Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:02:04.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Endometrial Ablation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2020

Mary E. Connor
Affiliation:
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield
T. Justin Clark
Affiliation:
Birmingham Women’s Hospital
Get access

Summary

Endometrial ablation (EA) is a minimally invasive surgical intervention that aims to reduce heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) by destroying functionally active endometrial glands within the endometrium and the superficial myometrium, including the deep basal glands. To prevent regeneration and stop menstruation this destruction should be to a depth of 5 mm. In the past, destruction of the endometrium required an operating hysteroscope. Endometrial tissue was either removed using an electrical cutting loop or destroyed by applying thermal energy to induce necrosis using an electrical ‘rollerball’ or laser fibre. These first-generation techniques have largely been superseded by second-generation techniques that comprise semi-automated global ablative systems using a variety of energy sources to thermally ablate the endometrium. These systems require less operator skill, are less likely to require general anaesthesia, are quicker to perform and offer enhanced safety with no loss in effectiveness.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lethaby, A, Hickey, M, Garry, R. Endometrial destruction techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (4): CD001501.Google Scholar
Middleton, LJ, Chapameria, R, Daniels, JP, et al. Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients. BMJ 2010; 341: c3929.Google Scholar
Longinotti, MK, Jacobson, GF, Hung, YY, Learman, LA. Probability of hysterectomy after endometrial ablation. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 1214–20.Google Scholar
Bansi-Matharu, L, Gurol-Urganci, I, Mahmood, TA, et al. Rates of subsequent surgery following endometrial ablation among English women with menorrhagia: a population-based cohort study. BJOG 2013; 120: 1500–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munro, M. Endometrial ablation with a thermal balloon: the first 10 years. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004; 11: 822.Google Scholar
Badia, C, Nyirjesy, P, Atogho, A. Endometrial ablation devices: review of a manufacturer and user facility device experience database. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14: 436–44.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Assessment and Management. NICE Guideline NG88. London: NICE; 2018. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng88 (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Clark, TJ, Samuels, N, Malick, S, et al. Bipolar radiofrequency compared with thermal balloon endometrial ablation in the office: a randomised controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 1228.Google Scholar
McCausland, AM, McCausland, VM. Long-term complications of endometrial ablation: cause, diagnosis, treatment and prevention. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14: 399406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, TE, Tsourapas, A, Middleton, LJ, et al. Hysterectomy, endometrial ablation, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 2011; 342: d2202.Google Scholar
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy. Guidance on the responsibilities of manufacturers, the regulator and clinicians with respect to endometrial ablation. 2011. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20141205222136/http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Publications/Safetyguidance/Otherdevicesafetyguidance/CON108725 (accessed October 2019).Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Endometrial ablation. London: RCOG; 2015. www.rcog.org.uk/en/patients/patient-leaflets/endometrial-ablation (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Sharp, HT. Endometrial ablation: postoperative complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 242–7.Google Scholar
El Nashar, SA, Hopkins, M, Creedon, DJ, et al. Prediction of treatment outcomes after global endometrial ablation. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 113: 97106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guedj, H, Baggish, MS, Valle, RF. Operative Hysteroscopy. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.Google Scholar
Overton, C, Hargreaves, J, Maresh, M. A national survey of the complications of endometrial destruction for menstrual disorders: the MISTLETOE study. BJOG 1997; 104: 1351–9.Google Scholar
Byers, G, Pinion, S, Parkin, D, Chambers, W. Fluid absorption during transcervical resection of the endometrium. Gynaecol Endoscopy 1993; 2: 21–3.Google Scholar
Umranikar, S, Clark, TJ, Saridogan, E, et al. BSGE/ESGE guideline on management of fluid distension media in operative hysteroscopy. Gynecol Surg 2016; 13: 289303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lethaby, A, Penninx, J, Hickey, M, Garry, R, Marjoribanks, J. Endometrial resection and ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (8): CD001501.Google Scholar
MacLean-Fraser, E, Penava, D, Vilos, GA. Perioperative complication rates of primary and repeat hysteroscopic endometrial ablations. J Am Assoc Gyncol Laparosc 2002; 9: 175–7.Google Scholar
