Book contents
- Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Laws: An Empirical Evaluation
- Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Laws
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Origins and Evolution
- 2 Variations in the Structure and Operation of SORN Systems
- 3 Registries and Registrants:
- 4 Law Enforcement and SORN
- 5 The Public and SORN Laws
- 6 The Ancillary Consequences of SORN
- 7 Offenders and SORN Laws
- 8 Integrating the Etiology of Sexual Offending into Evidence-Based Policy and Practices
- 9 Juvenile Registration and Notification Are Failed Policies That Must End
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Preface
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2021
Book contents
- Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Laws: An Empirical Evaluation
- Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Laws
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Origins and Evolution
- 2 Variations in the Structure and Operation of SORN Systems
- 3 Registries and Registrants:
- 4 Law Enforcement and SORN
- 5 The Public and SORN Laws
- 6 The Ancillary Consequences of SORN
- 7 Offenders and SORN Laws
- 8 Integrating the Etiology of Sexual Offending into Evidence-Based Policy and Practices
- 9 Juvenile Registration and Notification Are Failed Policies That Must End
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification LawsAn Empirical Evaluation, pp. ix - xiiiPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
American Law Institute, Model Penal Code: Sexual Assault and Related Offenses § 213.11A et seq. (Prelim. Draft No. 11, October 16, 2020), https://www.ali.org/smedia/filer_private/31/38/3138e339-a68f-4bac-9616-5e308904c827/mpc_sa_pd_11_-_online.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Crime Victimization Survey 2010, Washington, www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv10.pdfGoogle Scholar
Calif. Dept. of Justice, Frequently Asked Questions-California Tiered Sex Offender Registration (Last Updated January 1, 2020), https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/csor/registrant-faqs.pdfGoogle Scholar
Calif. Sex Offender Mgmt. Bd., A Better Path to Community Safety: Sex Offender Registration in California 5 (2014), www.casomb.org/docs/Tiering%20Background%20Paper%20FINAL%20FINAL%204–2-14.pdfGoogle Scholar
Connecticut Sentencing Commission, A Study of the Sex Offender Sentencing, Registration, and Management System (December 2017), http://ctsentencingcommission.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Sex_Offender_Report_December_2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
Council of State Governments, Sex Offender Management Policy in the States: Strengthening Policy & Practice, Final Report 6 (2010), www.csg.org/policy/documents/SOMFinalReport-FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
Does #1–5 v. Snyder, 834 F.3d 696, 706 (6th Cir. 2016), cert denied, 138 S. Ct. 55 (2017)Google Scholar
Farrell, M. B. (November 6, 2009), Report: GPS Parole Monitoring of Phillip Garrido Failed, Christian Science Monitor, www.csmonitor.com/USA/2009/1106/p02s04-usgn.htmlGoogle Scholar
In re J. B., 107 A.3d 1, 20 (Pa. 2014)Google Scholar
Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J., Letourneau, E., Helmus, L. M., & Thornton, D. (2018). Reductions in Risk Based on Time Offense-free in the Community: Once a Sexual Offender, Not Always a Sexual Offender, Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 24(1), 48–63Google Scholar
Sandler, J., Freeman, N., & Socia, K. (2008). Does a Watched Pot Boil? A Time-Series Analysis of New York State’s Sex Offender Registration and Notification Law, Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 14, 284–302Google Scholar
Washington State Sex Offender Policy Board, General Recommendations for Sex Offender Management 10 (2016), https://sgc.wa.gov/sites/default/files/public/sopb/documents/general_recommendations.pdfGoogle Scholar