1 - Beyond Experiments
Innovation in Climate Governance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 March 2018
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Innovating Climate GovernanceMoving Beyond Experiments, pp. 1 - 26Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abbott, K. W. (2012). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 571–590.Google Scholar
Baker, L., and Sovacool, B. K. (2017). The political economy of technological capabilities and global production networks in South Africa’s wind and solar photovoltaic (PV) industries. Political Geography, 60, 1–12.Google Scholar
Berkhout, F., Verbong, G., Wieczorek, A. J., Raven, R., Lebel, L., and Bai, X. (2010). Sustainability experiments in Asia: Innovations shaping alternative development pathways? Environmental Science & Policy, 13(4), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, F., Abbot, K., Andresen, S., Backstrand, K., Bernstein, S., et al. (2012). Transforming governance and institutions for global sustainability: Key insights from the Earth System Governance Project. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(1), 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blok, A., and Tschötschel, R. (2016). World port cities as cosmopolitan risk community: Mapping urban climate policy experiments in Europe and East Asia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(4), 717–736.Google Scholar
Boschma, R. A., Lambooy, J. G., and Schutjens, V. (2002). Embeddedness and innovation. In Tayloer, M., and Leonard, S. (eds.), Embedded Enterprise and Social Capital. Aldershot: Ashgate, 19–37.Google Scholar
Broto, V. C., and Bulkeley, H. (2013). A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 92–102.Google Scholar
Brown, H. S., and Vergragt, P. J. (2008). Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: The case of a zero-energy residential building. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(1), 107–130.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., Bäckstrand, K., Betsill, M., Compagnon, D., et al. (2012). Governing climate change transnationally: Assessing the evidence from a database of sixty initiatives. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 591–612.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H. A., Broto, V. C., and Edwards, G. A. S. (2014). An Urban Politics of Climate Change: Experimentation and the Governing of Socio-technical Transitions. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Búrca, G., Keohane, R. O., and Sabel, C. (2014). Global experimentalist governance. British Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, S., Shaw, A., Dale, A., and Robinson, J. (2014). Triggering transformative change: A development path approach to climate change response in communities. Climate Policy, 14(4), 467–487. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.876342.Google Scholar
Chan, S., van Asselt, H., Hale, T., Abbott, K. W., Beisheim, M., et al. (2015). Reinvigorating international climate policy: A comprehensive framework for effective nonstate action. Global Policy, 6(4), 466–473.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Evans, J. P. (2011). Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36(2), 223–237.Google Scholar
Fagerberg, J. (2004). Innovation: A guide to the literature. In. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., and Nelson, R. R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, C., Clark, J., and Soete, L. (1982). Unemployment and Technical Innovation: A Study of Long Waves and Economic Development. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062–8.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. (2005). Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(6), 681–696. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, D. H., Linksz, D., and Mandell, M. (2003). Social Experimentation and Public Policymaking. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Hale, T., and Roger, C. (2014). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Review of International Organizations, 9(1), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R., Negro, S., Huhlmann, S., and Smits, R. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E., Thomke, S., and Sonnack, M. (1999). Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Business Review, 77, 47–57.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, M. J. (2011). Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoogma, R. (2000). Exploiting Technological Niches: Strategies for Experimental Introduction of Electric Vehicles. Enschede: Twente University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, D., and Higham, J. (eds.). (2016). Low Carbon Mobility Transitions. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers.Google Scholar
Hoppe, T., Coenen, F., and van den Berg, M. (2016). Illustrating the use of concepts from the discipline of policy studies in energy research: An explorative literature review. Energy Research and Social Science, 21, 12–32.Google Scholar
Howlett, M. (2014). Why are policy innovations rare and so often negative? Blame avoidance and problem denial in climate change policy-making. Global Environmental Change, 29, 395–403. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huitema, D., Jordan, A., Massey, E., Rayner, T., van Asselt, H., et al. (2011). The evaluation of climate policy: Theory and emerging practice in Europe. Policy Sciences, 44(2), 179–198.Google Scholar
Jordan, A., and Huitema, D. (2014a). Innovations in climate policy: Conclusions and new directions. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 906–925. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2014.924209.Google Scholar
Jordan, A., and Huitema, D. (2014b). Innovations in climate policy: The politics of invention, diffusion, and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 906–925.Google Scholar
Jordan, A., and Huitema, D. (2014c). Policy innovation in a changing climate: Sources, patterns and effects. Global Environmental Change, 29, 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., and Berkhout, F. (2010). Climate Change Policy in the European Union: Confronting the Dilemmas of Mitigation and Adaptation? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., Hildren, M., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T. J., et al. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change, 5(11), 977–982. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanie, N., Betsill, M. M., Zondervan, R., Biermann, F., Young, O. R. (2012). A charter moment: Restructuring governance for sustainability. Public Administration and Development, 32(3), 292–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, R., Schot, J., and Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198.Google Scholar
