Book contents
- Innovating Climate Governance
- Innovating Climate Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Beyond Experiments
- 2 Global Climate Governance after Paris
- Part I Experiments
- Part II Beyond Experiments
- 7 Developing Transformative and Orchestrating Capacities for Climate Governance Experimentation in Rotterdam
- 8 The Pilot Paradox
- 9 Policy Pilots for Climate Adaptation in Indian Agriculture
- 10 Evaluating Climate Governance Experiments
- 11 The City of Permanent Experiments?
- 12 Experiments and Beyond
- Index
- References
12 - Experiments and Beyond
An Emerging Agenda for Climate Governance Innovation
from Part II - Beyond Experiments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 March 2018
Book contents
- Innovating Climate Governance
- Innovating Climate Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Beyond Experiments
- 2 Global Climate Governance after Paris
- Part I Experiments
- Part II Beyond Experiments
- 7 Developing Transformative and Orchestrating Capacities for Climate Governance Experimentation in Rotterdam
- 8 The Pilot Paradox
- 9 Policy Pilots for Climate Adaptation in Indian Agriculture
- 10 Evaluating Climate Governance Experiments
- 11 The City of Permanent Experiments?
- 12 Experiments and Beyond
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Innovating Climate GovernanceMoving Beyond Experiments, pp. 216 - 241Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abbott, K. W. (2012). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 571–590. doi: 10.1068/c11127.Google Scholar
Abernathy, W. J., and Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40–47.Google Scholar
Berkhout, F., Verbong, G., Wieczorek, A., Raven, R., Lebel, L., and Bai, X. (2010). Sustainability experiments in Asia: Innovations shaping alternative development pathways? Environmental Science & Policy, 13(4), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, F., Abbott, K., Adresen, S., Bäckstrand, K., Bernstein, S., Betsill, M.M., Bulkeley, H., Cashore, B., Clapp, J., Folke, C., Gupta, A., Gupta, J., Haas, P.M., Jordan, A., Kanie, N., Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Meadowcroft, J., Mitchell, R.B., Newell, P., Oberthür, S., Olsson, L., Pattberg, P., Sánchez-Rodríguez, R., Schroeder, H., Underdal, A., Camargo Vieira, S., Vogel, C., Young, O.R., Brock, A. and Zondervan, R. (2012). Transforming governance and institutions for global sustainability: Key insights from the Earth System Governance Project. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(1), 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bos, J. J., and Brown, R. R. (2012). Governance experimentation and factors of success in socio-technical transitions in the urban water sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(7), 1340–1353. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.006.Google Scholar
Brown, H. S., and Vergragt, P. J. (2008). Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: The case of a zero-energy residential building. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(1), 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L, Bäckstrand, K., Betsill, M., Compagnon, D., Duffy, R., Kolk, A., Hoffmann, M., Levy, D., Newell, P., Milledge, T., Paterson, M., Pattberg, P. and vanDeveer, S. (2012). Governing climate change transnationally: Assessing the evidence from a database of sixty initiatives. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 591–612.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office (2003). Trying it out: The role of ‘pilots’ in policy-making. In Report of a Review of Government Pilots.Google Scholar
Chan, S., van Asselt, H., Hale, T., Abbott, K.W., Beisheim, M., Hoffmann, M., Guy, B., Hohne, N., Hsu, A., Pattberg, P., Pauw, P., Ramstein, C. and Widerberg, O. (2015). Reinvigorating international climate policy: A comprehensive framework for effective nonstate action. Global Policy, 6(4), 466–473.Google Scholar
Evans, J., Karvonen, A., and Raven, R. (eds.) (2016). The Experimental City. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evans, J. P. (2011). Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 36(2), 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F., and Raven, R. (2006). Non-linearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: Ups and downs in Dutch Biogas Development (1973–2003). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 375–392. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F. W., and Deuten, J. J. (2006). Local and global dynamics in technological development: A socio-cognitive perspective on knowledge flows and lessons from reinforced concrete. Science and Public Policy, 33(4), 265–275.Google Scholar
Grin, J., Rotmans, J., and Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hale, T., and Roger, C. (2014). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Review of International Organizations, 9(1), 59–82.Google Scholar
Hartmann, A., and Linn, J. (2009). Scaling up: A path to effective development. In von Braun, J., Vargas Hill, R., and Pandya-Lorch, R. (eds.), The Poorest and Hungry: Assessments, Analyses, and Actions. International Food Policy Research Institute, 449–558.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M. J. (2011). Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, S., Raven, R., and Romijn, H. (2012). Upscaling of business model experiments in off-grid PV solar energy in India. Sustainability Science, 7(2), 199–212. doi: 10.1007/s11625-012–0163-7.Google Scholar
Jordan, A., and Huitema, D. (2014). Policy innovation in a changing climate: Sources, patterns and effects. Global Environmental Change, 29, 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., Hildén, M., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T.J., Schoenefeld, J.J., Tosun, J., Forster, J. and Boasson, E.L. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change, 5(11), 977–982. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2725.Google Scholar
Kemp, R. P. M., Rip, A., and Schot, J. W. (2001). Constructing transition paths through the management of niches. In Garud, R., and Karnoe, P. (eds.), Path Dependence and Creation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 269–299.Google Scholar
Kivimaa, P. (2014). Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in system-level transitions. Research Policy, 43, 1370–1380.Google Scholar
Kivimaa, P., Hildén, M., Huitema, D., Jordan, A., Newig, J. (2017). Experiments in climate governance: A systematic review of research on energy and built environment transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169: 17–29.Google Scholar
Kivimaa, P., and Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, S., Berg, A., and Annala, M. (2017). Dynamics of experimental governance: A meta-study of functions and uses of climate governance experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.140.Google Scholar
Nair, S., and Howlett, M. (2016). Meaning and power in the design and development of policy experiments. Futures, 76, 67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2015.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.3.641.Google Scholar
Primmer, E., Paloniemi, R., Simila, J. and Barton, D. (2013). Evolution in Finland’s Forest Biodiversity Conservation payments and the institutional constraints on establishing new policy. Society & Natural Resources, 26(10), 1137–1154. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2013.820814.Google Scholar
Raven, R., Van Den Bosch, S., and Weterings, R. (2010). Transitions and strategic niche management: Towards a competence kit for practitioners. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 57–74. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2010.033128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabel, C. F., and Zeitlin, J. (2012). Experimentalist governance. In Levi-Faur, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A., and Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012.Google Scholar
Tassey, G. (2014). Innovation in innovation policy management: The Experimental Technology Incentives Program and the policy experiment. Science and Public Policy, 41(4), 419–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnheim, B., and Geels, F. W. (2012). Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997). Energy Policy, 50, 35–49.Google Scholar
Upham, P., Kivimaa, P., Mickwitz, P., Astrand, K. (2014). Climate policy innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 774–794.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, J. (2015). Extending Experimentalist Governance? The European Union and Transnational Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by