Alston, P. (2013). Does the Past Matter? On the Origins of Human Rights (Book Review). Harvard Law Review, 126, 2043–2081.Google Scholar

Altman, I. (1975). The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, Crowding. Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Aplin, T., Bently, L., Johnson, P., and Malynicz, S. (2012). Gurry on Breach of Confidence (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Apollonio, U. (Ed.) (1973). Futurist Manifestos. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar

Austin, L. (2003). Privacy and the Question of Technology. Law and Philosophy, 22, 119–166.Google Scholar

Beverley-Smith, H., Ohly, A., and Lucas-Schloetter, A. (2005). Privacy, Property and Personality Civil Law Perspectives on Commercial Appropriation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bonnet c Société Olibet, 13 juin 1882, Trib com Seine, Ann propr ind 1893, 246.Google Scholar

Brown, M. (2003). Who Owns Native Culture? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bygrave, L. (2014). Data Privacy Law: An International Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

C v Holland [2012] 3 NZLR 672.Google Scholar

Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457.Google Scholar

CE, ordonnance du 26 août 2016, Ligue des droits de l’homme et autres – association de défense des droits de l’homme collectif contre l’islamophobie en France (Nos 402742, 402777).Google Scholar

Charlesworth, H. and Chinkin, C. (2000). The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, H. and Larking, E. (Eds.)(2015). Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, M. (2004). Movement, Manifesto, Melee: The Modernist Group 1910–1914. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

De Hert, P. and Gutwirth, S. (2009). Data Protection in the Case Law of Strasbourg and Luxenbourg. In Gutwirth, S., Poullet, Y., de Hert, P., Terwangne, C., and Nouwt, S. (Eds.), Reinventing Data Protection (3–44). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Diggelmann, O. and Cleis, M. N. (2014). How the Right to Privacy Became a Human Right. Human Rights Law Review, 14, 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas v Hello! Ltd [2001] QB 967.Google Scholar

Douglas v Hello! Ltd [2006] QB 125.Google Scholar

Duchess of Argyll v Duke of Argyll [1967] Ch 302.Google Scholar

Dumas c Liébert, 25 mai 1867, C de Paris, Ann propr ind 1867, 247.Google Scholar

Edwards, P. (1990). Wyndham Lewis: Painter and Writer. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Errera, R. (2011, September 22–23). The Origins and Content of Article 9 of the Civil Code on the Right to Privacy, speech delivered at the Franco-British Lawyers Society Privacy in an Open Society. London.Google Scholar

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union), Brussels, 7 December 2000, in force 1 December 2009, OJ 2000/C 364/01.Google Scholar

European Convention on Human Rights (Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms), Rome, 4 November 1950, in force 3 September 1953, 213 UNTS 222.Google Scholar

Félix c O’Connell, 16 juin 1858, Trib Civ de la Seine, 1ere Ch, Dalloz 1858, 3.62.Google Scholar

Fenwick, H. and Phillipson, G. (2006). Media Freedom under the Human Rights Act. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald v Kelburne and Karori Tramway Company, Limited (1901) 4 GLR 42.Google Scholar

Foster and Others v Mountford and Rigby Ltd (1976) 14 ALR 71.Google Scholar

Gardner, E. (2016, May 25). Judge Upholds Hulk Hogan’s $140 Million Trial Victory against Gawker. Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved from www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-upholds-hulk-hogans-140–897301.Google Scholar

Gavison, R. (1980). Privacy and the Limits of Law. Yale Law Journal, 89, 421–471.Google Scholar

Gee v Pritchard (1818) 1 Swans 402.Google Scholar

Giller v Procopets (2008) 24 VR 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Gokal Prasad v Radho (1888) IL R 10 Allahabad 358.Google Scholar

Greenleaf, G. (2014). Asian Data Privacy Laws. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. (2013). Fractured Times: Culture and Society in the Twentieth Century. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Hoggart, R. (1957). The Uses of Literacy. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar

Holmes, D. (1999). Ordinary Heroines: Resistance and Romance in the War Fiction of Elsa Triolet. In Peitsch, H., Burdett, C. and Gorrara, C. (Eds.), European Memories of the Second World War (12–22). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Hughes, K. (2012). A Behavioural Understanding of Privacy and Its Implications for Privacy Law. Modern Law Review, 75, 806–836.Google Scholar

Human Rights Act 1998 (c. 42), 9 November 1998, in force 2 October 2000.Google Scholar

Hunt, L. (2007). Inventing Human Rights: A History. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Jane Doe 464533 v ND 2016 ONSC 541.Google Scholar

Johnson, G. (1998). A Magna Carta for Mankind: Writing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In Johnson, G. and Symonides, J. (Eds.), The Universal Declaration on Human Rights: A History of Its Creation and Implementation 1948–1998 (19–76). New York: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Kommers, D. P. and Miller, R. (2012). The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. (1997). Lauterpacht: The Victorian Tradition in International Law. European Journal of International Law, 6, 215–263.Google Scholar

Lake, J. (2016). The Face That Launched a Thousand Lawsuits: The American Women Who Forged a Right to Privacy. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H. (1945). An International Bill of the Rights of Man. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, W. (Ed.) (1914, June 20). Blast, no 1. London: John Lane.Google Scholar

Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469.Google Scholar

Manola v Stevens & Myers, New York Supreme Court, Unreported, June 1890.Google Scholar

Marwick, A. and boyd, d. (2014). Networked Privacy: How Teenagers Negotiate Context in Social Media. New Media & Society, 16, 1051–1067.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. (2003). Me++: The Cyborg Self and the Networked City. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. (2004). Why Buck Rogers Will Be Invisible (interview conducted by Victor Chase). Pictures of the Future, Spring, 34–35.Google Scholar

Mitsilegas, V. (2016). Surveillance and Digital Privacy in the Transatlantic ‘War on Terror’: The Case for a Global Privacy Regime. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 47, 1–77.Google Scholar

Moreham, N. (2006). Privacy in Public Places. Cambridge Law Journal, 65, 606–635.Google Scholar

Moreham, N. and Warby, M. (2016). Tugendhat and Christie the Law of Privacy and the Media (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morsink, J. (1999). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting and Intent. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Morsink, J. (2009). Inherent Human Rights: Philosophical Roots of the Universal Declaration. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford: Stanford Law Books.Google Scholar

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations Human Rights. The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age. Retrieved from www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/DigitalAge/Pages/DigitalAgeIndex.aspx.Google Scholar

Oster, J. (2015). Media Freedom as a Fundamental Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Peltzer c Castan, 26 décembre 1888, Bruxelles, Sirey 1891 IV 35.Google Scholar

Picard, É. (1999). The Right to Privacy in French Law. In Markesinis, B. (Ed.). Protecting Privacy (49–103). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] AC 1081.Google Scholar

Pollard v Photographic Company (1888) 40 ChD 345.Google Scholar

Pound, E. (1913) A Few Don’ts, republished in Eliot, T. S. (Ed., 1954). Literary Essays of Ezra Pound. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Prince Albert v Strange (1849) 1 H & Tw 28.Google Scholar

Prost, M. (2012). The Concept of Unity in Public International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Quentin Baxter, Q. (1968). International Protection of Human Rights. Keith, K. J. (Ed.) Essays on Human Rights (1–12). Wellington: Sweet & Maxwell (NZ) Ltd.Google Scholar

Regan, P. (1995). Legislating Privacy: Technology, Social Values, and Public Policy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Richards, N. (2015). Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Richardson, M., Bryan, M., Vranken, M., and Barnett, K. (2012). Breach of Confidence: Social Origins and Modern Developments. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Roessler, B. and Mokrosinska, D. (2015). Social Dimensions of Privacy: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rössler, B. (2005). The Value of Privacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Schabas, W. (Ed.) (2013). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, The Travaux Préparatoires, 3 vols. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. (1968). The Social Psychology of Privacy. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 741–752.Google Scholar

Simmel, G. (1903). The Metropolitis and Mental Life (Die Großstädte und das Geistesleben). In Wolff, K. (Ed. and Trans.) (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel (409–424). Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar

Simmel, G. (1909) Brücke und Tür in Essays Des Philosophen Zur Geschichte, Religion, Kunst Und Gesellschaft (1–7). K. F. Koehler Verlag Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Simpson, A. W. B. (2001). Human Rights and the End of Empire: Britain and the Genesis of the European Convention. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Solove, D. (2008). Understanding Privacy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Southey v Sherwood (1817) 2 Mer 345.Google Scholar

Stephens v Avery [1988] I Ch 449.Google Scholar

Tele2 Sverige (Judgment) [2016] EUECJ C–203/15.Google Scholar

Trilling, L. (1972). Sincerity and Authenticity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tugendhat, Sir M. (2016). Liberty Intact. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

(United Nations) Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Human Rights Committee (HRC). (1988). CCPR General Comment No 16: Article 17 (Right to Privacy), The Right to Respect for Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence, and Protection of Honour and Reputation, 8 April 1988.Google Scholar

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, United Nations, Paris, 10 December 1948, General Assembly Resolution 217 A (III), UN Doc A/810.Google Scholar

von Hannover v Germany [2004] EMLR 21.Google Scholar

von Hannover v Germany (No 2) (2012) EMLR 16.Google Scholar

Wacks, R. (2013). Privacy and Media Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warren, S. and Brandeis, L. (1890). The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4, 193–220.Google Scholar

Westin, A. (1952). The Wire-tapping Problem. Columbia Law Review, 52, 165–202.Google Scholar

Wild, Sir R. (1968). Human Rights in Retrospect. Keith, K. J. (Ed.) Essays on Human Rights (1–12). Wellington: Sweet & Maxwell (NZ) Ltd.Google Scholar

Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana/Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Wilson, E. (1966). Sociology: Rules, Roles, and Relationships. Homewood, Illinois: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar

Wilson v Ferguson [2015] WASC 15.Google Scholar

Witzleb, N., Lindsay, D., Paterson, M., and Rodrick, S. (Eds.) (2014). Emerging Challenges in Privacy Law: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Woolf, V. (1929). A Room of One’s Own. Bradshaw, D. and Clarke, S. (Eds., 2015). Malden: John Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar

Zalnieriute, M. (2015). An International Constitutional Moment for Data Privacy in the Times of Mass-Surveillance. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 23, 99–133.Google Scholar