Book contents
- Innovating Climate Governance
- Innovating Climate Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Beyond Experiments
- 2 Global Climate Governance after Paris
- Part I Experiments
- Part II Beyond Experiments
- 7 Developing Transformative and Orchestrating Capacities for Climate Governance Experimentation in Rotterdam
- 8 The Pilot Paradox
- 9 Policy Pilots for Climate Adaptation in Indian Agriculture
- 10 Evaluating Climate Governance Experiments
- 11 The City of Permanent Experiments?
- 12 Experiments and Beyond
- Index
- References
11 - The City of Permanent Experiments?
from Part II - Beyond Experiments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 March 2018
Book contents
- Innovating Climate Governance
- Innovating Climate Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Beyond Experiments
- 2 Global Climate Governance after Paris
- Part I Experiments
- Part II Beyond Experiments
- 7 Developing Transformative and Orchestrating Capacities for Climate Governance Experimentation in Rotterdam
- 8 The Pilot Paradox
- 9 Policy Pilots for Climate Adaptation in Indian Agriculture
- 10 Evaluating Climate Governance Experiments
- 11 The City of Permanent Experiments?
- 12 Experiments and Beyond
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Innovating Climate GovernanceMoving Beyond Experiments, pp. 201 - 215Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Alexander, R., Hope, M., and Degg, M. (2007). Mainstreaming sustainable development – a case study: Ashton Hayes is going carbon neutral. Local Economy, 22, 62–74.Google Scholar
Andres, L. (2013). Differential spaces, power hierarchy and collaborative planning: A critique of the role of temporary uses in shaping and making places. Urban Studies, 50, 759–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelouvski, I., and Carmin, J. (2011). Something borrowed, everything new: Innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 169–175.Google Scholar
Ashton Hayes Going Carbon Neutral (AHGCN) (2017). Ashton Hayes Going Carbon Neutral. Access 6 February 2017. www.goingcarbonneutral.co.ukGoogle Scholar
Beck, U. (1995). Ecological Enlightenment: Essays on the Politics of the Risk Society. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Bell, D., and Jayne, M. (eds.) (2004). City of Quarters: Urban Villages in the Contemporary City. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Benneworth, P., Charles, D., and Madanipour, A. (2010). Building localized interactions between universities and cities through university spatial development. European Planning Studies, 18, 1611–1629.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., and Pattberg, P. (2008). Global environmental governance: Taking stock, moving forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 277–294.Google Scholar
Brenner, N., Madden, D. J., and Wachsmuth, D. (2011). Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory. City, 15, 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. S., and Vergragt, P. J. (2008). Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: The case of a zero-energy residential building. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 107–130.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H., and Castán Broto, V. (2013). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38, 361–375.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Castán Broto, V., and Edwards, G. A. S. (2015). An Urban Politics of Climate Change: Experimentation and the Governing of Socio-Technical Transitions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., and Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carvalho, L. (2015). Smart cities from scratch? A socio-technical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8, 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castán Broto, V., and Bulkeley, H. (2013). Maintaining climate change experiments: Urban political ecology and the everyday reconfiguration of urban infrastructure. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, 1934–1948.Google Scholar
Chatterton, P. (2013). Towards an agenda for post-carbon cities: Lessons from Lilac, the UK’s first ecological, affordable cohousing community. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, 1654–1674.Google Scholar
Chatterton, P. (2016). Building transitions to post-capitalist urban commons. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41, 403–415.Google Scholar
Collins, K., and Ison, R. (2009). Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: Social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19, 358–373.Google Scholar
Conroy, A. (1994). Christiania: The Evolution of a Commune. Amsterdam: International Institute of Social History.Google Scholar
Coutard, O., and Rutherford, J. (2011). The rise of post-networked cities in Europe? Recombining infrastructural, ecological and urban transformations in low carbon transitions. In Bulkeley, H., Castán Broto, V., Hodson, M., and Marvin, S. (eds.), Cities and Low Carbon Transitions. London: Routledge, 106–125.Google Scholar
Coutard, O., and Rutherford, J. (2016). Beyond the networked city: An introduction. In Coutard, O., and Rutherford, J. (eds.), Infrastructure Reconfigurations and Urban Change in the North and South. London: Routledge, 1–25.Google Scholar
Evans, J., Jones, R., Karvonen, A., Millard, L., and Wendler, J. (2015). Living labs and co-production: University campuses as platforms for sustainability science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 1–6.Google Scholar
Evans, J., and Karvonen, A. (2011). Living laboratories for sustainability: Exploring the politics and epistemology of urban transition. In Bulkeley, H., Castán Broto, V., Hodson, M., and Marvin, S. (eds.), Cities and Low Carbon Transitions. London: Routledge, 126–141.Google Scholar
Evans, J., and Karvonen, A. (2014). ‘Give me a laboratory and I will lower your carbon footprint!’ – Urban laboratories and the pursuit of low carbon futures. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J., Karvonen, A., and Raven, R. (2016). The experimental city: New modes and prospects of urban transformation. In Evans, J., Karvonen, A., and Raven, R. (eds.), The Experimental City. London: Routledge, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. P. (2011). Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feola, G., and Nunes, R. (2014). Success and failure of grassroots innovations for addressing climate change: The case of the Transition Movement. Global Environmental Change, 24, 232–250.Google Scholar
