Introduction

Megan Richardson

doi:10.1017/9781108303972.002

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2017

Megan Richardson

Show author details

Megan Richardson: Affiliation:
University of Melbourne

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Right to Privacy
Origins and Influence of a Nineteenth-Century Idea
, pp. xii

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108303972.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Miss Manola Seeks an Injunction (1890, June 21). New York Times, 2.Google Scholar

Pictures with Histories (1891, January). Strand Magazine, 1(3), 226.Google Scholar

Abernethy v Hutchinson (1825) 1 H & Tw 28.Google Scholar

Ariès, P. and Duby, G. (Eds.) (1985–1987). Histoire de la Vie Privée, 5 vols. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Bajac, Q. (2002). The Invention of Photography: The First Fifty Years. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar

Bentham, J. (1822). First Principles Preparatory to Constitutional Code. Schofield, P. (Ed., 1989). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bentham, J. (1825). A Treatise on Judicial Evidence, Extracted from the Manuscripts of Jeremy Bentham by M Dumont, translated into English. London: J. W. Paget.Google Scholar

Berenson, E. and Giloi, E. (Eds.) (2010). Constructing Charisma: Celebrity, Fame, and Power in Nineteenth-century Europe (164–182). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Blackstone, W. (1765–1769). Commentaries on the Laws of England, 4 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bowring, John (Ed.). The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843, vol 4.Google Scholar

Boyce, G., Curran, J. and Wingate, P. (Eds.) (1978). Newspaper History from the 17th Century to the Present Day. London: Constable.Google Scholar

Boyd v United States, 116 US 616 (1886).Google Scholar

Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457.Google Scholar

Canuel, M. (2011). Bentham, Utility and the Romantic Imagination. In Engelmann, S. (Ed.), Selected Writings of Jeremy Bentham (500–519). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, T. (2012). ‘Emotion’: The History of a Keyword in Crisis. Emotion Review, 4, 338–344.Google Scholar

Engraving Copyright Act 1735 (8 Geo 2, c 13).Google Scholar

Engraving Copyright Act 1766 (7 Geo III, c 38).Google Scholar

Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 How St Tr 1029.Google Scholar

Félix c O’Connell, 16 juin 1858, Trib Civ de la Seine, 1ere Ch, Dalloz 1858, 3.62.Google Scholar

Gee v Pritchard (1818) 1 Swans 402.Google Scholar

von Jhering, R. (1872). Der Kampf ums Recht. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar

von Jhering, R. (1877). Geist Des Römischen Rechts, vol 1 (3rd ed.). Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 5–6, translated by Smith, M. (1927). A General View of European Legal History and Other Papers. New York: Columbia University Press, 122.Google Scholar

von Jhering, R. (1879). The Struggle for Law (Der Kampf ums Recht) (2nd ed.) (Lalor, J., Trans. 1915). Chicago: Callaghan and Company.Google Scholar

Keith, K. (2006). ‘Privacy and Constitutions’. In Kenyon, A. and Richardson, M. (Eds.), New Dimensions in Privacy Law (250–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kohler, J. (1903). Das Eigenbild im Recht. Berlin: J Guttentag, gmbh.Google Scholar

Manola v Stevens & Myers, New York Supreme Court, Unreported, June 1890.Google Scholar

Melikan, R. (1999). John Scott, Lord Eldon, 1751–1838: The Duty of Loyalty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1833). Essay on Bentham, republished in Warnock, M. (Ed., 1962). Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Essay on Bentham. London: Collins.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1859). On Liberty, republished in Warnock, M. (Ed., 1962). Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Essay on Bentham. London: Collins.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism, republished in Warnock, M. (Ed., 1962). Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Essay on Bentham. London: Collins.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1870). Autobiography. Stillinger, J. (Ed., 1971). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mitchell, P. (2015). A History of Tort Law 1900–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Olmstead v United States, 277 US 438 (1928).Google Scholar

Paton, H. J. (1948). The Moral Law: Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals (Paton, H. J., Trans.). London: Hutchinson & Co.Google Scholar

Perrauld-Charmantier, A. (1930). Le Droit de Réponse Dans la Presse. Paris: Marchal et Billard.Google Scholar

Picard, É. (1999). The Right to Privacy in French Law. In Markesinis, B. (Ed.), Protecting Privacy (49–103). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Pollard v Photographic Company (1888) 40 ChD 345.Google Scholar

Prince Albert v Strange (1849a) 2 De G & Sm 652.Google Scholar

Prince Albert v Strange (1849b) 1 H & Tw 28.Google Scholar

Reeve, H. (1855, October). The Newspaper Press. Edinburgh Review, cii, 470.Google Scholar

RG (II), 29 November 1898 and RG, 28 December 1899, reproduced in Kohler, J. (1903). Das Eigenbild im Recht. Berlin: J Guttentag, gmbh, at 29 and 32.Google Scholar

Salkowski, C. (1886). Institutes and History of Roman Private Law: with Catena of Texts (Lehrbuch der Institutionen und der Geschichte des Römischen Privatrechts). Whitfield, E. E. (Ed. and Trans.). London: Stevens and Haynes.Google Scholar

Simmel, G. (1903). The Metropolitis and Mental Life (Die Großstädte und das Geistesleben), in Wolff, K. (Ed. and Trans.) (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel (409–424). Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Southey v Sherwood (1817) 2 Mer 345.Google Scholar

Tugendhat, M. Sir (2016). Liberty Intact. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

United States v Jones, 546 US 400 (2012).Google Scholar

Vaughan, G. (2011). The Cult of the Queen Empress: Royal Portraiture in Colonial Victoria. Art Journal of the National Gallery of Victoria, 50, 29–43.Google Scholar

Warren, S. and Brandeis, L. (1890). The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4, 193–220.Google Scholar

Whitman, J. (2004). Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty. Yale Law Journal, 113, 1151–1221.Google Scholar

Wilde, O. (1890). The Critic as Artist (The True Function and Value of Criticism), reprinted in Wilde, O. (2010). The Decay of Lying and Other Essays. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Wilde, O. (1891). The Soul of Man under Socialism, reprinted in Wilde, O. (2010). The Decay of Lying and Other Essays. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana/Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Williams, R. (1989). When Was Modernism? New Left Review, 175, 48–52.Google Scholar

Wordsworth, W. (1802). Preface to Lyrical Ballads (3rd ed.). London: TN Longman and Rees.Google Scholar

Wordsworth, W. (1937). Letters of William and Dorothy Wordsworth, vol III. de Sélincourt, E. (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Wyatt v Wilson, Bill and Answer in the case argued before Lord Eldon, 1820.Google Scholar

Zweigert, K. and Siehr, K. (1971). Jhering’s Influence on the Development of Comparative Legal Method. American Journal of Comparative Law, 19, 215–231.Google Scholar

Book contents

Introduction

Summary

Access options

References

Works Cited

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive