Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T01:09:58.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pelvic pain

from Medical topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Robert R. Edwards
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Because of the dearth of research examining the involvement of psychosocial factors in acute pelvic pain, this chapter focuses on chronic pain in the pelvic region, excluding abdominal pain. Although remarkably common in the female population, chronic pelvic pain (CPP) constitutes a broad and poorly-defined diagnostic category. Indeed, a recent survey of published studies noted that over 90% of investigators did not specify anatomical locations of pain beyond noting that it was ‘in the pelvic region’, and approximately three-quarters of published CPP studies included no information on whether physical pathology was present (Williams et al., 2004).

The most commonly utilized definition of CPP; ‘recurrent or constant pain in the lower abdominal region that has lasted for at least 6 months’, ignores aetiology (Zondervan & Barlow, 2000). The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) has also promulgated a definition for CPP without obvious pathology, but such terms have been criticized for drawing an artificial distinction between organic and non-organic pain (Grace, 2000). Current conceptualizations of pain generally utilize the IASP's definition of pain as ‘an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage’ (International Association for the Study of Pain, 1979). This inclusion of affect in the definition of pain has largely abolished old distinctions between ‘organic’ and ‘functional’ pain.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American College of Gynaecologists (ACOG) (2004). Practice Bulletin No. 51. Chronic pelvic pain. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103, 589–605.
Bergeron, S., Binik, Y. M., Khalife, S.et al. (2001). A randomized comparison of group cognitive-behavioral therapy, surface electromyographic biofeedback, and vestibulectomy in the treatment of dyspareunia resulting from vulvar vestibulitis. Pain, 91, 297–306.Google Scholar
Dinoff, B. L., Meade-Pruitt, S. M. & Doleys, D. M. (2003). Mental health care providers: resource rather than last resort in patients with chronic pelvic pain. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, 46, 804–10.Google Scholar
Ehlert, U., Heim, C. & Hellhammer, D. H. (1999). Chronic pelvic pain as a somatoform disorder. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 68, 87–94.Google Scholar
Engel, C. C. Jr., Walker, E. A., Engel, A. L., Bullis, J. & Armstrong, A. (1998). A randomized, double-blind crossover trial of sertraline in women with chronic pelvic pain. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 44, 2003–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flor, H., Fydrich, T. & Turk, D. C. (1992). Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review. Pain, 49, 221–30.Google Scholar
Fry, R. P. W., Crisp, A. H. & Beard, R. W. (1997). Sociopsychological factors in chronic pelvic pain: a review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 42, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, V. M. (2000). Pitfalls of the medical paradigm in chronic pelvic pain. Baillièr's best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 14, 525–39.Google Scholar
Gracely, R. H., Grant, M. A. & Giesecke, T. (2003). Evoked pain measures in fibromyalgia. Best Practice & ResearchClinical Rheumatology, 17, 593–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granot, M., Friedman, M., Yarnitsky, D. & Zimmer, E. Z. (2002). Enhancement of the perception of systemic pain in women with vulvar vestibulitis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109, 863–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granot, M., Yarnitsky, D., Itskovitz-Eldor, J.et al. (2001). Pain perception in women with dysmenorrhea (1). Obstetrics and Gynecology, 98, 407–11.Google Scholar
Granot, M., Zimmer, E. Z., Friedman, M., Lowenstein, L. & Yarnitsky, D. (2004). Association between quantitative sensory testing, treatment choice, and subsequent pain reduction in vulvar vestibulitis syndrome. The Journal of Pain, 5, 226–32.Google Scholar
Harrop-Griffiths, J., Katon, W., Walker, E., Holm, L., Russo, J. & Hickok, L. (1988). The association between chronic pelvic pain, psychiatric diagnoses and childhood sexual abuse. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 71, 589–94.Google Scholar
International Association for the Study of Pain (1979). Pain terms: a list with definitions and notes on usage. Pain, 6, 249–52.
