Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T18:38:06.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Offenders and SORN Laws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2021

By
Amanda Agan  and
J.J. Prescott
Edited by
Wayne Logan  and
J. J. Prescott
Wayne Logan
Affiliation:
Florida State University School of Law
J. J. Prescott
Affiliation:
University of Michigan Law School
Get access

Summary

Chapter 7 describes what we know about the effects of SORN laws on criminal behavior. A coherent story emerges from this review: there is virtually no evidence that SORN laws reduce recidivism or otherwise increase public safety. The chapter first delineates the various ways registration and notification alter the legal environment not only for registrants but also for nonregistrants, the public, and law enforcement. There are many channels through which SORN laws might impact the frequency of sex offenses, including some that would produce an increase in overall offending. The chapter assesses these possibilities in light of a large body of relevant empirical research, focusing on potential changes in registrant recidivism, nonregistrant criminal behavior, the geography of victimization, and the distribution of types of sex offenses and victims. Scholars have plumbed many different data sources using a range of methodologies, yet nearly every study finds no evidence that SORN laws – in particular, community notification laws – reduce sexual recidivism. In fact, notification laws may increase recidivism risk. The final section discusses registrant beliefs about the effects of SORN laws. In sum, the chapter comprehensively engages with the pressing question of whether SORN laws protect the public and concludes that they do not.

Keywords

sex offender recidivismdeterrencecriminal behaviorgeography of victimizationeffectiveness of sex offender registration and notificationempirical criminal researchsex offender beliefs
Type
Chapter
Information
Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Laws
An Empirical Evaluation
 , pp. 102 - 144
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, A. R. & Sacks, M. (2012). Can General Strain Theory be Used to Explain Recidivism among Registered Sex Offenders? Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 187–193.Google Scholar
Ackerman, A. R., Sacks, M., & Greenberg, D. F. (2012). Legislation Targeting Sex Offenders: Are Recent Policies Effective in Reducing Rape? Justice Quarterly, 29(6), 858–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, A. R., Sacks, M., & Osier, L. N. (2013). The Experiences of Registered Sex Offenders with Internet Offender Registries in Three States. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 52, 29–45. DOI: 10.1080/10509674.2012.720959.Google Scholar
Adkins, G., Huff, D., & Stageberg, P. (2000). Iowa Sex Offender Registry and Recidivism. Iowa Department of Human Rights Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning and Statistical Analysis Center, 1–21. https://humanrights.iowa.gov/sites/default/files/media/SexOffenderReport%5B1%5D.pdf.Google Scholar
Agan, A. Y. (2011). Sex Offender Registries: Fear Without Function? Journal of Law & Economics, 54, 207–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agan, A. Y. & Prescott, J.J. (2014). Sex Offender Law and the Geography of Victimization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11(4), 786–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agan, A. & Prescott, J.J. (2015). Sex Offenses. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 1–15. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_579-1.Google Scholar
Alper, M. & Durose, M. R. (2019). Recidivism of Sex Offenders Released from State Prison: A 9 Year Follow-up (2005–14). Bureau of Justice Statistics: Special Report, U.S. Department of Justice. www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsorsp9yfu0514.pdf.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. J. S. & Klein, J. L. (2018). Ashamed and Alone: Comparing Offender and Family Member Experiences with the Sex Offender Registry. Criminal Justice Review, 43(4), 440–457. DOI: 10.1177/0734016818756486.Google Scholar
