
, pp. 57 - 79
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, C. H. 2002 Toward a new political methodology: microfoundations and ARTAnnual Review of Political Science 5 423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A. 1999 Greener Pastures: Politics, Markets and Community Among A Pastoral Migrant PeopleDurham, NC:Duke University PressGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A.Goyal, S. 2001 Group size and collective action: third party monitoring in common-pool resourcesComparative Political Studies 34 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A.Ostrom, E. 2001 Collective action, property rights and decentralization in resource use in India and NepalPolitics and Society 29 485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A.Yadama, G. N. 1997 How do local institutions mediate market and population pressures on resources? Forest panchayats in Kumaon, IndiaDevelopment and Change 28 435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, A.Demsetz, H. 1973 The property rights paradigmJournal of Economic History 33 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baland, J.-M.Platteau, J.-P. 2000 Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities?New YorkOxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, S. 1993 No Condition is Permanent: The Social Dynamics of Agrarian Change In Sub-Saharan AfricaMadison, WIUniversity of Wisconsin PressGoogle Scholar
Blaikie, P. 2006 Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and BotswanaWorld Development 34 1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, C. 2007 Property and constitutional order: Land tenure reform and the future of the African stateAfrican Affairs 106 557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, D. W. 1992 Bromley, D. W.Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice, and PolicySan Francisco, CAICS PressGoogle Scholar
Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V.Bishop, R. C. 1975 “Common property” as a concept in natural resources policyNatural Resources Journal 15 713Google Scholar
Dayton-Johnson, J. 1999 Irrigation organization in Mexicanunidades de riego 13 55Google Scholar
Dayton-Johnson, J. 2000 Choosing rules to govern the commons: a model with evidence from MexicoJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization 42 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deininger, K.Binswanger, H. 1999 The evolution of the World Bank’s land policy: Principles, experience, and future challengesThe World Bank Research Observer 14 247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H. 1967 Toward a theory of property rightsAmerican Economic Review 57 347Google Scholar
De Soto, H. 2000 The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere ElseNew YorkBasic BooksGoogle Scholar
Edwards, V. M.Steins, N. A. 1998 Developing an analytical framework for multiple-use commonsJournal of Theoretical Politics 10 347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ensminger, J. 1996 Making a Market: The Institutional Transformation of an African SocietyNew YorkCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C. C. 1999 Politicians and Poachers: The Political Economy of Wildlife Policy in AfricaNew YorkCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C. C.Marks, S. A. 1995 Transforming rural hunters into conservationists: An assessment of community-based wildlife management programs in AfricaWorld Development 23 941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A.Taylor, R. C. R. 1996 Political science and the three new institutionalismsPolitical Studies 44 936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G. 1968 The tragedy of the commonsScience 162 1243Google ScholarPubMed
Hooghe, L.Marks, G. 2003 Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governanceAmerican Political Science Review 97 233Google Scholar
Igoe, J.Brockington, D. 2007 Neoliberal conservation: a brief introductionConservation and Society 5 432Google Scholar
Knight, J. 1992 Institutions and Social ConflictNew YorkCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landry, P. F.Shen, M. 2005 Reaching migrants in survey research: The use of global positioning system to reduce coverage bias in ChinaPolitical Analysis 13 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, S. I.Morrison, M. K. C. 2008 Are African voters really ethnic or clientelistic? Survey evidence from GhanaPolitical Science Quarterly 123 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, C. 2006 Twilight institutions: public authority and local politics in AfricaDevelopment and Change 37 685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manor, J. 2004 User committees: a potentially damaging second wave of decentralisation?European Journal of Development Research 16 192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G.Olsen, J. P. 1984 The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political lifeAmerican Political Science Review 8 734Google Scholar
Meinzen-Dick, R.Raju, K. V.A. Gulati, 2002 What affects organization and collective action for managing resources? Evidence from canal irrigation systems in IndiaWorld Development 30 649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migdal, J. S. 1988 Strong Societies and Weak States: State Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third WorldPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. F. 2001 Certainties undone: fifty turbulent years of legal anthropology, 1949–1999The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netting, R. McC. 1981 Balancing on an Alp: Ecological Change and Continuity in a Swiss Mountain CommunityNew YorkCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
North, D. 1990 Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic PerformanceNew YorkCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakerson, R. J. 1992 Bromley, D. W.Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice, and PolicySan Francisco, CAICS PressGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1990 Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective ActionNew YorkCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, P. E. 1984 Struggles over water, struggles over meaning: cattle, water and the state in BotswanaAfrica: Journal of the International African Institute 54 2949, 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poteete, A. R. 1999
Poteete, A. R. 2003 Ideas, interests, and institutions: challenging the property rights paradigm in BotswanaGovernance 16 527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poteete, A. R. 2003 When professionalism clashes with local particularities: Ecology, elections, and procedural arrangements in BotswanaJournal of Southern African Studies 29 461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poteete, A. R. 2009 Is development path dependent or political? A reinterpretation of mineral-dependent development in BotswanaJournal of Development Studies 45 544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poteete, A. R. 2009 Defining political community and rights to natural resources in BotswanaDevelopment and Change 40 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poteete, A. R.Janssen, M.Ostrom, E. 2010 Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in PracticePrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poteete, A. R.Ostrom, E. 2004 In pursuit of comparable concepts and data about collective actionAgricultural Systems 82 215232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribot, J. C. 2003 Democratic decentralisation of natural resources: Institutional choice and discretionary power transfers in Sub-Saharan AfricaPublic Administration and Development 23 53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribot, J. C.Peluso, N. L. 2003 A theory of accessRural Sociology 68 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribot, J. C.Chhatre, A.Lankina, T. 2010 Introduction: institutional choice and recognition in the formation and consolidation of local democracyConservation and Society 6 1Google Scholar
Rudel, T. K. 2008 Meta-analyses of case studies: a method for studying regional and global environmental changeGlobal Environmental Change 18 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlager, E.Ostrom, E. 1992 Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysisLand Economics 68 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoonmaker Freudenberger, M. 1993 Friedmann, J.Rangan, H.In Defense of Livelihood: Comparative Studies on Environmental ActionWest Hartford, CTKumarian PressGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, K. Z. S. 2006 Nature and National Identity after CommunismPittsburgh, PAUniversity of Pittsburgh PressGoogle Scholar
Sikor, T.Lund, C. 2009 Access and property: a question of power and authorityDevelopment and Change 40 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O. 2002 Ostrom, E.Dietz, T.Dolsak, N.The Drama of the Commons. WashingtonDCNational Academy PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×