Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T08:55:36.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Resisting Spectacle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2017

Megan Richardson
Megan Richardson
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Right to Privacy
Origins and Influence of a Nineteenth-Century Idea
 , pp. 62 - 85
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

The Ardlamont Shooting Case (1893, December 16). The Illustrated Police News, cover.Google Scholar
Brevities (1887, February 26). The Daily Inter Ocean, 6.Google Scholar
End of the Oscar Wilde Case (1895, June 1). The Illustrated Police News, 4.Google Scholar
Erratic Nina Van Zandt (1887a, January 23). The Washington Post, 1.Google Scholar
Latest Details of the Whitechapel Murders (1888a, September 22). Illustrated Police News, cover.Google Scholar
Latest Incidents in Connection with the Doings of Jack the Ripper: The East-End Fiend (1888b, October 27). Illustrated Police News, cover.Google Scholar
Manola Claps an Injunction on Manager, Stevens and the Photographer (1890, June 8). The Sun, 2.Google Scholar
Miss Manola Seeks an Injunction (1890b, June 21). New York Times, 2.Google Scholar
Miss Van Zandt Enjoins Them (1887, January 25). The Milwaukee Sentinel, 4.Google Scholar
Miss Van Zandt in Wax (1887, February 26). St Louis Globe-Democrat, 2.Google Scholar
Miss Van Zandt in Wax (1887, February 26). Daily Inter Ocean, 6.Google Scholar
Miss Van Zandt’s Book (1887, January 30). New York Times, 8.Google Scholar
Miss Van Zandt’s Wax Effigy (1887b, January 25). The Washington Post, 5.Google Scholar
Murderers’ Row in Cook County Jail (1887, October 1). Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper, cover.Google Scholar
Ninny Nina (1887, March 20). Los Angeles Times, 2.Google Scholar
Obituary (1900, December 1). The Times, 8.Google Scholar
Oscar Wilde at Bow Street (1895a, April 20). Police News, cover.Google Scholar
Our Picayunes (1887, February 13). The Daily Picayune, 4.Google Scholar
Passing Notes (1889, December 21). Illustrated Police News, 3.Google Scholar
Permanent Injunction against the Flash-light Photographers (1890, June 20). The Evening World, 1.Google Scholar
Photographed in Tights: Marion Manola Caught on the Stage by a Camera (1890a, June 15). New York Times, 2.Google Scholar
Post Mortem Publicity (1891, July 1). New York Law Journal, 842–844.Google Scholar
Property in One’s Own Person (1890, June 17). New York Law Journal, 588–590.Google Scholar
A Record of the Commemoration, November Fifth to Eight, 1886, on the Two Hundred and Fiftieth Anniversary of the Founding of Harvard College (1887). Cambridge: John Wilson.Google Scholar
Abrams v United States, 250 US 616 (1919).Google Scholar
Adams, E. (1902). The Law of Privacy. North American Review, 175, 361–369.Google Scholar
Adams, E. (1905). The Right of Privacy, and Its Relation to the Law of Libel. American Law Review, 39, 37–58.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. (1999). The Failure of American Privacy Law. In Markesinis, B. (Ed.), Protecting Privacy (139–168). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Banner, S. (2011). American Property: A History of How, Why, and What We Own. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barbas, S. (2015). Laws of Image: Privacy and Publicity in America. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269.Google Scholar
Boyd v United States, 116 US 616 (1886).Google Scholar
Brandeis, L. (1971). Letters of Louis D Brandeis, vol I (1870–1907). Urofsky, M. and Levy, D. (Eds.). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Brandeis, L. (1916). The Living Law. Illinois Law Review, 19, 461–471.Google Scholar
Brayer, E. (1996). George Eastman: A Biography. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J. (2002). Beyond the Lines: Pictorial Reporting, Everyday Life, and the Crisis of Gilded Age America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. (1994). Free Press v Fair Trial: Supreme Court Decisions since 1807. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cochran, R. (2012). Louis D Brandeis’s MIT Lectures on Law (1892–1894). Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Colman, C. (2016). About Ned. Harvard Law Review Forum, 129, 128–152.Google Scholar
Cook, M. (2008). London and the Culture of Homosexuality, 1885–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, R. (1888). A Treatise on the Law of Torts or the Wrongs Which Arise Independent of Contract (2nd ed). Chicago: Callaghan & Company.Google Scholar
Cooley, T. (1906). A Treatise on the Law of Torts or the Wrongs Which Arise Independent of Contract, (vol 1 3rd ed). Lewis, J.. Chicago: Callaghan & Company.Google Scholar
Cornish, W. (2010). Personality Rights and Intellectual Property. In Cornish, W., Anderson, S., Cocks, R., Lobban, M., Polden, P. and Smith, K. (Eds.), Oxford History of the Laws of England, Vol. XIII (1820–1914: Fields of Development) (847–1014). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coste, B. (2014). Autonomy in the Dock: Oscar Wilde’s First Trial. Cahiers Victoriens & Édouardiens, 79, 2–11.Google Scholar