Barnoski, R. (2005). Sex Offender Sentencing in Washington State: Has Community Notification Reduced Recidivism? Washington State Institute for Public Policy. www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/919/Wsipp_Has-Community-Notification-Reduced-Recidivism_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Barnoski, R. (2006). Sex Offender Sentencing in Washington State: Failure to Register as a Sex Offender–Revised. Washington State Institute for Public Policy. www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/926/Wsipp_Failure-to-Register-as-a-Sex-Offender-Revised_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Barr, R. & Pease, K. (1990). Crime Placement, Displacement, and Deflection. Crime and Justice. 12, 277–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten Bensel, T. & Sample, L. L. (2017). The Influence of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws on Fostering Collective Identity among Offenders. Journal of Crime and Justice, 40(4), 497–511. DOI: 10.1080/0735648X.2015.1131184.Google Scholar
Bernasco, W. (2010). A Sentimental Journey to Crime: Effects of Residential History on Crime Location Choice. American Society of Criminology, 48(2), 389–416.Google Scholar
Bierie, D. M. & Detar, P. J. (2016). Geographic and Social Movement of Sex Offender Fugitives. Crime & Delinquency, 62(8), 983–1002. DOI: 10.1177/0011128714530658.Google Scholar
Bierie, D. M. & Budd, K. M. (2020). Registration and the Closure of Stranger-Perpetrated Sex Crimes Reported to Police. Sexual Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063220931824.Google Scholar
Bouffard, J. A. & Askew, L. N. (2019). Time-Series Analyses of the Impact of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Law Implementation and Subsequent Modifications on Rates of Sexual Offenses. Crime & Delinquency, 1–30. DOI: 10.1177/0011128717722010.Google Scholar
Bowen, K., Frenzel, E., & Spraitz, J. D. (2016). Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws: Thoughts from Registered Sex Offenders in Three States. Safer Communities, 15(2), 94–109. DOI: 10.1108/SC-12-2015-0040.Google Scholar
Brannon, Y., Levenson, J., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Attitudes about Community Notification: A Comparison of Sexual Offenders and the Non-Offending Public. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(4), 369–379.Google Scholar
Burchfield, K. B. & Mingus, W. (2008). Not in My Neighborhood: Assessing Registered Sex Offenders’ Experiences with Local Social Capital and Social Control. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35 (3), 356–374. DOI: 10.1177/0093854807311375.Google Scholar
Burchfield, K. & Mingus, W. (2014). Sex Offender Reintegration: Consequences of the Local Neighborhood Context. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 109–124. DOI: 10.1007/s12103-012-9195-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Justice Statistics (2018). Number of Rape/Sexual Assaults by Victim-Offender Relationship and Reporting to the Police, 2001–2018. Generated using the NCVS Victimization Analysis Tool (NVAT), www.bjs.gov.Google Scholar
Canter, D. V. (1996). The Environmental Range of Serial Rapists. Psychology in Action, 13(1), 217–230.Google Scholar
Carr, J. B. (2019). The effect of sex offender registries on recidivism: Evidence from a natural experiment. Department of Economics, Purdue University, 1–37.Google Scholar
Cooley, B. E., Moore, S. E., & Sample, L. L. (2017). The Role of Formal Social Control Mechanisms in Deterring Sex Offending as Part of the Desistance Process. Criminal Justice Studies, 30(2), 136–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2017.1299335.Google Scholar
Durlauf, S. & Nagin, D. (2011). Imprisonment and Crime: Can Both be Reduced? Criminology Public Policy, 10(1), 13–54.Google Scholar
Duwe, G. & Donnay, W. (2008). The Impact of Megan’s Law on Sex Offender Recidivism: The Minnesota Experience. Criminology, 46(2), 411–446.Google Scholar
Duwe, G. & Donnay, W. (2010). The Effects of Failure to Register on Sex Offender Recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(5), 520–536. DOI: 10.1177/0093854810364106.Google Scholar
Elborgan, E. B., Patry, M., & Scalora, M. J. (2003). The Impact of Community Notification Laws on Sex Offender Treatment Attitudes. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26, 207–219.Google Scholar
Freeman, N. J. (2012). The Public Safety Impact of Community Notification Laws: Rearrest of Convicted Sex Offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 58(4), 539–564.Google Scholar
Freeman, N. J. & Sandler, J. C. (2010). The Adam Walsh Act: A False Sense of Security of an Effective Public Policy Initiative? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 21(1), 31–49.Google Scholar
Hanson, R. K. & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The Characteristics of Persistent Sexual Offenders: A Meta-Analysis of Recidivism Studies. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeglic, E. L., Mercado, C. C., & Levenson, J. S. (2012). The Prevalence and Correlates of Depression and Hopelessness among Sex Offenders Subject to Community Notification and Residence Restriction Legislation. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 46–59. DOI: 10.1007/s12103-010-9096-9.Google Scholar