Kemp, R. P. M., Rip, A., and Schot, J. W. (2001). Constructing transition paths through the management of niches. In Garud, R., and Karnoe, P. (eds.), Path Dependence and Creation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 269–299.Google Scholar
Kivimaa, P., Hildén, M., Huitema, D., Jordan, A., and Newig, J. (2017). Experiments in climate governance: A systematic review of research on energy and built environment transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169: 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivimaa, P., and Martiskainen, M. (2017). Innovation, low energy buildings and intermediaries in Europe: systematic case study review. Energy Efficiency, 1–21.Google Scholar
Lange, P., Driessen, P. P. J., Sauer, A., Bornemann, B., and Burger, P. (2013). Governing towards sustainability: Conceptualizing modes of governance. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 15(3), 403–425.Google Scholar
Leonard-Barton, D. (1988). Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17(5), 251–267. doi: 10.1016/0048–7333(88)90006-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., and Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–152. doi: 10.1007/s11077-012–9151-0.Google Scholar
Martin, S., and Sanderson, I. (1999). Evaluating public policy experiment: Measuring outcomes, monitoring processes or managing pilots. Evaluation, 5(3), 245–258.Google Scholar
McFadgen, B., and Huitema, D. (2017). Are all experiments created equal? A framework for analysis of the learning potential of policy experiments in environmental governance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 20(10) 1–20.Google Scholar
McFadgen, B., and Huitema, D. (2017). Experimentation at the interface of science and policy: A multi-case analysis of how policy experiments influence political decision-makers. Policy Sciences, 1–27. doi: 10.1007/s11077-017-9276-2Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (1990). The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nye, D. E. (1998). Consuming Power: A Social History of American Energies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.3.641.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365.Google Scholar
Pierre, J., and Peters, B. (2005). Governing Complex Societies: Trajectories and Scenarios. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time. London: Beacon.Google Scholar
Renn, O., Klinke, A., and van Asselt, M. (2011). Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: A synthesis. Ambio, 40(2), 231–246.Google Scholar
Rip, A., and Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In Rayner, S., and Malone, L. (eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 2, Resources and Technology. Washington, DC: Batelle Press, 327–399.Google Scholar
Sabel, C. F., and Zeitlin, J. (2010). Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. In Sabel, C. F., and Zeitlin, J. (eds.), Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–28.Google Scholar
Sabel, C. F., and Zeitlin, J. (2012). Experimentalist governance. In Levi-Faur, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schot, J., Hoogma, R., and Elzen, B. (1994). Strategies for shifting technological systems: The case of the automobile system. Futures, 26(10), 1060–1076.Google Scholar
Schot, J., Kanger, L., and Verbong, G. (2016). The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems. Nature Energy, 1(5), 16054. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengers, F., Berkhout, F., Wieczorek, A. J., and Raven, R. (2016). Experimenting in the city: Unpacking notions of experimentation for sustainability. In Evans, J., Karvonen, A., and Raven, R. (eds.), The Experimental City. London and New York: Routledge, 15–31.Google Scholar
Seyfang, G., Hielscher, S., Hargreaves, T., Martiskainen, M., Smith, A. (2014). A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, 21–44. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfang, G., and Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 4016(4), 37–41. doi: 10.1080/09644010701419121.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2006). Green niches in sustainable development: The case of organic food in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(3), 439–458. doi: 10.1068/c0514j.Google Scholar
Smith, A., and Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012.Google Scholar
Smith, A., Stirling, A., and Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34(10), 1491–1510. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., Voss, J. P., and Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39(4), 435–448. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023.Google Scholar
Späth, P., and Rohracher, H. (2012). Local demonstrations for global transitions: Dynamics across governance levels fostering socio-technical regime change towards sustainability. European Planning Studies, 20(3), 461–479.Google Scholar
Tassey, G. (2014). Innovation in innovation policy management: The Experimental Technology Incentives Program and the policy experiment. Science and Public Policy, 41(4), 419–424.Google Scholar
Thomke, S., von Hippel, E., and Franke, R. (1998). Modes of experimentation: An innovation process – and competitive – variable. Research Policy, 27(3), 315–332. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00041–9.Google Scholar
Turnheim, B., Berkhout, F., Geels, F., Hof, A., McMeekin, A., Nykvist, B., and van Vuuren, D. (2015). Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges. Global Environmental Change, 35, 239–253.Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L., and Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: Interactions between external and emergent processes and strategic choice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 171–222.Google Scholar
Upham, P., Kivimaa, P., Mickwitz, P., and Åstrand, K. (2014). Climate policy innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 774–794.Google Scholar
Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S., and Westerlund, M. (2013). Linking living lab characteristics and their outcomes: Towards a conceptual framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12), 6–15.Google Scholar
van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D., Garud, R., and Venkataraman, S. (1999). The Innovation Journey. New York: Oxford University Press New York.Google Scholar
Vreugdenhil, H., Taljaard, S., and Slinger, J. H. (2012). Pilot projects and their diffusion: A case study of integrated coastal management in South Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(1–2), 148–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1998). Introductory essay: Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9(5), 543–555.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by