Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:13:09.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

151 - Pregnancy and Childbirth

from Section 2 - Medical Conditions and Symptoms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2019

Carrie D. Llewellyn
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
City, University of London
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
University College London
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
City, University of London
Keith J. Petrie
Affiliation:
University of Auckland
Tracey A. Revenson
Affiliation:
City University of New York
John Weinman
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayers, S. & Olander, E. K. (2013). What are we measuring and why? Using theory to guide perinatal research and measurement. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, Special Edition, 31(5), 439448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayers, S. & Pickering, A. D. (2005). Women’s expectations and experience of birth. Psychology & Health, 20 (1), 7992.Google Scholar
Betran, A. P., Ye, J., Moller, A. B., et al. (2016). The increasing trend in Caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One, 11(2), e0148343. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao-Lei, L., Dancause, K. N., Elgbeili, G., et al. (2015a). DNA methylation mediates the impact of exposure to prenatal maternal stress on BMI and central adiposity in children at age 13(1/2) years: Project Ice Storm. Epigenetics, 10(8), 749761. DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2015.1063771.Google Scholar
Cao-Lei, L., Elgbeili, G., Massart, R., et al. (2015b). Pregnant women’s cognitive appraisal of a natural disaster affects DNA methylation in their children 13 years later: Project Ice Storm. Translational Psychiatry, 5, e515. DOI: 10.1038/tp.2015.13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dick-Read, G. (1933), Natural Childbirth. London: Pinter & Martin.Google Scholar
Dick-Read, G. (2004), Childbirth Without Fear: The Principles and Practice of Natural Childbirth. London: Pinter & Martin.Google Scholar
Gagnon, A. J. & Sandall, J. (2007). Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002869.pub2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, V. (2016). Maternal stress during pregnancy and infant and child outcomes. In Wenzel, A. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Perinatal Psychology (pp. 268283). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, J. M., Coupland, V. A. & Kitzinger, J. V. (1998). Great Expectations: A Prospective Study of Women’s Expectations and Experiences of Childbirth. Hale: Books for Midwives.Google Scholar
Gupton, A., Beaton, J., Sloan, J. & Bramadat, I. (1991). The development of a scale to measure childbirth expectations. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 23(2), 3547.Google ScholarPubMed
Iravani, M., Zarean, E., Janghorbani, M. & Bahrami, M. (2015). Women’s needs and expectations during normal labor and delivery. Journal of Education & Health Promotion, 23(4), 6.Google Scholar
Jessop, D. C., Craig, L. & Ayers, S. (2014). Applying Leventhal’s self-regulatory model to pregnancy: evidence that pregnancy-related beliefs and emotional responses are associated with maternal health outcomes. Journal of Health Psychology, 19(9), 10911102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, B. (1993). Birth in Four Cultures, a Crosscultural Investigation of Childbirth in Yucatan, Holland, Sweden and the United States. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Laplante, D. P., Brunet, A., Schmitz, N., Ciampi, A. & King, S. (2008). Project Ice Storm: prenatal maternal stress affects cognitive and linguistic functioning in 5½ year old children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47(9), 10631072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laplante, D. P., Brunet, A. & King, S. (2016). The effects of maternal stress and illness during pregnancy on infant temperament: Project Ice Storm. Pediatric Research, 79(1), 107113. DOI: 10.1038/pr.2015.177.Google Scholar
Laursen, M., Johansen, C. & Hedegaard, M. (2009). Fear of childbirth and risk for birth complications in nulliparous women in the Danish National Birth Cohort. BJOG, 116, 13501355. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02250.x.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
MacDorman, M. F., Menacker, F. & Declercq, E. (2008). Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes. Clinical Perinatology, 35(2): 293307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCourt, C., Weaver, J., Statham, H., et al. (2007). Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth, 34(1), 6579. DOI:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00147.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menacker, F., Declercq, E. & Macdorman, M. F. (2006). Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Seminars in Perinatology, 30(5), 235241. DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M. & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6, 42. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nieminen, K., Stephansson, O. & Ryding, E. L. (2009). Women’s fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section: a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavia, 88, 807813. DOI: 10.1080/00016340902998436.Google Scholar
Olander, E. K., Darwin, Z. J., Atkinson, L., Smith, D. M. & Gardner, B. (2016). Beyond the ‘teachable moment’: a conceptual analysis of women’s perinatal behaviour change. Women and Birth, 29(3), e67–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, W. L., Bottle, A. & Aylin, P. (2015). Association between day of delivery and obstetric outcomes: observational study. BMJ, 351(8035), 20.Google Scholar
Rouhe, H., Salmela-Aro, K., Halmesmaki, E. & Saisto, T. (2009). Fear of childbirth according to parity, gestational age, and obstetric history. BJOG, 116, 6773. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02002.x.Google Scholar
Salomonsson, B., Gullberg, M. T., Alehagen, S. & Wijma, K. (2013). Self-efficacy beliefs and fear of childbirth in nulliparous women. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 34, 116121. DOI: 10.3109/0167482X.2013.824418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saxby, D. E. (2017). Birth of a new perspective? A call for biopsychosocial research on childbirth. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 8186.Google Scholar
Storksen, H. T., Garthus-Niegel, S., Vangen, S. & Eberhard-Gran, M. (2013). The impact of previous birth experiences on maternal fear of childbirth. Acta Obstetrica et Gynecologica Scandinavia, 92, 318324. DOI:10.1111/aogs.12072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suls, J. & Rothman, A. (2004). Evolution of the biopsychosocial model: prospects and challenges for health psychology. Health Psychology, 23(2), 119125. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Parys, A., Ryding, E. L., Schei, B., Lukasse, M. & Temmerman, M. (2012). Fear of childbirth and mode of delivery in six European countries: The BIDENS study. 22nd European Congress of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG), Book of Abstracts (S14.4).Google Scholar
Wadhwa, P. D., Buss, C., Entringer, S. & Swanson, J. M. (2009). Developmental origins of health and disease: brief history of the approach and current focus on epigenetic mechanisms. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 27(5), 358368. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1237424.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2015). Caesarean sections should be performed only when necessary. News release. www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2015/caesarean-sections/en/ (accessed 11 January 2017).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×