Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:36:47.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Obstetric Conditions and Practices that Affect the Fetus and Newborn

from Section 2 - Pregnancy, Labor, and Delivery Complications Causing Brain Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2017

By
Jane Chueh ,
Justin Collingham  and
Reinaldo Acosta
Edited by
David K. Stevenson ,
William E. Benitz ,
Philip Sunshine ,
Susan R. Hintz  and
Maurice L. Druzin
David K. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
William E. Benitz
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Philip Sunshine
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Susan R. Hintz
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Maurice L. Druzin
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal and Neonatal Brain Injury , pp. 125 - 134
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reddy, UM, Abuhamad, AZ, Levine, D, Saade, GR; Fetal Imaging Workshop Invited Participants. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for MaternalFetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging workshop. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 745–57.Google Scholar
Iyasu, S, Saftlas, AK, Rowley, DL, et al. The epidemiology of placenta previa in the United States, 1979 through 1987. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 1424–9.Google Scholar
Cresswell, JA, Ronsmans, C, Calvert, C, Filippi, V. Prevalence of placenta praevia by world region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Int Health 2013; 18: 712–24.Google Scholar
Clark, SL, Koonings, PP, Phelan, JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean sections. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66:89–92.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanlysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1071–8.Google Scholar
Babinszki, A, Kerenyi, T, Torok, O, et al. Perinatal outcome in grand and great grand multiparity: effects of parity on obstetric risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 669–74.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1071–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, MA, Mittendorf, R, Lieberman, E, et al. Cigarette smoking during pregnancy in relation to placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165:28–32.Google Scholar
Handler, AS, Mason, ED, Rosenberg, DL, et al. The relationship between exposure during pregnancy to cigarette smoking and cocaine use and placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 884–9.Google Scholar
Schachter, M, Torbin, Y, Arieli, S, et al. In vitro fertilization is a risk factor for vasa previa. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 642–3.Google Scholar
Love, CD, Wallace, EM. Pregnancies complicated by placenta previa: what is appropriate management? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 864–7.Google Scholar
Farine, D, Fox, HE, Jakobson, S, et al. Is it really a placenta previa? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989; 31: 103–8.Google Scholar
Smith, RS, Lauria, MR, Comstock, CH, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography for all placentas that appear to be low lying or over the internal cervical os. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 9: 22–4.Google Scholar
Hertzberg, BS, Bowie, JD, Carroll, BA, et al. Diagnosis of placenta previa during the third trimester: role of transperineal sonography. AJR Am J Roetgenol 1992; 159: 83–7.Google Scholar
Dawson, WB, Dumas, MD, Romano, WM, et al. Translabial ultrasonography and placenta previa: does measurement of the os-placenta distance predict outcome? Ultrasound Med 1996; 15: 441–6.Google Scholar
McShane, PM, Heyl, PS, Epstein, MF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity resulting from placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 176–82.Google Scholar
Cotton, DB, Read, JA, Paul, RH, et al. The conservative aggressive management of placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 137: 687–95.Google Scholar
Besinger, RE, Moniak, CW, Paskiweicz, LS, et al. The effect of tocolytic use in the management of symptomatic placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1770–5.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, G, Steer, P. ABC of labour care: obstetric emergencies. BMJ 1999; 318: 1342–5.Google Scholar
D’Angelo, LJ, Irwin, LF. Conservation management of placenta previa: a cost-benefit analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149: 320–6.Google Scholar
Wing, DA, Paul, RH, Millar, LK. Management of the symptomatic placenta previa: a randomized, controlled trial of inpatient versus outpatient expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 806–11.Google Scholar
Brar, HS, Platt, LD, De Vore, GR, et al. Fetal umbilical velocimetry for the surveillance of pregnancies complicated by placenta previa. Reprod Med 1988; 33: 741–4.Google Scholar
Wolf, EJ, Mallozi, A, Rodis, JF, et al. Placenta previa is not an independent risk factor for a small for gestational age infant. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 707–9.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Demisse, K, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. Placenta previa in singleton and twin births in the United States, 1989 through 1998: a comparison of risk factor profiles and associated conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 275–81.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. The effect of placenta previa on neonatal mortality: a population-based study in the United States, 1989 through 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1299–304.Google Scholar
Crane, JM, van den Hof, MC, Dodds, L, et al. Neonatal outcomes with placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 541–4.Google Scholar
