Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T10:27:01.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 11

from Part III - Taxonomy, Integration, and Multiple Levels of Explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2020

Edited by
Kenneth S. Kendler ,
Josef Parnas  and
Peter Zachar
Kenneth S. Kendler
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University
Josef Parnas
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Peter Zachar
Affiliation:
Auburn University, Montgomery
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Levels of Analysis in Psychopathology
Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives
 , pp. 377 - 418
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Aaronson, C. J., Bender, D. S., Skodol, A. E., & Gunderson, J. G. (2006) ‘Comparison of attachment styles in borderline personality disorder and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder.’ Psychiatric Quarterly, 77(1), 69–80.Google Scholar
Bender, D. S., & Skodol, A. E. (2007) ‘Borderline personality as self-other representational disturbance.’ Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(5), 500–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lakatos, I. (1970) ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes.’ In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDoux, J. E., & Pine, D. S. (2016) ‘Using neuroscience to help understand fear and anxiety: A two-system framework.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(11), 1083–1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morey, L. C., & Bender, D. S. (2014) ‘Articulating a core dimension of personality pathology.’ In Oldham, J. M., Skodol, A. E., & Bender, D. S. (Eds.), The American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of personality disorders (2nd ed., pp. 39–54). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1988) ‘Five kinds of self‐knowledge.’ Philosophical Psychology, 1(1), 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (1993) Discovery and explanation in biology and medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1956) ‘Empiricism and the philosophy of mind.’ In Feigl, H. & Scriven, M. (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 1, pp. 253–329). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Bach, B., Lee, C., Mortensen, E. L., & Simonsen, E. (2016) ‘How do DSM-5 personality traits align with schema therapy constructs?’ Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(4), 502–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bender, D. S., Skodol, A. E., First, M. B., & Oldham, J. M. (2018) Structured clinical interview for the alternative model for personality disorders (SCID-5-AMPD) – Module I – Structured clinical interview for the level of personality functioning scale. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.Google Scholar
Brown, R., Lau, H., & LeDoux, J. E. (2019) ‘Understanding the Higher-Order Approach to Consciousness.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 23(9):754–768. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.06.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalmers, D. J. (1995) ‘Facing up to the problem of consciousness.’ Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S. (2014) Consciousness and the brain: Deciphering how the brain codes our thoughts. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. P. (2011) ‘Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing.’ Neuron, 70(2), 200–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehaene, S., Charles, L., King, J. R., & Marti, S. (2014) ‘Toward a computational theory of conscious processing.’ Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 25, 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, S., Lau, H., & Kouider, S. (2017) ‘What is consciousness, and could machines have it?’ Science, 358(6362), 486–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drislane, L. E., Brislin, S. J., Jones, S., & Patrick, C. J. (2018) ‘Interfacing five-factor model and triarchic conceptualizations of psychopathy.’ Psychological Assessment, 30(6), 834–840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanselow, M. S., & Pennington, Z. T. (2017) ‘The danger of LeDoux and Pine’s two-system framework for fear.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(11), 1120–1121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanselow, M. S., & Pennington, Z. T. (2018) ‘A return to the psychiatric dark ages with a two-system framework for fear.’ Behaviour Research and Therapy, 100, 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, C., Perry, R., & Lumer, E. (1999) ‘The neural correlates of conscious experience: An experimental framework.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(3), 105–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, S. (2000) ‘Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 14–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, S., & Shear, J. (1999) Models of the self. Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890) The principles of psychology. New York: H. Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Katsuki, F., & Constantinidis, C. (2014) ‘Bottom-up and top-down attention: Different processes and overlapping neural systems.’ Neuroscientist, 20(5), 509–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, K. S., & Schaffner, K. F. (2011) ‘The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: An historical and philosophical analysis.’ Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology (PPP), 18(1), 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knopik, V. S., Neiderhiser, J. M., Plomin, R., & DeFries, J. C. (2017) Behavioral genetics (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1970) ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes.’ In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge, England: University Press.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E., & Pine, D. S. (2016) ‘Using neuroscience to help understand fear and anxiety: A two-system framework.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(11), 1083–1093.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeDoux, J. E., & Brown, R. (2017) ‘A higher-order theory of emotional consciousness.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 114(10), E2016–E2025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lycan, W. (2004). The superiority of HOP to HOT. In Gennaro, R. (Ed.), Higher-order theories of consciousness (pp. 115–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lynam, D. R., Loehr, A., Miller, J. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2012) ‘A five-factor measure of avoidant personality: The FFAvA.’ Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(5), 466–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millikan, R. G. (2000). On clear and confused ideas : An essay about substance concepts. Cambridge, England; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, E. A., Wise, S. P., & Graham, K. S. (2017) The evolution of memory systems: Ancestors, anatomy, and adaptations (1st ed.). Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1988) ‘Five kinds of self knowledge.’ Philosophical Psychology, 1, 35–59.Google Scholar