Curtis, P. (2001). Jack the Ripper and the London Press. New Haven Ct: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Delaqua, G. H. (2015). The Influence of John Stuart Mill on Oscar Wilde’s Concept of Freedom. A Palo Seco – Escritos de Filosofia e Literatura, 7, 21–27.Google Scholar
Diamond, M. (2003). Victorian Sensation, or, The Spectacular, The Shocking, and the Scandalous in Nineteenth-century Britain. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Douglas v Hello! Ltd [2001] QB 967.Google Scholar
Ellmann, R. (1988). Oscar Wilde. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
English, D. (1984). Political Uses of Photography in the Third French Republic 1871–1914. Ann Arbour: UMI Research Press.Google Scholar
Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 How St Tr 1029.Google Scholar
Evans, R. (2016). The Pursuit of Power: Europe 1815–1914. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Fisher, W., Horwitz, M. and Reed, T. (Eds.) (1993). American Legal Realism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gadja, A. (2008) What if Samuel D. Warren Hadn’t Married a Senator’s Daughter? Uncovering the Press Coverage That Led to ‘The Right to Privacy’. Michigan State Law Review, 1, 35–60.Google Scholar
Garval, M. (2012). Cléo de Mérode and the Rise of Modern Celebrity Culture. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Glancy, D. (1979). The Invention of the Right to Privacy. Arizona Law Review, 21, 1–39.Google Scholar
Glancy, D. (1990). Privacy and the Other Miss M. Northern Illinois University Law Review, 10, 401–410.Google Scholar
Godkin, E. L. (1890). The Rights of the Citizen IV: To His Own Reputation. Scribner’s Magazine, 8, 58–67.Google Scholar
Green, J. (2006). Death in the Haymarket: A Story of Chicago, the First Labor Movement, and the Bombing that Divided Gilded Age America. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Haelan Laboratories, Inc v Topps Chewing Gum, Inc, 202 F 2d 866 (1953).Google Scholar
Hannavy, J. (2008). Encyclopaedia of Nineteenth-century Photography. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hofer, M. and Scharnhorst, G. (Ed.) (2010). Oscar Wilde in America: The Interviews. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Holland, M. (2003). Irish Peacock & Scarlet Marquess: The Real Trial of Oscar Wilde. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Holmes, O. W. Jr (1881). The Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Holmes, O. W. Jr (1897). The Path of the Law. Harvard Law Review, 10, 457–478.Google Scholar
von Jhering, R. (1879). The Struggle for Law (Der Kampf ums Recht) (2nd ed.) (Lalor, J., Trans. 1915). Chicago: Callaghan and Company.Google Scholar
Kenyon, A. and Richardson, M. (2016). Reverberations of Sullivan? Considering Defamation and Privacy Law Reform. In Kenyon, A. (Ed.), Comparative Defamation and Privacy Law (309–330). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, J. (2016). The Face That Launched a Thousand Lawsuits: The American Women Who Forged a Right to Privacy. New Haven Ct: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Le Bon, G. (1897). The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind (Psychologie des Foules, 1895). London: T Fisher Unwin.Google Scholar
Levy, A. (2015). Huck Finn’s America. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Levy, A. (2015). Huck Finn’s America: Mark Twain and the Era that Shaped His Masterpiece. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Loi Relative à la Presse du 11 Mai 1868.Google Scholar
Manola v Stevens & Myers, New York Supreme Court, Unreported, June 1890.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. T. (2000). The Rights of Publicity and Privacy (2nd ed.) Paul, St., Minn.: West Group.Google Scholar
McCormack, J. (2007). From Chinese Wisdom to Irish Wit: Zhuangzi and Oscar Wilde. Irish University Review, 37, 302–321.Google Scholar
McCullough, J. (1981). Living Pictures on the New York Stage. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press.Google Scholar
Melvin v Reid, 112 Cal App 285 (1931).Google Scholar
Mensel, R. (1991). Kodakers Lying in Wait: Amateur Photography and the Right to Privacy in New York, 1885–1915. American Quarterly, 43, 24–45.Google Scholar
Monson v Tussauds Limited [1894] 1 QB 671.Google Scholar
Morris, R. (2013). Declaring His Genius: Oscar Wilde in North America. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moser v Press Publishing Company, 59 Misc 78 (1908).Google Scholar
Muller v Oregon, 208 US 412 (1908).Google Scholar
Murray, J. (1909). A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles: Founded Mainly on the Materials Collected by the Philological Society, vol O–P, 1888–1933. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Neill, B. (1999). Privacy: A Challenge for the Next Century. In Markesinis, B. (Ed.), Protecting Privacy (1–28). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
