Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:56:09.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Screening: cardiac

from Medical topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Alethea F. Cooper
Affiliation:
St. Thomas' Hospital
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Cardiac risk factors

Cardiac screening is a focus of attention because cardiovascular diseases are responsible for the deaths of 16.7 million people worldwide each year (World Health Organization, 2003), but 50% of deaths and disability from cardiovascular disease (CVD) can be reduced through reduction of major coronary risk factors (World Health Organization, 2002). Population-based studies, such as the well known Framingham Heart Study, demonstrated several major risk factors to be independent predictors of coronary heart disease (CHD) although the studies were based on a mainly White population in Massachusetts, USA. Major risk factors include cigarette smoking, hypertension, high serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes mellitus and advancing age. Data from the Framingham Heart Study form the basis of internationally used coronary prediction algorithms (Wilson et al., 1998), two dimensional risk charts (Wood et al., 1998) and a Cardiac Risk Assessor computer programme (The Framingham Risk Equation; Anderson et al., 1991) for calculating risk in patients without known existing CHD. Psychological factors are absent from risk calculation instruments, although recent reviews have detailed the role of psychological factors in manifestation of CHD (Rozanski et al., 2005).

Cardiac screening is generally based on a ‘high risk’ approach in which individuals in the general population at particularly high risk are identified for provision of advice, further diagnostic investigation, or treatment in order to reduce their risk of manifestation of CHD or CVD. A reduction of risk factors is important because people with multiple risk factors for heart disease are three to five times more likely to die, suffer a heart attack, or other major cardiovascular event than people without such conditions or risk factors (DoH, NSF, 2000).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, K. M., Wilson, P. W. F., Odell, P. M. & Kannel, W. B. (1991). An updated coronary risk profile: a statement for health professionals. Circulation, 83, 357–63.Google Scholar
Bass, C., Clyde, W., Hand, C. & Jackson, G. (1983). Patients with angina with normal and near normal coronary arteries: clinical and psychosocial state 12 months after angiography. British Medical Journal, 287, 1505–8.Google Scholar
Bass, C. & Mayou, R. (2002). ABC of psychological medicine: chest pain. British Medical Journal, 325, 588–91.Google Scholar
Beitman, B. D., Mukerji, V., Lamberti, J. W.et al. (1989). Panic disorder in patients with chest pain and angiographically normal coronary arteries. American Journal of Cardiology, 63, 1399–403.Google Scholar
Carter, C., Maddock, R., Zoglio, M.et al. (1994). Panic disorder and chest pain: a study of cardiac stress scintigraphy patients. Americal Journal of Cardiology, 74, 296–8.Google Scholar
Cheng, C., Wong, W., Lai, K.et al. (2003). Psychosocial factors in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 443–9.Google Scholar
Christensen, B. (1995). Psychological reactions to information about risk of ischaemic heart disease in practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 13, 164–7.Google Scholar
Christensen, B., Engberg, M. & Lauritzen, T. (2004). No long-term psychological reaction to information about increased risk of coronary heart disease in general practice. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, 11, 239–43.Google Scholar
Connelly, J., Cooper, J., Mann, A. & Meade, T. W. (1998). The psychological impact of screening for risk of coronary heart disease in primary care settings. Journal of Cardiovascular Risk, 5, 185–91.Google Scholar
Department of Health. (2000). National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease, Chapter Two: Preventing coronary heart disease in high risk patients. London: Stationery Office.
Goldberg, D. (1978). Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER Publishing.
Goldberg, D. & Williams, P. (1988) A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER Nelson.
Haynes, R. B., Sackett, D. L., Taylor, W., Gibson, E. S. & Johnson, A. L. (1978). Increased absenteeism from work after detection and labeling of hypertensive patients. New England Journal of Medicine, 299, 741–4.Google Scholar
Irvine, M. J., Garner, D. M., Olmsted, M. P. & Logan, A. G. (1989). Personality differences between hypertensive and normotensive individuals: influence of knowledge of hypertension status. Psychosomatic Medicine, 51, 537–49.Google Scholar
Marteau, T. M. & Kinmonth, A. L. (2002). Screening for cardiovascular risk: public health imperative or matter for individual informed choice?British Medical Journal, 325, 78–80.Google Scholar
Marteau, T. M., Kinmonth, A. L., Pyke, S. & Thompson, S. on behalf of the British Family Heart Study Group. (1995). Readiness for lifestyle advice: self-assessment of coronary risk prior to screening in the British family heart study. British Journal of General Practice, 45, 5–8.Google Scholar
Marteau, T. M., Kinmonth, A. L., Thompson, S. & Pyke, S. on behalf of the British Family Heart Study Group. (1996). The psychological impact of cardiovascular screening and intervention in primary care: a problem of false reassurance?British Journal of General Practice, 46, 577–82.Google Scholar
Potts, S. G. & Bass, C. M. (1993). Psychosocial outcome and use of medical resources in patients with chest pain and normal or near-normal coronary arteries. Quarterly Journal of Medicine, 86, 583–93.Google Scholar
Rozanski, A., Blumenthal, J. A., Davidson, K. W., Saab, P. G. & Kubzansky, L. (2005). The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 45, 637–51.Google Scholar
Shaw, C., Abrams, K. & Marteau, T. M. (1999). Psychological impact of predicting individuals' risks of illness: a systematic review. Social Science and Medicine, 49, 1571–98.Google Scholar
Stampfer, M. J., Hu, F. B., Manson, J. E., Rimm, E. B. & Willet, W. C. (2000). Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle. New England Journal of Medicine, 343, 16–22.Google Scholar
Tymstra, T. & Bieleman, B. (1987). The psychosocial impact of mass screening for cardiovascular risk factors. Family Practice, 4, 287–90.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. W. F., D' Agostino, R. B., Levy, D.et al. (1998). Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation, 97, 1837–47.Google Scholar
Wood, D. A., Backer, G., Faergeman, O., Graham, I., Marcia, G. & Pyorala, K. with members of the Task Force. (1998). Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. Recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology, European Atherosclerosis Society and European Society of Hypertension. European Heart Journal, 19, 1434–503.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). (2003). World Health Report. Geneva: WHO.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2002). Integrated Management of Cardiovascular Risk. Report of a WHO Meeting, Geneva, July.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×