Kåregård, M, Gennser, G. Incidence and recurrence rate of abruptio placentae in Sweden. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 523–8.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. Incidence of placental abruption in relation to cigarette smoking and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 622–8.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Wilcox, AJ. Placental abruption and perinatal mortality in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 153: 332–7.Google Scholar
Abdella, TN, Sibai, BM, Hays, JM, et al. Perinatal outcome in abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 365–70.Google Scholar
Pritchard, JA, Cunningham, FG, Pritchard, SA, et al. On reducing the frequency of severe abruptio placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1345–51.Google Scholar
Kramer, MS, Usher, RH, Pollack, R, et al. Etiologic determinants of abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 221–6.Google Scholar
Krohn, M, Voig, L, McKnight, B, et al. Correlates of placental abruption. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 333–40.Google Scholar
Toohey, JS, Keegan, KA, Morgan, MA, et al. The “dangerous multipara”: fact or fiction? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 683–6.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Savitz, DA, Williams, MA. Placental abruption and its association with hypertension and prolonged rupture of membranes: a methodologic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 309–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ananth, CV, Savitz, DA, Bowes, WA, et al. Influence of hypertensive disorders and cigarette smoking on placental abruption and uterine bleeding during pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 572–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibai, BM, Lindheimer, M, Hauth, J, et al. Risk factors for preeclampsia, abruptio placentae and adverse neonatal outcomes among women with chronic hypertension. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development network of maternal–fetal medicine units. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 667–71.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Berkowitz, GS, Savitz, DA, et al. Placental abruption and adverse perinatal outcomes. JAMA 1999; 282: 1646–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misra, DP, Ananth, CV. Risk factor profiles of placental abruption in first and second pregnancies: heterogeneous etiologies. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 453–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonen, R, Hannah, ME, Milligan, JE. Does prolonged premature rupture of the membranes predispose to abruptio placentae? Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 347–50.Google Scholar
Major, CA, de Veciana, M, Lewis, DF, et al. Preterm premature rupture of membranes and abruptio placentae: is there an association between these pregnancy complications? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 672–6.Google Scholar
Bingol, N, Fuchs, M, Diaz, V, et al. Teratogenicity of cocaine in humans. J Pediatr 1987; 110: 93–6.Google Scholar
Hoskins, IA, Friedman, DM, Frieden, FJ, et al. Relationship between antepartum cocaine abuse, abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry, and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78: 279–82.Google Scholar
Slutsker, L. Risks associated with cocaine use during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 778–89.Google Scholar
Kupferminc, MJ, Eldor, A, Steinman, N, et al. Increased frequency of genetic thrombophilia in women with complications of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 50–2.Google Scholar
Gherman, RB, Goodwin, TM. Obstetric implications of activated protein C resistance and factor V Leiden mutation. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000; 55: 117–22.Google Scholar
Kettel, LM, Branch, DW, Scott, JR. Occult placental abruption after maternal trauma. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 449–53.Google Scholar
Stafford, PA, Biddinger, PW, Zumwalt, RE. Lethal intrauterine fetal trauma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159: 485–9.Google Scholar
Rice, JP, Kay, HH, Mahony, BS. The clinical significance of uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1212–16.Google Scholar
Nimrod, CA, Oppenheimer, LW. Medicine of the Fetus and Mother, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1999: 1498–501.Google Scholar
Hurd, WW, Miodovnik, M, Hertzberg, V, et al. Selective management of abruptio placentae: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 467–73.Google Scholar
Combs, CA, Nyberg, DA, Mack, LA, et al. Expectant management after sonographic diagnosis of placental abruption. Am J Perinatol 1992; 9: 170–4.Google Scholar
Towers, CV, Pircon, RA, Heppard, M. Is tocolysis safe in the management of third trimester bleeding? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1572–8.Google Scholar
Grunfeld, JP, Pertuiset, N. Acute renal failure in pregnancy: 1987. Am J Kidney Dis 1987; 9: 359–62.Google Scholar
Shaw, KJ. Abruptio placentae. In Mishell, DR, Brenner, DR, eds., Management of Common Problems in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3rd edn. Boston: Blackwell, 1994: 211–15.Google Scholar
Spinillo, A, Fazzi, E, Stronati, I, et al. Early morbidity and neurodevelopmental outcome in low birth weight infants born after third trimester bleeding. Am J Perinatol 1994; 11:85–90.Google Scholar
Oyelese, Y, Catanzarite, V, Prefumo, F, et al. Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 937–42.Google Scholar
Englert, Y, Imbert, MC, Van Rosendael, E, et al. Morphological anomalies in the placentae of IVF pregnancies: preliminary report of a multicentric study. Hum Reprod 1987; 2: 155–7.Google Scholar
Burton, G, Saunders, DM. Vasa praevia: another cause of concern in in vitro fertilization pregnancies. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 28: 180–1.Google Scholar
Oyelese, KO, Schwarzler, P, Coates, S, et al. A strategy for reducing the mortality rate from vasa previa using transvaginal sonography with color Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12: 377–9.Google Scholar
