Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T04:47:00.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Candidate Genes for Pregnancy Loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2017

By
Evica Rajcan-Separovic
Edited by
Roy G. Farquharson  and
Mary D. Stephenson
Roy G. Farquharson
Affiliation:
Liverpool Women's Hospital
Mary D. Stephenson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois College of Medicine
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Early Pregnancy , pp. 102 - 112
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Yamada, H, Sata, F, Saijo, Y, Kishi, R, Minakami, H. Genetic factors in fetal growth restriction and miscarriage. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis. 2005;31:334–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christiansen, OB, Steffensen, R, Nielsen, HS, Varming, K. Multifactorial etiology of recurrent miscarriage and its scientific and clinical implications. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2008;66:257–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sierra, S, Stephenson, M. Genetics of recurrent pregnancy loss. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 2006;24:17–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephenson, M, Kutteh, W. Evaluation and management of recurrent early pregnancy loss. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;50:132–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nath, S, Moghe, M, Chowdhury, A, Godbole, K, Godbole, G, Doiphode, M, et al. Is germline transmission of MAD2 gene deletion associated with human fetal loss? Molecular Human Reproduction. 2012;18:554–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rull, K, Nagirnaja, L, Laan, M. Genetics of recurrent miscarriage: challenges, current knowledge, future directions. Frontiers in Genetics. 2012;3:34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaiman, D. Genetic regulation of recurrent spontaneous abortion in humans. Biomedical Journal. 2015;38:11–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, EC, Christiansen, OB, Kolte, AM, Macklon, N. New insights into mechanisms behind miscarriage. BMC Medicine. 2013;11:154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sergi, C, Al Jishi, T, Walker, M. Factor V Leiden mutation in women with early recurrent pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the causal association. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2014;291:671–79.Google Scholar
Rogenhofer, N, Engels, L, Bogdanova, N, Tuttelmann, F, Markoff, A, Thaler, C. Paternal and maternal carriage of the annexin A5 M2 haplotype are equal risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: a pilot study. Fertility and Sterility. 2012;98:383–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajcan-Separovic, E. Chromosome microarrays in human reproduction. Human Reproduction Update. 2012;18:555–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaaf, CP, Wiszniewska, J, Beaudet, AL. Copy number and SNP arrays in clinical diagnostics. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. 2011;12:25–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kearney, HM, Thorland, EC, Brown, KK, Quintero-Rivera, F, South, ST. American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. Genetics in Medicine. 2011;13:680–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stankiewicz, P, Beaudet, AL. Use of array CGH in the evaluation of dysmorphology, malformations, developmental delay, and idiopathic mental retardation. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 2007;17:182–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaeffer, AJ, Chung, J, Heretis, K, Wong, A, Ledbetter, DH, Lese Martin, C. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2004;74:1168–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimokawa, O, Harada, N, Miyake, N, Satoh, K, Mizuguchi, T, Niikawa, N, et al. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis in first-trimester spontaneous abortions with ‘normal’ karyotypes. American Journal of Medical Genetics A. 2006;140:1931–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Robberecht, C, Schuddinck, V, Fryns, JP, Vermeesch, JR. Diagnosis of miscarriages by molecular karyotyping: benefits and pitfalls. Genetics in Medicine. 2009;11:646–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menten, B, Swerts, K, Delle Chiaie, B, Janssens, S, Buysse, K, Philippe, J, et al. Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples. BMC Medical Genetics. 2009;10:89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benkhalifa, M, Kasakyan, S, Clement, P, Baldi, M, Tachdjian, G, Demirol, A, et al. Array comparative genomic hybridization profiling of first-trimester spontaneous abortions that fail to grow in vitro. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2005;25:894–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, YX, Zhang, YP, Gu, Y, Guan, FJ, Li, SL, Xie, JS, et al. Genetic analysis of first trimester miscarriages with a combination of cytogenetic karyotyping, microsatellite genotyping and array CGH. Clinical Genetics. 