Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T07:02:39.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Complications of Hysteroscopic Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2020

By
Kevin Phillips  and
T. Justin Clark
Edited by
Mary E. Connor  and
T. Justin Clark
Mary E. Connor
Affiliation:
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield
T. Justin Clark
Affiliation:
Birmingham Women’s Hospital
Get access

Summary

Hysteroscopy is safe and effective and can greatly reduce morbidity and enhance recovery compared with conventional open procedures. Furthermore, it can minimise the inherent risks of general anaesthesia and hospital admissions because many hysteroscopic procedures can now be delivered in non-anaesthetised women in an outpatient setting. The overall complication rate of hysteroscopic intervention is estimated to be less than 1% [1, 2], of which half is due to serious complications, namely fluid overload, uterine perforation and upper genital tract haemorrhage. Complications occur during access and entry into the uterine cavity or during the diagnostic or operative procedure. Complication rates are higher with operative hysteroscopy (0.95%) compared with purely diagnostic procedures (0.13%) [1]. These risks are highest with more complex hysteroscopic surgery such as myomectomy and adhesiolysis and lowest with purely diagnostic procedures.

Type
Chapter
Information
Diagnostic and Operative Hysteroscopy , pp. 109 - 117
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jansen, FW, Vredevoogd, CB, van Ulzen, K, et al. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 266–70.Google Scholar
Clark, TJ, Voit, D, Song, F, et al. Accuracy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and disease: a systematic review. JAMA 2002; 288: 1610–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overton, C, Hargreaves, J, Maresh, M. A national survey of the complications of endometrial destruction for menstrual disorders: the MISTLETOE study.BJOG 1997; 104: 1351–9.Google Scholar
Taskin, O, Yalcinoglu, A, Kucuk, S, et al. The degree of fluid absorption during hysteroscopic surgery in patients pretreated with goserelin. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996; 3: 555–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donnez, J, Vilos, G, Gannon, MJ, et al. Goserelin acetate (Zoladex) plus endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding: a large randomized, double-blind study. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 29–36.Google Scholar
Cooper, KG, Pinion, SB, Bhattacharya, S, Parkin, DE. The effects of the gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue (goserelin) and prostaglandin E1 (misoprostol) on cervical resistance prior to transcervical resection of the endometrium. BJOG 1996; 103: 375–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, N, Smith, P, Khan, K, Clark, TJ. Does cervical preparation before outpatient hysteroscopy reduce women’s pain experience? A systematic review. BJOG 2011; 118 : 1292–301.Google Scholar
Polyzos, NP, Zavos, A, Valachis, A, et al. Misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy in premenopausal and post-menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18: 393–404.Google Scholar
Al-Fozan, H, Firwana, B, Al Kadri, H, Hassan, S, Tulandi, T. Preoperative ripening of the cervix before operative hysteroscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (4): CD005998.Google Scholar
Munro, MG, Christianson, LA. Complications of hysteroscopic and uterine resectoscopic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58: 765–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darney, PD, Atkinson, E, Hirabayashi, K. Uterine perforation during second-trimester abortion by cervical dilation and instrumental extraction: a review of 15 cases. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 441–4.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Best Practice in Outpatient Hysteroscopy. Green-top Guideline No. 59. London: RCOG; 2011. www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg59 (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Agostini, A., Bretelle, F, Cravello, L, et al. Complications of operative hysteroscopy. Presse Med 2003; 32(18): 826–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Tan, Y, Lethaby, A. Pre-operative endometrial thinning agents before endometrial destruction for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (11): CD010241.Google Scholar
Castaing, NDE. Mechanical and metabolic complications of hysteroscopic surgery: report of a retrospective study of 352 procedures. Contracept Fertil Sex 1999; 27: 210–15.Google Scholar
Pasini, A, Belloni, C. Intraoperative complications of 697 consecutive operative hysteroscopies. Minerva Gynecol 2001; 53(1): 13–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Vilos, GA, Stan, B, Graham, G, McCulloch, S, Borg, P. Genital tract electrical burns during hysteroscopic endometrial ablation: report of 13 cases in the United States and Canada. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000; 7: 141–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muzii, L, Boni, T, Bellati, F, et al. GnRH analogue treatment before hysteroscopic resection of submucous myomas: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 1496–9.Google Scholar
Mavrelos, D, Ben-Nagi, J, Davies, A, et al. The value of pre-operative treatment with GnRH analogues in women with submucous fibroids: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 2264–9.Google Scholar
Phillips, DR, Nathanson, HG, Milim, SJ, et al. The effect of dilute vasopressin solution on blood loss during operative hysteroscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 761–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corson, SL, Brooks, PG, Serden, SP, Batzer, SR, Gocial, B. Effects of vasopressin administration during hysteroscopic surgery. J Reprod Med 1994; 39: 419–23.Google Scholar
Cooper, NA, Smith, P, Khan, KS, Clark, TJ. A systematic review of the effect of the distension medium on pain during outpatient hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 264–71.Google Scholar
Hahn, RG, Sandfelt, L, Nyman, CR. Double-blind randomized study of symptoms associated with absorption of glycine 1.5% or mannitol 3% during transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol 1998; 160: 397–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umranikar, S, Clark, TJ, Saridogan, E, et al. BSGE/ESGE guideline on management of fluid distension media in operative hysteroscopy. Gynecol Surg 2016; 13: 289–303.Google Scholar
AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL Practice Report. Practice guidelines for the management of hysteroscopic distending media. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20: 137–48.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. Venous air embolism during operative hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1997; 4: 399–402.Google Scholar
Munro, MG, Weisberg, M, Rubinstein, E. Gas and air embolization during hysteroscopic electrosurgical vaporization: comparison of gas generation using bipolar and monopolar electrodes in an experimental model. Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001; 8: 488–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandner, P, Neis, KJ, Ehmer, C. The etiology, frequency, and prevention of gas embolism during CO2 hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1999; 6: 421–8.Google Scholar
Imasogie, N, Crago, R, Leyland, N, Chung, F. Probable gas embolism during operative hysteroscopy caused by products of combustion. Can J Anaesth 2002; 49: 1044–7.Google Scholar
Lethaby, A, Hickey, M, Garry, R. Endometrial destruction techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (4): CD001501.Google Scholar
Munro, MG, Christianson, LA. Complications of hysteroscopic and uterine resectoscopic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58: 765–97.Google Scholar
Smith, PP, Kolhe, S, O’Connor, S, Clark, TJ. Vaginoscopy Against Standard Treatment (VAST): a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2019; 126: 891–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thinkhamrop, J, Laopaiboon, M, Lumbiganon, P. Prophylactic antibiotics for transcervical intrauterine procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (3): CD005637.Google Scholar
Janjua, A, Smith, P, Dawoud, K, Gray, J, Clark, J. Fatal systemic infection following an outpatient hysteroscopic diagnosis of a chronic pyometra: a case report and survey of practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 194: 250–1.Google Scholar
Barnett, JC, Hurd, WW, Rogers, RM, Williams, NL, Shapiro, SA. Laparoscopic positioning and nerve injuries. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14: 664–72.Google Scholar
Tulandi, T. Introduction: prevention of adhesion formation: the journey continues. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 545–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Touboul, C, Fernandez, H, Deffieux, X, et al. Uterine synechiae after bipolar hysteroscopic resection of submucosal myomas in patients with infertility. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1690–3.Google Scholar
Bansi-Matharu, L, Gurol-Urganci, I, Mahmood, TA, et al. Rates of subsequent surgery following endometrial ablation among English women with menorrhagia: a population-based cohort study. BJOG 2013; 120: 1500–7.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×