North, M. (2010). The Picture of Oscar Wilde. PMLA, 125, 185–191.Google Scholar
Olmstead v United States, 277 US 438 (1928).Google Scholar
Pavesich v New England Life Insurance Company, 122 Ga 190 (1905).Google Scholar
Phelps, E. (1889). The Age of Words. Scribner’s Magazine, 6, 760–768.Google Scholar
Plaisance, P. (2005). A Gang of Pecksniffs Grows Up: The Evolution of Journalism Ethics Discourse. The Journalist and Editor and Publisher. Journalism Studies, 6, 479–491.Google Scholar
Pollock, F. (1896). A First Book of Jurisprudence for Students of the Common Law. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Pollock, F. (1923). A First Book of Jurisprudence for Students of the Common Law (5th ed.). London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Pound, R. (2015). Interests of Personality. Harvard Law Review, 28, 343–365, 445–456.Google Scholar
Price, G. (2016, June 2). Wilde and Hegel: Irish Peacock and Protestant Aquinas. University Limerick Irish Protestant Playwrights Conference. Galway: NUI Galway.Google Scholar
Proffat, J. (1880). The Law of Newspaper Libel. North American Review, 131, 109–128.Google Scholar
Prosser, W. (1960). Privacy. California Law Review, 48, 383–423.Google Scholar
Restatement of the Law, Second, Torts. (1977). St Paul, Minn: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
Richardson, M., Bryan, M., Vranken, M. and Barnett, K. (2012). Breach of Confidence: Social Origins and Modern Developments. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Roberson v Rochester Folding Box Co, 171 NY 538, 64 NE 442 (NY 1902).Google Scholar
Rosen, J. (2016). Louis D Brandeis: American Prophet. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Salkowski, C. (1886). Institutes and History of Roman Private Law: With Catena of Texts (Lehrbuch der Institutionen und der Geschichte des Römischen Privatrechts). Whitfield, E. E. (Ed. and Trans.). London: Stevens and Haynes.Google Scholar
Schuyler v Curtis, 15 NY Supp 787 (1891).Google Scholar
Schuyler v Curtis, 24 NY Supp 509 (1893).Google Scholar
Schuyler v Curtis, 42 NE 22 (1895).Google Scholar
Scoglio, S. (1998). Transforming Privacy: A Transpersonal Philosophy of Rights. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.Google Scholar
Seagle, W. (1945). Rudolf von Jhering: Or Law as a Means to an End. University of Chicago Law Review, 13, 71–89.Google Scholar
Sidis v F-R Pub Corporation, 113 F 2d 806 (1940).Google Scholar
Soressi, B. (2015). Europe in Emerson and Emerson in Europe. In McClure Mudge, J. (Ed.), Mr Emerson’s Revolution (325–372), Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.Google Scholar
Spies v Illinois, 123 US 131 (1887).Google Scholar
Tan, D. (2017). The Commercial Appropriation of Fame: A Cultural Analysis of the Right of Publicity and Passing Off. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Zandt v Epstean, Illinois Supreme Court unreported, February 1887.Google Scholar
Vranken, T. (2017). Little-known Document: ‘Oscar Wilde’s Book’. PMLA, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Warren, S. and Brandeis, L. (1890). The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4, 193–220.Google Scholar
Webster, N. (1913). Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary, edited under the supervision of Porter, Noah. Springfield, Massachusetts: G & C Merriam.Google Scholar
West, N. (2000). Kodak and the Lens of Nostalgia. Charlottesville, Virginia: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Whitman, J. (2004). Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty. Yale Law Journal, 113, 1151–1221.Google Scholar
Whitney v California, 274 US 357 (1927).Google Scholar
Wilde, O. To Read or Not to Read (1886, February 8). The Pall Mall Gazette, 11.Google Scholar
Wilde, O. (2000). The Complete Letters of Oscar Wilde. Holland, M. and Hart-Davis, R. (Eds.). London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Wilde, O. (1891). The Soul of Man under Socialism, reprinted in Wilde, O. (2010). The Decay of Lying and Other Essays. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Williams, R. (1983). Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (2nd ed.; 1st ed., 1976). London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Winston, B. (2005). Messages: Free Expression, Media and the West from Gutenberg to Google. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Resisting Spectacle
  • Megan Richardson, University of Melbourne
  • Book: The Right to Privacy
  • Online publication: 28 September 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108303972.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Resisting Spectacle
  • Megan Richardson, University of Melbourne
  • Book: The Right to Privacy
  • Online publication: 28 September 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108303972.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Resisting Spectacle
  • Megan Richardson, University of Melbourne
  • Book: The Right to Privacy
  • Online publication: 28 September 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108303972.006
Available formats
×