Kernsmith, P. D., Comartin, E., Craun, S. W., & Kernsmith, R. M. (2009). The Relationship between Sex Offender Registry Utilization and Awareness. Sexual Abuse, 21(2), 181–193.Google Scholar
Kilmer, A. & Leon, C. S. (2017). “Nobody Worries About Our Children”: Unseen Impacts of Sex Offender Registration on Families with School-Age Children and Implications for Desistance. Criminal Justice Studies, 30(2), 181–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2017.1299852.Google Scholar
Klein, J. L., Tolson, D., & Collins, C. (2014). Lamenting the List: A Partial Test of Sherman’s Defiance Theory as Applied to Female Sex Offenders. Contemporary Justice Review, 17(3), 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2014.944798.Google Scholar
Langan, P. A., Schmitt, E. L., & Durose, M. R. (2003). Recidivism of Sex Offenders Released from Prison in 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Lasher, M. P. & McGrath, R. J. (2012). The Impact of Community Notification on Sex Offender Reintegration: A Quantitative Review of the Research Literature. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(1), 6–28. DOI: 0.1177/0306624X10387524.Google Scholar
Letourneau, E. J. & Armstrong, K. S. (2008). Recidivism Rates for Registered and Nonregistered Juvenile Sexual Offenders. Sexual Abuse, 20(4), 393–408.Google Scholar
Letourneau, E. J., Armstrong, K. S., Bandyopadhyay, D., & Sinha, D. (2012). Sex Offender Registration and Notification Policy Increases Juvenile Plea Bargains. Sexual Abuse, 25(2), 189–207. DOI: 10.1177/1079063212455667.Google Scholar
Letourneau, E. J., Bandyopadhyay, D., Armstrong, K. S., & Sinha, D. (2010). Do Sex Offender Registration and Notification Requirements Deter Juvenile Sex Crimes? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(5), 553–569. DOI: 10.1177/0093854810363562.Google Scholar
Letourneau, E. J., Levenson, J. S., Bandyopadhyay, D., Armstrong, K., & Sinha, D. (2010). Effects of South Carolina’s Sex Offender Registration and Notification Policy on Deterrence of Adult Sex Crimes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(5), 435–458.Google Scholar
Letourneau, E. J., Levenson, J. S., Bandyopadhyay, D., Sinha, D., & Armstrong, K. S. (2010). Effects of South Carolina’s Sex Offender Registration and Notification Policy on Adult Recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 21(4), 435–458. DOI: 10.1177/0887403409353148.Google Scholar
Letourneau, E. J., Shields, R. T., Nair, R., Kahn, G., Sandler, J. C., & Vandiver, D. M. (2018). Juvenile Registration and Notification Policies Fail to Prevent First-Time Sexual Offenses: An Extension of Findings to Two New States. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 1–15. DOI: 10.1177/0887403418786783.Google Scholar
Levenson, J. S. & Cotter, L. P. (2005). The Effect of Megan’s Law on Sex Offender Reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 49–66. DOI: 10.1177/1043986204271676.Google Scholar
Levenson, J. S., D’Amora, D. A., & Hern, A. L. (2007). Megan’s Law and Its Impact on Community Re-Entry for Sex Offenders. Behavioral Sciences Law, 25(4), 587–602. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levenson, J. S., Letourneau, E. J., Armstrong, K., & Zgoba, K. M. (2010). Failure to Register as a Sex Offender: Is it Associated with Recidivism? Justice Quarterly, 27(3), 305–331. DOI: 10.1080/07418820902972399.Google Scholar
Levenson, J. S., Sandler, J. C., & Freeman, N. J. (2012). Failure-to-Register Laws and Public Safety: An Examination of Risk Factors and Sex Offense Recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 36(6), 555–565. DOI: 10.1037/b0000002.Google Scholar
Levenson, J. S. & Tewksbury, R. (2009). Collateral Damage: Members of Registered Sex Offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 54–68. DOI: 10.1007/s12103-008-9055-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenson, J. S. & Zgoba, K. M. (2016). Community Protection Policies and Repeat Sexual Offenses in Florida. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(1), 1140–1158. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X15573946.Google Scholar
Linden, L. & Rockoff, J. E. (2008). Estimates of the Impact of Crime Risk on Property Values from Megan’s Laws. American Economic Review, 98(3), 1103–1127. DOI: 10.1257/aer.98.3.1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddan, S. (2005). Sex Offenders as Outsiders: A Reexamination of the Labeling Perspective Utilizing Current Sex Offender Registration and Notification Policies. University of Nebraska: Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor in Philosophy. Omaha: Nebraska.Google Scholar
