Bottomley, C, Bourne, T. Diagnosing miscarriage. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009;23:463–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Early pregnancy loss. Practice Bulletin No. 150. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:1258–67.Google Scholar

Aleman, A, Althabe, F, Belizan, JM, Bergel, E. Bed rest during pregnancy for preventing miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(2):CD003576.Google Scholar

Rumbold, A, Middleton, P, Crowther, CA. Vitamin supplementation for preventing miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(2):CD004073.Google Scholar

Haas, DM, Ramsey, PS. Progesterone for preventing miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(2):CD003511.Google Scholar

Silver, R. Fetal death. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:153–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management in early pregnancy of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage. NICE Clinical Guideline 154. Manchester (UK); NICE; 2012. Available at www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg154/resources/guidance-ectopic-pregnancy-and-miscarriage-pdf. (Accessed on Jan 18, 2016).Google Scholar

Zheng, T, Mendez, MD, Kulgren, B, Baumbach, J, Hadiashar, M. Spontaneous abortion. Complete guide to oral boards, Obstet Gynecol 2011:271–3.Google Scholar

Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1103–11.Google Scholar

Walch, KT, Huber, JC. Progesterone for recurrent miscarriage: truth and deceptions. Best Prac Resear Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2008;22:375–89.Google ScholarPubMed

Lindbohm, ML, Sallem, M, Taskinen, H. Effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke on reproductive health. Scand J Work Environ Health 2002;28(Suppl 2):84–6.Google ScholarPubMed

Ness, RB, Grisso, JA, Hirshinger, N et al. Cocaine and tobacco use and the risk of spontaneous abortion. N Eng J Med 1999;340:333–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kesmodel, U, Wisborg, K, Olsen, SF et al. Moderate alcohol intake in pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous abortions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991;39:31–6.Google Scholar

Barnhart, KT. Early pregnancy failure: beware of the pitfalls of modern management. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1061–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bree, RL, Edwards, M, Bohm-Velex, M, Beyler, S, Roberts, J, Mendelson, EB. Transvaginal sonography in the evaluation of normal early pregnancy; correlation with hCG level. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:75–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldstein, I, Zimmer, EA, Tamir, A, Peretz, BA, Paldi, E. Evaluation of normal gestational sac growth: appearance of embryonic heartbeat and embryo body movements using the transvaginal technique. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:885–8.Google Scholar

Yeh, H-C, Goodman, JD, Carr, L, Rabinowitz, JG. Intradecidual sign: a US criterion of early intrauterine pregnancy. Radiology 1986;161:463–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doubilet, PM, Benson, CB. Double sac sign and intradecidual sign in early pregnancy: interobserver reliability and frequency of occurrence. J Ultrasound Med 2013;32:1207–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mueller, CE. Intrauterine psuedogestational sac in ectopic pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 1979;7:133–6.Google Scholar

Ackerman, TE, Levi, CS, Lyons, EA, Dashefsky, SM, Lindsay, DJ, Holt, SC. Decidual cyst: endovaginal sonographic signs of ectopic pregnancy. Radiology 1993;189:727–31.Google Scholar

Brown, DL, Emerson, DS, Felker, RE, Cartier, MS, Smith, WC. Diagnosis of early embryonic demise by endovaginal sonography. J Ultrasound Med 1990;9:631–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pennell, RG, Needleman, L, Pajak, T et al. Prospective comparison of vaginal and abdominal sonography in normal early pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 1991;10:63–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doubilet, PM, Benson, CB, Bourne, T et al. Diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester. Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Multispecialty Panel on Early First Trimester Diagnosis of Miscarriage and Exclusion of a Viable Intrauterine Pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1443–51.Google Scholar

Doubilet, PM, Benson, CB, Chow, JS. Long-term prognosis of pregnancies complicated by slow embryonic heart rates in the early first trimester. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:537–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tuuli, MG, Norman, SM, Odibo, AO, Macones, GA, Cahill, AG. Perinatal outcomes in women with subchorionic hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1205–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barnhart, KT, Sammel, MD, Rinaudo, PF, Zhou, L, Hummel, AC, Guo, W. Symptomatic patients with an early viable intrauterine pregnancy: hCG curves redefined. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:50–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Seeber, BE. What serial hCG can tell you, and cannot tell you, about an early pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1074–7.Google Scholar

Barnhart, K, Sammel, MD, Chung, K, Zhou, L, Hummel, A, Guo, W. Decline of serum human chorionic gonadotropin and spontaneous complete abortion: defining the normal curve. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:975–81.Google Scholar

Chung, K, Sammel, M, Zhou, L, Hummel, A, Guo, W, Barnhart, K. Defining the curve when initial levels of human chorionic gonadotropin in patients with spontaneous abortions are low. Fertil Steril 2006;85:508–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kader, N, DeVore, G, Romero, R. Discriminatory hCG zone: its use in the sonographic evaluation for ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1981;58:156–61.Google Scholar

Bernaschek, G, Rudelstorfer, R, Csaicsich, P. Vaginal sonography versus serum human chorionic gonadotropin in early detection of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:608–12.Google Scholar

Bateman, BG, Nunley, WC Jr, Kolp, LA, Kitchin, JD III, Felder, R. Vaginal sonography findings and hCG dynamics of early intrauterine and tubal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:421–7.Google ScholarPubMed

Luise, C, Jermy, K, May, C, Costello, G, Collins, WP, Bourne, TH. Outcome of expectant management of spontaneous first trimester miscarriage: observational study. Br Med J 2002;324:873–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zhang, J, Gilles, JM, Barnhart, K, Creinin, MD, Westhoff, C, Frederick, MM. A comparison of medica management with misoprostol and surgical management for early pregnancy failure. National Institute of Child Health Human Development (NICHD) Management of Early Pregnancy Failure Trial. N Engl J Med 2005;353:761–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neilson, JP, Gyte, GM, Hickey, M, Vazquez, JC, Dou, L. Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013(3):Art. No.:CD007223. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007223.pub3.Google Scholar

Barber, AR, Rhone, SA, Fluker, MR. Curettage and asherman’s syndrome: lessons to (re-) learn? J Obstet Gynaecol Canada 2014;36:997–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffman, BL, Schorge, JO, Schaffer, JI et al. Chapter 41. Surgeries for benign gynecologic conditions. In: Hoffman, BL, Schorge, JO, Schaffer, JI et al., eds. Williams Gynecology, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2012.Google Scholar

US medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). MMWR Recomm Rep 2010;59(RR-4):1–86.Google Scholar

