Book contents
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Innovation Policy and Innovation Systems
- Part II Innovation in Developing and Emerging Countries
- Part III Regional Innovation Systems and Policies
- Part IV Innovation Management and its Links with Policy
- Index
- References
Introduction
Institution Systems, Policies and Management
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 August 2018
By
Edited by
Book contents
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Innovation Policy and Innovation Systems
- Part II Innovation in Developing and Emerging Countries
- Part III Regional Innovation Systems and Policies
- Part IV Innovation Management and its Links with Policy
- Index
- References
Summary
This book is about innovation, its policy, its institutional systems and its management. It is the result of an international conference held in Montreal in July 2016 where 290 speakers presented as many papers on innovation. It collects some of the best presentations on the three related topics of innovation: policy, systems and management.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Innovation Systems, Policy and Management , pp. 1 - 24Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Acemoglu, D. and Cao, D.. 2015. Innovation by entrants and incumbents. Journal of Economic Theory 157: 255–294.Google Scholar
Arnold, E. 2004. Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs system evaluation. Research Evaluation 13(1): 3–17.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions, in Nelson, R. (ed.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. 2007. Complexity and the economy, in Hanusch, H. and Pyka, A. (eds.) Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics. Cheltenham: Elgar, 1102–1110.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. and Lane, D.. 1993. Information contagion. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 4(1): 81–104.Google Scholar
Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M.. 2008. Evolutionary targeting. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 18: 151–160.Google Scholar
Bloom, N., Griffith, R. and Van Reenen, J.. 2002. Dotax credits for R&D work? Evidence for a panel of six countries 1979–1997. Journal of Public Economics 85(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Cooke, P. and Morgan, K.. 1998. The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions and Innovation. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlström, C., Lapuente, V. and Teorell, J.. 2012. The merit of meritocratization: politics, bureaucracy and the institutional deterrents of corruption. Political Research Quarterly 65(3): 656–668.Google Scholar
David, P. A. 1994. Why are institutions the carriers of history? Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 5(2): 205–220.Google Scholar
D’Este, P., Iammarino, S., Savona, M. and von Tunzelmann, N.. 2012. What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers. Research Policy 41: 482–488.Google Scholar
Dijk, M. and Yarme, M.. 2010. The emergence of electric cars: Innovation path creation through co-evolution of supply and demand. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77: 1371–1390.Google Scholar
Edler, J. and Yeow, J.. 2016. Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. Research Policy 45(2): 414–426.Google Scholar
Erickson, A. 2014. China’s pace development history: A comparison of the rocket and satellite sectors. Acta Astronautica 103: 142–167.Google Scholar
Essletzbichler, J. 2012. Renewable Energy Technology and Path Creation: A Multi-scalar Approach to Energy Transition in the UK. European Planning Studies 20(5): 791–816, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.667926.Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J. 2016. ‘Innovation policy and national innovation systems: lessons and challenges’, a presentation to the 16th congress of the International Schumpeter Society, Montreal, 5–8 July.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. and Audretsch, D.. 1999. Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review 43: 409–429.Google Scholar
Foray, D., Mowery, D. C., and Nelson, R. R.. 2012. Public R&D and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D programs. Research Policy 41: 1697–1702.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, R. and Grandi, A.. 2005. Business incubation and new venture creation: An assessment of incubating models. Technovation 25: 111–121.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E.. 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Hansson, A. and McGuire, S.. 1999. Commercial space and international trade rules: An assessment of the WTO’s influence on the sector. Space Policy 15(4): 199–205.Google Scholar
Industry Canada. 2013. Medical Devices Industry Profile. Ottawa. (www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/lsg-pdsv.nsf/eng/h_hn01736.htm).Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. and Baker, W. E.. 2000. Modernization, cultural change and persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review 65(1): 19–51.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E. and Lundvall, B. A.. 2007. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy 36: 680–693.Google Scholar
Kim, L. 1997. Imitation to Innovation, The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Klepper, S. 1997. Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change 6(1): 145–181.Google Scholar
Kumar, N., Scheer, L and Kotler, P.. 2000. From market driven to market driving. European Management Journal 18(2): 129–142.Google Scholar