Carp, HJ, Mashiach, S, Serr, DM. Vasa previa: a major complication and its management. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 53: 273–5.Google Scholar
Cordero, DR, Helfgoftt, AW, Landy, HJ, et al. A non-hemorrhagic manifestation of vasa previa: a clinico-pathologic case report. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82:698–700.Google Scholar
Antoine, C, Young, BK, Silverma, F, et al. Sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern with vasa previa in twin pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1982; 27: 295–300.Google Scholar
Oyelese, KO, Turner, M, Lees, C, et al. Vasa previa: an avoidable obstetric tragedy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1999; 54: 138–45.Google Scholar
Harding, JA, Lewis, DF, Major, CA, et al. Color flow Doppler: a useful instrument in the diagnosis of vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1566–8.Google Scholar
Meyer, WJ, Blumenthal, L, Cadkin, A, et al. Vasa previa: prenatal diagnosis with transvaginal color Doppler flow imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 1627–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hata, K, Hata, T, Fujiwaki, R, et al. An accurate antenatal diagnosis of vasa previa with transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 265–7.Google Scholar
Clerici, G, Burnelli, L, Lauro, V, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa presenting as amniotic band: “a not so innocent amniotic band.” Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 61–3.Google Scholar
Lee, W, Kirk, JS, Comstock, CH, et al. Vasa previa: prenatal detection by three-dimensional ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 384–7.Google Scholar
Oyelese, Y, Chavez, MR, Yeo, I, et al. Three-dimensional sonographic diagnosis of vasa previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 211–5.Google Scholar
Robinson, BK, Grobman, WA. Effectiveness of timing strategies for delivery of individuals with vasa previa. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 542–9.Google Scholar
Schellpfeffer, MA. Improved neonatal outcome of vasa previa with aggressive intrapartum management: a report of two cases. J Reprod Med 1995; 40: 327–32.Google Scholar
Publications Committee, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 430–9.Google Scholar
Gyamfi-Bannerman, C, Gilbert, S, Landon, MB, et al. Risk of uterine rupture and placenta accreta with prior uterine surgery outside of the lower segment. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 1332–7.Google Scholar
Norwitz, ER, Stern, HM, Grier, H, Lee-Parritz, A. Placenta percreta and uterine rupture associated with prior whole body radiation therapy. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 929–31.Google Scholar
Hare, AA, Olah, KS. Pregnancy following endometrial ablation: a review article. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 25: 108–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, S, Kocherginsky, M, Hibbard, JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1458–61.Google Scholar
Wax, JR, Seiler, A, Horowitz, S, Ingardia, CJ. Interpregnancy interval as a risk factor for placenta accreta. Conn Med 2000; 64: 659–61.Google Scholar
Esh-Broder, E, Ariel, I, Abas-Bashir, N, et al. Placenta accreta is associated with IVF pregnancies: a retrospective chart review. BJOG 2011; 118: 1084–9.Google Scholar
Silver, RM, Landon, MB, Rouse, DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1226–32.Google Scholar
Berkley, EM, Abuhamad, AZ. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accrete: is sonography all we need? J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 1345–50.Google Scholar
Comstock, CH, Bronsteen, RA. The antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. BJOG 2014; 121: 171–81.Google Scholar
D’Antonio, F, Iacovella, C, Palacios-Jarquemada, J, et al. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 8–16Google Scholar
Silver, RM, Fox, KA, Barton, JR, et al. Center of excellence for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 561–8.Google Scholar
Robinson, BK, Grobman, WA. Effectiveness of timing strategies for delivery of individuals with placenta previa and accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 835–42.Google Scholar
Sentilhes, L, Ambroselli, C, Kayem, G, et al. Maternal outcome after conservative management of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 526–34.Google Scholar
Riggs, JC, Jahshan, A, Schiavello, HJ. Alternative conservative management of placenta accreta: a case report. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 595–8.Google Scholar
Grobman, WA, Gersnoviez, R, Landon, MB, et al. Pregnancy outcomes for women with placenta previa in relation to the number of prior cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1249–55.Google Scholar
Naeye, RL. Umbilical cord length: clinical significance. J Pediatr 1985; 107: 278–81.Google Scholar
Krakowiak, P, Smith, EN, de Bruyn, G, et al. Risk factors and outcomes associated with a short umbilical cord. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 119–27.Google Scholar
Rolschau, J. The relationship between some disorders of the umbilical cord and intrauterine growth retardation. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand Suppl 1978; 72:15–21.Google Scholar
Liu, CC, Pretorious, DH, Scioscia, AL, et al. Sonographic prenatal diagnosis of marginal placental cord insertion: clinical importance. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 627–32.Google Scholar
Heinonen, S, Ryynaenen, M, Kirkinen, P, et al. Perinatal diagnostic evaluation of velamentous and umbilical cord insertion: clinical, Doppler, and ultrasonic findings. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 112–17.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, J, Matsuoka, R, Ichizuka, K, et al. Velamentous cord insertion into the lower third of the uterus is associated with intrapartum fetal heart rate abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 425–9.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×