Tan, YH, Lethaby, A. Pre-operative endometrial thinning agents before endometrial destruction for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (11): CD010241.Google Scholar
Penninx, JP, Herman, MC, Kruitwagen, RF, et al. Bipolar versus balloon endometrial ablation in the office: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 196: 52–6.Google Scholar
Jack, SA, Cooper, KG, Seymour, J, et al. A randomised controlled trial of microwave endometrial ablation without endometrial preparation in the outpatient setting: patient acceptability, treatment outcome and costs. BJOG 2005; 112: 1109–16.Google Scholar
Daniels, JP, Middleton, LJ, Champaneria, R, et al. Second generation endometrial ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding: network meta-analysis. BMJ 2012; 344: e2564.Google Scholar
Brun, JL, Burlet, G, Galand, B, Quereux, C, Bernard, P. Cavaterm thermal balloon endometrial ablation versus hysteroscopic endometrial resection to treat menorrhagia: the French, multicenter, randomized study. J Min Invasive Gynecol 2006; 13: 424–30.Google Scholar
Abbott, J, Hawe, J, Hunter, D, Garry, R. A double-blind randomized trial comparing the Cavaterm and the NovaSure endometrial ablation systems for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 203–8.Google Scholar
Friberg, B, Ahlgren, M. Thermal balloon endometrial destruction: the outcome of treatment of 117 women followed up for a maximum period of 4 years. Gynaecol Endosc 2000; 9: 389–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penninx, JP, Herman, MC, Kruitwagen, RF, et al. Bipolar versus balloon endometrial ablation in the office: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 196: 52–6.Google Scholar
Karamanidis, D, Nicolaou, P, Byros, A, Koutsougeras, G. Two-year results of a new two-minute hot liquid balloon endometrial ablation system (Thermablate): a pilot study. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2009; 36: 256–8.Google Scholar
Tas, B. Five-year experience of Minitouch endometrial outpatient ablation performed in an office setting without anaesthesia by a solo operator. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 24: S120.Google Scholar
Goldrath, MH. Evaluation of HydroThermAblator and rollerball endometrial ablation for menorrhagia 3 years after treatment. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003; 10: 505–11.Google Scholar
Berman, JM. Analysis of the safety and reliability of a hydrothermal ablation system: a multicenter, prospective postmarket study. J Reprod Med 2014; 59: 56.Google Scholar
Clark, TJ, Gupta, JK. Handbook of Outpatient Hysteroscopy: A Complete Guide to Diagnosis and Therapy. London: Hodder Arnold; 2005.Google Scholar
Kumar, V, Tryposkiadis, K, Gupta, JK. Hysteroscopic local anesthetic intrauterine cornual block in office endometrial ablation: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2016; 105: 474–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skensved, H. Global-local anaesthesia: combining paracervical block with intramyometrial prilocaine in the fundus significantly reduces patients’ perception of pain during radio-frequency endometrial ablation (Nova-Sure1) in an office setting. Gynecol Surg 2012; 9(: 207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapa, HO, Antonetti, AG., Bakker, K. Ketorolac-mepivacaine lower uterine block for in-office endometrial ablation: a randomized, controlled trial. J Reprod Med 2010; 55: 464–8.Google Scholar
Munro, MG, Brooks, PG. Use of local anesthesia for office diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17: 709–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lok, IH, Leung, PL, Ng, PS, Yuen, PM. Life-table analysis of the success of thermal balloon endometrial ablation in the treatment of menorrhagia. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 1255–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bongers, MY, Bourdrez, P, Mol, BW, Heintz, AP, Brolmann, HA. Randomised controlled trial of bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation and balloon endometrial ablation. BJOG 2004; 111: 1095–102.Google Scholar
Cooper, K, Lee, A, Chien, P, et al. Outcomes following hysterectomy or endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland. BJOG 2011; 118: 1171–9.Google Scholar
Daniels, JP. The long-term outcomes of endometrial ablation in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 25: 320–6.Google Scholar
Papadakis, EP, El Nashar, SA, Laughlin-Tommaso, SK, et al. Combined endometrial ablation and levonorgestre; intrauterine system use in women with dysmenorrhoea and heavy menstrual bleeding: novel approach for challenging case. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22: 1203–37.Google Scholar
Vaughan, D, Byrne, P. An evaluation of the simultaneous use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUS, Mirena®) combined with endometrial ablation in the management of menorrhagia. J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 32: 372–4.Google Scholar
Thinkhamrop, J, Laopaiboon, M, Lumbiganon, P. Prophylactic antibiotics for transcervical intrauterine procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (5): CD005637.Google Scholar
Dood, RL, Gracia, CR, Sammel, MD, et al. Endometrial cancer after endometrial ablation versus medical management of abnormal uterine bleeding. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 744–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×