2009;75:133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballif, BC, Kashork, CD, Saleki, R, Rorem, E, Sundin, K, Bejjani, BA, et al. Detecting sex chromosome anomalies and common triploidies in products of conception by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2006;26:333–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, JE, Turok, DK, Maxwell, TM, Brothman, AR, Silver, RM. Array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic evaluation of fetal loss between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;114:1093–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lathi, RB, Massie, JA, Loring, M, Demko, ZP, Johnson, D, Sigurjonsson, S, et al. Informatics enhanced SNP microarray analysis of 30 miscarriage samples compared to routine cytogenetics. PloS One. 2012;7:e31282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, J, Liu, C, Yao, F, Hao, N, Zhou, J, Zhou, Q, et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization is more informative than conventional karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the analysis of first-trimester spontaneous abortion. Molecular Cytogenetics. 2012;5:33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robberecht, C, Pexsters, A, Deprest, J, Fryns, JP, D'Hooghe, T, Vermeesch, JR. Cytogenetic and morphological analysis of early products of conception following hystero-embryoscopy from couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2012;32:933–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viaggi, CD, Cavani, S, Malacarne, M, Floriddia, F, Zerega, G, Baldo, C, et al. First trimester euploid miscarriages analysed by array-CGH. Journal of Applied Genetics. 2013;54:353–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bug, S, Solfrank, B, Schmitz, F, Pricelius, J, Stecher, M, Craig, A, et al. Diagnostic utility of novel combined arrays for genome-wide simultaneous detection of aneuploidy and uniparental isodisomy in losses of pregnancy. Molecular Cytogenetics. 2014;7:43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, B, Sigurjonsson, S, Pettersen, B, Maizenbacher, MK, Hall, MP, Demko, Z, et al. Genomic imbalance in products of conception: single-nucleotide polymorphism chromosomal microarray analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;124:202–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajcan-Separovic, E, Diego-Alvarez, D, Robinson, WP, Tyson, C, Qiao, Y, Harvard, C, et al. Identification of copy number variants in miscarriages from couples with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 2010;25:2913–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajcan-Separovic, E, Qiao, Y, Tyson, C, Harvard, C, Fawcett, C, Kalousek, D, et al. Genomic changes detected by array CGH in human embryos with developmental defects. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2010;16:125–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okamoto, T, Niu, R, Yamada, S, Osawa, M. Reduced expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-2 in gestational trophoblastic diseases. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2002;8:392–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, J, Hanna, CW, Martell, S, Leung, PC, Lewis, SM, Robinson, WP, et al. Functional consequences of copy number variants in miscarriage. Molecular Cytogenetics. 2015;8:6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreau, Y, Tranchevent, LC. Computational tools for prioritizing candidate genes: boosting disease gene discovery. Nature Reviews. 2012;13:523–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagirnaja, L, Palta, P, Kasak, L, Rull, K, Christiansen, OB, Nielsen, HS, et al. Structural genomic variation as a risk factor for idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Human Mutation. 2014;35:972–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Migita, O, Maehara, K, Kamura, H, Miyakoshi, K, Tanaka, M, Morokuma, S, et al. Compilation of copy number variants identified in phenotypically normal and parous Japanese women. Journal of Human Genetics. 2014;59:326–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bamshad, MJ, Ng, SB, Bigham, AW, Tabor, HK, Emond, MJ, Nickerson, DA, et al. Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discovery. Nature Reviews. 2011;12:745–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilissen, C, Hoischen, A, Brunner, HG, Veltman, JA. Disease gene identification strategies for exome sequencing. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2012;20:490–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabbani, B, Tekin, M, Mahdieh, N. The promise of whole-exome sequencing in medical genetics. Journal of Human Genetics. 2014;59:5–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Ligt, J, Veltman, JA, Vissers, LE. Point mutations as a source of de novo genetic disease. