Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T18:14:40.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 13

from Part III - Taxonomy, Integration, and Multiple Levels of Explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2020

Edited by
Kenneth S. Kendler ,
Josef Parnas  and
Peter Zachar
Kenneth S. Kendler
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University
Josef Parnas
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Peter Zachar
Affiliation:
Auburn University, Montgomery
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Levels of Analysis in Psychopathology
Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives
 , pp. 457 - 490
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Berrios, G. E. (1996) The history of mental symptoms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsboom, D., Cramer, A., & Kalis, A. (2018) ‘Brain disorders? Not really… Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, 1–54.Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R. (1958) Patterns of discovery. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2013) ‘A history of the DSM-5 scientific review committee.’ Psychological Medicine, 43, 1793–1800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, K. S. (2018) ‘The development of Kraepelin’s mature diagnostic concepts of paranoia (Die Verrücktheit) and paranoid dementia praecox (Dementia Paranoides): A close reading of his textbooks from 1887 to 1899.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 75(12), 1280–1288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, K. S. (2019) ‘The genealogy of dementia praecox I: Signs and symptoms of delusional psychoses from 1880 to 1900.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 45, 296–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

References

Albrecht, F. M. (1970) ‘A reappraisal of faculty psychology.’ Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 6, 36–40.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association. (1980) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Berrios, G. E. (1987) ‘Historical aspects of psychoses: 19th century issues.’ British Medical Bulletin, 43, 484–498.Google Scholar
Berrios, G. E. & Hauser, R. (1988) ‘The early development of Kraepelin’s ideas on classification: A conceptual history.’ Psychological Medicine, 18, 813–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, G. P. (1976) ‘The faculty psychology of Thomas Reid.’ Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 12, 65–77.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cullen, W. (1808) A Methodical System of Nosology. Translated from Latin by Dr. Lewis, Eldad. Stockbridge, MA: Cornelius Sturtevant.Google Scholar
Eigen, J. P. (2016) Mad-Doctors in the Dock: Defending the Diagnosis, 1760–1913 (1st ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, E. J. (2003) Clinical Psychiatry in Imperial Germany: A History of Psychiatric Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J. (1987) Console and Classify: The French Psychiatric Profession in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L. (1987) The Oxford Companion to the Mind. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griesinger, W. (1867) Mental Pathology and Therapeutics. London: The New Sydenham Society.Google Scholar
Grob, G. N. (2011) The Mad among Us: A History of the Care of America’s Mentally Ill (1st ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, W. A. (1883) A Treatise on Insanity in Its Medical Relations. New York: D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar
Hilgard, E. R. (1980) ‘The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation.’ Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 107–117.Google Scholar
Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K. et al. (2010) ‘Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 748–751.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2016a) ‘Phenomenology of schizophrenia and the representativeness of modern diagnostic criteria.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 73, 1082–1092.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2016b) ‘The phenomenology of major depression and the representativeness and nature of DSM criteria.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 771–780.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2016c) ‘The phenomenology of schizophrenia and the representativeness of modern diagnostic criteria.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 73(10), 1082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, K. S. (2017a) ‘The clinical features of mania and their representation in modern diagnostic criteria.’ Psychological Medicine, 47, 1013–1029.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2017b) ‘The clinical features of paranoia in the 20th century and their representation in diagnostic criteria from DSM-III through DSM-5.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43, 332–343.Google ScholarPubMed
Kendler, K. S. (2018) ‘The development of Kraepelin’s mature diagnostic concepts of paranoia (Die Verrücktheit) and paranoid dementia Praecox (Dementia Paranoides): A close reading of his textbooks from 1887 to 1899.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 75(12), 1280–1288.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1899) Psychiatrie: Ein Lehrbuch fur Studirende und Aerzte (6th ed., 2 vols.). Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1987) Memoirs. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1990) Psychiatry: A Textbook for Students and Physicians (Volume 2: Clinical Psychiatry), Quen, J. (ed.) (Translation of the 6th Edition of Psychiatrie, Translator Volume 2 – Sabine Ayed). Canton, MA: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Müller-Freienfels, R. (1935) The Evolution of Modern Psychology (1st ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Noble, D. (1853) Elements of Psychological Medicine: An Introduction to the Practical Study of Insanity, Adapted for Students and Junior Practitioners. London: John Churchill.Google Scholar
Radden, J. (1996) ‘Lumps and bumps: Kantian faculty psychology, phrenology, and twentieth-century psychiatric classification.’ Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology, 3, 1–14.Google Scholar
Scholz, F. (1892) Lehrbuch der Irrenheilkunde: Für Aerzte und Studirende. Leipzig: Eduard Heinrich Mayer (Einhorn & Jäger).Google Scholar
Scull, A. (2005) Most Solitary of Afflictions: Madness and Society in Britain, 1700–1900. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wyman, R. (1830) A Discourse on Mental Philosophy as Connected with Mental Disease: Delivered Before the Massachusetts Medical Society, June 2, 1830. Boston, MA: Daily Advertiser.Google Scholar