Bednarek, PH, Creinin, MD, Reeves, MF, Cwiak, C, Espey, E, Jensen, JT. Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration. Post-aspiration IUD randomization (PAIR) study trial group. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2208–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

World Health Organization. Report of a WHO technical consultation on birth spacing, 2005. Available at: www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/birth_spacing.pdf. (Accessed Feb 13, 2016).Google Scholar

Wong, LF, Schliep, KC, Silver, RM et al. The effect of short interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes following pregnancy loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;375:e1–11.Google Scholar

van den Boogaard, E, Kaandorp, SP, Franssen, MT et al. consecutive or non-consecutive recurrent miscarriage: is there any difference in carrier status? Hum Reprod 2010;25:1411–4.Google Scholar

Stirrat, GM. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet 1990;336:673–5.Google Scholar

Ford, HB, Schust, DJ. Recurrent pregnancy loss: etiology, diagnosis, and therapy. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009;2:76–83.Google Scholar

Lin, PC. Reproductive outcomes in women with uterine anomalies. J Women’s Health 2004;13:33–39.Google Scholar

Grimbizis, GF, Camus, M, Tarlatzis, BC et al. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7:161–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bajekal, N, Li, TC. Fibroids, infertility, and pregnancy wastage. Hum Reprod Update 2000;6:614–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rai, R, Backos, M, Rushworth, F, Regan, L. Polycystic ovaries and recurrent miscarriage: a reappraisal. Hum Reprod 2000;15:612–15.Google Scholar

Glueck, CJ, Wang, P, Goldenberg, N, Sieve-Smith, L. Pregnancy outcomes among women with polycystic ovary syndrome treated metformin. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2858–64.Google Scholar

Vaquero, E, Lazzarin, N, De Carolis, H et al. Mild thyroid abnormalities and recurrent spontaneous abortion: diagnostic and therapeutical approach. Am J Reprod Immunol 2000;43:204–8.Google Scholar

Lane, DA, Grant, PJ. Role of hemostatic gene polymorphisms in venous and arteria thrombotic disease. Blood 2000;95:1517–32.Google Scholar

Haas, DM, Ramsey, PS. Progestogen for preventing miscarriage. Cochrane Database Sys Rev 2008;(2):CD003511.Google Scholar

Rai, R, Backos, M, Baxter, N, et al. Recurrent miscarriage: an aspirin a day? Hum Reprod 2000;15:2220–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stray-Pedersen, B, Stray-Pedersen, S. Etiologic factors and subsequent reproductive performance in 195 couples with a prior history of habitual abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;148:140–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 94, “Medical management of ectopic pregnancy,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, 111 (6), 1479–85.Google Scholar

Chetty, M, Elson, J (2009), “Treating non-tubal ectopic pregnancy,” Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 23 (4), 529–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Korhonen, J, Stenman, UH, Ylotalo, P (1994), “Serum human chorionic gonadotropin dynamics during spontaneous resolution of ectopic pregnancy,” Fertility and Sterility, 61, 632–5.Google Scholar

Raughley, MJ, Frishman, GN (2007), “Local treatment of ectopic pregnancy,” Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 25 (2), 99–115.Google Scholar

Chang, J, Elam-Evan, LD, Berg, CJ et al. (2003), “Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance: United States, 1991–1999,” MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 52, 1–8.Google ScholarPubMed

Barnhart, KT, Sammel, MD, Gracia, CR, Chittams, J, Hummel, AC, Shaunik, A (2006), “Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in women with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancies,” Fertility & Sterility, 86, 36–43.Google Scholar

Chow, WH, Daling, JR, Cates, W JR, Greenberg, RS ( 1987), “Epidemilogy of ectopic pregnancy,” Epidemiologic Reviews, 9, 70–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ankum, WM, Mok, BW, Van der Veen, R, Bossyut, PM (1996), “Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis,” Fertility and Sterility, 65, 1093–9.Google Scholar

Silva, C, Sammel, MD, Zhou, L, Gracia, CR, Hummel, AC, Barnhart, KT(2006), “Human chorionic gonadotropin profile for women with ectopic pregnancy,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, 117, 605–11.Google Scholar

Creanga, AA, Shapiro-Mendoza, CK, Bish, CL, Zane, S, Berg, CJ, Callaghan, WM. (2011), “Trends in ectopic pregnancy mortality in the United States 1980–2007,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, 117 (4), 837–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jin, H, Shou, J, Yu, Y et al. (2004), “Intramural pregnancy, a report of two cases,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 49 (7), 569–72.Google Scholar

Ayinde, OA, Aimakhu, CO, Adeyanju, OA et al. (2005), “Abdominal pregnancy at University College Hospital, Ibadan: a ten-year review,” African Journal of Reproductive Health, 9, 123–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oki, T, Baba, Y, Yoshinaga, M et al. (2008), “Super-selective arterial embolization for uncontrolled bleeding in abdominal pregnancy,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, 112, 427–29.Google Scholar

Mitra, AG, LeQuire, MH (2003), “Minimally invasive management of 14.5 week abdominal pregnancy without laparotomy: a novel approach using percutaneous sonographically guided feticide and systemic methotrexate,” Journal of Ultrasound Medicine, 22, 709–14.Google Scholar

Shaw, SW, Hsu, JJ, Chueh, HY et al. (2007), “Management of primary abdominal pregnancy: twelve years of experience in a medical centre,” Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 86 (9), 1058–62.Google Scholar

Seckin, B, Turkcapar, FA, Tarhan, I, Yalcin, HR (2011), “Advanced intraligamentary pregnancy resulting in a live birth,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 31 (3), 260–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ushakov, FB, Elchalal, U, Aceman, PJ et al. (1996), “Cervical pregnancy: past and future,” Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 52, 45–59.Google Scholar

Kirk, E, Bourne, T (2009), “Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy with ultrasound,” Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 23 (4), 501–8.Google Scholar

Ackerman, TE et al. (1993), “Interstitial line: sonographic finding in interstitial (cornual) ectopic pregnancy,” Radiology, 189 (1), 83–7.Google Scholar

Leeman, LM, Wendlan, CI (2000), “Cervical ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis with endocervical ultrasound examination and succesfull treatment with methotrexate,” Archives of Family Medicine, 9, 72–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spitzer, D, Steiner, H, Graf, A et al. (1997), “Conservative treatment of cervical pregnancy by curettage and local injection,” Human Reproduction, 12 (4), 860–6.Google Scholar

