Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T07:15:49.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Infrastructure and Instrumentation for Hysteroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2020

By
Priya Madhuvrata ,
Gillian Smith  and
Mary E. Connor
Edited by
Mary E. Connor  and
T. Justin Clark
Mary E. Connor
Affiliation:
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield
T. Justin Clark
Affiliation:
Birmingham Women’s Hospital
Get access

Summary

The first part of this chapter has been written with the patient’s journey in mind: from the time of presentation to the general practitioner (GP) with a problem such as abnormal uterine bleeding, through referral to secondary care for investigation, including hysteroscopy if appropriate, and to treatment as indicated. We hope this approach will clarify what is involved in providing such a service. In the second half of the chapter, the equipment required for providing hysteroscopy services is described in detail, making extensive use of published standards and guidelines for gynaecology and hysteroscopy specifically.

Type
Chapter
Information
Diagnostic and Operative Hysteroscopy , pp. 20 - 35
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gupta, JK, Clark, TJ, More, S, Pattison, HM. Patient anxiety and experiences associated with an outpatient ‘one-stop’ ‘see and treat’ hysteroscopy clinic. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 1099–104.Google Scholar
Gambadauro, P, Navaratnarajah, R, Carli, V. Anxiety at outpatient hysteroscopy. Gynecol Surg 2015; 12: 189–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Standards for Gynaecology: Report of a Working Party. London: RCOG; 2008. www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/wprgynstandards2008.pdf (accessed October 2019).Google Scholar
Campaign Against Painful Hysteroscopy. Patients’ stories. www.hysteroscopyaction.org.uk/patients-stories (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Care Opinion. What’s your story? www.careopinion.org.uk (accessed November 2019). [Search for ‘hysteroscopy’.]Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Providing Quality Care for Women: Standards for Gynaecology Care. London: RCOG; 2016. www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/working-party-reports/gynaestandards.pdf (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Best Practice in Outpatient Hysteroscopy. Green-top Guideline No. 59. London: RCOG; 2011. www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg59 (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Chartered Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors. What is ergonomics? www.ergonomics.org.uk/Public/Resources/What_is_Ergonomics_.aspx (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Health and Safety Executive. Musculoskeletal disorders. www.hse.gov.uk/msd (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Moberly, T. Sickness absence rates across the NHS. BMJ 2018; 361: k2210.Google Scholar
Paton, N. Thousands of NHS staff off work due to musculoskeletal disorders or bullying. Occupational Health & Wellbeing 2015. www.personneltoday.com/hr/thousands-nhs-staff-work-due-musculoskeletal-disorders-bullying (accessed October 2019).Google Scholar
NHS Choices. Repetitive strain injury. www.nhs.uk/conditions/repetitive-strain-injury/Pages/Introduction.aspx (accessed October 2019).Google Scholar
Harvin, G. Review of musculoskeletal injuries and prevention in the endoscopy practitioner. J Clin Gastroenterol 2014; 48: 590–4.Google Scholar
Bettocchi, S, Ceci, O, Di Venere, R, et al. Advanced operative office hysteroscopy without anaesthesia: analysis of 501 cases treated with a 5 Fr. bipolar electrode. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2435–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emanuel, MH, Wamsteker, K. The intra uterine morcellator: a new hysteroscopic operating technique to remove intrauterine polyps and myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005; 12: 62–6.Google Scholar
Medtronic. A clear advantage in uterine tissue removal. New Haven, CT: Medtronic; 2018. www.medtronic.com/content/dam/covidien/library/us/en/product/gynecology-products/truclear-system-comprehensive-brochure.pdf (accessed October 2019).Google Scholar
Myosure Tissue Removal System Physician Brochure. www.myosure.com/sites/myosure/files/PP-00121-001_Rev004_MyoSure_Patient_Brchr_6.pdf (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Bigatti, G. IBS® Integrated Bigatti Shaver, an alternative approach to operative hysteroscopy. Gynecol Surg 2011; 8: 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mencaglia, L, Lugo, E, Consigli, S, Barbosa, C. Bipolar resectoscope: the future perspective of hysteroscopic surgery. Gynecol Surg 2009; 6: 15.Google Scholar
Munro, MG. Complications of hysteroscopic and uterine resectoscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2010; 37: 399–425.Google Scholar
Welchman, S, Cochrane, S, Minto, G, Lewis, S. Systematic review: the use of nitrous oxide gas for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 324–33.Google Scholar
AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL Practice Report. Practice guidelines for the management of hysteroscopic distending media. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20: 137–48.Google Scholar
Umranikar, S, Clark, TJ, Saridogan, E, et al. BSGE/ESGE guideline on management of fluid distension media in operative hysteroscopy. Gynecol Surg 2016; 13(4): 289–303.Google Scholar
Coleman, WP, Flynn, TC, Coleman, KM. When one liter does not equal 1000 milliliters: implications for the tumescent technique. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26(1): 1024–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolopoulos, I, Phillips, G. Reliability of fluid monitoring during operative hysteroscopy. Gynecol Surg 2016; 13: 23–26.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×