References

American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Andreasen, N.C. (1984) The broken brain: The biological revolution in psychiatry. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Borsboom, D., Cramer, A.O.J., & Kalis, A. (2019) ‘Brain disorders? Not really: Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, e2: 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuthbert, B.N. (2014) ‘The RDoC framework: Facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology.’ World Psychiatry, 13, 28–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuthbert, B.N., & Insel, T R. (2010) ‘Toward new approaches to psychotic disorders: The NIMH Research Domain Criteria project.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36, 1061–1062.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B.N., & Insel, T.R. (2013) ‘Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC.’ BMC Medicine, 11, 126.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B.N., & Kozak, M.J. (2013) ‘Constructing constructs for psychopathology: The NIMH research domain criteria.’ Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 928–937.Google Scholar
Frances, A. (2013) Saving normal: An insider’s revolt against out-of-control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the medicalization of ordinary life. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Frances, A. (2014) ‘RDoC is necessary, but very oversold.’ World Psychiatry, 13, 47–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heller, W. (1993) ‘Neuropsychological mechanisms of individual differences in emotion, personality, and arousal.’ Neuropsychology, 7, 476–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (1738) Treatise of human nature. Book 2. Of passions. Part 3. Section 3. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Treatise_of_Human_Nature/Book_2:_Of_the_passions/Part_3/Section_3, accessed 06/29/19.Google Scholar
Hyman, S.E. (2010) ‘The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification.’ Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155–179.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R. (2014) ‘The NIMH research domain criteria (RDoC) project: Precision medicine for psychiatry.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 395–397.Google Scholar
Insel, T.R., Cuthbert, B.N., Garvey, M.A., Heinssen, R.K., Pine, D.S., Quinn, K.J., … Wang, P.S. (2010) ‘Research domain criteria: Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 748–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, P., & Cambrosio, A. (2004) ‘Does biomedicine entail the successful reduction of pathology to biology?’ Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 47, 357–371.Google Scholar
Kozak, M.J., & Cuthbert, B.N. (2016) ‘The NIMH research domain criteria initiative: Background, issues, and pragmatics.’ Psychophysiology, 53, 286–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lake, J.I., Yee, C.M., & Miller, G.A. (2017) ‘Misunderstanding RDoC.’ Mechanisms of mental disorders special issue. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225, 170–174.Google Scholar
Lang, P.J. (1984) ‘Dead souls: Or why the neurobehavioral science of emotion should pay attention to cognitive science.’ In Elbert, T., Rockstroh, B., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (Eds.), Self-regulation of the brain and behavior (pp. 255–272). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., & Cuthbert, B.N. (1990) ‘Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex.’ Psychological Review, 97, 377–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilienfeld, S.O., & Treadway, M.T. (2016) ‘Clashing diagnostic approaches: DSM-ICD versus RDoC.’ Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 435–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meehl, P.E. (1978) ‘Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald and the slow progress of soft psychology.’ Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G.A. (1996) ‘How we think about cognition, emotion, and biology in psychopathology.’ Psychophysiology, 33, 615–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G.A. (2004) ‘Another quasi-thirty years of slow progress.’ Applied and Preventive Psychology: Current Scientific Perspectives, 11, 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G.A. (2010) ‘Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain.’ Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 716–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G.A., Crocker, L.D., Spielberg, J.M., Infantolino, Z.P, & Heller, W. (2013) ‘Issues in localization of brain function: The case of lateralized frontal cortex in cognition, emotion, and psychopathology.’ Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 7, 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G.A., & Keller, J. (2000) ‘Psychology and neuroscience: Making peace.’ Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 212–215.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A., Rockstroh, B.S., Hamilton, H.K., & Yee, C.M. (2016) ‘Psychophysiology as a core strategy in RDoC.’ Psychophysiology, 53, 410–414.Google Scholar
Miller, G.A., & Yee, C.M. (2015) ‘Moving psychopathology forward.’ Psychological Inquiry, 26, 263–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osgood, C., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. (1957) The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1980) ‘A circumplex model of affect.’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (2003) ‘Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.’ Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanislow, C.A., Pine, D.S., Quinn, K.J., Kozak, M.J., Garvey, M.A., Heinssen, R.K., … Cuthbert, B.N. (2010) ‘Developing constructs for psychopathology research: Research domain criteria.’ Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 631–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, S.J., Lilienfeld, S.O., Meca, A., & Sauvigné, K.C. (2016) ‘The role of neuroscience within psychology: A call for inclusiveness over exclusiveness.’ American Psychologist, 71, 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, P.B., & Eldar, E. (2019) ‘Computational models of anxiety: Nascent efforts and future directions.’ Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 170–176.Google Scholar
Sharp, P.B., & Miller, G.A. (2019) ‘Reduction and autonomy in psychology and neuroscience: A call for pragmatism.’ Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39, 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J.G., & Sharp, P.B. (2019) ‘Mechanistic science: A new approach to comprehensive psychopathology research that relates psychological and biological phenomena.’ Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 196–215.Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985) ‘Toward a consensual structure of mood.’ Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yee, C.M., Javitt, D.C., & Miller, G.A. (2015) ‘Replacing DSM categorical analyses with dimensional analyses in psychiatry research: The research domain criteria initiative.’ JAMA Psychiatry, 72, 1159–1160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zachar, P. (2006) ‘The classification of emotion and scientific realism.’ Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 26, 120–138.Google Scholar
Zachar, P., & Ellis, R. D. (Eds.). (2012) Categorical versus dimensional models of affect: A seminar of the theories of Panksepp and Russell. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zachar, P., Krueger, R. F., & Kendler, K. S. (2016) ‘Personality disorder in DSM-5: An oral history.’ Psychological Medicine, 46, 1–10.Google Scholar
Zachar, P., Regier, D.A., & Kendler, K. (2019) ‘The aspirations for a paradigm shift in DSM-5: An oral history.’ Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 207(9), 778–784.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×