Jamieson, D. J. & Steege, J. F. (1996). The prevalence of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain, and irritable bowel syndrome in primary care practices. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 87, 55–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, D. J. & Steege, J. F. (1997). The association of sexual abuse with pelvic pain complaints in a primary care population. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 177, 1408–12.Google Scholar
Kjerulff, K. H., Langenberg, P., Seidman, J. D., Stolley, P. D. & Guzinski, G. M. (1996). Uterine leiomyomas. Racial differences in severity, symptoms and age at diagnosis. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 41, 483–90.Google Scholar
Klonoff, E. A., Landrine, H. & Brown, M. (1993). Appraisal and response to pain may be a function of its bodily location. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 37, 661–70.Google Scholar
Lampe, A., Doering, S., Rumpold, G.et al. (2003). Chronic pain syndromes and their relation to childhood abuse & stressful life events. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 54, 361–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampe, A., Solder, E., Ennemoser, A.et al. (2000). Chronic pelvic pain and previous sexual abuse. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 96, 929–33.Google Scholar
Marshall, K. (2003). Interstitial cystitis: understanding the syndrome. Alternative Medicine Review, 8, 426–37.Google Scholar
Mathias, S. D., Kuppermann, M., Liberman, R. F., Lipschutz, R. C. & Steege, J. F. (1996). Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 87, 321–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcgowan, L. P. A., Clark-Carter, D. D. & Pitts, M. K. (1998). Chronic pelvic pain: a meta-analytic review. Psychology and Health, 13, 937–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielson, W. R. & Weir, R. (2001). Biopsychosocial approaches to the treatment of chronic pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 17, S114–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. A., Dorst, E., Jellis, B.et al. (1991). A randomized clinical trial to compare two different approaches in women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 77, 740–4.Google Scholar
Rannestad, T., Eikeland, O. J., Helland, H. & Qvarnstrom, U. (2000). Quality of life, pain, and psychological well-being in women suffering from gynecological disorders. Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine, 9, 897–903.Google Scholar
Raphael, K. G., Widom, C. S. & Lange, G. (2001). Childhood victimization and pain in adulthood: a prospective investigation. Pain, 92, 283–93.Google Scholar
Reed, B. D., Haefner, H. K., Punch, M. R.et al. (2000). Psychosocial and sexual functioning in women with vulvodynia and chronic pelvic pain. A comparative evaluation. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 45, 624–32.Google Scholar
Reiter, R. C. (1998). Evidence-based management of chronic pelvic pain. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 41, 422–35.Google Scholar
Roth, R. S., Punch, M. R. & Bachman, J. E. (2001). Educational achievement and pain disability among women with chronic pelvic pain. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 51, 563–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salerno, S. M., Browning, R. & Jackson, J. L. (2002). The effect of antidepressant treatment on chronic back pain: a meta-analysis. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stones, R. W., Selfe, S. A., Fransman, S. & Horn, S. A. (2000). Psychosocial and economic impact of chronic pelvic pain. Baillièr's best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 14, 415–31.Google Scholar
Turk, D. C. & Okifuji, A. (2002). Psychological factors in chronic pain: evolution and revolution. Journal of consulting clinical psychology, 70, 678–90.Google Scholar
Walker, E. A., Roy-Byrne, P. P., Katon, W. J. & Jemelka, R. (1991). An open trial of nortriptyline in women with chronic pelvic pain. International journal of psychiatry in medicine, 21, 245–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walling, M. K., Reiter, R. C., O'Hara, M. W.et al. (1994). Abuse history and chronic pain in women: I. Prevalences of sexual abuse and physical abuse see comments. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 84, 193–9.Google Scholar
Wesselmann, U., Burnett, A. L. & Heinberg, L. J. (1997). The urogenital and rectal pain syndromes. Pain, 73, 269–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. E., Hartmann, K. E. & Steege, J. F. (2004). Documenting the current definitions of chronic pelvic pain: implications for research. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103, 686–91.Google Scholar
Zondervan, K. & Barlow, D. H. (2000). Epidemiology of chronic pelvic pain. Baillièr's best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 14, 403–14.Google Scholar
Zondervan, K. T., Yudkin, P. L., Vessey, M. P.et al. (1998). The prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women in the United Kingdom: a systematic review. British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 105, 93–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×