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 2013;23:257–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boycott, KM, Vanstone, MR, Bulman, DE, MacKenzie, AE. Rare-disease genetics in the era of next-generation sequencing: discovery to translation. Nature Reviews. 2013;14:681–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillman, SC, Willams, D, Carss, KJ, McMullan, DJ, Hurles, ME, Kilby, MD. Prenatal exome sequencing for fetuses with structural abnormalities: the next step. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2015;45:4–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filges, I, Friedman, JM. Exome sequencing for gene discovery in lethal fetal disorders – harnessing the value of extreme phenotypes. Prenatal diagnosis. 2015;35(10):1005–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellard, S, Kivuva, E, Turnpenny, P, Stals, K, Johnson, M, Xie, W, et al. An exome sequencing strategy to diagnose lethal autosomal recessive disorders. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2015;23:401–04.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shamseldin, HE, Swaid, A, Alkuraya, FS. Lifting the lid on unborn lethal Mendelian phenotypes through exome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine. 2013;15:307–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filges, I, Nosova, E, Bruder, E, Tercanli, S, Townsend, K, Gibson, WT, et al. Exome sequencing identifies mutations in KIF14 as a novel cause of an autosomal recessive lethal fetal ciliopathy phenotype. Clinical Genetics. 2014;86:220–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsurusaki, Y, Yonezawa, R, Furuya, M, Nishimura, G, Pooh, RK, Nakashima, M, et al. Whole exome sequencing revealed biallelic IFT122 mutations in a family with CED1 and recurrent pregnancy loss. Clinical Genetics. 2014;85:592–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filges, I, Manokhina, I, Penaherrera, MS, McFadden, DE, Louie, K, Nosova, E, et al. Recurrent triploidy due to a failure to complete maternal meiosis II: whole-exome sequencing reveals candidate variants. Molecular human reproduction. 2015;21(4):339–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carss, KJ, Hillman, SC, Parthiban, V, McMullan, DJ, Maher, ER, Kilby, MD, et al. Exome sequencing improves genetic diagnosis of structural fetal abnormalities revealed by ultrasound. Human Molecular Genetics. 2014;23:3269–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krieg, SA, Fan, X, Hong, Y, Sang, QX, Giaccia, A, Westphal, LM, et al. Global alteration in gene expression profiles of deciduas from women with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2012;18:442–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosova, G, Stephenson, MD, Lynch, VJ, Ober, C. Evolutionary forward genomics reveals novel insights into the genes and pathways dysregulated in recurrent early pregnancy loss. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 2015;30:519–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rull, K, Tomberg, K, Koks, S, Mannik, J, Mols, M, Sirotkina, M, et al. Increased placental expression and maternal serum levels of apoptosis-inducing TRAIL in recurrent miscarriage. Placenta. 2013;34:141–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santamaria, X, Taylor, H. MicroRNA and gynecological reproductive diseases. Fertility and Sterility. 2014;101:1545–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morales-Prieto, DM, Ospina-Prieto, S, Chaiwangyen, W, Schoenleben, M, Markert, UR. Pregnancy-associated miRNA-clusters. Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2013;97:51–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, X, Li, B, Wang, J, Lei, J, Liu, C, Ma, Y, et al. Evidence that miR-133a causes recurrent spontaneous abortion by reducing HLA-G expression. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2012;25:415–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dong, F, Zhang, Y, Xia, F, Yang, Y, Xiong, S, Jin, L, et al. Genome-wide miRNA profiling of villus and decidua of recurrent spontaneous abortion patients. Reproduction (Cambridge, England). 2014;148:33–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanna, CW, McFadden, DE, Robinson, WP. DNA methylation profiling of placental villi from karyotypically normal miscarriage and recurrent miscarriage. The American Journal of Pathology. 2013;182:2276–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuen, RK, Jiang, R, Penaherrera, MS, McFadden, DE, Robinson, WP. Genome-wide mapping of imprinted differentially methylated regions by DNA methylation profiling of human placentas from triploidies. Epigenetics & Chromatin. 2011;4:10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbaux, S, Gascoin-Lachambre, G, Buffat, C, Monnier, P, Mondon, F, Tonanny, MB, et al. A genome-wide approach reveals novel imprinted genes expressed in the human placenta. Epigenetics. 2012;7:1079–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×