Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T18:36:28.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - Urodynamics

from Section 4 - Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2018

By
Emily Wu ,
Jill Danford  and
Wilma Larsen
Edited by
Lisa Keder  and
Martin E. Olsen
Lisa Keder
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Martin E. Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Gynecologic Care , pp. 207 - 223
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, P, Blaivas, JG, Stanton, SL, Andersen, JT. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. The International Continence Society Committee on Standardisation of Terminology. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1988;114:5–19.Google Scholar
Abrams, P, Cardozo, L, Fall, M et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167–78.Google Scholar
Abrams, P, Cardozo, L, Wein, A. Fourth international consultation on incontinence-research society 2013. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014 Jun;33(5):571–2. doi: 10.1002/nau.22617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, JM, Vaughan, CP, Goode, PS et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;123(1):141–8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000057.Google Scholar
Al-Mukhtar Othman, J, Åkervall, S, Milsom, I, Gyhagen, M. Urinary incontinence in nulliparous women aged 25–64 years: a national survey. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:149.e1-149.e11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juliato, CR, Baccaro, LF, Pedro, AO, Gabiatti, JR, Lui-Filho, JF, Costa-Paiva, L. Factors associated with urinary incontinence in middle-aged women: a population-based household survey. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:423–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, JM, Stinnett, S, Jackson, RA, Jacoby, A, Learman, LA, Kuppermann, M. Prevalence and incidence of urinary incontinence in a diverse population of women with noncancerous gynecologic conditions. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16(5):284–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, JM, Matthews, CA, Conover, MM, Pate, V, Jonsson Funk, M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1201–6. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, KS, Wein, A, Nicholson, S, Kvasz, M, Chen, CI, Milsom, I. Economic burden of urgency urinary incontinence in the United States: a systematic review. J Manag Care Pharm. 2014 Feb;20(2):130–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Norton, PA, Nager, CW, Brubaker, L et al. Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. The cost of preoperative urodynamics: a secondary analysis of the ValUE trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Jan;35(1):81–4. doi: 10.1002/nau.22684. Epub 2014 Oct 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemack, GE. Urodynamic assessment of patients with stress incontinence: how effective are urethral pressure profilometry and abdominal leak point pressures at case selection and predicting outcome? Curr Opin Urol. 2004 Nov;14(6):307–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyndaele, J.J. A clinical study on subjective sensations during bladder filling. International Urogynecology Journal. 1991 Dec;2(4):215–8.Google Scholar
Weld, KJ, Graney, MJ, Dmochowski, RR. Differences in bladder compliance with time and associations of bladder management with compliance in spinal cord injured patients. J Urol. 2000 Apr;163(4):1228–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Gormley, EA, Lightner, DJ, Burgio, KL et al. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2012 Dec;188(6 Suppl):2455–63. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.079. Epub 2012 Oct 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schäfer, W, Abrams, P, Liao, L et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):261–74.Google Scholar
Walters, M, Karram, M. Urodynamics: indications, techniques, interpretation, and clinical utility. Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, 4th ed. Philadephia: Elsevier, 2015. 130–52.Google Scholar
Swift, SE. The reliability of performing a screening cystometrogram using a fetal monitoring device for the detection of detrusor instability. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutherst, JR, Brown, MC. Comparison of single and multichannel cystometry in diagnosing bladder instability. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984;288:1720.Google Scholar
Fonda, D, Brimage, PJ, D’astoli, M. Simple screening for urinary incontinence in the elderly: comparison of simple and multichannel cystometry. Urology 1993;42:536.Google Scholar
Cooper, MA, Fletter, PC, Zaszczurynski, PJ, Damaser, MS. Comparison of air-charged and water-filled urodynamic pressure measurement catheters. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Mar;30(3):329–34. doi: 10.1002/nau.20991. Epub 2011 Feb 8.Google ScholarPubMed
Digesu, GA, Derpapas, A, Robshaw, P, Vijaya, G, Hendricken, C, Khullar, V. Are the measurements of water-filled and air-charged catheters the same in urodynamics? Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jan;25(1):123–30. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2182-z. Epub 2013 Aug 1.Google ScholarPubMed