Newman, G. E., Bloom, P., & Knobe, J. (2014) ‘Value judgments and the true self.’ Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 203–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nostro, A. D., Muller, V. I., Varikuti, D. P., Plaschke, R. N., Hoffstaedter, F., Langner, R., … Eickhoff, S. B. (2018) ‘Predicting personality from network-based resting-state functional connectivity.’ Brain Structure and Function, 223(6), 2699–2719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parnas, J. (2011) ‘A disappearing heritage: The clinical core of schizophrenia.’ Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37(6), 1121–1130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parnas, J., Moller, P., Kircher, T., Thalbitzer, J., Jansson, L., Handest, P., & Zahavi, D. (2005) ‘EASE: Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience.’ Psychopathology, 38(5), 236–258.Google Scholar
Pine, D. S., & LeDoux, J. E. (2017) ‘Elevating the role of subjective experience in the clinic: Response to Fanselow and Pennington.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(11), 1121–1122.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. J. (2002) Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz, J. J. (2012) The conscious brain: How attention engenders experience. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffman, D. (1995). ‘On the persistence of phenomenology.’ In Metzinger, T. (Ed.), Conscious experience. Paderborn: Schöningh/Imprint AcademicGoogle Scholar
Rosenstrom, T., Gjerde, L. C., Krueger, R. F., Aggen, S. H., Czajkowski, N. O., Gillespie, N. A., … Ystrom, E. (2018) ‘Joint factorial structure of psychopathology and personality.’ Psychological Medicine, 1–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Saurat, W., & Lycan, W. (2014). Attention and internal monitoring: A farewell to HOP. Analysis, 74 (3), 363–370Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (1992a) ‘Theory change in immunology. Part I: Extended theories and scientific progress.’ Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 13(2), 175–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaffner, K. F. (1992b) ‘Theory change in immunology. Part II: The clonal selection theory.’ Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 13(2), 191–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaffner, K. F. (1993) Discovery and explanation in biology and medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (2016) Behaving: What’s genetic and what’s not, and why should we care. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (2017) ‘Neuroethics, free will, self-identity, and neuromodulation.’ Cerebrum. https://www.dana.org/article/the-first-neuroethics-meeting-then-and-nowGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (2019) ‘Comments on Pine.’ In Kendler, K. S., Parnas, J., & Zachar, P. (Eds.), Copenhagen-V. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (2020a) – Construct Validity in Psychology and Psychiatry (to be submitted; available on request to the author).Google Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (2020b) ‘A comparison of two neurobiological models of fear and anxiety: A “construct validity” application?’. Perspectives on Psychological Science, under review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K. F. (in development) Choosing: What Can We Learn about Choice and Flourishing from Behavioral Neurogenetics.Google Scholar
Skodol, A. E. (2018) ‘Can personality disorders be redefined in personality trait terms?’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 175(7), 590–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strohminger, N., Knobe, J., & Newman, G. (2017) ‘The true self: A psychological concept distinct from the self.’ Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(4), 551–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tekin, S. (2016). ‘The missing self in scientific psychiatry.’ Synthese, 196(6), 2197–2215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tononi, G., Boly, M., Massimini, M., & Koch, C. (2016) ‘Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate.’ Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7), 450–461.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (2005) ‘Episodic memory and autonoesis: Uniquely human?’ In Terrace, H. S. & Metcalfe, J. (Eds.), The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness (pp. ix, 364pp., 368 leaves of plates). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Cruijsen, R., Peters, S., & Crone, E. A. (2017) ‘Neural correlates of evaluating self and close-other in physical, academic and prosocial domains.’ Brain and Cognition, 118, 45–53.Google Scholar
White, L. K., Sequeira, S., Britton, J. C., Brotman, M. A., Gold, A. L., Berman, E., … Pine, D. S. (2017) ‘Complementary features of attention bias modification therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in pediatric anxiety disorders.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(8), 775–784.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., Bach, B., Chmielewski, M., Clark, L. A., DeYoung, C., Hopwood, C. J., … Thomas, K. M. (2019) ‘Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP.’ Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(4), 345–355.Google Scholar
Zachar, P., Krueger, R. F., & Kendler, K. S. (2016) ‘Personality disorder in DSM-5: An oral history.’ Psychological Medicine, 46(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zahavi, D. (2000) Exploring the self: Philosophical and psychopathological perspectives on self-experience. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2005) Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2014a) Self and other: Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2014b) Self and other: Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2018) The Oxford handbook of the history of phenomenology. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Baluška, F., & Levin, M. (2016) ‘On having no head: Cognition throughout biological systems.’ Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 902. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00902Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. (2008) Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Craver, C. F. (2007) Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1970) ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes.’ In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E., & Brown, R. (2017) ‘A higher-order theory of emotional consciousness.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114, E2016–E2025.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E., & Pine, D. S. (2016) ‘Using neuroscience to help understand fear and anxiety: A two-system framework.’ American Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 1083–1093.Google Scholar
Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000) ‘Thinking about mechanisms.’ Philosophy of Science, 67, 1–25.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1988) ‘Five kinds of self-knowledge.’ Philosophical Psychology, 1, 35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacter, D. L. (1996) Searching for memory: The brain, the mind, and the past. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) ‘Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain.’ Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 657–661.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1956) ‘Empiricism and the philosophy of mind.’ In Feigl, H. & Scriven, M. (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. I. The foundations of science and the concepts of psychology and psychoanalysis (pp. 253–329). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. A. (2007) ‘Bacteria are small but not stupid: Cognition, natural genetic engineering and socio-bacteriology.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 38, 807–819.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1983) Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×