Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T13:59:45.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 32 - Stimulating the Poor Responder

from Section 5 - Embryo Selection and Transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2019

By
Yadava B. Jeve  and
Harish M. Bhandari
Edited by
Gabor Kovacs ,
Anthony Rutherford  and
David K. Gardner
Gabor Kovacs
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Anthony Rutherford
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
David K. Gardner
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
How to Prepare the Egg and Embryo to Maximize IVF Success , pp. 368 - 374
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ferraretti, AP, La Marca A, , Fauser, BC, et.al. ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 2011;26(7): 1616–24.Google Scholar
Bozdag, G, Polat, M, Yarali, I, Yarali, H. Live birth rates in various subgroups of poor ovarian responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2017: S1472–6483(17)30141–4. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.009.Google Scholar
Patrizio, P, Vaiarelli, A, Levi Setti, PE et al. How to define, diagnose and treat poor responders? Responses from a worldwide survey of IVF clinics. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2015;30: 581–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boza, A, Cakar, E, Boza, B, et.al. Microdose flare-up gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist versus GnRH antagonist protocols in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility. 2016;17: 163–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Jeve, YB and Bhandari, HM. Effective treatment protocol for poor ovarian response: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2016;9:70–81.Google Scholar
Turgay Çelik, Gİ, Sütçü, HK, Akpak, YK, Akar, ME. A flexible multidose GnRH antagonist versus a microdose flare-up GnRH agonist combined with a flexible multidose GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders to IVF. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:970163.Google Scholar
Yang, R, Li, H, Li, R, Liu, P, Qiao, J. A comparison among different methods of letrozole combined with gonadotropin in an antagonist protocol and high-dose gonadotropin ovarian stimulation antagonist protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2016;294: 1091–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surrey, ES. Management of the poor responder: the role of GnRH agonists and antagonists. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2007;24: 613–19.Google Scholar
Pandian, Z, McTavish, AR, Aucott, L, Hamilton, MP, Bhattacharya, S. Interventions for ‘poor responders’ to controlled ovarian hyper stimulation (COH) in in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online). 2010(1):CD004379.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, J, Antaki, R, Kadoch, I-J et al. 450 IU versus 600 IU gonadotropin for controlled ovarian stimulation in poor responders: a randomized controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility.104: 1419–25.Google Scholar
Humaidan, P, Chin, W, Rogoff, D et al. Efficacy and safety of follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in ART: a randomized controlled trial in poor ovarian responders. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 2017;32: 544–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mak, SM, Wong, WY, Chung, HS et al. Effect of mid-follicular phase recombinant LH versus urinary HCG supplementation in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF – a prospective double-blinded randomized study. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2017;34: 258–66.Google Scholar
Selman, H, Rinaldi, L. Effectiveness of corifollitropin alfa used for ovarian stimulation of poor responder patients. International Journal of Women’s Health. 2016;8: 609–15.Google Scholar
Li, XL, Wang, L, Lv, F et al. The influence of different growth hormone addition protocols to poor ovarian responders on clinical outcomes in controlled ovary stimulation cycles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2017;96:e6443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qin, JC, Fan, L, Qin, AP. The effect of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation on women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) in IVF cycle: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction. 2017;46:1–7.Google Scholar
Bosdou, JK, Venetis, CA, Dafopoulos, K et al. Transdermal testosterone pretreatment in poor responders undergoing ICSI: a randomized clinical trial. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 2016;31: 977–85.Google Scholar
Song, D, Shi, Y, Zhong, Y et al. Efficiency of mild ovarian stimulation with clomiphene on poor ovarian responders during IVF\ICSI procedures: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2016;204:36–43.Google Scholar
Bastu, E, Buyru, F, Ozsurmeli, M et al. A randomized, single-blind, prospective trial comparing three different gonadotropin doses with or without addition of letrozole during ovulation stimulation in patients with poor ovarian response. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2016;203:30–34.Google Scholar
Youssef, MA, van Wely, M, Al-Inany, H et al. A mild ovarian stimulation strategy in women with poor ovarian reserve undergoing IVF: a multicenter randomized non-inferiority trial. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 2017;32: 112–18.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×