Mahajan, ST, Fitzgerald, MP, Kenton, K, Shott, S, Brubaker, L. Concentric needle electrodes are superior to perineal surface-patch electrodes for electromyographic documentation of urethral sphincter relaxation during voiding. BJU Int. 2006 Jan;97(1):117–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steward, JE, Clemons, JD, Zaszczurynski, PJ, Butler, RS, Damaser, MS, Jiang, HH. Quantitative evaluation of electrodes for external urethral sphincter electromyography during bladder-to-urethral guarding reflex. World J Urol. 2010 Jun;28(3):365–71. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0463-4. Epub 2009 Aug 13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, M. Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing – part 5: evaluation of bladder filling/storage functions. Urol Nurs. 2011 May–Jun;31(3):149–53.Google Scholar
Gray, M. Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing – part 8: evaluating sensations of bladder filling. Urol Nurs. 2011 Nov–Dec;31(6):369–74.Google Scholar
Foon, R, Toozs-Hobson, P, Latthe, P. Prophylactic antibiotics to reduce the risk of urinary tract infections after urodynamic studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD008224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008224.pub2.Google Scholar
Wolf, JS Jr, Bennett, CJ, Dmochowski, RR, Hollenbeck, BK, Pearle, MS, Schaeffer, AJ; Urologic Surgery Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Best Practice Policy Panel. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1379–90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.068.Google Scholar
Dass, AK, Lo, TS, Khanuengkitkong, S, Tan, YL. Bacteriuria and safety of female urodynamic studies. Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Apr;24(4):677–82. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1910-0. Epub 2012 Sep 28.Google Scholar
Böthig, R, Fiebag, K, Thietje, R, Faschingbauer, M, Hirschfeld, S. Morbidity of urinary tract infection after urodynamic examination of hospitalized SCI patients: the impact of bladder management. Spinal Cord. 2013 Jan;51(1):70–3. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.107. Epub 2012 Sep 11.Google Scholar
Gürbüz, C, Güner, B, Atış, G, Canat, L, Caşkurlu, T. Are prophylactic antibiotics necessary for urodynamic study? Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2013 Jun;29(6):325–9. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Dec 23.Google Scholar
Okorocha, I, Cumming, G, Gould, I. Female urodynamics and lower urinary tract infection. BJU Int. 2002 Jun;89(9):863–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhatia, NN, Bergman, A. Cystometry: unstable bladder and urinary tract infection. Br J Urol. 1986 Apr;58(2):134–7.Google Scholar
Yenilmez, A, Kebapci, N, Isikli, B, Hamarat, M, Donmez, T. Morbidity after urodynamic study in diabetic patients. Acta Diabetol. 2009 Sep;46(3):197–202. doi: 10.1007/s00592-008-0075-2. Epub 2008 Nov 7.Google Scholar
Tsai, SW, Kung, FT, Chuang, FC1, Ou, YC, Wu, CJ, Huang, KH. Evaluation of the relationship between urodynamic examination and urinary tract infection based on urinalysis results. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;52(4):493–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.10.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yip, SK, Fung, K, Pang, MW, Leung, P, Chan, D, Sahota, D. A study of female urinary tract infection caused by urodynamic investigation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;190(5):1234–40.Google Scholar
Prieto, J, Murphy, CL, Moore, KN, Fader, M. Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 10;(9):CD006008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006008.pub3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyndaele, JJ, Brauner, A, Geerlings, SE, Bela, K, Peter, T, Bjerklund-Johanson, TE. Clean intermittent catheterization and urinary tract infection: review and guide for future research. BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E910-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11549.x. Epub 2012 Oct 4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fantl, JA, Smith, PJ, Schneider, V et al. Fluid weight uroflowmetry in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;145:1017–24.Google Scholar
Bates, P, Bradley, WE, Glen, E et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. J Urol. 1979 May;121(5):551–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haylen, BT, Ashby, D, Sutherst, JR, Frazer, MI, West, CR. Maximum and average urine flow rates in normal male and female populations – the Liverpool nomograms. Br J Urol. 1989 Jul;64(1):30–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massey, JA, Abrams, PH. Obstructed voiding in the female. Brit J Urol. 1988 61:36–9.Google Scholar
Haylen, BT, Yang, V, Logan, V. Uroflowmetry: its current clinical utility for women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jul;19(7):899–903. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0597-8. Epub 2008 Apr 22.Google Scholar
Nager, CW, Albo, ME, Fitzgerald, MP et al. Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Reference urodynamic values for stress incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(3):333–40.Google Scholar