Cosin, JA, Bean, M, Grow, D et al. (1997), “The use of methotrexate and arterial embolization to avoid surgery in a case of cervical pregnancy,” Fertility and Sterility, 67 (6), 1169–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeng, CJ, Ko, ML, Shen, J. (2007), “Transvaginal ultrasound-guided treatment of cervical pregnancy,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, 109 (5), 1076–82.Google Scholar

Barnhart, K, Spandorfer, S, Coutifaris, C. (1997), “Medical treatment of interstitial pregnancy: a report of three unsuccessful cases,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 42 (8), 521–4.Google Scholar

Voigt, RR et al. (1994), “Treatment of interstitial pregnancy with methotrexate: report of an unsuccessful case,” Human Reproduction, 9 (8), 1576–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hung, TH et al. (1998), “Prognostic factors for an unsatisfactory primary methotrexate treatment of cervical pregnancy: a quantitative review,” Human Reproduction, 13 (9), 2636–42.Google Scholar

Shufaro, Y, Nadjari, M (2001), “Implantation of a gestational sac in a cesarean section scar,” Fertility and Sterility, 75 (6), 12–17.Google Scholar

Graesslin, O, Dedecker, F, Quereux, C et al. (2005), “Conservative treatmentof ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean scar,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, 105 (4), 869–71.Google Scholar

Lawrence, A, Jurkovic, D (1999), “Three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of interstitial pregnancy,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14 (4), 292–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jurkovic, D et al. (2003), “First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 21 (3), 220–7.Google Scholar

de Vaate, AJ et al. (2010), “Therapeutic options of caesarean scar pregnancy: case series and literature review,” Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 38 (2), 75–84.Google Scholar

Yang, MJ, Jeng, MH (2003), “Combination of transarterial embolisation of uterine arteris and conservative surgical treatment for pregnancy in a cesarean section scar: a report of three cases,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 48, 213–16.Google Scholar

Jurkovic, D, Ben-nagi, J, Offili-Yebovi, D et al. (2007), “Efficacy of Shirodkar cervical suture in securing hemostasis following surgical evacuation of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 30, 95–100.Google Scholar

Hwang, JH et al. (2010), “Classification and management of cervical ectopic pregnancies: experience at a single institution,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 55 (11–12), 469–76.Google Scholar

Bouyer, J, Coste, J, Ferrnandez, K et al. (2002), “Sites of ectopic pregnancy; a 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases,” Human Reproduction, 17, 3224–30.Google Scholar

Jurkovic, D, Marvelos, D (2007), “Catch me if you can: ultrasound diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 30, 1–7Google Scholar

Tulandi, T, Saleh, A (1999), “Surgical management of three ectopic pregnancy,” Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, 42, 31–8.Google Scholar

Moon, HS, Choi, YJ, Park, YH et al. (2000), “New simple endoscopic operations for interstial pregnancies,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 182, 114–82.Google Scholar

Huang, MC, Su, TH, Lee, MY (2005), “Laparoscopic management of interstial pregnancy,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 88, 51–2.Google Scholar

Cassik, P, Offili-Yebovi, D, Yazbek, U et al (2005), “Factors influencing the success of conservative treatment of interstial pregnancy,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 26, 279–82.Google Scholar

Jermy, K, Thomas, J, Doo, A et al. (2004), “The conservative management of interstitial pregnancy,” British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 111, 1283–8.Google Scholar

Hiersch, L, Krissi, H, Ashwal, E, From, A, Wiznitzer, A, Pheled, Y (2014), “Effectiveness of medical treatment with methotrexate for interstitial pregnancy,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 54, 576–80.Google Scholar

Hafner, T et al. (1999), “The effectiveness of non-surgical management of early interstitial pregnancy: a report of ten cases and review of the literature,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13 (2), 131–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lau, S, Tulandi, T (1999), “Conservative medical and surgical management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy,” Fertility and Sterility, 72 (2), 207–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nahum, GG (2002), “Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy: the twentieth century worldwide experience of 588 cases,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 47, 151–63.Google Scholar

Timor-Tritsch, IE et al. (1992), “Sonographic evolution of cornual pregnancies treated without surgery,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, 79 (6), 1044–9.Google Scholar

Spiegelberg, O. (1873), “Zur kasuistik der ovarialschwangerschaft,” Archiv für Gynaekologie, 13, 73–9.Google Scholar

Molinaro, TA, Barnhart, KT (2007), “Ectopic pregnancies in unusual locations,” Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 25 (2), 123–30.Google Scholar

Ghi, T, Banfi, A, Marconi, R et al. (2005), “Three-dimensional sonographic diagnosis of ovarian pregnancy,” Ultrasound Obstetrics and Gynecology, 26, 102–4.Google Scholar

Comstock, C, Huston, K, Lee, W (2005), “The ultrasonographic appearance of ovarian ectopic pregnancies,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, 105(1), 42–5.Google Scholar

Nicholas, FK, Schwartz, LB (1992), “Primary ovarian pregnancy successfully treated with methotrexate,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 167 (5), 1307–8.Google Scholar

Seinera, P, DiGregorio, A, Arisio, R et al. (199), “Ovarian pregnancy and operative laparoscopy: report of eight cases,” Human Reproduction, 12(3), 608–10.Google Scholar

Barnhart, KT (2009), “Ectopic pregnancy: clinical practice,” New England Journal of Medicine, 361(4), 379–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Perez, JA et al. (1993), “Local medical treatment of interstitial pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET): two case reports,” Human Reproduction, 8 (4), 631–4.Google Scholar

Wang, CN et al. (2007), “Successful management of heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy combined with intrauterine pregnancy after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer,” Fertility and Sterility, 88 (3), 706, e13–6.Google Scholar

Faschingbauer, F et al. (2011), “Treatment of heterotopic cervical pregnancies,” Fertility and Sterility, 95(50), 1787.e9-13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Guideline No. 21 (Revised 2010). The management of tubal pregnancy, 1–10.Google Scholar

Bourdel, N et al. (2007), “Interstitial pregnancy. Ultrasonographic diagnosis and contribution of MRI: A case report,” Gynecologie, Obstetrique & Fertilité, 35 (2), 121–4.Google Scholar

Rotas, MA, Haberman, S, Levgur, M. (2006), “Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, 107 (6), 1373–81.Google Scholar

Benifla, JL et al. (1996), “Alternative to surgery of treatment of unruptured interstitial pregnancy: 15 cases of medical treatment,” European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 70 (2), 151–6.Google Scholar

Doubilet, PM et al. (2004), “Sonographically guided minimally invasive treatment of unusual ectopic pregnancies,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine: Official Journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 23 (3), 359–70.Google Scholar

