Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T20:26:01.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chromosomal abnormalities

from Medical topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Jeremy Turk
Affiliation:
St. George's, University of London
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Genetic influences on psychological functioning are well established (McGuffin et al., 2004). A multifactorial interactional model between polygenic inheritance and environmental experience is most commonly proposed. However, many single gene anomalies have characteristic psychological profiles.

The term ‘behavioural phenotype’ (O'Brien, 2002) describes aspects of psychological functioning attributable to a discrete underlying genetic anomaly, even when other contributors such as age, gender and social background are accounted for. The first published use of the term was by Nyhan in his proposal of an association between the inborn error of metabolism and severe self-mutilation in Lesch–Nyhan syndrome (Nyhan, 1972). Nyhan also reported behaviours characteristic of Cornelia de Lange syndrome including self-injury, hyperactivity and autistic features (Berney et al., 1999).

Somewhat earlier, Langdon Down described characteristic personality traits in individuals with Down syndrome including strong powers of imitation, a lively sense of humour, obstinacy and amiability. Research confirms greater similarity of personality and temperament between people with Down syndrome than expected by chance (Nygaard et al., 2002). It also confirms increased risks of Alzheimer's dementia (Holland et al., 2000) and depression (Collacott et al., 1998).

Clinical considerations

Information on psychiatric, psychological and behavioural functioning can be categorized into:

