Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T08:16:10.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Innovation Management and its Links with Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2018

Jorge Niosi
Affiliation:
Université du Québec, Montréal
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D., and Carlsson, B. 2009. The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics January. 32(1): 1530.Google Scholar
AEGIS Research Project 2013 (Advancing Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship and Innovation for Economic Growth and Social Well-being in Europe), Grant Agreement number 225134) European Commission, DG Research, Brussels.Google Scholar
Andersen, E. S. 2009. Schumpeter’s Evolutionary Economics: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Engine of Capitalism. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., and Ray, S. 2003. A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing 18: 105123.Google Scholar
Bull, I. and Willard, G. 1993. Towards a theory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 8(3): 183195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caloghirou, Y., Protogerou, A., and Tskanikas, A. (2015) Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship: Exploring a taxonomy based on the AEGIS survey, in Malerba, F., Caloghirou, Y., McKelvey, M., and Radosevic, S. (eds.), Dynamics of Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship: Business Strategy and Public Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caloghirou, Y., Protogerou, A., and Tsakanikas, A. 2011. Final report summarizing survey methods and results. AEGIS – 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, Deliverable 7.1.5.Google Scholar
Carlsson, B., Braunerhjelm, P., McKelvey, M., Olofsson, C., Persson, L., and Ylinenpää, H. 2013. The Evolving Domain of Entrepreneurship Research. Small Business Economics 41: 913930.Google Scholar
Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M., and Etzebarria, G. 1997. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy 26(4–5): 475491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, P. Low, M. and Wright, M. 2001. Low and MacMillan ten years on: Achievements and future directions for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 25(4):515.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, J. and Shane, S. 2003. Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management 29 (3): 333349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmén, M., Magnusson, M., and McKelvey, M. 2007. What are innovative opportunities? Industry and Innovation 14(1): 2745.Google Scholar
KEINS Research Project (Knowledge base entrepreneurship: Institutions, networks and systems, EU project n.CT2-CT-2004–506022) supported by European DG Research.Google Scholar
Klepper, S. 2015. Experimental Capitalism: The Nanoeconomics of American High-Tech Industries. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Landström, H., Harirchi, G., and Åström, F. 2012. Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy 41(7): 11541181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ljungberg, D., McKelvey, M., and Lassen, A. H. 2012. Final report on case studies: Emerging trends, lessons and methodological issues. The AEGIS case study analysis. AEGIS – 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, Deliverable D7.2.3.Google Scholar
Lundvall, B. A. 1992. National Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. 2002. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31(2): 247264.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. (ed.). 2004. Sectoral Systems of Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malerba, F. 2010. Knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship and innovation systems in Europe, in Malerba, F. (ed.), Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship and Innovation Systems: Evidence from Europe. Abington; New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malerba, F., Caloghirou, Y., McKelvey, M., and Radosevic, S. (eds.). 2015. Dynamics of Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship: Business Strategy and Public Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. and McKelvey, M. 2011. Conceptualizing knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship: Concepts and models. AEGIS – 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, Deliverable 1.1.1.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. and McKelvey, M. 2015. Knowledge intensive entrepreneurship: Conceptual framework, in Malerba, F., Caloghirou, Y., McKelvey, M., and Radosevic, S. (eds.), Dynamics of Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship: Business Strategy and Public Policy. Routledge.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. and McKelvey, M. 2018. Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship: Integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics and innovation systems. Small Business Economics.Google Scholar
McKelvey, M. and Lassen, A. H. 2013a. Managing Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
McKelvey, M. and Lassen, A. H. 2013b. How Entrepreneurs Do What They Do: Case Studies of Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
McKelvey, M., Ljungberg, D. and Lassen, A. H., 2015. Structuring the process of knowledge intense entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of 86 case studies of ventures. In Malerba, et al 2015. Dynamics of Knowledge Intensive Entrepreneurship. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. S. 1998. Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J. S. and Foster, J. 2012 Economic emergence: An evolutionary economics perspective. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization 82(2–3): 420432.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. 1993. National Innovation Systems. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
OECD (2008) Fostering entrepreneurship for innovation, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2008/5, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science 11(4): 448469.Google Scholar
Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. 2002. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review 25: 217226.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1934. The theory of Economic Development.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1949. Economic theory and entrepreneurial History, in Change and the Entrepreneur. Postulates and Patterns for Entrepreneurial History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vaghely, I. P. and Julien, P.-A. 2010. Are opportunities recognized or constructed? An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification. Journal of Business Venturing 25(1): 7386.Google Scholar