Lee, K. (2013): Schumpeterian analysis of Economic catch-up: Knowledge, Path creation and the Middle Income Trap, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipsey, R. and Carlaw, K.. 1998. Technology policies in neo-classical and structuralist-evolutionary models. STI Review 22: 30–73.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. 2005. Sectoral systems of innovation: A framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14(1): 63–82.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. (ed.) 2004. Sectoral Systems of Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, M. 2016. From market fixing to market creation: A new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation 23(2): 140–156.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, B. D. 2011. Women, empowerment and development in Arab Gulf states: A critical appraisal of governance, culture and national human resource development (HRD) framework. Human Resource Development International 14(2): 131–148.Google Scholar
Mohnen, P. and Röller, L. H.. 2005. Complementarities in innovation policy. European Economic Review 49: 1431–1450.Google Scholar
Mohrman, K., Ma, W. and Baker, D.. 2008. The research university in transition: The emerging global model. Higher Education Policy 21(1): 5–27.Google Scholar
Montalvo, J. G. and Reynal-Querol, M.. 2005. Ethnic diversity and economic development. Journal of Development Economics 76(2): 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowery, D. C. 2009. What does economic theory tell us about ‘mission-oriented R&D’? in Foray, D. (ed.) The New Economics of Technology Policy. Cheltenham: Elgar, 131–147.Google Scholar
Mowery, D. C. and Rosenberg, N.. 1989. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (ed.) 1993. National Innovation Systems. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. 1994. Why do firms differ and how does it matter? in Rumelt, R. P., Schendel, D. E. and Teece, D. J. (eds.) Fundamental Issues in Strategy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 247–269.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. 2005. Technology, Institutions and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Niosi, J. 2000a. Science based industries: A new Schumpeterian taxonomy. Technology in Society 22(3): 429–444.Google Scholar
Niosi, J. 2000b. Canada’s National System of Innovation. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Niosi, J. 2010. Building National and Regional Systems of Innovation. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
Niosi, J., Saviotti, P., Bellon, B. and Crow, M.. 1993. National systems of innovation: In search of a workable concept. Technology in Society 15(2): 207–227.Google Scholar
Niosi, J. and Zhao, J.. 2013. China’s catching up in aerospace. International Journal of Technology and Globalization 7(1–2): 80–91.Google Scholar
O’Conner, G. C. and Rice, M. P.. 2013. A comprehensive model of uncertainty associated with radical innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 51: 2–18.Google Scholar
OECD. 2006a. Innovation in Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. Comparing National Innovation Systems at the Sectoral Level. Paris.Google Scholar
Pavitt, K. 1998. Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: What Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter does not. Industrial and Corporate Change 7(3): 433–452.Google Scholar
Rahmeyer, F. 2012. Schumpeter, Marshall and Neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary economics. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik / Journal of Economics and Statistics 233(1): 39–63.Google Scholar
Rauch, J. E. and Evans, P. B.. 2000. Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. Journal of Public Economics 75: 49–71.Google Scholar
Saviotti, P. P. 1996. Technological Evolution, Variety and the Economy. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
Schienstock, G. 2007. From path dependency to path creation. Current Sociology 55(1): 92–109.Google Scholar
Scillitoe, J. L. and Chakrabarti, A. K.. 2010. The role of incubator interactions in assisting new ventures. Technovation 30: 155–167.Google Scholar
Sidow, J., Windeler, A., Schubert, C. and Möllering, G.. 2012. Organizing R&D consortia for path creation and extension: the case of semiconductor manufacturing technologies. Organization Studies 33(7): 907–936.Google Scholar
Smits, R. and Kuhlmann, S.. 2004. The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1(1/2): 4–32.Google Scholar
Sterman, J. 2000. Business Dynamics, Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Subramanian, A. 2015. Making merit: The Indian Institute of Technology and the social life of caste. Comparative Studies in Society and History 57(2): 291–322.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. 2008. Beyond technology-push and demand-pull: Lessons from California’s solar policy. Energy Economics 30: 2829–2854.Google Scholar
Tödtling, F. and Trippl, M.. 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy. Research Policy 34(8): 1203–1219.Google Scholar
Ulnicane, I. 2016. Grand challenges concept: A return of big ideas in science, technology and innovation policy? International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 11(1–3): 5–17.Google Scholar
Vecchiato, R. and Roveda, C.. 2014. Foresight for public procurement and regional innovation policy: The case of Lombardy. Research Policy 43(2): 438–450.Google Scholar
Vedovello, C. and Godinho, M. M.. 2003. Business incubators as a technological infrastructure for supporting small innovative firms’ activities. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 3(1–2): 4–21.Google Scholar
Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product life cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80: 190–207.Google Scholar