Cerveira, I et al. (2008), “Cervical ectopic pregnancy successfully treated with local methotrexate injection,” Fertility and Sterility, 90 (5), e7–05, e10.Google Scholar

Moon, HS et al. (2010), “Use of Tuohy needle for intraamniotic methotrexate injection through the cervical canal in a cervical pregnancy after failure of systemic methotrexate treatment,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 202 (5), e4–6.Google Scholar

Tanaka, T, Hayashi, H, Kutsuzawa, T, Fujimoto, S, Ichinoe, K. (1982), “Treatment of interstitial ectopic pregnancy with methotrexate: report of a successful case,” Fertility and Sterility, 37, 851–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tulandi, T et al. (1991), “Treatment of ectopic pregnancy by transvaginal intratubal methotrexate administration,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, 77 (4), 627–30.Google Scholar

Fernandez, H et al. (1993), “Methotrexate treatment of ectopic pregnancy: 100 cases treated by primary transvaginal injection under sonographic control,” Fertility and Sterility, 59 (4), 773–7.Google Scholar

Fernandez, H et al. (1994), “Treatment of unruptured tubal pregnancy with methotrexate: pharmacokinetic analysis of local versus intramuscular administration,” Fertility and Sterility, 62 (5), 943–7.Google Scholar

Lin, YS et al. (2007), “Successful rescue of an early interstitial pregnancy after failed systemic methotrexate treatment: a case report,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 52 (4), 332–4.Google Scholar

Sagiv, R et al. (2001), “Three conservative approaches to treatment of interstitial pregnancy,” Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 8 (1), 154–8.Google Scholar

Timor-Tritsch, IE et al. (1994), “Successful management of viable cervical pregnancy by local injection of methotrexate guided by transvaginal ultrasonography,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 170 (3), 737–9.Google Scholar

Verma, U, Goharkhay, N (2009), “Conservative management of cervical ectopic pregnancy,” Fertility and Sterility, 91 (3), 671–4.Google Scholar

Evans, MI, Britt, DW (2005), “Fetal reduction,” Seminars in Perinatology, 29 (5), 321–9.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, M et al. (1992), “Treatment of interstitial pregnancy with methotrexate via hysteroscopy,” Fertility and Sterility, 58 (6), 1234–6.Google Scholar

Hartung, J, Meckies, J (2003), “Management of a case of uterine scar pregnancy by transabdominal potassium chloride injection,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 21 (1), 94–5.Google Scholar

Darai, E et al. (1996), “Transvaginal intratubal methotrexate treatment of ectopic pregnancy: report of 100 cases,” Human Reproduction, 11 (2), 420–4.Google Scholar

The Practice Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (2006), “Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy,” Fertility and Sterility, 86 (4), S96–S102.Google Scholar

Gamzul, R, Almong, B, Levin, Y et al. (2002), “The ultrasonographic appearance of tubal pregnancy in patients treated with methotrexate,” Human Reproduction 17 (10), 2585–7.Google Scholar

Krissi, H, Hiersch, L, Stolovitch, N, Nitke, S, Wiznitzer, A, Peled, Y (2014), “Outcome, complications and future fertility in women treated with uterine artery embolization and methotrexate for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy,” European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 182, 172–6.Google Scholar

American Society of Reproductive Medicine and The Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Fertility. Directory of Fellowship Programs in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Available in 2017, 2016. www.socrei.org/uploadedFiles/Affiliates/SOCREI/Fellowships/REIFellowshipPrograms.pdfGoogle Scholar

Connolly, MP, Hoorens, S, Chambers, GM. The cost and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective. Hum Reprod Update 2010; 16(6): 603–613.Google Scholar

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Assisted reproductive technology 2012 national summary report. www.cdc.gov/art/ART2012Google Scholar

Kulkarni, G, Mohanty, NC, Mohanty, IR, Jadhav, P, Boricha, BG. Survey of reasons for discontinuation from in vitro fertilization among couples attending infertility clinic. J Hum Reprod Sci 2014; 7(4): 249–254.Google Scholar

Gameiro, S, Verhaak, CM, Kremer, JAM, Boivin, J. Why we should talk about compliance with assisted reproductive technologies (ART): a systematic review and meta-analysis of ART compliance rates. Hum Reprod Update 2013 Mar; 19(2): 124–135.Google Scholar

The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Criteria for the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion, Fertil Steril 2013; 99: 44–46.Google Scholar

Cramer, SF, Patel, A. The frequency of uterine leiomyomas. Am J Clin Pathol 1990; 94: 435.Google Scholar

Downes, E, Sikirica, V, Gilabert-Estelles, J et al. The burden of uterine fibroids in five European countries, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 152: 96.Google Scholar

Myomas and Reproductive Function, Practice Committee of American Society of Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with the Society of Reproductive Surgeons. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: s125–130.Google Scholar

FDA warns against using laparoscopic power morcellators to treat uterine fibroids. November 24, 2014. www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm424435.htmGoogle Scholar

FDA allows marketing of first-of-kind tissue containment system for use with certain laparoscopic power morcellators in select patients. April 7, 2016. www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/NewsRoom/PressAnouncement/ucm494650.htmGoogle Scholar

Gibbons, L, Belizan, JM, Lauer, JA, Betran, AP, Merialdi, M, Althabe, F. Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: e1–19.Google Scholar

Vervoort, AJ, Uittenbogaard, LB, Hehenkamp, WJ, Brolmann, HA, Huirne, JA. Why do niches develop in Cesarean scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum Reprod 2015; 30(12): 2695–2702.Google Scholar

Jacobson, MT, Osias, J, Velasco, A, Charles, R, Nezhat, C. Laparoscopic repair of uteroperitoneal fistula. J S Laparoendsc Surg 2003; 7(4): 367–369.Google Scholar

Healy, MW, Schexnayder, NB, Connell, MT et al. Intrauterine adhesion prevention after hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 267–275.Google Scholar

Saccone, G, Perriera, L, Berghella, V. Prior uterine evacuation of pregnancy as independent risk factor for preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016 May; 572–591.Google Scholar

Goldberg, AB, Dean, G, Kang, MS, Youssof, S, Darney, PD. Manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for early first-trimester abortion: a controlled study of complication rates, Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 101–107.Google Scholar

Bermejo, C, Martinez Ten, P, Cantarero, R, Diaz, D, Perez Pedregosa, J et al. Three dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 593–601.Google Scholar

Dabirashrafi, H, Bahadori, M, Mohammad, K, Alavi, M, Moghadami-Tabrizi, N, Zandinejad, K et al. Septate uterus: new idea on the histologic features of the septum in this abnormal uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 105–107.Google Scholar