References

Abramovitz, M. 1994. Catch-up and convergence in the post-war growth boom and after, in Baumol, W. J., Nelson, R. R. and Wolf, E. N. (eds.), Convergence of Productivity – Cross-National Studies and Historical Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 86125.Google Scholar
Bauer, A., Feichtinger, J., and Steurer, R.. 2012. The governance of climate change adaptation in 10 OECD countries: Challenges and approaches. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 14: 279304.Google Scholar
Begg, I. 2015. EU policy and governance: Part of the problem or part of the solution? in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R., 204228.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. 2007. Earth system governance as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change 17: 326337.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. and Gupta, A.. 2011. Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics 70: 18561864.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. and Pattberg, P. 2008. Global environmental governance: Taking stock, moving forward. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 33: 277294.Google Scholar
BP. 2016a. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2016 (downloaded from www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
BP. 2016b. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2016, Carbon Dioxide Emissions (downloaded from www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
Cingano, F. 2014. Trends in income inequality and its impact on economic growth, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 163, Paris: OECD Publishing (downloaded from www.oecd.org/els/soc/trends-in-income-inequality-and-its-impact-on-economic-growth-SEM-WP163.pdf on 10 October2016).Google Scholar
ECF. 2013. From Roadmaps to Reality – A Framework for Power Sector Decarbonisation in Europe. Brussels: European Climate Foundation.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014. An investment plan for Europe, Brussels: European Commission (downloaded from http://ec.europa.eu/priorities/jobs-growth-investment/plan/index_en.htm on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
European Council. 2014. Conclusions from the European Council 23 and 24 October 2014, EUCO 169/14, Brussels: European Council. (downloaded from http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%20169%202014%20INIT on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R.. 2015. The Triple Challenge for Europe: Economic Development, Climate Change and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R. (eds.). 2016. The triple challenge for Europe: The economy, climate change, and governance. Challenge 59: 178204.Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J. and Verspagen, B.. 2015. One Europe or several? Causes and consequences of the European stagnation, in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R., B. R. 3359.Google Scholar
Figenbaum, E., and Kolbenstvedt, M.. 2013. Electromobility in Norway – experiences and opportunities with Electric Vehicles, Report 1281/2013, The Institute of Transport Economics (downloaded from www.toi.no/publikasjoner/elektromobilitet-i-norge-erfaringer-og-muligheter-med-elkjoretoy-article32103-8.html on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. 2015. The arduous transition to low-carbon energy: A multi-level analysis of renewable electricity niches and resilient regimes, in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R., B. R. 91118.Google Scholar
Global Utmaning. 2015. Nordic Transport Ways (a report from the independent Swedish think tank Global Utmaning) (downloaded from www.globalutmaning.se/rapporter/ on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
GMDAC. 2016. IOM Global Migration Data Analysis Centre (downloaded from http://iomgmdac.org on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
Gordon, R. 2012. Is US Economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds, NBER Working Paper 18315. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. 2016. The Rise and Fall of American Growth – the U.S. Standard of Living Since the Civil War. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. et al. 2016a. Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: Evidence from paleoclimatic data, climate modeling, and modern observations that 2°C global warming could be dangerous. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16: 37613812.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. et al. 2016b. Young people’s burden: Requirement of negative CO2 emissions (discussion paper publ. 161004 by Earth System Dynamics, an open access journal of the European Geosciences Union, (downloaded from www.earth-syst-dynam-discuss.net/esd-2016–42/ on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
IEA. 2014. Energy Technology Perspectives – Harnessing Electricity’s Potential. Paris: OECD, International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
IEA. 2015b. Energy and Climate Change – World Energy Outlook Special Report. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
IEA. 2016. Key CO2 Emissions Trends, Excerpt from: CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion. Paris: OECD/IEA.Google Scholar
IPCC. 2012. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC. 2013a. Climate Change 2013 – Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC. 2013b. Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014 – Mitigation of Climate Change (WGIII contribution to AR5) (downloaded from www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_frontmatter.pdf on 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
Laestadius, S. 2015. Transition paths: Assessing conditions and alternatives, in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R., 143169.Google Scholar
Landesmann, M. A. 2015. The new North-South divide in Europe – Can the European convergence model be resuscitated? in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R., 6087.Google Scholar
Lauber, V. and Jacobsson, S.. 2015. Lessons from Germany’s Energiewende, in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R., 173203.Google Scholar
Mathews, J. 2014. Greening of Capitalism: How Asia Is Driving the Next Great Transformation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, M. and Perez, C.. 2015. Innovation as growth policy: The challenge for Europe, in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S. and Martin, B. R., 229264.Google Scholar
McNeill, J. R. and Engelke, P.. 2016. The Great Acceleration – An Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moriarty, P. and Honnery, D.. 2016. Can renewable energy power the future? Energy Policy 93: 37.Google Scholar
Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R. R. and Martin, B. R.. 2010. Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won’t work), Research Policy, 39: 10111023.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. 2013. The Climate Casino – Risk, Uncertainty and Economics for a Warming World. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. 1981. Structural Change and Economic Growth: A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Rogelj, J. et al. 2016. Paris agreement climate proposals need a boss to keep warming well below 2°C. Nature 534: 631639.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H. and Lema, R.. 2015. The global green economy: Competition or cooperation between Europe and China? in Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., and Martin, B. R., 119142.Google Scholar
Reilly, J. et al. 2015. Energy and Climate Outlook – Perspectives from 2015, MT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Sandén, B. 2008. Solar solution: the next industrial revolution. Materials Today 11(2): 2224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smil, V. 2010. Energy Transitions – History, Requirements Prospects. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
Steffen, W. et al. 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347(6223): paper 1259855.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2012. Turn Down the Heat – Why a 4°C Warmer World Must be Avoided. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2013. Turn Down the Heat – Climate Extremes, Regional Impact, and the Case for Resilience. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×