  • intellectual functioning

  • speech and language

  • attentional deficits and impulse control

  • social functioning and understanding

  • other behavioural disturbances

Intellectual functioning

Intellectual abilities in those with a particular condition can vary widely. People with Down syndrome usually have moderate-to-severe intellectual disability, while those with fragile X syndrome usually have mild-to-moderate intellectual disability (Cornish et al., 2004b).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, J., Anker, S., Braddick, O.et al. (2001). Visual and visuospatial development in young children with Williams syndrome. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 43, 330–7.Google Scholar
Baker, P., Piven, J. & Sato, Y. (1998). Autism and tuberous sclerosis complex: prevalence and clinical features. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 279–85.Google Scholar
Bax, M. C. O. & Colville, G. A. (1995). Behaviour in mucopolysaccharide disorders. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 73, 77–81.Google Scholar
Bender, B. G., Harmon, R. J., Linden, M. G., Bucher-Bartelson, B. & Robinson, A. (1999). Psychosocial competence of unselected young adults with sex chromosome abnormalities. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 88, 200–6.Google Scholar
Berney, T. P., Ireland, M. & Burn, J. (1999). Behavioural phenotype of Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 81, 333–6.Google Scholar
Carmichael, B., Pembrey, M., Turner, G. & Barnicoat, A. (1999). Diagnosis of fragile X syndrome: the experiences of parents. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 43, 47–53.Google Scholar
Clayton-Smith, J. & Laan, L. (2003). Angelman syndrome: a review of the clinical and genetic aspects. Journal of Medical Genetics, 40, 87–95.Google Scholar
Collacott, R. A., Cooper, S.-A., Branford, D. & McGrother, C. (1998). Behaviour phenotype for Down's syndrome. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 85–9.Google Scholar
Colvin, L., Fyfe, S., Leonard, S.et al. (2003). Describing the phenotype of Rett syndrome using a population database. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 88, 38–43.Google Scholar
Cornish, K., Sudhalter, V. & Turk, J. (2004a). Attention & language in fragile X. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 10, 11–16.Google Scholar
Cornish, K. M., Turk, J., Wilding, J.et al. (2004b). Annotation: deconstructing the attention deficit in fragile X syndrome: a developmental neuropsychological approach. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1042–53.Google Scholar
Descheemaeker, M. J., Vogels, A., Govers, V.et al. (2002). Prader–Willi syndrome: new insights in the behavioural and psychiatric spectrum. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, 41–50.Google Scholar
Donaldson, M. D. C., Chu, C. E., Cooke, A.et al. (1994). The Prader–Willi syndrome. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 70, 58–63.Google Scholar
Franke, P., Maier, W., Hautzinger, M.et al. (1996). Fragile X carrier females: evidence for a distinct psychopathological phenotype?American Journal of Medical Genetics, 64, 334–9.Google Scholar
Geerts, M., Steyaert, J. & Fryns, J. P. (2003). The XYY syndrome: a follow-up study on 38 boys. Genetic Counselling, 14, 267–79.Google Scholar
Hagerman, P. J. & Hagerman, R. J. (2004). The fragile-X premutation: a maturing perspective. American Journal of Human Genetics, 74, 805–16.Google Scholar
Hagerman, R. J. & Hagerman, P. J. (2002). Fragile X syndrome: diagnosis, treatment and research. Baltimore, London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Holland, A. J., Hon, J., Huppert, F. A. & Stevens, F. (2000). Incidence and course of dementia in people with Down's syndrome: findings from a population-based study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 44, 138–46.Google Scholar
Laan, L. A., Renier, W. O., Arts, W. F.et al. (1997). Evolution of epilepsy and EEG findings in Angelman syndrome. Epilepsia, 38, 195–9.Google Scholar
Mandoki, M. W., Sumner, G. S., Hoffman, R. P. & Riconda, D. L. (1991). A review of Klinefelter's syndrome in children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 167–72.Google Scholar
McCauley, E., Feuillan, P., Kushner, H. & Ross, J. L. (2001). Psychosocial development in adolescents with Turner syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 22, 360–5.Google Scholar
McGuffin, P., Owen, M. J. & Gottesman, I. I. (2004). Psychiatric genetics and genomics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Metcalfe, K. (1999). Williams syndrome: an update on clinical and molecular aspects. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 81, 198–200.Google Scholar
Mount, R. H., Hastings, R. P., Reilly, S., Cass, H. & Charman, T. (2003). Towards a behavioral phenotype for Rett syndrome. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 108, 1–12.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. C. (2004). Review: the behavioural phenotype in velocardiofacial syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48, 524–30.Google Scholar
Nygaard, E., Smith, L. & Torgersen, A. M. (2002). Temperament in children with Down syndrome and in prematurely born children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 61–71.Google Scholar
Nyhan, W. L. (1972). Behavioral phenotypes in organic genetic disease. Pediatric Research, 6, 1–9.Google Scholar
O'Brien, G. (2002). Behavioural phenotypes in clinical practice. London: MacKeith Press.
O'Callaghan, F. J. K., Harris, T., Joinson, C.et al. (2004). The relation of infantile spasms, tubers and intelligence in tuberous sclerosis complex. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 89, 530–3.Google Scholar
Peters, S. U., Beaudet, A. L., Madduri, N. & Bacino, C. A. (2004). Autism in Angelman syndrome: implications for autism research. Clinical Genetics, 66, 530–6.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, P., Börjesson, O., Wentz, E. & Gillberg, C. (2001). Autistic disorders in Down syndrome: background factors and clinical correlates. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 43, 750–4.Google Scholar
Robey, K. L., Reck, J. F., Giacomini, K. D., Barabas, G. & Eddey, G. E. (2003). Modes and patterns of self-mutilation in persons with Lesch–Nyhan disease. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 45, 167–71.Google Scholar
Rovet, J. & Ireland, L. (1994). Behavioral phenotype in children with Turner syndrome. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 19, 779–90.Google Scholar
Rutter, S. C. & Cole, T. R. P. (1991). Psychological characteristics of Sotos syndrome. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 33, 898–902.Google Scholar
Sarimski, K. (2003). Behavioural and emotional characteristics in children with Sotos syndrome and learning disabilities. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 45, 172–8.Google Scholar
Sarimski, K. (2004). Communicative competence and behavioural phenotype in children with Smith–Magenis syndrome. Genetic Counselling, 15, 347–55.Google Scholar
Steffenburg, U., Hagberg, G. & Hagberg, B. (2001). Epilepsy in a representative series of Rett syndrome. Acta Paediatrica, 90, 34–9.Google Scholar
Symons, F. J., Clark, R. D., Hatton, D. D., Skinner, M. & Bailey, D. B. (2003). Self-injurious behavior in young boys with fragile X syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics A, 118, 115–21.Google Scholar
Turk, J. (1998). Fragile X syndrome and attentional deficits. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 11, 175–91.Google Scholar
Turk, J. (2004). The importance of diagnosis. In Dew-Hughes, D. (Ed.). Educating children with fragile X syndrome (pp. 15–19). London: Routledge Falmer.
Turk, J. & Graham, P. (1997). Fragile X syndrome, autism and autistic features. Autism, 1, 175–97.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×