Practice Committee Opinion. Uterine septum: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2016; 106 (3): 530–539.Google Scholar

Mueller, GC, Hussain, HK, Smith, YR, Quint, EH, Carlos, RC, Johnson, TD et al. Mullerian duct anomalies: comparison of MRI diagnosis and clinical diagnosis, AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 1294–1302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Maneschi, F, Zupi, E, Marconi, D, Valli, E, Romamanini, C, Mancuso, S. Hysteroscopically detected asymptomatic mullerian anomalies. Prevalence and reproductive implications, J Reprod Med 1995; 40: 684–688.Google Scholar

Dermir, B, Dilbaz, B, Karadag, B, Duraker, R, Akkurt, O, Kocak, M et al. Coexistence of endometriosis and uterine septum in patients with abortion or infertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2011; 37: 1596–1600.Google Scholar

Tonguc, EA, Var, T, Batioglu, S. Hysteroscopic metroplasty in patients with a uterine septum and otherwise unexplained infertility. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 113: 128–130.Google Scholar

Salim, R, Regan, L, Woelfer, B, Backos, M, Jurkovic, D. A comparative study of the morphology of congenital uterine anomalies in women with and without a history of recurrent first trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 162–166.Google Scholar

Candiani, GB, Vercellini, P, Fedele, L, Carinelli, SG, Merlo, D, Arcaini, L. Repair of the uterine cavity after hysteroscopic septal incision, Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 991–994.Google Scholar

Berkkanoglu, M, Isikoglu, M, Arici, F, Ozgur, K. What is the best time to perform intracytoplasmic sperm injection/embryo transfer cycle after hysteroscopic surgery for an incomplete uterine septum? Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 2112–2115.Google Scholar

Rock, JA, Katayama, KP, Martin, EJ et al. Factors influencing the success of salpingostomy techniques for distal fimbrial obstruction, Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 591.Google Scholar

Johnson, N, van Voorst, S, Sowter, MC, Strandell, A, Moll, BW. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilization, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010 (1); CD002125.Google Scholar

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: s66–69.Google Scholar

Ransom, MX, Garcia, AJ. Surgical management of cornual-isthmic tubal occlusion. Fertil Steril 1997; 68(5): 887–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion, Fertil Steril 2015; 103(6): e37–e43.Google Scholar

Gomel, V. The place of reconstructive tubal surgery in the era of ART. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015; 31: 722–731.Google Scholar

Rouzi, AA, Mackinnon, M, McComb, PF. Predictors of success of reversal of sterilization, Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 29–36.Google Scholar

Yoon, TK, Sung, HR, Kang, HG, Lee, CN, Cha, KY. Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: fertility outcome in 202 cases. Fertil Steril 1999; 72; 1121–1126.Google Scholar

Essure: summary of safety and effectiveness. www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/02/briefing/3881b1_02.docGoogle Scholar

Monteith, CW, Berger, GS, Zerden, ML. Pregnancy success after hysteroscopic sterilization reversal, Obstet Gynecol 2014 Dec; 124(6): 1183–1189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Galen, DI, Richter, KS. Essure multicenter off-label treatment for hydrosalpinx before in vitro fertilization. J Min Invasive Gynecol. 2011 May–Jun; 18(3): 338–342.Google Scholar

de Wit, W, Gowrising, CJ, Kuik, DJ, Lens, JW, Schats, R. Only hydrosalpinges visible on ultrasound are associated with reduced implantation and pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 1696–1701.Google Scholar

Sagoskin, AW, Lessey, BA, Mottla, GL, Richter, KS, Chetkowski, RJ, Chang, AS et al. Salpingectomy or proximal tubal occlusion of unilateral hydrosalpinx increases the potential for spontaneous pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 2634–2637.Google Scholar

Bulent Tiras, M, Noyan, V, Ozdemir, H, Guner, H, Yildiz, A, Yildirim, M. The changes in ovarian hormone levels and ovarian artery blood flow rate after laparoscopic tubal ligation, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001; 99: 219–221.Google Scholar

Kerin, JF, Munday, D, Ritossa, M, Rosen, D. Tissue encapsulation of the proximal Essure mirco-insert from the uterine cavity following hysteroscopic sterilization. J Min Invas Gynecol 2007; 14: 202–204.Google Scholar

Wiesenfeld, HC, Hillier, SL, Meyn, L et al. Mycoplasma genitalium- is it a pathogen in acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)? STI & AIDS World Congress 2013 (Joint Meeting of the 20th ISSTDR and 14th IUSTI Meeting); July 14–27, 2013; Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar

Gaitan, H, Angel, E, Diaz, R et al. Accuracy of five different diagnostic techniques in mild-to-moderate pelvic inflammatory disease, Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2002; 10: 171–180.Google Scholar

Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID). www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/pid.htmGoogle Scholar

Peipert, JF, Ness, RB, Blume, J et al. Clinical predictors of endometritis in women with symptoms and signs of pelvic inflammatory disease, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 856–864.Google Scholar

Sweet, RL. Treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2011; 561909Google Scholar

Smith, KJ, Ness, RB, Wiesenfeld, HC et al. Cost-effectiveness of alternative outpatient pelvic inflammatory disease treatment strategies, Sex Transm Dis 2007; 34: 960–966.Google Scholar

Soper, DE. Surgical considerations in the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease. Surg Clin North Am 1991; 71(5): 947–962.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, DS, Stern, JL, Hamod, KA et al. Tubo-ovarian abscess: a retrospective review, Am J Ob stet Gynecol 1980; 138: 1055.Google Scholar

Epstein, AM, Boutselis, JG, Ullery, JC. Surgical indications and treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease, Am J Surg 1962; 104(4): 555–559.Google Scholar

Tulandi, T, Murray, C, Guralnick, M. Adhesion formation and reproductive outcome after myomectomy and second-look laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 213–215.Google Scholar

Levrant, SG, Bieber, EJ, Barnes, RB. Anterior abdominal wall adhesions after laparotomy or laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1997; 4: 353–356.Google Scholar

Rappaport, WD, Holcomb, M, Valente, J, Chvapil, M. Antibiotic irrigation and the formation of intraabdominal adhesions. Am J Surg 1989; 44: 115–136.Google Scholar

Wiseman, DM, Trout, JR, Diamond, MP. The rates of adhesion development and the effects of crystalloid solutions on the adhesion development in pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 702–711.Google Scholar

Mais, V, Ajossa, S, Piras, B, Guerriero, S, Marongiu, D, Melis, GB. Prevention of de novo adhesion formation after laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an oxidized regenerated cellulose absorbable barrier, Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 3133–3135.Google Scholar

Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgeons. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Reproductive Surgeons Fertil Steril 2007; 88: 21–26.Google Scholar

Eskenazi, B, Warner, ML. Epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 1997;24:235–58.Google Scholar

Giudice, LC, Kao, LC. Endometriosis. Lancet. 2004;364:1789–99.Google Scholar

Simoens, S, Dunselman, G, Dirksen, C, Hummelshoj, L, Bokor, A, Brandes, I et al. The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres. Human Reproduction. 2012;27:1292–9.Google Scholar

Balasch, J, Creus, M, Fabregues, F, Carmona, F, Ordi, J, Martinez-Roman, S et al. Visible and non-visible endometriosis at laparoscopy in fertile and infertile women andin patients with chronic pelvic pain: a prospective study. Human Reproduction. 1996;11:387–91.Google Scholar

Simpson, JL, Bischoff, FZ, Kamat, A, Buster, JE, Carson, SA. Genetics of endometriosis. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2003 Mar;30(1):21–40, vii.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burney, RO, Giudice, LC. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility. 2012;98(3):511–19.Google Scholar

Hadfield, R, Mardon, H, Barlow, D, Kennedy, S. Delay in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a survey of women from the USA and the UK. Human Reproduction. 1996;11:878–80.Google Scholar

Ballard, K, Seaman, H, de Vries, C, Wright, J. Can symptomatology help in the diagnosis of endometriosis? Findings from a national case-control study, part 1. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2008;115(11):1382–91.Google Scholar

Mansour, G, Aziz, N, Sharma, R, Falcone, T, Goldberg, J, Agarwal, A. The impact of peritoneal fluid from healthy women and from women with endometriosis on sperm DNA and its relationship to the sperm deformity index. Fertility and Sterility. 2009;92(1):61–67.Google Scholar

Missmer, SA, Hankinson, SE, Spiegelman, D, Barbieri, RL, Malspeis, S, Willett, WC et al. Reproductive history and endometriosis among premenopausal women. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2004;104:965–74.Google Scholar

Mcleod, B, Retzloff, B. Epidemiology of endometriosis: an assessment of risk factors, Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010;53(2):389–96.Google Scholar

Riazi, H, Tehranian, N, Ziaei, S, Mohammadi, E, Hajizadeh, E, Montazeri, A. Clinical diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis: a scoping review. BMC Women’s Health. 2015;15:39.Google Scholar

Vodolazkaia, A, El-Aalamat, Y, Popovic, D, Mihalyi, A, Bossuyt, X, Kyama, C et al. Evaluation of a panel of 28 biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Human Reproduction. 2012;27(9):2698–2711.Google Scholar

Brosens, I, Puttemans, P, Campo, R, Gordts, S et al. Non-invasive methods of diagnosis of endometriosis. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003 Dec;15(6):519–22.Google Scholar

Exacoustos, CC. Imaging for the evaluation of endometriosis and adenomyosis: best practice & research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2014;28:655.Google Scholar

Siegelman, ES, Oliver, ER. MR imaging of endometriosis: ten imaging pearls, Radiographics. 2012 Oct;32(6):1675–91. doi:10.1148/rg.326125518.Google Scholar

Hsu, A, Khachikyan, I, Stratton, P. Invasive and non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010 Jun; 53(2):413–19.Google Scholar

Berlanda, N, Vercellini, P, Fedele, L. The outcomes of repeat surgery for recurrent symptomatic endometriosis. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010 Aug;22(4):320–5.Google Scholar

Tinnebrg, HR, Tuttlies, F, Berkes, E, Krombach, GA, Hackethal, A, Konrad, L, Oehmke, F. Classification of endometriosis. Endometriosis. Japan: Springer, 2014. Pp 341–62.Google Scholar

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 114. Management of endometriosis. Obstetrics Gynecology 2010 Jul;116(1):223–36.Google Scholar

Endometriosis a Guide for Patients. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. www.asrm.org/BOOKLET_Endometriosis/Google Scholar

Garry, R, Clayton, R, Hawe, J. The effect of endometriosis and its radial laparoscopic excision on quality of life indicators. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2000 Jan 107 (1):44–54.Google Scholar

Sutton, C, Adamson, D, Jones, K. Conservative surgery. Modern Management of Endometriosis. Andover, Hampshire: Thomson Publishing Service. Pp 127–51. 2005.Google Scholar

Kent, A, Shakir, F,Rockall, T, Haines, P, Pearson, C, Rae-Mitchell, W, Jan, H. Laparoscopic surgery for severe rectovaginal endometriosis compromising the bowel: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2015 Dec 24. pii: S1553-4650(15)01710-0.Google Scholar

Posadzka, E, Jach, R, Pityński, K, Jablonski, M. Treatment efficacy for pain complaints in women with endometriosis of the lesser pelvis after laparoscopic electroablation vs. CO2 laser ablation. Lasers in Medical Science. 2015 Jan;30(1):147–52.Google Scholar

Mowafi, DM. Laparoscopic Management of Endometriosis. Geneva: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research, 16 Nov. 2006.Google Scholar

Kopelman, D. King, LP, Nezhat, C. Laparoscopic management of intestinal endometriosis. In Prevention and Management of Laparoendoscopic Surgical Complications, 3rd ed. Feb. 2016.Google Scholar

Hornstein, MD, Hemmings, R, Yuzpe, AA, Heinrichs, WL. Use of nafarelin versus placebo after reductive laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility. 1997; 68:860–4.Google Scholar

Beretta, P, Franchi, M, Ghezzi, F, Busacca, M, Zupi, E, Bolis, P. Randomized clinical trial of two laparoscopic treatments of endometriomas: cystectomy versus drainage and coagulation. Fertility and Sterility. 1998 Dec 70(6):1176–80.Google Scholar

Luciano, A, Lamonica, R, Luciano, D. Strategies and steps for the surgical management of endometriosis. OBG Management. 2011 Nov. 23 (11):34–50.Google Scholar

Alborzi, S, Momtahan, M, Paranezhad, ME, Dehbashi, S, Zolghadri, J, Alborzi, S. A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus fenestration and coagulation in patients with endometriomas. Fertility and Sterility. 2004;82(6):1633–7.Google Scholar

Rizk, B, Fischer, AS, Lotfy, HA, Turki, R, Zahed, HA, Malik, R et al. Recurrence of endometriosis after hysterectomy: Facts, Views and Visions in OB/GYN. 2014; 6(4):219–27.Google Scholar