Maddan, S. (2008). The Labeling of Sex Offenders: The Unintended Consequences of the Best Intentioned Policies.Google Scholar
Maddan, S., Miller, J. M., Walker, J. T., & Marshall, I. H. (2011). Utilizing Criminal History Information to Explore the Effect of Community Notification on Sex Offender Recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 303–324.Google Scholar
Maurelli, , K. & Ronan, , G. (2013). A Time-Series Analysis of the Effectiveness of Sex Offender Notification Laws in the USA. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 24(1), 128–143.Google Scholar
McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G. F., & Lasher, M. P. (2009). Impact of Community Notification on Sex Offender Reintegration Before and After Passage of a Megan’s Law. Burlington: Vermont Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Sexual Abuse. www.researchgate.net/publication/280023713_Impact_of_Community_Notification_on_Sex_Offender_Reintegration_in_Vermont_Before_and_After_Passage_of_a_Megan’s_Law.Google Scholar
Mercado, C. C., Alvarez, S., & Levenson, J. (2008). The Impact of Specialized Sex Offender Legislation on Community Reentry. Sexual Abuse, 20(2), 188–205. DOI: 10.1177/1079063208317540.Google Scholar
Murphy, L. & Federoff, J. P. (2013). Sexual Offenders’ Views of Canadian Sex Offender Registries: A Survey of a Clinical Sample. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 45(3), 238–249. DOI: 10.1037/a0033251.Google Scholar
Mustaine, E. E. & Tewksbury, R. (2011). Residential Relegation of Registered Sex Offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 44–57.Google Scholar
Mustaine, E. E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K. M. (2006). Residential Location and Mobility of Registered Sex Offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(2), 177–192.Google Scholar
Mustaine, E. E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K. M. (2006). Social Disorganization and Residential Locations of Registered Sex Offenders: Is This a Collateral Consequence? Deviant Behavior, 27, 329–350. DOI: 10.1080/01639620600605606.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence in the Twenty-First Century. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 199–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J. H., Bandyopadhyay, D., & Letourneau, E. (2014). Examining Deterrence of Adult Sex Crimes: A Semi-parametric Intervention Time Series Approach. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 69, 198–207. DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.08.004. PMID: 24795489; PMCID: PMC4002981. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24795489/.Google Scholar
Prescott, J.J. (2016). Portmanteau Ascendant: Post-Release Regulations and Sex Offender Recidivism. Connecticut Law Review, 48(4), 1035–1078.Google Scholar
Prescott, J.J. & Rockoff, J. E. (2011). Do Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws Affect Criminal Behavior? Journal of Law and Economics, 54(1), 161–206.Google Scholar
Robbers, M. L. P. (2009). Lifers on the Outside: Sex Offenders and Disintegrative Shaming. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(1), 5–28. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X07312953.Google Scholar
Salmon, T. M. (2010). Sex Offender Registry: Reliability Could Be Significantly Improved. Report of the Vermont State Auditor. Available at https://auditor.vermont.gov/sites/auditor/files/files/reports/performance-audits/Final_SOR_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Sandler, J. C., Freeman, N. J., & Socia, K. M. (2008). Does a Watched Pot Boil? A Time-Series Analysis of New York State’s Sex Offender Registration and Notification Law. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 14(4), 284–302. DOI: 10.1037/a0013881.Google Scholar
Sandler, J. C., Letourneau, E. J., Vandiver, D. M., Shields, R. T., & Chaffin, M. (2017). Juvenile Sexual Crime Reporting Rates are Not Influenced by Juvenile Sex Offender Registration Policies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(2), 131–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schram, D. D. & Milloy, C. D. (1995). Community Notification: A Study of Offender Characteristics and Recidivism. Urban Policy Research, 1–30. www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/1208/Wsipp_Community-Notification-A-Study-of-Offender-Characteristics-and-Recidivism_Full-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Seidler, K. (2010). Community Management of Sex Offenders: Stigma Versus Support. Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand, 2(2), 66–76.Google Scholar