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gleeson, B. (2012). ‘Make No Little Plans’: Anatomy of planning ambition and prospect. Geographical Research, 50, 242–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopakumar, G. (2014). Experiments and counter-experiments in the urban laboratory of water-supply partnerships in India. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 393–412.Google Scholar
Graham, S., and Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities, and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gross, M. (2010a). The public proceduralization of contingency: Bruno Latour and the formation of collective experiments. Social Epistemology, 24, 63–74.Google Scholar
Gross, M. (2010b). Ignorance and Surprise: Science, Society, and Ecological Design. London: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, O., LeCavalier, J., Calvillo, N., and Pietsch, W. (2013). Test-bed urbanism. Public Culture, 25, 271–306.Google Scholar
Harris, E. (2015). Navigating pop-up geographies: Urban space–times of flexibility, interstitially and immersion. Geography Compass, 9, 592–603.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M. J. (2011). Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karvonen, A. (2016). Low-carbon devices and desires in community housing retrofit. In Bulkeley, H., Stripple, J., and Patterson, M. (eds.), Towards a Cultural Politics of Climate Change: Devices, Desires and Dissent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 51–65.Google Scholar
Karvonen, A., Evans, J., and van Heur, B. (2014). The politics of urban experiments: Radical change or business as usual? In Hodson, M., and Marvin, S. (eds.), After Sustainable Cities? London: Routledge, 104–115.Google Scholar
Karvonen, A., and van Heur, B. (2014). Urban laboratories: Experiments in reworking cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 379–392.Google Scholar
Kshetri, N., Alcantara, L. L., and Park, Y. (2014). Development of a smart city and its adoption and acceptance: The case of New Songdo. Communications & Strategies, 96, 113–145.Google Scholar
Kullman, K. (2013). Geographies of experiment/experimental geographies: A rough guide. Geography Compass, 7, 879–894.Google Scholar
Laurent, B. (2011). Technologies of democracy: Experiments and demonstrations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, 649–666.Google Scholar
Lindsay, G. (1 February 2010). Cisco’s big bet on New Songdo: Creating cities from scratch. Fast Company Magazine. Accessed 6 February 2017, www.fastcompany.com/1514547/ciscos-big-bet- new-songdo-creating-cities-scratchGoogle Scholar
Marvin, S., and Silver, J. (2016). The urban laboratory and emerging sites of urban experimentation. In Evans, J., Karvonen, A., and Raven, R. (eds.), The Experimental City. London: Routledge, 47–60.Google Scholar
McFarlane, C. (2011a). The city as a machine for learning. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 360–376.Google Scholar
McFarlane, C. (2011b). The city as assemblage: Dwelling and urban space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 649–671.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J. (1999). Planning for sustainable development: What can be learned from the critics? In Kenny, M., and Meadowcroft, J. (eds.), Planning for Sustainability. London: Routledge, 12–38.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42, 323–340.Google Scholar
Middlemiss, L., and Parrish, B. D. (2010). Building capacity for low-carbon communities: The role of grassroots initiatives. Energy Policy, 38, 7559–7566.Google Scholar
Miles, M. (2007). Urban Utopias: The Built and Social Architectures of Alternative Settlements. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neal, P. (ed.) (2003). Urban Villages and the Making of Communities. London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, B., and Rossiter, N. (2008). Precarity as a political concept, or, Fordism as exception. Theory, Culture & Society, 25, 51–72.Google Scholar
Németh, J., and Langhorst, J. (2014). Rethinking urban transformation: Temporary uses for vacant land. Cities, 40, 143–150.Google Scholar
Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L., and Loorbach, D. (2013). Urban transition labs: Co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 111–122.Google Scholar
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., and Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H., and Schroeder, H. (2009). Conceptualizing climate governance beyond the international regime. Global Environmental Politics, 9, 58–78.Google Scholar
Pickerill, J., and Maxey, L. (2009). Geographies of sustainability: Low impact developments and radical spaces of innovation. Geography Compass, 3, 1515–1539.Google Scholar
Ramadier, T. (2004). Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: The case of urban studies. Futures, 36(4), 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reno, J. (2011). Managing the experience of evidence: England’s experimental waste technologies and their immodest witnesses. Science, Technology & Human Values, 36, 842–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roodhouse, S. (2010). Cultural Quarters: Principles and Practice. Bristol: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
Sabel, C. F., and Zeitlin, J. (2008). Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 14, 271–327.Google Scholar
Sabel, C. F., and Zeitlin, J. (eds.) (2010). Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80, 1–22.Google Scholar
Shapin, S., and Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Silver, J. (2014). Incremental infrastructures: Material improvisation and social collaboration across post-colonial Accra. Urban Geography, 35, 788–804.Google Scholar
Simone, A. M. (2013). Cities of uncertainty: Jakarta, the urban majority, and inventive political technologies. Theory, Culture & Society, 30, 243–263.Google Scholar
Späth, P., and Rohracher, H. (2012). Local demonstrations for global transitions: Dynamics across governance levels fostering socio-technical regime change towards sustainability. European Planning Studies, 20, 461–479.Google Scholar
Vanolo, A. (2013). Alternative capitalism and creative economy: The case of Christiania. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, 1785–1798.Google Scholar
Voytenko, Y, McCormick, K., Evans, J., and Schliwa, G. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 45–54.Google Scholar
Walker, G. (2011). The role for ‘community’ in carbon governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2, 777–782.Google Scholar
- 35
- Cited by