DeLancey, J, Skinner, B. Selecting the route for hysterectomy: a structured approach. Contemporary OBGYN. 2013 Aug 01. Website viewed February 15, 2016. http://contemporaryobgyn.modernmedicine.com/contemporary-obgyn/content/tags/gynecologic-surgery/selecting-route-hysterectomy-structured-approachGoogle Scholar

Shawki, HE. The efficacy of laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation (LUNA) in the treatment of unexplained chronic pelvic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Gynecologic Surgery. 2011 Feb; 8(1):31–39.Google Scholar

Sinha, R, Sanjay, M, Rupa, B, Kumari, S. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. 2015 Jan–Mar; 11(1):50–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

AAGL position statement. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2013 Jan–Feb; 20(1):2–9.Google Scholar

Siesto, G, Ieda, N, Rosati, R, Vitobello robotic surgery for deep endometriosis: a paradigm shift. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 2014 Jun; 10(2):140–6.Google Scholar

Remorgida, V, Ferrero, S, Fulcheri, E, Ragni, N, Martin, DC. Bowel endometriosis: presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Obstetrical and Gynecology Survey. 2007 Jul; 62(7):461–70.Google Scholar

Meuleman, C, D’Hoore, A, Van Cleynenbreugel, B, Beks, N, D’Hooghe, T. Outcome after multidisciplinary CO2 laser laparoscopic excision of deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2009; 18(2):282–9.Google Scholar

Kondo, W, Zomer, M, Ribeiro, R, Trippia, C, Pinho de Oliveira, M, Crispi, C. Laparoscopic treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the intestine: technical aspects. Brazilian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery. 2012; 5(2):23–39.Google Scholar

Baird, D, Dunson, D, Hill, M, Cousins, D, Schectman, J. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:100–107.Google Scholar

Munro, M, Critchley, H, Broder, M et al. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2011;113:3–13.Google Scholar

Pritts, E, Parker, W, Olive, D. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril 2009;91(4):1215–23.Google Scholar

Bosteels, J, Kasius, J, Weyers, S et al. Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;(2):CD009461.Google Scholar

Buttram, V, Reiter, R. Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomatology, and management. Fertil Steril. 1981;36(4):433.Google Scholar

Vilos, G, Allaire, C, Laberge, P et al. The management of uterine leiomyomas. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37(2):157–78.Google Scholar

Klatsky, P, Tran, N, Caughey, A et al. Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198(4):357–66.Google Scholar

Chen, Y, Lin, H, Chen, S et al. Increased risk of preterm births among women with uterine leiomyoma: a nationwide population-based study. Hum Reprod 2009;24(12):3049–56.Google Scholar

Stout, M, Odibo, A, Graseck, A et al. Leiomyomas at routine second-trimester ultrasound examination and adverse obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116(5):1056–63.Google Scholar

Hulka, J, Peterson, H, Phillips, J et al. Operative hysteroscopy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists’ 1993 membership survey. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995;2(2):131–2.Google Scholar

Ferrero, S, Racca, A, Tafi, E et al. Ulipristal acetate prior to high complexity hysteroscopic myomectomy: a retrospective comparative study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar

Pundir, J, Pundir, V, Walavalkar, R et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs. abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013;20(3):335–45.Google Scholar

Food and Drug Administration. Laparoscopic uterine power morcellation in hysterectomy and myomectomy: FDA safety communication, Available at: www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm393576.htm. Retrieved February 29, 2016.Google Scholar

Barron, K, Richard, T, Robinson, P et al. Association of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration morcellation warning with rates of minimally invasive hysterectomy and myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126(6):1174–80.Google Scholar

Chittawar, B, Franik, S, Pouwer, A et al. Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(10):CD004638.Google Scholar

LaMorte, A, Lalwani, S, Diamond, M. Morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82(6):897–900.Google Scholar

Lethaby, A, Vollenhoven, B, Sowter, M. Pre-operative GnRH analogue therapy before hysterectomy or myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(2):CD000547Google Scholar

Conforti, A, Mollo, A, Alviggi, C, et al. Techniques to reduce blood loss during open myomectomy: a qualitative review of literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015;192:90–5.Google Scholar

Al-Shabibi, N, Chapman, L, Madari, S et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues with triple tourniquets at open myomectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;116(5):681–7.Google Scholar

Frederick, J, Fletcher, H, Simeon, D et al. Intramyometrial vasopressin as a hemostatic agent during myomectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101(5):1103–5.Google Scholar

Fletcher, H, Frederick, J, Hardie, M et al. A randomized comparison of vasopressin and tourniquet as hemostatic agents during myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87(6):1014–18.Google Scholar

Wong, A, Cheung, C, Yeung, S et al. Transcervical intralesional vasopressin injection compared with placebo in hysteroscopic myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124(5):897–903.Google Scholar

Celik, H, Sapmaz, E. Use of single preoperative dose of misoprostol is efficacious for patients who undergo abdominal myomectomy. Fertil Steril 2003;79(5);1207–10.Google Scholar

Abdel-Hafeez, M, Elnaggar, A, Ali, M et al. Rectal misoprostol for myomectomy: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2015;55(4):363–8.Google Scholar

Ragab, A, Khaiary, M, Badawy, A. The use of single versus double dose of intra-vaginal prostaglandin e2 “misoprostol” prior to abdominal myomectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Reprod Infertil 2014;15(3):152–6.Google Scholar

Shaaban, M, Ahmed, M, Farhan, R et al. Efficacy of tranexamic acid on myomectomy-associated blood loss in patients with multiple myomas: a randomized controlled clinical trail. Reprod Sci 2015. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar

Ahmad, G, O’Flynn, H, Hindocha, A, Watson, A. Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 (4):CD000475.Google Scholar

Tulandi, T, Closon, F, Czuzoj-Shulman, N, Abenhaim, H. Adhesion barrier use after myomectomy and hysterectomy: rates and immediate postoperative complications. Obstet Gynecol 2016;127(1):23–8.Google Scholar

Malone, L. Myomectomy: recurrence after removal of solitary and multiple myomas. Obstet Gynecol 1969;34:200–203.Google Scholar

Martin-Merino, E, Rodriguez, L, Wallander, M et al. The incidence of hysterectomy, uterus-preserving procedures and recurrent treatment in the management of uterine fibroids. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015;194:147–52.Google Scholar

Radosa, M, Owsianowski, Z, Mothes, A et al. Long-term risk of fibroid recurrence after laparoscopic myomectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;180:35–9.Google Scholar