Socia, K. M., Levenson, J. S., Ackerman, A. R., & Harris, A. J. (2015). “Brothers under the Bridge”: Factors Influencing the Transience of Registered Sex Offenders in Florida. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(6), 559–586. DOI: 10.1177/1079063214521472.Google Scholar
Shao, L. & Li, J. (2006). The Effect of Sex Offender Registration Laws on Rape Victimization. Unpublished manuscript. University of Alabama, Department of Economics, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Stucky, T. D. & Ottensmann, J. R. (2016). Registered Sex Offenders and Reported Sex Offenses. Crime & Delinquency, 62(8), 1026–1045. DOI: 10.1177/0011128714556738.Google Scholar
Terry, K. J. (2015). Sex Offender Laws in the United States: Smart Policy or Disproportionate Sanctions? International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 39(2), 113–127. DOI: 10.1080/01924036.2014.973048.Google Scholar
Tewksbury, R. (2004). Experiences and Attitudes of Registered Female Sex Offenders. Federal Probation: A Journal of Correctional Philosophy and Practice, 68(3), 3–4, 9. www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/fed_probation_dec_2004.pdf.Google Scholar
Tewksbury, R. (2005). Collateral Consequences of Sex Offender Registration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 67–81. DOI: 10.1177/1043986204271704.Google Scholar
Tewksbury, R. & Jennings, W. G. (2010). Assessing the Impact of Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification on Sex-Offending Trajectories. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(5), 570–582. DOI: 10.1177/0093854810363570.Google Scholar
Tewksbury, R., Jennings, W. G., & Zgoba, K. M. (2012). A Longitudinal Examination of Sex Offender Recidivism Prior to and Following the Implementation of SORN. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30(3), 308–328. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.1009.Google Scholar
Tewksbury, R. & Lees, M. B. (2007). Perceptions of Punishment: How Registered Sex Offenders View Registries. Crime & Delinquency, 53(3), 380–407. DOI: 10.1177/0011128706286915.Google Scholar
Tewksbury, R., Mustaine, E. E., & Rolfe, S. (2016). Sex Offender Residential Mobility and Relegation: The Collateral Consequences Continue. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 852–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tewksbury, R. & Zgoba, K. M. (2010). Perceptions and Coping with Punishment: How Registered Sex Offenders Respond to Stress, Internet Restrictions, and the Collateral Consequences of Registration. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(4), 537–551. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X09339180.Google Scholar
Vasquez, B. E., Maddan, S., & Walker, J. T. (2008). The Influence of Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws in the United States: A Time-Series Analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 54(2), 175–192.Google Scholar
Yeh, S. (2015). Revealing the Rapist Next Door: Property Impacts of a Sex Offender Registry. International Review of Law and Economics, 44, 42–60.Google Scholar
Zevitz, R. G. (2006). Sex Offender Community Notification: Its Role in Recidivism and Offender Reintegration. Criminal Justice Studies, 19(2), 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zevitz, R. G. & Farkas, M. A. (2000). Sex Offender Community Notification: Managing High Risk Criminal or Exacting Further Vengeance? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 375–391.Google Scholar
Zgoba, K. M., Jennings, W. G., & Salerno, L. M. (2018). Megan’s Law 20 Years Later: An Empirical Analysis and Policy Review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(7), 1028–1046. DOI: 10.1177/0093854818771409.Google Scholar
Zgoba, K. M. & Levenson, J. S. (2012). Failure to Register as a Predictor of Sex Offense Recidivism: The Big Bad Wolf or a Red Herring? Sexual Abuse, 24 (4), 328–349. doi:10.1177/1079063211421010.Google Scholar
Zgoba, K., Veysey, B. M., & Dalessandro, M. (2010). An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Community Notification and Registration: Do the Best Intentions Predict the Best Practices? Justice Quarterly, 27(5), 667–691. DOI: 10.1080/07418820903357673.Google Scholar
Zgoba, K., Witt, P., Dalessandro, M., & Veysey, B. (2008). Megan’s Law: Assessing the Practical and Monetary Efficacy. National Institute of Justice, 1–44. www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/225370.pdf.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×