Blaivas, JG, Groutz, A. Bladder outlet obstruction nomogram for women with lower urinary tract symptomatology. Neurourol Urodyn. 2000;19(5):553–64.Google Scholar
Futyma, K, Nowakowski, Ł, Bogusiewicz, M, Ziętek, A, Wieczorek, AP, Rechberger, T. Use of uroflow parameters in diagnosing an overactive bladder-Back to the drawing board. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:198–202.Google Scholar
Ryall, RL, Marshall, VR (1982) The effect of a urinary catheter on the measurement of maximum urine flow rate. J Urol 128:429–32.Google Scholar
Chassagne, S, Bernier, PA, Haab, F, Roehrborn, CG, Reisch, JS, Zimmern, PE. Proposed cutoff values to define bladder outlet obstruction in women. Urology. 1998 Mar;51(3):408–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haylen, BT, Law, MG, Frazer, M, Schulz, S. Urine flow rates and residual urine volumes in urogynecology patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10(6):378–83.Google Scholar
Sorel, MR, Reitsma, HJ, Rosier, PF, Bosch, RJ, de Kort, LM. Uroflowmetry in healthy women: A systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Jun 27. doi: 10.1002/nau.23051.Google Scholar
Zimmern, P, Nager, CW, Albo, M, Fitzgerald, MP, McDermott, S. Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Interrater reliability of filling cystometrogram interpretation in a multicenter study. J Urol. 2006 Jun;175(6):2174–7.Google Scholar
Grossman, SL, Lovatsis, D. Overactive bladder: correlating symptoms with low cystometric capacity. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010 May;16(3):158–63. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3181df9ca1.Google Scholar
Robertson, AS, Griffiths, CJ, Ramsden, PD, Neal, DE. Bladder function in healthy volunteers: ambulatory monitoring and conventional urodynamic studies. Br J Urol. 1994 Mar;73(3):242–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, RL, Cundiff, GW, Theofrastous, JP, Bump, RC. Bladder compliance in neurologically intact women. Neurourol Urodyn. 1996;15(5):483–8.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahl, EF, Churchill, BM. Detrusor pressure rise in a normal bladder. BJU Int. 2004 Oct;94(6):901–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, SJ, Lee, SC, Jeong, CW, Hong, SK, Byun, SS, Lee, SE. Clinical and urodynamic differences among women with overactive bladder according to the presence of detrusor overactivity. Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Feb;24(2):255–61. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1817-9. Epub 2012 May 16.Google Scholar
Lovick, TA. Central control of visceral pain and urinary tract function. Auton Neurosci. 2016 Feb 6. pii: S1566-0702(16)30006-6. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2016.02.001.Google Scholar
Gray, M. Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing – part 10: evaluation of micturition via the voiding pressure-flow study. Urol Nurs. 2012 Mar–Apr;32(2):71–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Gray, M. Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing – part 7: evaluation of bladder filling/storage: evaluation of urethral sphincter incompetence and stress urinary incontinence. Urol Nurs. 2011 Sep–Oct;31(5):267–77, 289.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, TS, Lemack, GE, Zimmern, PE. Management of intrinsic sphincteric deficiency in women. J Urol. 2003 May;169(5):1662–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, AA, Ogah, JA. Retropubic or transobturator mid-urethral slings for intrinsic sphincter deficiency-related stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jan;27(1):19–28. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2797-3. Epub 2015 Jul 29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berman, CJ, Kreder, KJ. Comparative cost analysis of collagen injection and fascia lata sling cystourethropexy for the treatment of type III incontinence in women [see comments]. J Urol. 1997 Jan;157(1):122–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeon, MJ, Jung, HJ, Chung, SM, Kim, SK, Bai, SW. Comparison of the treatment outcome of pubovaginal sling, tension-free vaginal tape, and transobturator tape for stress urinary incontinence with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul;199(1):76.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.060. Epub 2008 Jan 25.Google Scholar
Haab, F, Zimmern, PE, Leach, GE. Urinary stress incontinence due to intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: experience with fat and collagen periurethral injections. J Urol. 1997 Apr;157(4):1283–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chartier-Kastler, E, Van Kerrebroeck, P, Olianas, R. Artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800) implantation for women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a technique for insiders? BJU Int. 2011 May;107(10):1618–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09610.x. Epub 2010 Aug 25.Google Scholar
Phé, V, Benadiba, S, Rouprêt, M, Granger, B, Richard, F, Chartier-Kastler, E. Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2014 Jun;113(6):961–7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12360.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×