Weibel, H, Jarcevic, R, Gagnon, R, Tulandi, T. Perspectives of obstetricians on labour and delivery after abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014;36(2):128–32.Google Scholar

ACOG Committee Opinion #560. Medically indicated late-preterm and early-term deliveries. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121(4):908–10.Google Scholar

Gambacorti-Passerini, Z, Gimovsky, A, Locatelli, A, Berghella, V. Trial of labor after myomectomy and uterine rupture: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016; [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar

Schover, LR Brey K, Lichtin A, Lipshultz LI, Jeha S. Oncologists’ attitudes and practices regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1890–7.Google Scholar

Quinn, GP Vadaparampil ST, Lee JH et al. Physician referral for fertility preservation in oncology patients: a national study of practice behaviors. J Clin Oncol 2009;10:5952–7.Google Scholar

Letourneau, JM Melisko ME, Cedars MI, Rosen MP. A changing perspective: improving access to fertility preservation. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2011;8:56–60.Google Scholar

Achille, MA, Rosberger Z, Robitaille R et al. Facilitators and obstacles to sperm banking in young men receiving gonadotoxic chemotherapy for cancer: the perspective of survivors and health care professionals. Human Reprod 2006:21;3206–16.Google Scholar

Loren, AW, Mangu, PB, Beck, LN et al. Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2500–2510 (ASCO Guidelines).Google Scholar

Murphy, SL, Xu, J, Kochanek, KD. Deaths: final data for 2013, Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2016;64(4):1–119.Google Scholar

American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2014; www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsstatistics/cancerfactsfigures2014/Google Scholar

Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2014, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2014/.Google Scholar

Fertility Risk Tool; www.livestrong.org.Google Scholar

Blumenfeld, Z, Avivi, I, Linn, S, Epelbaum, R, Ben-Shahar, M, Haim, N. Prevention of irreversible chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage in young women with lymphoma by a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in parallel to chemotherapy. Human Reprod 1996;11(8):1620–6.Google Scholar

Blatt, J, Poplack, DG, Sherrins, RJ. Testicular function in boys after chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 1981;304:1121–4.Google Scholar

Whitehead, E, Shalet, SM, Morris Jones, PH, Beardwell, CG, Deakin, DP. Gonadal function after combination chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s disease in childhood. Arch Dis Child 1982;47:287–91.Google Scholar

Morita, Y, Perez, GI, Paris, F et al., Oocyte apoptosis is suppressed by disruption of the acid sphingomyelinase gene or by sphinosine-1-phosphate therapy, Nature Med October 2000:6(10):1109–14.Google Scholar

Glode, LM, Robinson, J, Gould, SF. Protection from cyclophosphamide-induced testicular damage with an analogue of gonadotropin-releasing hormone, Lancet 1981 May 23;1:1132–4.Google Scholar

Blumenfeld, Z, von Wolff, M. GnRH-analogues and oral contraceptives for fertility preservation in women during chemotherapy. Human Reprod 2008;14 (6):541–2.Google Scholar

Blumenfeld, Z. Ovarian rescue/protection from chemotherapeutic agents. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2001:8(suppl 1):S60–4.Google Scholar

Fox, K, Scialla, H, Moore, H. Preventing chemotherapy-related amenorrhea using leuprolide during adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001;21:98a.Google Scholar

Recchia, F, Sica, G, DeFillipis, S, Rosselli, M, Rea, S. Goserelin as an ovarian protection in the adjuvant treatment of premenopausal breast cancer: a phase II pilot study, Anticancer Drugs 2002 Apr 13(4):417–24.Google Scholar

DelMastro, L, Cappi, M, Poggio, F et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian failure in cancer women: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Cancer Treat Rev 2014 June 40(5):675–83.Google Scholar

Loibl, S, Gerber, B. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue for premenopausal women with breast cancer. JAMA 2011;306(16):1760–1.Google Scholar

Elgindy, EA, El-Haieq, DO, Khoshid, OM et al. Gonadotropin suppression to prevent chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013 Jan;121(1):78–86.Google Scholar

Vitek, WS, Shayne, M, Hoeger, K et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for the preservation of ovarian function among women with breast cancer who did not use tamoxifen after chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2014;102:808–15.Google Scholar

Danforth, DR, Arboqast, LK, Friedman, CI. Acute depletion of murine primordial follicle reserve by gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists. Fertil Steril 2005 May;83(5):1333–8.Google Scholar

Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy: a committee opinion. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertil Steril 2013 Nov;100(5):1214–23.Google Scholar

Lambertini, M, Del Mastro, L, Pescio, MC et al. Cancer and fertility preservation: international recommendations from an expert meeting. BMC Med. 2016 Jan 4;14:1.Google Scholar

Shrader, M, Muller, M, Sofikitis, N, Straub, B, Krause, H, Miller, K. “Onco-tese”: testicular sperm extraction in azospermic cancer patients before chemotherapy: new guidelines? Urology 2003 Feb:61(2);421–5.Google Scholar

Tesarick, J, Bahceci, M, Ozcan, C, Greco, E, Mendoza, C. Restoration of fertility by in-vitro spermatogenesis. Lancet 1999:353(9152):555–6.Google Scholar

Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013 Nov;100(5):1224–31.Google Scholar

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2014 May;101(5):1237–43.Google Scholar

In vitro maturation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013;99:663–6.Google Scholar

Noyes, N, Porcu, E, Borini, A. Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;18:277–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Acosta, JM, Tiao, G, Stein, JE, Mahour, GH. Temporary relocation of testes to the anterior abdominal wall before radiation therapy of the pelvis or perineum, J Pediatr Surg 2002 Aug;37(8):1232–3.Google Scholar

D’Angio, GJ, Exelby, PR, Ghavimi, F et al. Protection of certain structures from high doses of irradiation. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1974;122(1):103–8.Google Scholar

Fallat, ME, Hutter, J. Preservation of fertility in pediatric and adolescent patients with cancer. Pediatrics 2008 May;121:e1461–9.Google Scholar

Bartholome, WG. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995;96(5 pt. 1):981–2.Google Scholar

Partridge, AH, Gelber, S, Peppercorn, J et al. Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer, J Clin Oncol 2004 Oct 15;22(20):4174–83.Google Scholar

Lee, SJ, Schover, LR, Partridge, AH et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2006 Jun 20;24(18):2917–31.Google Scholar

Azim, AA, Constantini-Ferrando, M, Oktay, K. Safety of fertility preservation by ovarian controlled stimulation with letrozole and gonadotropins in patients with breast cancer: a prospective controlled study. J Clin Oncol 2008 Jun 1;26(16):2630–35.Google Scholar